Ahmed Deedat gumamit ng panloloko sa Balik Islam

HINDI na po NAKASAGOT si ABDULLAH BALIK ISLAM sa HAMON NATIN sa KANYA na PATUNAYAN na si ISMAEL ay ITINURING ng DIYOS na KAPATID ng mga ISRAELITA.

Marahil po ay NAMULAT sa KATOTOHANAN si ABDULLAH na HINDI TALAGA KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang KAPATID ng mga ISRAELITA.

At DAHIL HINDI ITINURING ng DIYOS na KAPATID ng ISRAELITA si ISMAEL ay MALINAW na WALA RING BATAYAN para sabihin na ang PROPETA ng BALIK ISLAM ang TINUTUKOY sa Deuteronomy 18:18 bilang PROPETA na IBABANGON ng DIYOS MULA sa KAPATIRAN ng mga ISRAELITA.

Ngayon, BAHALA NA ang mga BALIK ISLAM para HANAPAN ng KATWIRAN ang PANINIWALA NILA sa KANILANG PROPETA.

DESISYON NA NILA kung MANINIWALA pa SILA sa KANILANG PROPETA kahit pa ALAM NILA na HINDI ITO ang PROPETANG TINUKOY ng DIYOS sa Deut 18:18.

KAYA lang naman po NAPANIWALA ang mga BALIK ISLAM na ang PROPETA NILA ang tinutukoy sa Deut 18:18 ay dahil NALINLANG SILA ng SKOLAR NILANG si AHMED DEEDAT.

Si DEEDAT po kasi ang isa sa mga MASIPAG at MASIGASIG na NAGPAKALAT ng MALING ARAL na ang PROPETA ng BALIK ISLAM ang "PROPETA" sa Deut 18:18. Si DEEDAT din po ang NAG-IMBENTO ng SARI-SARING PALIWANAG para MASUPORTAHAN ang MALING ARAL na IYAN.

Kahit po PAGSISINUNGALING ay GINAMIT ni DEEDAT para MALINLANG at MALOKO ang mga WALANG ALAM at WALANG MALAY na mga BALIK ISLAM.

Tingnan po natin ang ISA sa mga KASINUNGALINGAN na GINAMIT ni DEEDAT para MALOKO ang mga WALANG MALAY.

Sa IBABA po ay MABABASA NATIN ang ISANG KWENTO MISMO ni SHIEKH AHMED DEEDAT tungkol sa PAKIKIPAG-USAP NIYA sa isang "REV. ROBERTS."

Diyan ay GUSTONG PALABASIN ni DEEDAT na DINAGDAGAN LANG ang BIBLIYA, partikular sa LUKE 3:23. At dahil daw may "DAGDAG" ay "CORRUPTED" at "HINDI DAPAT PANIWALAAN" ang BIBLIYA.

Pero IPAKIKITA po NATIN sa IBABA na SI DEEDAT ang NAG-IMBENTO at NAGDAGDAG ng HINDI TOTOONG IMPORMASYON para MALINLANG at MALOKO ang KANYANG MGA KAUSAP.

HETO po ang MISMONG ISINULAT ni DEEDAT at SINIPI ng isang BALIK ISLAM na NALOKO NIYA:
I drew the Reverend's (ROBERTS) attention to the words - "(As was supposed)." I said: "Do you see that the words 'As was supposed' are written within brackets?" He said that he saw that. I asked him: "Why are the brackets there?" He acknowledged, "I don't know, but I could find out for you from some Bible scholars." I admired his humility. Though I knew that all Supervisors of Bible Houses in South Africa are retired reverends, it was possible that this aspect of Bible knowledge was beyond their sphere. I said: "If you do not know, then let me tell you what the brackets are doing there in this verse. You do not have to take the trouble of looking for a Bible scholar."

I explained that in the "most ancient" manuscripts of Luke, the words "As was supposed" are not there.

CENON BIBE:
HERE we again EXPOSE DEEDAT as a LIAR.

IT IS NOT TRUE that the WORDS "AS WAS SUPPOSED" ARE NOT IN THE "MOST ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS" of LUKE.

ONE of the OLDEST MANUSCRIPTS of LUKE is called P75.

The TEXT of P75 is SIMILAR to that of CODEX VATICANUS and is USED as BASIS by the "Novum Testamentum Graece, Nestle-Aland 26th edition."

In the GREEK NEW TESTAMENT of NESTLE-ALAND 26th edition, WE CAN READ in Lk 3:23:
"Καὶ αὐτὸς ἦν Ἰησοῦς ἀρχόμενος ὡσεὶ ἐτῶν τριάκοντα, ὢν υἱός, ὡς ἐνομίζετο, Ἰωσὴφ τοῦ Ἠλὶ"

TRANSLITERATED, the GREEK TEXT READS:
"Kai autoz hn Ihsouz aoxomenoz wsei etwn toiakonta, wn vioz, wz enomizeto, Iwshf tou Hli."

PLEASE TAKE NOTE of the WORDS "wz enomizeto."

THAT is the GREEK EQUIVALENT of the WORDS "AS WAS SUPPOSED" WHICH DEEDAT CLAIMS ARE NOT in the ANCIENT TEXT of LUKE 3:23.

As WE CAN SEE CLEARLY, the ANCIENT TEXT of P75 (as CITED by NESTLE-ALAND) CONTAINS the WORDS "AS WAS SUPPOSED," which PROVES that DEEDAT LIED when he SAID that IT WAS NOT in the ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS.

WHAT DOES THAT PROVE about AHMED DEEDAT, the SCHOLAR of ISLAMIC REVERTS or BALIK ISLAM?

IT PROVES that DEEDAT USES LIES that would FOOL ANYONE WHO KNOWS LITTLE of BIBLE TEXTS.

In this case, DEEDAT'S LIES WERE FOOLING one REV. ROBERTS, as DEEDAT OPENLY ADMITS.

So, WHAT DOES THIS TELL US of the PRIMARY SOURCE of BALIK ISLAM MEMBERS?

IT PROVES to US that THEIR PRIMARY SOURCE BASES HIS TEACHINGS on LIES and that ALL THAT THEY ARE TELLING US (through DEEDAT'S WRITINGS) are ALL LIES.

THAT SHOWS that ALL the TEXTS that THEY ARE COPY PASTING on this BLOG are FROM what others may call, A LIAR.

Kaya po KUNG BINABASA NINYO ang mga KINA-COPY-PASTE DITO ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay BINABASA NINYO ang MGA SINULAT ng GUMAGAMIT ng KASINUNGALINGAN at PANLOLOKO.

At KUNG NAPANIWALA KAYO ng mga KINA-COPY-PASTE DITO ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay NALOLOKO NA PO KAYO.

SORRY po pero IYAN ang SIMPLENG KATOTOHANAN.