Heto po, BASAHIN NATIN ang SABI ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
Ang nasabing Talata po ay Ukol kay Kristo "But in vain they do worship me" Oh hindi nga ba na ang mga Nagpakilalang mga Kristyano sila lang naman ang SUMASAMBA kay Kristo? Oh ano nga ba ang sinasabi ni Kristo sa mga katulad nilang mga Tanga na sumasamba sa kanya na kong saan ang nasabing paniniwala ay nagmumula lamang sa mga aral ni Pablo na isa rin Tao? NaTumbok po ni Kristo dyan ang lahat na mga Kristyano na Katangahang Sumasamba sa kanya! na kong saan katuruan lamang ito ng Taong si Pablo!
CENON BIBE:
SORRY po kung magiging PRANGKA TAYO pero MANLOLOKO po talaga itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.
MGA KRISTIYANO raw po ang TINUTUMBOK ni KRISTO dahil KRISTIYANO raw po ang SUMASAMBA kay KRISTO.
BASAHIN po NATIN ang KONTEKSTO ng MATTHEW 15:9 para MAKITA NATIN kung MGA KRISTIYANO ang SINASABIHAN DIYAN.
Sa Mt15:1 pa lang po ay MAKIKITA na NATIN kung SINO ang KAUSAP ni KRISTO.
Sabi po riyan:
"Then some PHARISEES and TEACHERS OF THE LAW came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, "Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don't wash their hands before they eat!"
MGA KRISTIYANO po ba ang LUMAPIT at KUMAUSAP kay HESUS?
HINDI po.
Ang LUMAPIT at KUMAUSAP kay KRISTO ay MGA PARISEO at mga GURO ng KAUTUSAN. AYON po iyan MISMO sa BIBLIYA.
Kaya po MALINAW po na MANLOLOKO itong BALIK ISLAM. PINALALABAS kasi NIYA na KRISTIYANO ang KAUSAP kahit HINDI NAMAN.
Ngayon, HETO po ang SAGOT ng PANGINOONG HESUS sa MGA PARISEO.
Heto po ang sabi Niya sa Mt15:3:
"Jesus replied, "And why do YOU break the command of God for the sake of your tradition?"
SINO po ang "YOU" riyan? MGA KRISTIYANO po ba tulad ng IPINANLOLOKO nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM?
HINDI po. MGA PARISEO nga po ang KAUSAP e.
SINASAGOT lang ni KRISTO ang MGA PARISEO.
Yung SINABI po ni KRISTO sa Mt15:9 ay PATUNGKOL din sa mga PARISEO.
Sabi ni KRISTO sa Mt15:7
"You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:"
NAKITA po NINYO?
MGA PARISEO pa rin ang SINASABIHAN DIYAN. MGA PARISEO ang KAUSAP e. HINDI mga KRISTIYANO at HINDI MGA ALAGAD ni KRISTO.
SANAY at UGALI na po TALAGA ng BALIK ISLAM ang MAMBALUKTOT at MAGTURO ng BALUKTOT.
Ngayon, diyan ay IPINAHIYA NA NAMAN ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang PROPETA NIYA.
Sa isa po kasing POST ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ay GINAMIT NIYA ang Isaiah 29:12 at SINABING TUMUTUKOY daw po IYAN sa PROPETA MUHAMMAD NILA.
Sabi po ng BALIK ISLAM sa COMMENTS SECTION ng ating ARTIKULO na "Ang Ilusyon ni Slum Boy Palaboy" sa ARAW at ORAS na "May 29, 2010 9:35 AM."
"For western readers who are not convinced that Muhammad is a prophet of Allah, proof of this claim can be found in the Bible (Deut. 18:15-18, 33:2-3; Isaiah 29:12; Songs of Solomon 5:16;John 14:1516, 16:12-14)"
Ngayon, HINDI po ALAM nitong NAGMAMARUNONG na BALIK ISLAM na ang SINIPI ng PANGINOON sa Mt15:9 ay ang ISAIAH 29:13.
KASUNOD na KASUNOD po ng Is29:12 na TUMUTUKOY raw sa PROPETA NILA, di po ba?
Kung babasahin po natin ang Is 29:13 ay MAKIKITA NATIN na ang TINUTUKOY riyan na TA0 na SUMUSUNOD LANG sa ARAL ng TAO ay ang NASA Is 29:12.
At dahil SINASABI ng BALIK ISLAM na PROPETA NILA ang NASA Is29:12 ay SILA MISMO ang NAGSASABI na ang TINUTUKOY sa Is29:13 na SUMUSUNOD LANG sa ARAL ng TAO ay ang PROPETA NILA.
NAKITA po NINYO kung PAANO IPINAHIYA nitong mga PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang PROPETA ng ISLAM?
PANAY kasi SILA PAGMAMARUNONG at PAGKUKUNWARI na MAY ALAM kaya HINDI NILA ALAM ay IPINAPAHIYA NA PALA NILA ang KANILANG PROPETA sa mga KAMANGMANGAN NILA.
KALAWANG TALAGA ng ISLAM itong mga APOSTATE o TUMALIKOD LANG sa TUNAY na DIYOS.
Islamic tradition states that Mohammed initially thought that Mohammed was DEMON possessed, and contemplated suicide.
ReplyDeleteIslamic scholars including, Ibn Ishaq, actually acknowledge that SATAN SPOKE through MOHAMMED in the Qur'an, verses 17:73-75, and verses 22:52-53. These passages are known as the Satanic verses. After Salman Rushdie wrote concerning these Satanic Verses of the Qur'an, Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini posted a one-million dollar reward for the murder of Salman Rushdie.
"The author of the SATANIC VERSES book [Salman Rushdie], which is against Islam, the Prophet, and the Koran, and all those involved in its publication who were aware of its content, are sentenced to death. I ask all Moslems to execute them wherever they find them." - Ayatolla Ruholla Khomeini 1900-1989
Satan and the Ayatollah Khomeini, obviously knew that Salman Rushdie's book was a threat to Islam, and so the Ayatollah responded exactly in accordance with the murderous policies of the devil. The Ayatollah's offer of a reward for murder, has never been rescinded by any subsequent leader of Islam.
"The essence of his (Mohammad's) doctrine was VIOLENCE AND LUST: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature" - John Quincy Adams 1767-1848
The devil is not the Great Creator, and the devil is not creative. When the devil decided to establish another damning religion, the devil knew that the devil did not have the ability to create anything. The devil knows that as much as the devil would like to be God, the devil is not God. The devil again attempted to be like God. The devil established a DAMNING RELIGION that was as close to Judeo-Christianity as the devil could make it, but substituted the DEVIL who is ALLAH, for God. Because the devil is a deceiver, the devil knew that the more that the devil's COUNTERFEIT religion looked like genuine worship of God, the more damning the devil's counterfeit religion would be.
Matthew 24:24 (NIV) "For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect--if that were possible."
ReplyDeleteThe devil is a liar, thief, murderer, and destroyer:
John 10:10 (NIV) "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full."
The devil STOLE the writings of Judeo-Christianity, claimed the human lineage of Judeo-Christianity as the human lineage of ISLAM, substituted Ishmael FOR ISAAC, and substituted HIMSELF for God.
Islam was specifically DESIGNED BY THE DEVIL to damn the DESCENDANTS of Ishmael! The devil has used the hatred that the descendants of Ishmael have for the descendants of Isaac, to damn the descendants of Ishmael!
Because the devil is a deceiver, thief, liar, and murderer, the devil could not exercise self control.
Galatians 5:22-23a (NIV) But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-control.
The devil TWISTED the writings of Judeo-Christianity, and added passages for deceiving, lying, stealing, and MURDERING; the DEVIL then put forth through MOHAMMED, this conglomerated cacophony of lies, NOW KNOWN AS THE QURAN.
"An error is the more dangerous the more truth it contains." - Henri-Frederic Amiel 1821-1881
Islam is a BASTARDIZED Judeo-Christianity. A great portion of the Islamic religion is plagiarized from Judeo-Christianity. What is NOT plagiarized from Judeo-Christianity is false, and a blatant lie from the devil.
"He said likewise
That a lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies,
That a lie which is all a lie may be met and fought with outright,
But a lie which is part a truth is a harder matter to fight." - Alfred, Lord Tennyson 1809-1892
THE DEVIL'S PLAN, IS PLAGIARIZED FROM THE PLAN OF GOD GIVEN TO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL, BUT WITH THE CONTRAST THAT THE DEVIL WANTS THE NATION OF ISLAM TO CONQUER NOT ONLY THE PROMISED LAND OF ISRAEL, BUT THE ENTIRE WORLD, IN ORDER TO BRING FORTH THE ANTICHRIST!
ReplyDeleteIslam is currently exploding in an expansion around the earth, because the wickedness of man is spiritually heating the earth to the spiritual flash point. As the spiritual temperature of the earth gets to the flash point, the ignition of the expansion of Islam is appearing to occur spontaneously.
ALTHOUGH SOMETIMES NOT PRACTICED, THE FOUNDATIONAL TEACHING OF ISLAM IS TO STEAL, AND KILL, AND DESTROY.
ReplyDelete"ALLAH promiseth you MUCH BOOTY THAT YE WILL CAPTURE, and hath given you this in advance, and hath withheld men's hands from you, that it may be a token for the believers, and that He may guide you on a right path." - QURAN 48:18-20
"Therefore, when ye meet the UNBELIEVERS in fight, SMITE THEIR NECKS; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, BIND A BOND FIRMLY ON THEM; thereafter is the time for either generosity or RANSOM, until the war lays down its burdens...But those who are slain in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." - QURAN 47:4
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, SLAY THE IDOLATERS WHEREVER YE FIND THEM, and take them captive, and besiege them, and prepare for them each AMBUSH. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! ALLAH is Forgiving, Merciful." - Qur'an 9:5 (LOL!)
"O Prophet! Strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell, an evil refuge indeed." - Qur'an 9:73
"Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including STEEDS OF WAR, to STRIKE TERROR into the hearts of the enemies, of ALLAH and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know." - QURAN 8:60
Muslim;
ReplyDeleteAng kasagotan ko pong ito ay Patungkol po sa pangalawang pOSTING nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala mga giliw na taga subaybay na may pamagat na PROPETA NG ISLAM IPINAPAHIYA ULI NG BALIK ISLAM. Ang naging usapin po o issue ng naturang blog o posting ay hinggil sa talatang Matt 15:9 and I quote;
Matthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Mga giliw na taga subaybay malinaw at klarong-klaro po ang mga pangungusap na ito ni Kristo mula sa nasabing talata, ito po ay patungkol sa mga taong sumasamba sa kanya at dinudios si Kristo na kong saan katuruan lamang ito ng mga Tao! Ang taong si Pablo. Tila nayayanig po ng husto itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala mga giliw na taga subaybay mula sa sinasabi ni Kristo dyan sa nasabing talata.
Hindi ko po lubus maisip at matanggap bakit di po talaga nauuunawaan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang malinaw at klarong-klaro na mga pangungusap ni Kristo dyan sa nasabing talata na yan! ang Matt 15:9 at sa halip po ang nasabing talata na tumbok na tumbok sa kanila maling gawain at paniniwala mula sa kanilang tuwiran Pagasamba kay Kristo ay ito naman daw ang nasbing talata Matt 15:9 ay ukol sa mga PARISEO at HINDI MGA KRISTIYANO, ayon sa depensa at pagTatangaTangahan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala.
kaya nga po ang naging hamon ko sa MangMang na ito na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay malitaw sya ng kahit isang talata mula sa Bibliya na kong saan magpapatunay na ang mga PARISEO nga ay SumaSamba kay Kristo! Pero sa kasawiang palad po hanggang sa kasalukuyan ay wala pa rin ang nasabing patunay na maaring magsalba sa kanyang KATANGAHAN pagbibentang sa mga PARISEO. Tila hindi po yata alam nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala kong ano ang mga PARISEO, ang kanilang paniniwala at kong kanino sila sumasamba?!
KayA kong pagmasdan nyo po mga giliw na taga subaybay tila nayayanig itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe ngayon, hindi nya malalaman kong papaano nya lulusotan ang malaking KaTangahang pinasok nya. ang Matthew 15:9 po mga giliw na taga subaybay ay ukol sa SINASAMBA at ang mga SUMASAMBA sa kanya! and I quote again;
Matthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
HImay-himayin po natin mga giliw na taga subaybay ang nasabing talata na tila hindi MANGUYA o MAUUNAWAAN nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala, "But In VAIN They" (sino-sino ang tinutukoy sa THEY mga giliw na taga subayaby? na SUMASAMBA daw po sa kanya?) DO WOrship Me (At sino naman po ang tinutukoy na ME dyan mga giliw na taga subaybay na SINASAMBA daw po? At sino po ba ang nangungusap sa nasabing Talata? ha? mga giliw na taga subaybay? Baka kayo nauunawaan ninyo ang nassbing Talata? Kasi itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay nagpakalunod na lamang sa kanyang KaTangahan at patuloy na nagBulag-bulagan mula sa katutohanan!
Kaya kong mapapansin nyo po tila kong ano-anong talata na lamang ang kanyang ibinibigay na wala naman po'ng kaugnayan sa usaping ito ng Matt 15:9
Cenon Bibe;
ReplyDeleteTingnan po ninyo, MALI NA NAMAN ang HIRIT NIYA.
Si PABLO raw po ang NAGKWENTO sa ACTS 9:3-5?
MALI PO!
Ang NAGSULAT po ng ACTS ay si LUCAS kaya si LUCAS ang NAG-UULAT DIYAN sa ACTS 9:3-5.
Muslim;
Si Lukas daw po ang NagSULAT ng ACTS? Ito ang sabi ng isang BobO at mangMang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;! "Ang NAGSULAT po ng ACTS ay si LUCAS" At sinong GinagagO mo? Pagmumukha mo ba Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? ito! itong mga ito sulat din ba ito ni Lukas? Unawain mong Mangmang ka! Magpalusot ka na nga lang Sablay pa! BobO! Ultimo sariling Bibliya mo MangMang ka!
Ito si Lukas ba ang tinutukoy dito? Kong ang Acts ay talagang Sulat ni Lukas ayon sa Katangahan mong Estupido ka! Eh sino ang tinutukoy dito na I o AKO etc! etc! si Lukas ba ito? sunagot kang MangMang ka!
Acts 22: (only Paul Fell unto the ground)
6
And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me.
7
And I Fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
8
And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.
9
And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.
10
And I said, What shall I do, LORD? And the Lord said unto me, Arise, and go into Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things which are appointed for thee to do.
Versus! V.S.
Acts 26: (They ALL! mean ALL! ALL Fallen to the earth! Sige hilotin mo ang problema nyong yan!)
12
Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests,
13
At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.
14
And when we were ALL Fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
15
And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.
16
But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;
17
Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
18
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
Cenon Bibe;
PALPAK po ang BANAT nitong BALIK ISLAM. WALA po TALAGA SIYANG KREDEBILIDAD.
Ngayon, ANO po PUNTO ng WALANG ALAM na BALIK ISLAM? NAGKONTRA-KONTRA RAW ang ULAT ni PABLO?
INCEST in the INSPIRED Hole este HOLY Bible:
ReplyDelete"Sexual intercourse between two persons who are too closely related." (New Collins Dictionary). For example, between father and daughter, son and mother, father-in-law and daughter-in-law, brother and sister, etc. INCEST IN GOD'S BOOK (?) BETWEEN A FATHER AND HIS DAUGHTERS: (a) "That night they (both the daughters of Lot) gave him (their father Lot) wine to drink and the older daughter had INTERCOURSE with him ... "The next day the older daughter said to her sister, I slept with him last night. now let's get him drunk again tonight, and you sleep with him. Then each of us will have a child by our father. So that night they got him drunk and the younger daughter had INTERCOURSE with him ... "In this way both of Lot's daughters became PREGNANT by their father. " GENESIS 19:33-35 (From the "Good News Bible- In Today's English"). In the older Versions, like the King James and the Roman Catholic Versions, "SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" is vaguely described as "COLLECTING THE SEED OF OUR FATHER." INCEST BETWEEN MOTHER AND SON: (b) "While Jacob (Israel) was living in the land, Reuben (his firstborn, his eldest son) had SEXUAL INTERCOURSE with Bilhah, his father's concubine. GENESIS 35:22. The older Versions of the Bible, use the word, "lay" for SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. INCEST BETWEEN FATHER-IN-LAW AND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW: (c) "When Judah saw her (Tamar, his daughter-in-law), he thought she was a prostitute, because she had covered her face. "He went over to her at the side of the road and said, "ALL RIGHT, HOW MUCH DO YOU CHARGE?" (He did not know that she was his daughter-in-law) {The words in parenthesis i.e. within brackets from He did not know to daughter-in-law are not in the original Hebrew manuscripts. They are the editors g loss.}
"She said, what will you give me?" (To have sex with me) 'He answered, I WILL SEND YOU A YOUNG GOAT FROM MY FLOCK "She said, "All right, if you will give me something to keep as a pledge until you send the ,goat. ' . . He gave them (the pledges) to her. Then had INTERCOURSE, and she became pregnant GENESIS 38: 15-18 (Quoted from the ''Good News Bible"). CONCUBINE and WIFE are synonymous terms in the Bible. Look for it in the index under ''KETURAH" (the third wife of Abraham). Out of this incestuous relationship between a father-in-law and his daughter-in-law, twins were born, who were destined to become the great-grand-fathers of Jesus Christ see Matthew 1:3; "And Judas begat Phares and Zarah of Thamar . . .
ReplyDeleteINCEST AND RAPE BETWEEN BROTHER AND SISTER (d) " . . he took hold of her (Thamar, his sister, not to be confused with Tamar in "c" above,, and said unto her, Come lie with me (have sex with me), my sister. "And she answered him, Nay, my brother (Amnon, one of the sons of David, the man after God's own heart) do not force me . . . "But he would not listen to her, and since he was stronger than she was, he overpowered her and RAPED her (his sister). " 2 Samuel 13:5-14 WHOLESALE RAPE AND INCEST BETWEEN SON AND HIS MOTHERS! (e) So they set up a tent for Absalom (another son of King David) on the palace roof, and in the sight of everyone, Absalom went in and had INTERCOURSE with his father's concubines " 2 SAMUELS 16:22
". . . In the sight of every one" is rendered in the King James Version as "in the sight of all Israel." This is a fulfillment of God's promise to David the King:
"Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee (David) out of thine own house, and I will take THY WIVES before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbor (actually thy son) and he shall lie (have sexual intercourse) with thy wives in the sight of sun (for the whole world to watch the fun).
For thou didst it secretly (with Bath-Sheba the wife of Uriah): but I will do this thing before ALL Israel, and before the sun." 2 Samuel 12:11-12
You can well guess where "Penthouse" and "Playboy" got their inspiration from. Wherefrom if not from the Book of Books?
(f) For other various types of incest see LEVITICUS 18:8-18. 20:11-14 and 17-21. Concubine seems synonymous to the word wife in the Bible. Look for this reference in index under "Keturah" the third wife of Abraham.
THE BIBLICAL LANGUAGE & TEACHINGs
ReplyDeleteDISGUSTFUL COMMAND TO EZEKIEL
[Ezek. 4:12] The Lord said to Ezekiel, "And you shall eat it as barley cakes and you shall bake it WITH DUNG THAT COMES OUT OF MAN in their sight. And the Lord said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the gentiles.
Then Ezekiel said, "Ah, Lord, God, behold, my soul has not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dies of its self, or is torn in pieces, neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth." Then God replied and said to him, "Lo, I HAVE GIVEN COW'S DUNG FOR MAN'S DUNG, and you shall prepare your bread there with."
THEY EAT DUNG & DRINK PISS
[2King 18:27] Rab'-sha-keh said, "Has he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, THAT THEY MAY EAT THEIR OWN DUNG, AND DRINK THEIR OWN PISS with you."
WOMAN IS NOT THE GLORY OF GOD
[1 Corin. 11:7] For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man, for man was not made for woman, but woman from man, neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.
WOMAN IS EVIL !
[Zech. 5:7] The leaden cover was lifted, there was a woman sitting, and he (the angel) said: this is wickedness.
HIDE WOMAN'S VOICE !
[1 Corin. 14:34] The woman should keep silence in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is any thing they desire to know let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.
[1 Timo. 2:9] Woman should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in seemly apparel, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly attire but by good deeds.
KILL WOMEN, CHILDREN, ANIMALS !!
[Ezek. 9:5] And the Lord said, "Go through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have you pity. SLAY UTTERLY OLD AND YOUNG, BOTH MAIDS AND LITTLE CHILDREN, AND WOMEN. [Num. 31:1] And the Lord said unto Moses, "Avenge the children of the Mid'-an'ites.. They warred against the Mid'-i-an'ites, as the Lord commanded Moses, and they slay all the males. And they took all women as captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods. And they burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire.
Moses said, "HAVE YOU SAVED ALL THE WOMEN ALIVE? NOW KILL EVERY MALE AMONG THE LITTLE ONES, AND KILL EVERY WOMAN that has known a man by lying with him, but all the young girls who have not known a man by lying with him keep alive for yourselves.
[Josh 6:16] Joshua said to the people of Israel, "The Lord has given you the city (of the Canaanites).. all silver, and gold, and vessels of brass and iron, are c consecrated unto the Lord: They shall come into the treasury of the Lord. The people utterly DESTROYED ALL THAT WAS IN THE CITY, BOTH MAN AND WOMAN, YOUNG AND OLD, AND OX AND SHEEP, AND ASS, WITH THE EDGE OF THE SWORD.
KILLING, KIDNAPPING, SLAVERY!!
ReplyDelete[Josh. 16:10] So the Canaanites have dwelt in the midst of E'phraim to this day, but become slaves to do forced labour. (see also Joshua 17:13 and Judg. 1:30) [Judg. 21:10] The congregation of Benjamin sent twelve thousand of their bravest men, and commanded them, "Go and smite the inhabitants of Ja'-besh-gil'ead with the edge of the sword; also the women and the little ones. Every male and every woman that has lain with a male YOU SHALL UTTERLY DESTROY.
And they found among the inhabitants four hundred YOUNG VIRGINS who had not known a man by lying with him; and they brought them to the camp of Shiloh, which is the land of Canaan. And Benjamin returned at that time, and they gave them the women whom they had saved alive of the women of Ja'besh-gil'ead, but they did not suffice for them.
STEALING WOMEN !!
And they commanded the Benjaminites, saying:"Go and lie in wait in the vineyard, and watch, if the daughters of Shiloh go out to dance in the dances, then come out of the vineyard and seize each man his wife from the daughters of Shiloh. And the Benjaminites did so, and took their wives from the dancers whom they caught.
KILL THEM AND TAKE THEIR PROPERTIES!!
[Deut. 20:10] When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it SHALL BE FORCED LABOUR FOR YOU AND SHALL SERVE YOU..
But if it makes no peace with you, then you shall besiege it, .. YOU SHALL PUT ALL ITS MALES TO THE SWORD, BUT THE WOMEN AND THE LITTLE ONES, the cattle and every thing else in the city all its spoil, YOU SHALL TAKE AS BOOTY FOR YOURSELVES; AND YOU SHALL ENJOY THE SPOIL OF YOUR ENEMIES.
THE BIBLE MISREPRESENTS GOD'S MERCY!!
[Jer. 19:7] The Lord said, "T WILL MAKE THEM EAT THE FLESH OF THEIR SONS AND THEIR DAUGHTERS, and every one shall eat the flesh of his neighbour. [Levi. 26:14] If you will not hearken to me..21 I will bring a sword upon you.. 29 YOU SHALL EAT THE FLESH OF YOUR SONS, AND DAUGHTERS. [Lam. 2:20] LOOK O LORD, AND SEE! WITH WHOM YOU HAVE DONE THAT: SHOULD WOMEN EAT THEIR FRUIT AND CHILDREN OF A SPAN LONG? [Lam. 4:4] The hands of compassionate women have boiled their own childrenthey became their food.
SWORD AND FIRE IN NEW TESTAMENT!!
[Math. 10:34] "Do not think that I have come to make peace on earth? I HAVE NOT COME TO BRING PEACE, BUT A SWORD. "For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother."[said Jesus]! [Luk. 12:49] 'I CAME TO CAST FIRE UPON THE EARTH, AND WOULD THAT IT WERE ALREADY KINDLED.. DO YOU THINK THAT I HAVE COME TO GIVE PEACE ON EARTH? NO, I TELL YOU, BUT RATHER DIVISION; for from henceforth in one house there will be five divided, three against two, and two against three. They will be divided, father against son, and son against father, mother against daughter, and daughter against her mother. [said Jesus]! [Luk. 19:27] For these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, BRING THEM HERE AND SLAY THEM BEFORE ME. [Luk. 14:26] If any one comes to me and does not HATE his own father and mother and wife, and children, and brothers and sisters yes and even his own life: he cannot be my disciple.
MOTHERS EAT THEIR CHILDREN !!
ReplyDelete[Lam. 2:20] Look O Lord, why are you punishing us like this ? Women are eating the bodies of their children they loved. [Lam. 3:18] MY HOPE IN THE LORD IS GONE .(According to the Good News Bible known as To Day English's Language.) 42 We have sinned and rebelled, and you O Lord have not forgiven us. You pursued us and killed, YOUR MERCY WAS HIDDEN BY YOUR ANGER. SLAYING WITHOUT PITY, YOU HAVE WRAPPED YOURSELF WITH A CLOUD SO THAT NO PRAYER CAN PASS THROUGH. [Lam. 4:4] The tongue of the nursling cleaves to the roof of its mouth for thirst, the children beg for food. 8 Their visage is blacker than soot.. Their skin has shrivelled upon their bones. The HANDS OF THE COMPASSIONATE WOMEN HAVE BOILED THEIR OWN CHILDREN. THEY BECAME THEIR FOOD in the destruction of the daughter of my people. The Lord gave full vent to his wrath, and poured out his hot anger, and he kindled a fire in Zion.
AUTHENTICITY OF THE BIBLE
BIBLE'S TESTIMONY TOWARD THE SCRIBES
[Jer. 8:8] How can you say we are wise and the law of the Lord is with us. Behold, THE FALSE PEN OF THE SCRIBES TURNED IT INTO A LIE. [Jer. 6:10] Behold, the word of the Lord is unto them a reproach, they have no delight in it.. From the least of them even unto the greatest of them, every one is given to covetousness, and FROM THE PROPHET EVENT UNTO THE PRIEST, EVERY ONE DEALS FALSELY.
[Jer 14:14] The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not neither have I commanded them, neither spoke unto them. [Jer. 23:31] They use their tongues and say, "HE SAYS". (How similar is that to the verses of the Quran wherein Allah charged the scribes with the same accusation we read "There is among them a section who distort the book with their tongues; in order that you would think it is a part of the book [of revelation] but it is not a part of the book, and they say that is from Allah, but it is not from Allah, it is they who tell a lie and well they know it. (Quran 3:78)" [Jer. 23:36] And the burden of the Lord shall you mention no more.. For you have perverted the words of the living God.
BOTH TESTAMENTS ARE TEMPORAL
[1 Corin. 13:9] For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. BUT WHEN THAT WHICH IS PERFECT IS COME, THEN THAT WHICH IN PART SHALL BE DONE AWAY. (Paul is giving a prophesy about the coming of the perfect one which cancel his prophesy and knowledge in another word: It makes both the Old and New testament already old, and no more valid, we should recall that Paul wrote his letters long time after Jesus's ascension therefore he was not speaking about the Holy Spirit who was supposed to come directly after the ascension of Jesus. Any way: Christians must look for [the perfect] which cancel the "Previous predictions and revelations of Paul.)
APOCRYPHAL VERSES IN K.J.V.
(After the removal of seven books from the Catholic Bible, here comes the turn of the K.J. version which became the second victim, and which also became exposed to so many criticisms and doubts. Every new sect of Christianity gives its own doubt against the K.J. version. It had been revised by 32 of the highest scholars backed by 15 co-operating denominations. The all agreed in the introduction of the R.S.V, that: "The king James version has grave defects which are so many and so serious". Therefore, they allowed themselves to omit (through this declaration) many verses from it as you will see in these coming verses. The Mormons do not trust the K.J.V, the keep it under the watch of their own Mormon's book, the Jehovah witnesses submit that it contains 50,000 errors according to (AWAKE magazine 8 September 1957) and therefore they have their own "modified Bible". Hence, We ask this : where is the role of the Holy Spirit who was supposed to lead them out of this confusion ?!)
MATHEW 17:21
ReplyDeleteK.J.V Howbeit this kink goes not out but by prayer and fasting. R.S.V Omitted N.I.V Omitted G.N.B Omitted L.B.V Omitted (This Bible is known as the LIVING BIBLE. Published previously in 1962. It represents another great change in its verses and expression in comparison to the other versions of the Bible. According to some Christian authorities it is considered as a shameful Bible.)
MARK 9:44
K.J.V Where their warm dies not, and the fire is not quenched. R.S.V Omitted G.N.B Omitted N.I.V Omitted L.B.V Omitted
MARK 9:46
K.J.V Where their warm dies not, and the fire is not quenched. R.S.V Omitted N.I.V Omitted G.N.B Omitted L.B.V Omitted
MARK 16:9-20
K.J.V (all paragraph from 9 till 20. R.S.V Omitted (in edition 1952 and restored in recent editions)
(The commentators of recent versions admitted at the footnotes of N.I.V AND R.S.V AND L.B.V that these verses were exposed to many additions and insertions saying: "The most reliable manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20" (N.I.V) "Verses 9-20 are not found in the most ancient manuscripts, but may be considered an appendix giving additional facts." (L.B.V) "Some of the most ancient authorities bring the book to a close at the end of verse 8. One authority concludes the book by ADDING after verse 8 the following: 'But they reported briefly to Peter and those with him all that they had been told.. ETC.' Other authorities include the preceding passage and continue with verses 9-20. In most authorities verses 9-20 follow immediately after verse 8; a few authorities INSERT ADDITIONAL MATERIAL after verse 14." (R.S.V)
LUKE 9:56
K.J.V For the son of man is not come to destroy men's life, but save. R.S.V Omitted N.I.V Omitted G.N.B Omitted L.B.V Omitted
LUKE 17:36
K.J.V. Two men shall be in the field, the one shall be taken and the other left. R.S.V Omitted N.I.V Omitted G.N.B Omitted
JOHN 5:4
K.J.V For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool and troubled the water. Whosoever then after the troubling of the water stepped in was made of whatsoever disease he had. R.S.V Omitted N.I.V Omitted G.N.B Omitted
1 JOHN 5:7
K.J.V For there are three that bear witness in heaven, the father and the word and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one. R.S.V Omitted N.I.V For there are three that testify: The spirit The water, and the blood and these three are in agreement. G.N.B There are three witnesses: The spirit the water and the blood, and all three give the same testimony. L.B.V The verses 6,7,8 are totally omitted.
ReplyDelete"BEGOTTEN" IS OMITTED JOHN 3:16
K.J.V For God so love the world that he gave his only begotten son. R.S.V For God so love the world that he gave his only son. N.I.V For God so love the world that he gave his one and only son. G.N.B For God so love the world, so much that he gave his only son. L.B.V For God loved the world so much that he gave his only son.
ROMANS 7:15
R.S.V I do not understand my own actions. K.J.V Omitted
MARK 16:19 AND LUKE 24:15 AND JOHN 8:1-10
K.J.V After the Lord spoke to them he was received up into heaven. R.S.V Omitted in 1952 version and restored in the recent publications.
(These verses were omitted in the revised standard version which was published in 1952, the same verses were restored in the next publication of 1972 after great controversy. These verses talk about the ascension of Jesus and the women who were taken in adultery. The Living Bible's commentators stated at its note p.79 that most ancient manuscripts omit John 7:53 - 8:1-11)
CHANGES OF VERSES
LUKE 22:70
K.J.V Then they said, "Are you the son of God? He said unto them, "You said that I am." N.I.V They all asked, "Are you the son of God? He said, "You are right in saying I am." L.B.V They all shouted "Then you claim you are the son of God. And He replied YES I AM."
DUET. 23:2
K.J.V A BASTARD shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord. N.I.V No one born of a forbidden marriage may enter the assembly of the Lord. G.N.B No one born out of wedlock may be included among the Lord's people.
HEBREW 12:8
K.J.V Then you are BASTARDS, and not sons. R.S.V Then you are illegitimate children and not sons. G.N.B It means you are not real sons, but BASTARDS. L.B.V It means that you are not God's son at all.
JOB 13:15
K.J.V Though he slay me yet I trust him. R.S.V He will slay me, I have no hope. G.N.B I've lost all hope so what if God kills me. L.B.V God may kill me for saying this-in fact, I expect him to.
PSALMS 2:7
K.J.V David said, "God said to me: You are my son, this day I have begotten you. N.I.V David said, "God said to me: You are my son today I have become your father. (The N.I.V revisers analyzed that the word begotten should not be attributed to both David, and Jesus, while Jesus should be the only begotten son of God as John 3:16 proclaims. Yet by this modification of this verse -as well as others- they attract the attention of the people how the false pen of the SCRIBES change the word of God as Jeremiah 8:8 proclaimed.)
LEVITICUS 15:20
K.J.V And everything that she lies upon in her separation shall be unclean. R.S.V And everything upon which she lies in her impurity shall be unclean. L.B.V Anything she lies on sits on during that time shall be defiled.
BETWEEN ACTS 9:3 AND ACTS 22:9
K.J.V They saw the light, but they heard not the voice. N.I.V They saw the light, but they did not understand the voice.
(The reason behind the change in this verse is because of the contradiction between Act. 9:3 and Act. 22:9 which they attempted to cover. We find that modification in the N.I.V.)
ANOTHER ADDITION IN G.N.B.
ReplyDeleteG.N.B The women went to Peter and his friends, and gave a brief account of all they had been told. R.S.V Does not exist N.I.V Does not exist K.J.V Does not exist
CHANGING RED INK TO BLACK
JOHN 17:12
K.J.V Those which you have given me I lost none but one. (red) L.B.V Those which you have given me I lost none but one. (black)
JOHN 18:9
K.J.V Those which you have given me I lost none. (red) L.B.V Those which you have given me I lost none. (black)
REVELATION OF JOHN
Almost 79 of the red Ink verses in the book of revelation were changed into black !!
WHY DID LUKE WRITE HIS GOSPEL ?
[Luke 1:1] For as much as many have taken in order a declaration of these things which are most surely believed among us. Even as they DELIVERED THEM UNTO US, WHICH FROM THE BEGINNING WERE EYEWITNESSED AND MINISTERS OF THE WORD: IT SEEMED GOOD TO ME also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first to write unto you in order, MOST EXCELLENT THE-OPH'-I-LUS, (the church tried to know : who is that The-oph'-i-lus, Luke's close friend. However, there are some Christians today claim that this is not a name of a person, but a Greek word which means "People". * I do not understand why the whole Bible was translated into English except for this word! * And if such: what is the value of keeping it ? * And they start this "so called" Greek word with a capital letter ? * And who was "most excellent" to Luke ? The people or his friend: The-oph'-i- lus ? This is how they defend the error by making another error, it is in fact another trick, by this they attempt to avoid the difficulties which this paragraph creates. The fact that this introduction of Luke's Gospel makes his Gospel no more than a personal letter.) that you MIGHT KNOW THE CERTAINTY of those things wherein you have been instructed. (This paragraph indicates three essential points: * Luke was not an eyewitness to Jesus peace be with him. * He did not claim that he was inspired, but it seemed good idea to him to write his book. * His book was only a message to his friend, not to the world.)
DID MOSES WRITE DEUTERONOMY ?
[Deut. 34:5] So Moses the servant of the Lord DIED there in the land of Moab according to the word of the Lord. And he buried him in a valley, but no man KNEW HIS SEPULCHRE UNTO THIS DAY. And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died.
DID MATHEW WRITE HIS GOSPEL ?
[Math. 9:9] And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man names Mathew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he said unto him: Follow me. And he arose, and followed him.
DID JOHN WRITE HIS GOSPEL ?
[John 21:24] This is the disciple which testifies of these things, and wrote these things: And we know that his testimony is true.
IS GOD SPEAKING IN THESE VERSES ?
[Psalm 10:1] Why do you stand a far off, O Lord, why do you HIDE YOURSELF in times of trouble ? [Psalm 89:46] HOW LONG, O LORD ? WILL YOU HIDE YOURSELF FOREVER ? How long will your wrath burn like fire ? [Lam. 3:18] My strength and MY HOPE IS PERISHED FROM THE LORD.
THE DISCIPLES OF JESUS ACCUSE PAUL
ReplyDelete[Acts 21:20] They said to him, "How many thousands of Jews there are which believe, and they are zealous of the law: and they are informed of you, that you teach all the jews which are among the GENTILES to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs." THEREFORE HE WAS COMPLAINING TO TIMOTHY THAT ALL OF THEM DOUBTED HIM AND LEFT HIM SAYING:
[1 Timo. 1:15] You know that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me. [2 Timo. 4:16] Alexander the coppersmith did me much evil, the Lord reward him according to his works. Of whom you be ware also, for he has greatly withstood our wards. At my first answer no man stood with me.
PAUL CALLED THE LAW OLD !
[Gal. 5:4] Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law, YOU ARE FALLEN FROM GRACE. [Rom 7:6] But now we are DELIVERED FROM THE LAW.
[Gal. 2:16] A man is NOT JUSTIFIED BY WORKS of the law, but by faith of Jesus Christ. (this idea of Paul contradicts absolutely the book of James 20:1 and the book of Ezekiel 14:14 "They should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness". It even contradicts what Paul himself said that "God will render to every man according to his deeds." [Rom. 2:6]) For if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. [Gal. 3:10] For as many as are of the works of the law are UNDER THE CURSE. [2 Corin. 3:6] God made us able ministers of the new testament.
FINALLY HE CANCELLED IT !!!
[Heb. 8:13] Paul said, "In that He [God] said, "A new covenant." He had made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old: is ready to VANISH AWAY.
DOES PAUL RESPECT JESUS ?!!
[Gal. 3:13] Paul said: Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us. (Let those who truthfully love Jesus the Christ remember that this great Prophet was cursed in their Bible. For it is enough and great blasphemy in Islam to refer to Jesus such horrible description. High is Jesus above what their description of him.) For it is written: Cursed be everyone who hangs on a tree.
IS PAUL SINLESS OF SINFUL ?!!!
[Gal 2:15] He said: We who are Jews by nature, and NOT SINNERS of the Gentiles. [Rom. 7:15] But he also said: I do not understand my own action. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate.
Now if I do what I do not want, I agree that the law is good. So then it is no longer I that I do it, but SIN WHICH DWELLS WITHIN ME, that is in my flesh.
I can will what is right, but I can not do it, for I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do.
Now if I do not want, it is no longer that I do it, but SIN WHICH DWELLS WITHIN ME. So I find it to be a law that when I want to do right evil lies close at hand.
For I delight in the law of God in my inmost self. but I see my members another law at war with the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of SIN WHICH DWELLS IN MY MEMBERS.
Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body of death. (I will suggest that you present Paul's confession to the Born agains' and ask them how come the spirit of Evil fits in his holy body of a saint and hinders him from doing good, while he has the spirit of God in him at the same time revealing to him your new testament which you recite today? what is the use of the Holy spirit if it does not defeat that evil spirit in his body, it is impossible for you to receive the Holy Spirit. Therefore you so not have the Holy Spirit in your bodies, but there is "A SPIRIT" in it.)
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteMatthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Mga giliw na taga subaybay malinaw at klarong-klaro po ang mga pangungusap na ito ni Kristo mula sa nasabing talata, ito po ay patungkol sa mga taong sumasamba sa kanya at dinudios si Kristo na kong saan katuruan lamang ito ng mga Tao! Ang taong si Pablo.
CENON BIBE:
Kahit IGIIT MO ang BALUKTOT at KASINUNGALINGAN MONG UNAWA ay HINDI MO MALOLOKO ang mga NARITO.
OUT OF CONTEXT at CORRUPTED ang UNAWA MO.
KATUNAYAN ay HINDI MO MASAGOT at HINDI MO MATUTULAN na MGA PARISEO ang SINASABIHAN DIYAN ni HESUS (Matthew 15:1).
LAHAT ng SINASABI MO ay PURO PALUSOT.
BALIK ISLAM KA KASI kaya PURO KA PALUSOT.
SORRY po.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteTila nayayanig po ng husto itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala mga giliw na taga subaybay mula sa sinasabi ni Kristo dyan sa nasabing talata.
CENON BIBE:
YANIG na YANIG KA NGA E. HINDI KA MAKATUTOL at HINDI KA MAKASAGOT na MGA PARISEO ang SINASABIHAN sa Mt15:9.
TAMA NA po ang PALUSOT.
HINDI KA MALILIGTAS ng MGA KASINUNGALINGAN MO.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteHindi ko po lubus maisip at matanggap bakit di po talaga nauuunawaan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang malinaw at klarong-klaro na mga pangungusap ni Kristo dyan sa nasabing talata na yan!
CENON BIBE:
HINDI MO kamo MASAGOT at HINDI MO MATUTULAN na MGA PARISEO ang TINUMBOK DIYAN sa Mt 15:9.
HINDI MO RIN MATUTULAN na IPINAHIYA MO ang PROPETA MO.
SABI po ng BALIK ISLAM, ang PROPETA NILA ang TINUTUKOY sa ISAIAH 29:12.
Ayon naman sa DIYOS sa ISAIAH 29:13 ay MGA DALDAL LANG ang PAGSAMBA ng NASA IS 29:12 at ang NASA IS 29:12 ay SUMUSUNOD LANG sa ARAL ng TAO.
NAPAHIYA po ang PROPETA ng ISLAM dahil sa KAMANGMANGAN at PAGMAMARUNONG ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeletekaya nga po ang naging hamon ko sa MangMang na ito na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay malitaw sya ng kahit isang talata mula sa Bibliya na kong saan magpapatunay na ang mga PARISEO nga ay SumaSamba kay Kristo!
CENON BIBE:
Ang ILITAW MO ay TALATA na KRISTIYANO at HINDI PARISEO ang TINUTUMBOK sa Mt15:9.
WALA KANG MAILITAW dahil BALUKTOT at KASINUNGALINGAN ang UNAWA at PANINIWALA MO.
NAG-BALIK ISLAM KA para lang LOKOHIN MO ang MUKHA MO.
KAWAWA KA NAMAN.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteMatthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
HImay-himayin po natin mga giliw na taga subaybay ang nasabing talata na tila hindi MANGUYA o MAUUNAWAAN nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala
CENON BIBE:
HUWAG MONG IPAGPILITAN ang BALUKTOT at OUT OF CONTEXT MONG UNAWA.
BULAG KA BA na ang MT15:9 ay BAHAGI LANG ng ISANG BUONG CHAPTER?
IYAN ang HIMAYIN MO.
Lumalabas lang na SA BALIK ISLAM ay TINURUAN KAYONG MAGING MANGMANG at TINURUAN KAYONG MAGING BULAG sa KATOTOHANAN at KAAYUSAN.
Pero teka, HINDI KA BULAG. NAGBUBULAG-BULAGAN LANG.
SADYA MONG NILOLOKO ang MUKHA MO dahil HINDI MO MATANGGAP na MALI at BALUKTOT ang PINANIWALAAN MO.
KAWAWA KA TALAGA.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteKaya kong mapapansin nyo po tila kong ano-anong talata na lamang ang kanyang ibinibigay na wala naman po'ng kaugnayan sa usaping ito ng Matt 15:9
CENON BIBE:
HINDI MO MALOLOKO ang mga NAGBABASA RITO.
NAUMPOG KA LANG dahil NAIPAKITA NATIN DITO na PROPETA MO ang NATUMBOK MO.
IBINILAD MO rin dito na MANGMANG KA.
GAMIT-GAMIT KA ng Mt15:9 e IGNORANTE KA pala sa KATOTOHANAN na SINIPI LANG IYAN ni HESUS mula sa ISAIAH 29:13.
Tapos ngayon ay NATULALA KA at NAUNTOG KA dahil PROPETA MO pala ang TINUTUMBOK MO sa Mt15:9.
NAG-BALIK ISLAM KA para ka lang maging MANGMANG.
KAWAWA KA TALAGA.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteSi Lukas daw po ang NagSULAT ng ACTS? Ito ang sabi ng isang BobO at mangMang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;! "Ang NAGSULAT po ng ACTS ay si LUCAS" At sinong GinagagO mo?
CENON BIBE:
NAGBILAD na naman po ng pagiging IGNORANTE ang BALIK ISLAM.
IYAN po ba ang NANGYAYARI sa TAO kapag nagba-BALIK ISLAM--nagiging IGNORANTE?
Heto po ang SABI ng mga MARURUNONG kaugnay sa kung SINO ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS of the APOSTLES:
"The view that Luke-Acts was written by the physician Luke was nearly unanimous in the early Christian church. The Papyrus Bodmer XIV, which is the oldest known manuscript containing the start of the gospel (dating to around 200 AD), uses the title "The Gospel According to Luke". Nearly all ancient sources also shared this theory of authorship—Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and the Muratorian Canon all regarded Luke as the author of the Luke-Acts. Neither Eusebius of Caesarea nor any other ancient writer mentions another tradition about authorship."
AYAN po, MULA pa NOONG UNANG PANAHON ay KINILALA NA si LUCAS bilang MAY AKDA ng ACTS of the APOSTLES.
Nung LUMITAW ang BALIK ISLAM ay NAGKANDALOKO-LOKO NA. Hindi na raw si LUCAS ang MAY AKDA ng ACTS.
NAGING IGNORANTE po ba nung maging BALIK ISLAM?
Kayo na po ang MAGSABI.
NAGPAKA-IGNORANTENG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteIto si Lukas ba ang tinutukoy dito? Kong ang Acts ay talagang Sulat ni Lukas ayon sa Katangahan mong Estupido ka! Eh sino ang tinutukoy dito na I o AKO etc! etc! si Lukas ba ito? sunagot kang MangMang ka!
Acts 22:6-10 (only Paul Fell unto the ground)...
CENON BIBE:
NANLOLOKO NA NAMAN PO o NAGPAPAKA-IGNORANTE na naman po ang PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.
Porke po gumamit ng FIRST PERSON sa Acts 22:6-10 ay SI PABLO na raw po ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS.
PATUTUNAYAN po NATIN ULI na MANLOLOKO at IGNORANTE ang PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM, alin man sa dalawa ang TUGMA sa KANYA.
Kapag BINASA po NATIN ang BUONG ACTS 22 ay MAKIKITA NATIN na ang Acts 22:6-10 ay mga DIRECT QUOTES o DIREKTANG SIPI mula sa mga SINABI ni PABLO.
Ibig sabihin MAYROONG NAGKUKWENTO tungkol sa MGA SINABI ni PABLO. HINDI MISMO si PABLO ang NAGKUKWENTO.
Heto po ang PRUWEBA mula sa NEW AMERICAN BIBLE. Basahin po natin ang Acts 22:1-4:
"My brothers and fathers, listen to what I am about to say to you in my defense."
[Si PABLO po ang NAGSASALITA RIYAN. TAKE NOTE po na naka-QUOTES ang MGA SALITA ni PABLO.
Tapos po niyan ay MAY NAGSALITA:]
When they heard HIM [PAUL] addressing them in Hebrew they became all the more quiet. And HE [PAUL] continued,
"I am a Jew, born in Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up in this city. At the feet of Gamaliel I was educated strictly in our ancestral law and was zealous for God, just as all of you are today.
I persecuted this Way to death, binding both men and women and delivering them to prison.
Even the high priest and the whole council of elders can testify on my behalf. For from them I even received letters to the brothers and set out for Damascus to bring back to Jerusalem in chains for punishment those there as well.
"On that journey as I drew near to Damascus, about noon a great light from the sky suddenly shone around me..."
Diyan po ay NAPAKALINAW na SINISIPI LANG ang mga SALITA ni PABLO sa Acts 22.
MALINAW rin po riyan na MAYROONG NAGKUKWENTO tungkol sa mga SINABI ni PABLO. HINDI MISMO si PABLO ang NAGKUKWENTO.
Ang NAGKUKWENTO po ay si LUCAS, ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS of the APOSTLES.
TIYAK po na HINDI NA NAMAN MAKAKATUTOL ang PALAMURANG NAGPAPAKA-IGNORANTE.
BAWAL po ba sa BALIK ISLAM ang TUMANGGAP ng MAAYOS at MATINO? BAWAL po ba sa BALIK ISLAM ang TUMANGGAP ng KATOTOHANAN?
PURIHIN ang DIYOS dahil TAYO po ay KRISTIYANO na TUMATANGGAP sa MAAYOS, sa MATINO, at sa KATOTOHANAN.
TINGNAN naman po natin ang ACTS 26:12-19.
ReplyDeleteKUNG BABASAHIN po NATIN ang BUONG ACTS 26 ay MAKIKITA NATIN na kino-QUOTE o SINISIPI din lang ang MGA SINABI ni PABLO.
HINDI po riyan IPINAKIKITA na si PABLO ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS.
Sa ACTS 26:1 pa lang po ay MALINAW na kino-QUOTE LANG si PABLO e.
Sabi po riyan:
Then Agrippa said to Paul, "You may now speak on your own behalf." So PAUL stretched out his hand and BEGAN HIS DEFENSE.
KITA po NINYO?
MAY NAGKUKWENTO. At ang ACTS 26:12-19 ay BAHAGI LANG sa DEPENSANG SINABI ni PABLO.
SINIPI LANG po ang DEPENSA ni PABLO. HINDI po IYAN NAGPAPATUNAY na si PABLO ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS.
Nagpapaka-IGNORANTE LANG po talaga ang BALIK ISLAM.
BALIK ISLAM na nagpapaka-IGNORANTE:
ReplyDeleteMASSACRE in the Hole este HOLY Bible:
CENON BIBE:
So? E ANO po NGAYON kung INIULAT ng BIBLIYA ang mga MASSACRE na TOTOONG NANGYARI sa KASAYSAYAN?
PATUNAY lang po IYAN na TUNAY at TOTOO ang mga INIUULAT sa BIBLIYA. HINDI po SANITIZED o GAWA-GAWA LANG.
Ang dapat punahin ng nagpapaka-IGNORANTENG BALIK ISLAM ay ang mga SKOLAR NILA na MALI-MALI at BALUKTOT ang KWENTO na KINOPYA LANG NILA sa BIBLIYA.
Halimbawa po, sa BIBLIYA po ay SINABI ng mga SAKSI at NAKAKITA MISMO kay KRISTO na NAPAKO sa KRUS si KRISTO at SIYA ay NAMATAY.
E ANO naman po ang KWENTO ng mga SKOLAR ng ISLAM na GUMAWA ng "MEANINGS" daw ng QURAN?
HETO po ang SABI ng ISLAMIC SCHOLAR na si MUHAMMAD MOSHIN KHAN sa INTERPRETASYON NIYA sa Surah 4:157,
And because of their saying (in boast), "We killed Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah," - but THEY KILLED HIM NOT, NOR CRUCIFIED HIM, but it appeared so to them [the resemblance of 'Îsa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)], and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)
NAKITA po NINYO? NABAGO NA ang AKTWAL na NANGYARI.
Sabi ng mga AKTWAL na NAKAKITA at NAKASAKSI sa NANGYARI kay KRISTO ay NAPAKO SIYA sa KRUS at si KRISTO ay NAMATAY.
Sabi naman po ng SKOLAR na nag-INTERPRET sa QURAN ay HINDI raw NAPAKO sa KRUS at HINDI raw NAMATAY si KRISTO.
SAKSI po ba ITONG SKOLAR na ITO para BAGUHIN NIYA ang TUNAY na NANGYARI?
Hindi po ba NAGKAKALAT LANG ng MALI at KASINUNGALINGAN itong SKOLAR na ITO ng ISLAM?
Ang MASAKLAP ay IYANG MALI at BALUKTOT na INTERPRETASYON ng SKOLAR na MUSLIM ang PINANINIWALAAN nitong BALIK ISLAM.
Nag-BALIK ISLAM po SIYA para lang MANIWALA sa KWENTONG LIHIS sa KATOTOHANAN.
KAWAWA naman po SIYA.
NAG-COPY PASTE na naman po ang nagpapaka-IGNORANTENG BALIK ISLAM.
ReplyDeletePURO naman po PALPAK ang mga COPY-PASTE NIYA.
SARILI LANG NIYA ang KANYANG NILOLOKO.
KAWAWA po TALAGA kapag nag-BALIK ISLAM na.
PURIHIN ang DIYOS dahil HINDI po TAYO NALOLOKO ng mga BALIK ISLAM!
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteTila nayayanig po ng husto itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala mga giliw na taga subaybay mula sa sinasabi ni Kristo dyan sa nasabing talata.
CENON BIBE:
YANIG na YANIG KA NGA E. HINDI KA MAKATUTOL at HINDI KA MAKASAGOT na MGA PARISEO ang SINASABIHAN sa Mt15:9.
TAMA NA po ang PALUSOT.
HINDI KA MALILIGTAS ng MGA KASINUNGALINGAN MO.
hoy muslim na ito ano ka ba hinay2 lang parang ikaw na tong may-ari ng blog, pinuno mo na puro ka copy-pasteyong allah mo na satanas
ReplyDeletehindi ka ba nahihiya dyan ,
grabe ka naman kung mag-invento at wala pa sa
tamang kuento mo.
itanong mo yan kay Salman Rushdie,
yan lang
Psssttt balik-teroristang islam lumipat ka na dito di ka pa nagpapaliwanag ng palitan natin sa huling post ahhh...
ReplyDeleteStyle mo talga..Copy paste na walang katuturan!
Muslim;
ReplyDeleteAng naging usapin po o issue ng naturang blog o posting ay hinggil sa talatang Matt 15:9 and I quote;
Matthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Chris:
TALAGANG TANGA KA NGA MUSLIM. HINDI NAMAN SA HINUHUSGAHAN KITA PERO SA TINGIN KO KAHIT SA SCHOOL EH ROW 4 KA. YUN EH KUNG NAKATUNGTONG KA NGA SA SCHOOL.
HINDI MGA KRISTYANO ANG TINUTUKOY DYAN NG PANGINOONG JESUS, KUNDI MGA PARISEO. NALILITO KA KASI PAGKABASA MO NG ISANG TALATA SA BIBLIA, ISINASARA MO NA KAGAD.
ANO BA ANG SABI BAGO UNG TALATANG TINUKOY MO? SA TAGALOG TAYO HA:
MATEO 15:7 "Kayong mga mapagpaimbabaw, mabuti ang PAGKAHULA SA INYO NI ISAIAS, na nagsasabi,
8 "Ang bayang ito'y iginagalang ako ng kanilang mga labi; Datapuwa't ang kanilang puso ay malayo sa akin.9 Datapuwa't walang kabuluhan ang pagsamba nila sa akin, Na nagtuturo ng kanilang pinakaaral ang mga utos ng mga tao."
HINDI MO BA BINASA 'YAN? QUOTED FROM THE BOOK OF ISAIAH, DIOS-AMA ANG NAGSALITA D'YAN PATUNGKOL SA MGA HUDYO:
ISAIAH 29:13 "At SINABI NG PANGINOON, Yamang ang bayang ito ay lumapit sa akin, at PINAPUPURIHAN AKO NG KANILANG BIBIG at ng kanilang mga labi, nguni't INILAYO ANG KANILANG PUSO SA AKIN, at ang kanilang takot sa akin ay UTOS NG MGA TAO na itinuro sa kanila:"
NAKITA MO BA MR. BUGOK? INULIT LANG NI JESUS ANG SALITA NG DIOS-AMA MULA SA AKLAT NG ISAIAS PATUNGKOL SA MGA HUDYO.
PERO MALAMANG HINDI MO MAKITA KASI NGA BUKOD SA BOBO KA EH BINULAG KA NA NG dios ng sanlibutang ito, ang dios mo.
NANINIWALA KA BA NA HABANG ISINUSULAT KO ITO EH MERONG MGA MUSLIM NGAYON NA GUMAGAWA NG BOMBA?
FACT 'YAN MR. BUGOK.
balik-islam:
ReplyDeleteBible: God said to Jesus, "You are my son today I have begotten you" [Heb.5:5] God said to David, "You are my son today I have begotten you"[Psalm2:7]
Quran: Say: He is Allah, The One; Allah, The Eternal Absolute; He does not beget, Nor is He begotten, and there is none like unto Him. [112:1]
Chris:
Ung verse sa Psalm si Jesus din po ang tinutukoy d'yan:
Act 13:33 (ASV) "That God hath fulfilled the same unto our children, in that HE RAISED UP JESUS; as also IT IS WRITTEN IN THE SECOND PSALM, "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee."
Bobo mo talaga balik-islam kahabag-habag ka.
CENON BIBE:
ReplyDeleteKahit IGIIT MO ang BALUKTOT at KASINUNGALINGAN MONG UNAWA ay HINDI MO MALOLOKO ang mga NARITO.
OUT OF CONTEXT at CORRUPTED ang UNAWA MO.
KATUNAYAN ay HINDI MO MASAGOT at HINDI MO MATUTULAN na MGA PARISEO ang SINASABIHAN DIYAN ni HESUS (Matthew 15:1).
LAHAT ng SINASABI MO ay PURO PALUSOT.
Muslim;
Ano?! mga PARISEO daw ang tinutukoy sa Matt 15:9?! ito po ang nakasulat o nakasaad mula sa nasabing talata mga giliw na taga Subaybay; "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Iyan po ba sa unawa ninyo ay Ukol sa mga PARISEO mga giliw na taga subaybay? ha? ang mga PARISEO po ba ay SUMASAMBA kay Kristo? katulad ng mga ginagawa ng mga Katoliko na SUMASAMBA kay Kristo?! hindi lamang po talagA nauunawaan ang nasabing talata na ito nitopng si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! hahahahahahahaha! kawawa naman. Bakit napatunayan mo na ba Demon este Cenon Bibe pala sA amin na may kahit isang PARISEO man lamang na SUMASAMBA kay Kristo? baka ultimo kahulogan ng PARISEO ay hindi mo pa alam ang ibig sabihin! wala ka pa naman napatututnayan eh! At wala ka pang naipakita kahit isang talata mula sa hamon ko sayo! Para patunayan mo na PARISEO nga ang tinutukoy sa Matt 15:9
Chris:
ReplyDeleteUng verse sa Psalm si Jesus din po ang tinutukoy d'yan:
Bible: God said to Jesus, "You are my son today I have begotten you" [Heb.5:5] God said to David, "You are my son today I have begotten you"[Psalm2:7]
Quran: Say: He is Allah, The One; Allah, The Eternal Absolute; He does not beget, Nor is He begotten, and there is none like unto Him. [112:1]
Muslim;
Ano? Hoy! MangMang na Anti_Chris_To alam mo sinasabi mo? Alam mo ba na nagkakalat ka na? Huwag mo namang ipapahiya ang mga KATOLIKO, meron din naman sa kanila ang mga may UTAK eh. Pwera ka doon! kasi dito pa lamang sa Psalm2:7 ay inilantad mo na ang itong Katangahan! Sabi ng Bugok na ito na si Anti_Chris_To ay ganito po mga giliw na taga subaybay; "Ung verse sa Psalm si Jesus din po ang tinutukoy d'yan" Hoy MangMang may UTAK ka pa ba? ito po mga giliw na taga subaybay ang malinaw na nakasaad mula sa nasabing talata!; PSALM 2:7 "I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee." Dito ayon sa KaMangMangn nitong BobO at MangMang na ito na si Anti_Chris_To parang pinalabas nya na ang PSALM po ay iSinULAT ni Jesu-Kristo? hahahahahaha! kawawa naman po! kong ganito UMUNWA ang mga MangMang na ito sa kanilang Bibliya eh sa tingin po nyo mga giliw na taga subaybay hindi kaya magkawendangwendang ang kanilang paniniwala? kong BALUKTOT at SaLungat naman ang kanilang Pang-uunawa sa mga SIMPLING pangungusap na ito na mula sa Bibliya?! NO WONDER! kay mga MangMang talaga sila!
No wonder kaya hanggang ngayon wala kang sagot sa tanong ko sa kabilang post tumakbo ka na pala dito at copy-paste ka na naman hehehehe..
ReplyDeleteMag detonate ka na lang ng bomba oi!
ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteMatthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
HImay-himayin po natin mga giliw na taga subaybay ang nasabing talata na tila hindi MANGUYA o MAUUNAWAAN nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala
Unang-una po ang nasabing Talata Matthew 15:9 ay ukol kay Kristo na Sinasamba at sa mga Taong SumasamBa sa kanya, ang linaw po eh! ito po ang nakasaad mula sa nasabing talata
Matthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Ang mga PARISEO po ba mga giliw na taga subaybay na syang pinagbibentangan ngayon nitong MangMang at BobOng si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na sya daw pong tinutukoy mula sa Matt 15:9 bilang kanyang Palusot ay SUMASAMBA kaya sila kay Kristo? Nagtatanong lamang po! at Batid ko din naman mga giliw na taga subaybay na hindi rin po ang naging kasagotan nyo mula sa nasabing katanungan ko! Medyo naging malikot na lamang po ang gamay nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala mula sa mga nauna kong naIPOST medyo napapansin ko po kasi na may mga DAGDAG bawas na po ang aking mga POSTING na kanya pong inirePOST dito sa blog na ito! Siguro po inabot na rin po siguro sya ng HIYA! Ganon pa man sa mga nakakabasa ng buo ng mga nauna kong POSTINGS dito batid po ninyo ang mga ginagawang kalokohan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala mula sa mga nauna kong POSTING dito sa sanabing blog na ito!
CENON BIBE:
HUWAG MONG IPAGPILITAN ang BALUKTOT at OUT OF CONTEXT MONG UNAWA.
BULAG KA BA na ang MT15:9 ay BAHAGI LANG ng ISANG BUONG CHAPTER?
Muslim;
Palusot mo na lamang yan Demon este Cenon Bibge pala, eh Tumbok na tumbok ka sa KatAngahan mo ngayon eh! Matthew 15:9 lang hindi mo pa makuhang UNAWAIN napakaBobO mo talaga! Sarili mong Bibliya MangMang ka!
CENON BIBE:
HINDI MO MALOLOKO ang mga NAGBABASA RITO.
NAUMPOG KA LANG dahil NAIPAKITA NATIN DITO na PROPETA MO ang NATUMBOK MO.
IBINILAD MO rin dito na MANGMANG KA.
GAMIT-GAMIT KA ng Mt15:9 e IGNORANTE KA pala sa KATOTOHANAN na SINIPI LANG IYAN ni HESUS mula sa ISAIAH 29:13.
Muslim;
ReplyDeleteBueno po bayaan po natin ang mga Tao na po mismo na gamit ang kanilang mga UTAK at tamang PAG-IISIP ang magbabasa dito sa dalawang TalaTa na ito at Humusga mula sA Palusot mo Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! Ano daw po yon? KATOTOHANAN daw po na ang Matt 15:9 ay SINIPI LANG daw po IYAN ni HESUS mula sa ISAIAH 29:13 ??? hehehehehehe! Ano yon Demon este Cenon Bibe pala Palusot mo ba yon? bueno po ito ang ipapakita po natin, kong LULUsoT nga itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! hehehehehe! Nakakaawa po, hindi npo ba? Sarili nyan pong Bibliya eh nagkakalat sya?! What a SHAME! eh nagpakilala pa naman din itong MAGALING daaw po sya sa Bibliya! Pero ganon pa man Husgahan po natin ang kanyang PALUSOT mga giliw na taga subaybay!
Ito po and I quote;
ISAIAH 29:13 (pinagMulan ng sinipi ni Kristo!)
"Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:
Matthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Sino po ba ang nangungusap mula sa talata na yan ISAIAH 29:13 mga giliw na taga subaybay? Ang nangungusap po dyan mga giliw na taga subaybay ay ang TUNAY TUTOO at nagIISANG Dios na syang nag utus kay Kristo tungo sa mga nawawalang tupa ng bahay ng Israel.
Matthew 15:24
"But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
samantalang ang Matthew 15:9 ay Pangungusap yan na nagmula mismo kay Kristo! Kasi po may higit kailan man kay Kristo na syang nagsugo sa kanya!
John 13:16
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him."
Ngayon kapantay po ba si Kristo sa TUNAY TOTOO at Nag-IISANG Dios na syang Nagsugo sa kanya mga giliw na taga subaybay? Katotohanan ito pa po ang mga sinasabi ni Kristo patunay na mayroon po lamang NAG-IISA at Tunay na Dios!
Matthew 19:
16
And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17
And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but ONE that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Ano po ba ang naging tugon ni Kristo sa nagtatanong sa kanya nga giliw na taga subaybay? Hindi po ba sinasot sya ni Kristo ng ganito? & I quote; "Why callest thou me good? there is none good but ONE that is, God:" Sinabi ba ni Kristo dyan na there is none good but THREE? hindi naman ah?! Now ngayon kong totoong may THREE gods daw ayon sa Katangahan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala nagsisinungaling ba si Kristo dyan ng sabihin nyang may IISA lamang na GOOD at ito daw po ay ang Dios?!
CENON BIBE:
Tapos ngayon ay NATULALA KA at NAUNTOG KA dahil PROPETA MO pala ang TINUTUMBOK MO sa Mt15:9.
Muslim;
Sige magtaNgaTangahan ka na lamang Demon este Cenon Bibe pala dyan ka naman magaling eh!
Cenon Bibe Jr. said...
ReplyDeleteTINGNAN naman po natin ang ACTS 26:12-19.
KUNG BABASAHIN po NATIN ang BUONG ACTS 26 ay MAKIKITA NATIN na kino-QUOTE o SINISIPI din lang ang MGA SINABI ni PABLO.
Muslim;
Eh di titingnn At pag-aralan po natin kong may katotohanan nga ba na sinipi lamang daw ni Pablo ang mga nasabing Talata!
ACTS 26:
12
Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests,
13
At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me.
14
And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
15
And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.
16
But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;
17
Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
18
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
HINDI po riyan IPINAKIKITA na si PABLO ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS.
Sa ACTS 26:1 pa lang po ay MALINAW na kino-QUOTE LANG si PABLO e.
Muslim;
bakit ang Bibliya nyo ba isang PUZZLE? na may mga itinaTago pa? ang toto po bang salita ng Dios ay may mga itinatago? bueno po bayaan po natin na Bibliya mismo ang sasagot mula sa KatAngahang Palusot na ito ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;
ISAIAH 45:19
"I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth: I said not unto the seed of Jacob, Seek ye me in vain: I the LORD speak righteousness, I declare things that are right."
Papaano ngayon ipaliliwanag nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na totong salita ng Dios ang mga nakasaad dyan kong ganito naman pala na may mga itinaTago? hehehehehehehe! Nabuking ka tuloy! hehehehe! hindi ka kasi marunong Mag-isip eh! Tanga kaba talaga? Nakakaunawa ka ba ng SIMPLING english? Ito ba at ganito ba dapat ang mga Sulat ni Lucas?! Ha? ang Tanga mo TalagA!
"as I went to Damascus (sino daw po ang pumunta sa Damascus, si Lucas po ba?)
I saw in the way a light from heaven (sino daw po ang nakakita ng LIGHT si Lucas po ba?)
when we were all fallen to the earth (kasama ba si Lucas dyan o si Lucas po ba mismo ang nAgkwento dyan?!)
I heard a voice speaking unto me. (sino po ba ang kinaka-usap ng nasabing tinig? si Lucas po ba?)
Simpling English po hindi po talaga nauunawaan nitong nagmamarunong na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! Yang UTAK mo ba Mr. Cenon Bibe eh nasa ULO mo pa kaya? bakit hindi mo talaga mauunawaan ang napakasimpling TalAta na ito? Bakit mo kailang gamitin pa si Lucas na syang nangungusap dyan mula sa nasabing talata samantalang ang linaw-linaw si Pablo talaga yan! hindi naman po mga pangungusap yan ni Lucas! Bakit ang BobO mo?! Ganyan ba talaga? naging BobO kapag nag Katoliko? hehehehehehe! napakaSimply naman pero hindi pa rin talaga mauunawaan nitong MangMang na ito na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! kawawa naman po sya! Nagpakiklala pa man ding Writer kono pero Acts 26:12-18 lang pala ang katapat nya sa akin! Ito ay nabuking na po natin sya kaagad na wala po talaga Bait itong Taong ito!
Ayan po mga kababayan buong giting na naman na sumasagot ng pabalang na copy-paste itong si teroristang muslim..Pero simpleng katanungan natin sa kabilang post ay patuloy pa rin pong iniiwasan ni teroristang muslim..
ReplyDeleteAyan po malimaw din na matapang lang itong muslim na ito pumatay ng tao pero ang sumagot ng deretsa sa katanungan sa kanya ay parang bahag ang buntot..Pakipansin nyo po ang mga sagot ni muslim napakahaba pero wala po syang sariling sagot dyan kundi copy-paste nya lang na wala namang direktang kinalaman sa pinaguusapan..
Ito sagot mo sakin (muslim)..
Muslim;
Paki kumpara na lamang po ang Qur'an ng mga Muslim at ang inyong Bibliya! iyon lamang po ang aking SIMPLY na kasagotan sa Ktangahan mO!Bakit ang mga ARAL ba ni Kristo na ukol lamang sa mg Israel sinong nakasaksi nito? ito po ang sinasabi mismo ni Kristo na hindi makuhang maunawaan nitong Mangmang na ito na nagpakilala pang Simply Catholic daw po sya, eh pero sa tingin ko hindi sya Simply Catholic mas bagay sayong tatawagin kang Simply BobO o di kay Simply Tanga! oOh hindi ba mas bagay kang tawagin sa ganyan!
Ito mga tanong ko..
1. Nakita at nakusap ba ni muhammad ang dios nyo?
2. Saan kumuha ng karapatan si Muhammad na mangaral kung hindi nya nakita ang Dios?Anong batayan nya?
3. Sino ang pwede magpatotoo maliban sa pag angkin ni Muhammad na galing sa Dios ang mga pinagsasabi nya?
4. Paalala kung nag claim na galing sa dios ang mga pinagsasabi ni muhammad, meron syang tanyag na mga versers na galing sa demonyo tinawag pa nga itong satanic verses (o dili kaya lahat ng nasa koran ay galing sa demonyo, hhhmmm..nagtatanong lang po..)
Ikaw na magkumpara kung meron kinalaman ang sagot mo sa tanong ko hehehe..Kahit naman siguro grade na teroristang muslim ay makikitang walang laman ang sagot mo sa tanong ko..
Kunting background lang bakit natin naitanong ito kay muslim..Ito po sa dahilan ng kanyang mga sinabing ganito..
Muslim said..
Now ngayon mag-isip naman po tayo, sino ang may mas higit na karapatang upang mangaral; si Pablo na hindi man lamang nakita o narinig si Kristo o ang mga Discipolo ni Kristo na nakasama na mismo ni Kristo? Kong ang mismong mga Discipolo ni Kristo ang sabi nya ay wala pa itong kakayahan upang TANGGAPIN ang mga ARAL ni Kristo! Ah ang mangaral pa kaya?! eh higit si Pablo mga giliw na tagA subaybay na hindi at walang karapatang mangaral man lamang sa dahilang hindi man lamang nya nakita o narinig si Kristo! Kong ang mga Discipolo nga ni Kristo ay wala pang kakayahang tumanggap ng ARAL munla kay Kristo eh ang mangaral pa kaya? hehehehehehehe! huwag po tayong magpaloko sa mga KatAngahan nitong mga CFD na ito mga giliw na taga subaybay!
Ayan po ayun sa batayan ni muslim sino daw po ang may mas higit na karapatan mangaral yun nakakita kay Kristo o yung hindi..Binabalik lang po natin ang batayan nya kay muhammad..
Interesting po di ba?Pero asahan nyo na babaliwalain lang ni muslim ang post na ito..Mag copy-paste lang yan ng walang kwenta at walang kinalaman sa topic na binabanggit sa taas..
Simply Catholic said...
ReplyDeleteAyan po mga kababayan buong giting na naman na sumasagot ng pabalang na copy-paste itong si teroristang muslim..Pero simpleng katanungan natin sa kabilang post ay patuloy pa rin pong iniiwasan ni teroristang muslim..
CENON BIBE:
KUNG NAPANSIN po NINYO ay INALIS na NATIN ang mga WALANG KWENTANG COPY-PASTE ng mga BALIK ISLAM.
Hindi lang po kasi BASTOS ang mga BALIK ISLAM na NAKAKAUSAP NATIN DITO. SILA po ay MGA ABUSADO.
BINIBIGYAN NATIN SILA ng PAGKAKATAONG SUMAGOT at MAGPALIWANAG pero SA HALIP na SUMAGOT ay BINABABOY NILA ang BLOG NATIN.
AYAW daw NILA sa BABOY pero NASA UGALI NAMAN NILA ang UGALI ng BABOY.
MULA po NGAYON ay HINDI NA NATIN PAPAYAGAN ang PAMBABABOY at mga WALANG KWENTANG COPY-PASTE ng mga BALIK ISLAM, LALO NA kung WALANG KAUGNAYAN sa PINAG-UUSAPAN o NAPAG-USAPAN NATIN DITO.
Liban po sa PAGKABABOY sa ATING BLOG ay NAPAPANSIN po TIYAK NINYO na BUMABAGAL at NAGLULUKO ang BLOG SITE NATIN dahil sa DAMI ng WALANG KWENTANG COPY-PASTE ng mga BALIK ISLAM.
Iyan po ang HIRAP dito sa mga BALIK ISLAM: UMANIB SILA sa isang RELIHIYON na HINDI NILA KAYANG IPALIWANAG at HINDI NILA MAIPAGTANGGOL tapos ay magka-COPY-PASTE na lang SILA upang PAGTAKPAN ang KAPALPAKAN NILA.
HINDI na po IYAN PUWEDE NGAYON.
HINDI NA NATIN PAPAYAGAN ang mga PALUSOT na COPY-PASTE ng mga BALIK ISLAM.
HINDI na NATIN PAPALALAMPASIN ang PANG-AABUSO NILA.
PURO LANG iyan BASURANG PROPAGANDA para PAGTAKPAN ang KAPALPAKAN ng mga BALIK ISLAM.
Ang PAPAYAGAN na lang NATIN DITO ay ang REAKSYON na MAY KAUGNAYAN sa mga TOPIC NATIN DITO na KASALUKUYANG TINATALAKAY o NAKALIPAS NA.
SALAMAT po.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na HINDI MAKATUTOL sa SAGOT NATIN:
ReplyDeleteAno?! mga PARISEO daw ang tinutukoy sa Matt 15:9?! ito po ang nakasulat o nakasaad mula sa nasabing talata mga giliw na taga Subaybay; "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
CENON BIBE:
E di PATUNAYAN MO na HINDI mga PARISEO ang TINUTUMBOK sa Mt15:9.
HINDI po MATUTUTULAN ng BALIK ISLAM ang KATOTOHANAN na IYAN.
Ang GAGAWIN na lang NIYAN ay MAGPA-ULIT-ULIT ng OUT OF CONTEXT at BALUKTOT NIYANG UNAWA.
ANO po ang AASAHAN NATIN sa isang BALIK ISLAM?
LAHAT yata ng SINASABI at PINANINIWALAAN NILA ay BATAY sa MALING UNAWA at KASINUNGALINGAN.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na INUULIT-ULIT NA LANG ang BALUKTOT at OUT OF CONTEXT na UNAWA:
ReplyDeleteMatthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Ang mga PARISEO po ba mga giliw na taga subaybay na syang pinagbibentangan ngayon nitong MangMang at BobOng si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na sya daw pong tinutukoy mula sa Matt 15:9 bilang kanyang Palusot ay SUMASAMBA kaya sila kay Kristo? Nagtatanong lamang po!
CENON BIBE:
HINDI MO MAIPAKITA RITO ang KONTEKSTO ng Mt15:9, di ba?
ALAM MO kasi na MAPAPAHIYA KA, di ba?
WALA na pong BAGO RIYAN. PURO talaga KAHIHIYAN ang INAABOT ng mga BALIK ISLAM.
Sabi po sa Proverbs 3:35
"Honor is the possession of wise men, but FOOLS INHERIT SHAME."
Sa Pilipino:
"KARANGALAN ang PAG-AARI ng MARURUNONG, ngunit ang mga HANGAL ay NAGMAMANA ng KAHIHIYAN."
AYAN po, HANGAL dahil TUMALIKOD sa NAG-IISANG RELIHIYON na DIYOS MISMO ang NAGTAYO at UMANIB sa SAMAHANG HINDI NILA MAPATUNAYANG ITINAYO MISMO ng DIYOS.
Tingnan po NINYO, WALANG MAISAGOT sa mga SINASABI NATIN: HINDI MATUTULAN mula sa TAMANG KONTEKSTO ng Mt15:9 na MGA PARISEO ang TINUTUMBOK ni KRISTO.
Kahit sa TANONG ni SIMPLYCATHOLIC ay NAGTATAGO itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.
TUNAY po SABI ng BIBLIYA, ang mga HANGAL ay MAGMAMANA ng KAHIHIYAN.
Iyan po ang ISANG DAHILAN kung BAKIT GALIT na GALIT sa BIBLIYA ang mga BALIK ISLAM.
TINUTUMBOK KASI SILA ng BANAL na KASULATAN.
SABI po NATIN sa PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeleteHUWAG MONG IPAGPILITAN ang BALUKTOT at OUT OF CONTEXT MONG UNAWA.
BULAG KA BA na ang MT15:9 ay BAHAGI LANG ng ISANG BUONG CHAPTER?
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
Palusot mo na lamang yan Demon este Cenon Bibge pala, eh Tumbok na tumbok ka sa KatAngahan mo ngayon eh! Matthew 15:9 lang hindi mo pa makuhang UNAWAIN napakaBobO mo talaga! Sarili mong Bibliya MangMang ka!
CENON BIBE:
Ang DEPENSA NINYONG mga BALIK ISLAM ay KAPALAN na lang ang MGA MUKHA NINYO.
NAUUNAWAAN KO ang Mt15:9. NAIPAKITA KO nga at NAIPALIWANAG ang BUONG KONTEKSTO, pati ang PINAGKUNAN ni HESUS ng QUOTATION na IYAN e.
E KAYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM? ANO ang NAIPAKITA NINYONG KONTEKSTO sa PALIWANAG NINYO?
WALA.
NAGBALIK ISLAM KAYO para lang MAPAKAPAL NINYO ang mga MUKHA NINYO.
KAWAWA KAYO.
NAGPALOKO na KAYO sa SINUNGALING na si AHMED DEEDAT tapos ngayon ay KAYO NA ang LUMULOKO sa mga SARILI NINYO.
NAKAKAAWA KAYO.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na HINDI MAKATUTOL sa PALIWANAG NATIN sa Mt15:9:
ReplyDeleteBueno po bayaan po natin ang mga Tao na po mismo na gamit ang kanilang mga UTAK at tamang PAG-IISIP ang magbabasa dito sa dalawang TalaTa na ito at Humusga mula sA Palusot mo Demon este Cenon Bibe pala!
CENON BIBE:
PINATATAWANAN NA KAYO ng mga TAO.
Sabay niyan ay NAAAWA SILA sa INYO.
NILOLOKO na lang NINYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM ang MGA MUKHA NINYO.
PAKIUSAP LANG, IRESPETO NAMAN NINYO ang INYONG MGA SARILI.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
ReplyDeletePero ganon pa man Husgahan po natin ang kanyang PALUSOT mga giliw na taga subaybay!
Ito po and I quote;
ISAIAH 29:13 (pinagMulan ng sinipi ni Kristo!)
"Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:
Matthew 15:9
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
Sino po ba ang nangungusap mula sa talata na yan ISAIAH 29:13 mga giliw na taga subaybay? Ang nangungusap po dyan mga giliw na taga subaybay ay ang TUNAY TUTOO at nagIISANG Dios na syang nag utus kay Kristo tungo sa mga nawawalang tupa ng bahay ng Israel.
CENON BIBE:
TAKE NOTE po: HINDI NATUTULAN ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na SINIPI ng PANGINOONG HESUS ang ISAIAH 29:13.
Katunayan, UMAYON po ang PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM sa SINABI NATIN na ang Mt15:9 ay SINIPI ng PANGINOONG HESUS sa Is29:13.
PURIHIN si KRISTO! PURIHIN ang DIYOS!
MISMONG ang BALIK ISLAM ang NAGPATUNAY at NAGPATOTOO na TAMA ang SINABI NATIN DITO.
PURIHIN si HESUS! PURIHIN ang DIYOS!
Ngayon, SINUBUKAN po nitong BALIK ISLAM na MAGPALUSOT pero PUMALPAK po SIYA.
SINUBUKAN NIYANG ILAYO at ILIHIS ang USAPAN.
Ayon sa KANYA, ang NAG-IISANG TUNAY na DIYOS ang NAGSALITA sa Is29:13.
Bakit po? KAILAN po NAGING ISYU IYAN?
HINDI po IYAN ang ISYU.
Ang ISYU ay GALING ba sa Is 29:13 ang SINABI ni KRISTO sa Mt15:9.
At MISMONG ang BALIK ISLAM ang NAGPATUNAY na TAMA TAYO na GALING sa Is29:13 ang SINABI ng PANGINOON sa Mt15:9.
HINDI rin NATUTULAN ng BALIK ISLAM na ang PROPETA NILA ang TINUMBOK NILA noong GAMITIN NILA ang Is29:12 bilang TUMUTUKOY raw sa KANILANG PROPETA.
IPINAHIYA NILA ang PROPETA NILA.
HINDI TALAGA NAG-IISIP ang mga BALIK ISLAM na ITO. SARILING PROPETA NILA ay PINALABAS NILANG PURO DALDAL LANG ang PAGSAMBA sa DIYOS at ang ARAL daw ng PROPETA NILA ay ARAL LANG ng TAO.
Sabi ko na po, KALAWANG ng ISLAM itong mga BALIK ISLAM.
BALIK ISLAM na LITUNG-LITO NA sa PAGDADAHILAN:
ReplyDeleteSino po ba ang nangungusap mula sa talata na yan ISAIAH 29:13 mga giliw na taga subaybay? Ang nangungusap po dyan mga giliw na taga subaybay ay ang TUNAY TUTOO at nagIISANG Dios na syang nag utus kay Kristo tungo sa mga nawawalang tupa ng bahay ng Israel.
Matthew 15:24
"But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
CENON BIBE:
SO? E ANO NGAYON kung DIYOS MISMO ang NAGSABI ng nasa Is29:13? ANO rin ang KAUGNAYAN ng Mt15:24 sa ISYU na PINAG-UUSAPAN NATIN?
NAPATUNAYAN po ba ng BALIK ISLAM na HINDI GALING sa Is29:13 ang Mt15:9?
HINDI po.
PILIT na lang NAGHAHANAP ng SASABIHIN itong BALIK ISLAM dahil HINDI NIYA MATUTULAN ang SINABI NATIN na ang Mt15:9 at GALING sa Is29:13 at TUMUTUKOY sa mga HUDYO at HINDI sa mga KRISTIYANO.
Pero SALAMAT po sa BALIK ISLAM dahil BINANGGIT NIYA ang Mt15:24.
IYAN po ISA PANG PATUNAY na si KRISTO at HINDI ang PROPETA MUHAMMAD NILA ang PROPETA na IBABANGON ng DIYOS para sa mga ISRAELITA batay na rin sa Deut 18:18.
Paki SUNDAN po ang PALIWANAG sa SUSUNOD na ARTIKULO.
SALAMAT po.
BALIK ISLAM na NAGHAHANAP NA LANG ng PALUSOT:
ReplyDeleteMatthew 15:24
"But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
samantalang ang Matthew 15:9 ay Pangungusap yan na nagmula mismo kay Kristo! Kasi po may higit kailan man kay Kristo na syang nagsugo sa kanya!
John 13:16
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him."
CENON BIBE:
SO? E ANO NGAYON? NASAAN ang PATUNAY na MALI TAYO sa SINABI NATIN na ang Mt15:9 ay GALING sa Is29:13?
WALA pong MAITUTOL at WALANG MAISAGOT ang BALIK ISLAM kaya KUNG ANU-ANO NA LANG ang SINASABI NIYA para lang MAILAYO ang USAPAN.
OBVIOUS po ba?
Pero SALAMAT po sa KANYA dahil sa pamamagitan ng mga TALATANG IBINIGAY NIYA ay MAPATUTUNAYAN NATIN na si KRISTO ang PROPETANG TINUTUKOY sa Deut 18:18 at HINDI ang PROPETA NILA.
Paki ABANGAN po sa SUSUNOD na ARTIKULO.
BALIK ISLAM na DESPERADONG ILAYO ang USAPAN dahil HINDI SIYA MAKASAGOT at HINDI MAKATUTOL:
ReplyDeleteNgayon kapantay po ba si Kristo sa TUNAY TOTOO at Nag-IISANG Dios na syang Nagsugo sa kanya mga giliw na taga subaybay? Katotohanan ito pa po ang mga sinasabi ni Kristo patunay na mayroon po lamang NAG-IISA at Tunay na Dios!
Matthew 19:
16
And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17
And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but ONE that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
CENON BIBE:
NASAAN po sa Mt19:16-17 SINABI na HINDI PANTAY ang DIYOS AMA at DIYOS ANAK?
WALA po.
NAG-IILUSYON NA NAMAN po ang BALIK ISLAM.
HINDI po porke SINABI ni HESUS na ang AMA LANG ang "MABUTI" ay nangangahulugan nang HINDI MABUTI si HESUS.
Una, IPINAKIKITA lang po ng PANGINOONG HESUS ang pagiging MAPAGKUMBABA NIYA.
HINDI NIYA GUSTONG KUNIN ang PAPURI at SINASABI NIYA sa mga TAO na ang DAPAT PURIHIN ay ang DIYOS AMA. GANOON po ang mga MABUBUTING ANAK, ang PAPURI ay IBINIBIGAY sa MAGULANG at HINDI sa SARILI.
Pangalawa, HINDI po PAGPANTAY sa DIYOS ang PINAG-UUSAPAN sa Mt19:16-17. IPINAPAKITA LANG po RIYAN ang PAGBIBIGAY PURI ni HESUS sa KANYANG AMA.
Ganoon po yon.
SABI po NATIN:
ReplyDeleteHINDI po riyan IPINAKIKITA na si PABLO ang NAGSULAT ng ACTS.
Sa ACTS 26:1 pa lang po ay MALINAW na kino-QUOTE LANG si PABLO e.
BALIK ISLAM na HINDI MAKASAGOT:
bakit ang Bibliya nyo ba isang PUZZLE? na may mga itinaTago pa? ang toto po bang salita ng Dios ay may mga itinatago? bueno po bayaan po natin na Bibliya mismo ang sasagot mula sa KatAngahang Palusot na ito ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;
CENON BIBE:
ANO namang PUZZLE yang SINASABI MO? ANO ang DAPAT ITAGO?
LITUNG-LITO na naman po itong BALIK ISLAM kaya KUNG ANU-ANO na lang ang SINASABI.
Kaya nga NAG-UULAT ang BIBLIYA--kasama na si LUCAS na NAG-ULAT sa mga MISMONG SINABI ni PABLO--ay DAHIL NAGLALAHAD ITO ng KATOTOHANAN. Tapos, sa ISIP pala nitong BALIK ISLAM ay MAY GUSTONG ITAGO kaya NAGLALAHAD ng mga PANGYAYARI.
BALUKTOT at BALIKTAD po TALAGA ang ISIP nitong BALIK ISLAM.
Ngayon, kung MAY GUSTONG ITAGO ang BIBLIYA ay IPINAGBABAWAL DAPAT ang PAGSASALIN NITO sa IBANG WIKA.
Ang kaso po ay DIYOS MISMO ang NAG-UTOS na IPAHAYAG ang MABUTING BALITA sa LAHAT ng BANSA. Ibig sabihin ay PUWEDE ITONG ISALIN sa LAHAT ng WIKA.
HINDI TAKOT ang MGA KRISTIYANO na MAISALIN sa LAHAT ng WIKA ang BIBLIYA dahil WALA ITONG ITINATAGO.
E ang QURAN kaya? BAKIT IPINAGBABAWAL ang PAGSASALIN NITO sa IBANG WIKA?
IYAN ang DAPAT SAGUTIN NITONG BALIK ISLAM.
Kung ANU-ANONG BINTANG ang GINAGAWA NIYA sa BIBLIYA e AKLAT MISMO NIYA ay NAKATAGO sa mga HINDI ARABO.
BALIKTAD po talaga ang UTAK nitong BALIK ISLAM na ITO.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na LITUNG-LITO NA kaya KUNG ANU-ANO NA LANG ang SINASABI:
ReplyDeletePapaano ngayon ipaliliwanag nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na totong salita ng Dios ang mga nakasaad dyan kong ganito naman pala na may mga itinaTago? hehehehehehehe! Nabuking ka tuloy! hehehehe!
CENON BIBE:
SINO ang MAY SABI na MAY ITINATAGO ang BIBLIYA?
NAG-IMBENTO na naman po ng MALING KWENTO itong BALIK ISLAM tapos ang GAWA-GAWA NIYANG KWENTO ang INATAKE NIYA.
Ang BIBLIYA PUWEDENG MAISALIN sa LAHAT ng WIKA para MAUNAWAAN ng LAHAT ng TAO.
BIBLIYA po ba ang NABUKING?
Hindi po ba QURAN ang NATUMBOK nitong BALIK ISLAM?
Kapag MAY ITINATAGO raw ay HINDI TUNAY na SALITA ng DIYOS?
E bakit nga NAKATAGO ang QURAN sa WIKANG ARABO? BAKIT HINDI PUWEDENG ISALIN ang QURAN sa MGA WIKA na PUWEDENG MAUNAWAAN ng NAKARARAMING TAO?
Sa mga NAKALIPAS nating BLOG ay IPINAHIYA nitong BALIK ISLAM ang PROPETA NILA.
Ngayon po ay ang QURAN naman ang TINUMBOK at IPINAHIYA nitong BALIK ISLAM.
Mantakin ninyong IBINUBUKING pa ngayon nitong BALIK ISLAM na HINDI TOTOONG SALITA ng DIYOS ang AKLAT NILA dahil NAKATAGO ITO sa MGA HINDI ARABO.
HINDI talaga NAG-IISIP ang BALIK ISLAM na ITO.
MAGALING LANG MAGMARUNONG. WALA kasing UTAK.
PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na NAGPAPAKA-IGNORANTE:
ReplyDeleteTanga kaba talaga? Nakakaunawa ka ba ng SIMPLING english? Ito ba at ganito ba dapat ang mga Sulat ni Lucas?! Ha? ang Tanga mo TalagA!
"as I went to Damascus (sino daw po ang pumunta sa Damascus, si Lucas po ba?)
I saw in the way a light from heaven (sino daw po ang nakakita ng LIGHT si Lucas po ba?)
when we were all fallen to the earth (kasama ba si Lucas dyan o si Lucas po ba mismo ang nAgkwento dyan?!)
CENON BIBE:
IBINANDERA po nitong BALIK ISLAM ang pagiging IGNORANTE NIYA.
MANGMANG po pala siya sa tinatawag na DIRECT QUOTATION o DIREKTANG SIPI.
IPINAKITA po nitong NAGMAMARUNONG na BALIK ISLAM na IGNORANTE SIYA kung ANO ang KWENTO.
Sa KWENTO po ay MAKIKITA NATIN na MAY NAGKUKWENTO at maraming pagkakataon na DIREKTANG SINISIPI ng NAGKUKWENTO ang MISMONG SALITA ng IKINUKWENTO NIYA.
Iyan po ang HIRAP na IGNORANTE ang KAUSAP NATIN. SIMPLENG BAGAY ay HINDI NIYA ALAM.
Ngayon, PILIT pa NIYA TAYONG NILOLOKO.
Yung DIRECT QUOTES lang ang BINABASA NIYA pero YUNG PAGKUKUWENTO ni LUCAS ay HINDI NIYA IPINAKITA.
Bakit po?
PARA po LINLANGIN TAYO. PARA po LOKOHIN TAYO.
Ang AKALA naman nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ay MAGPAPALOKO TAYO.
Hindi porke NAGPALOKO SIYA ay MAKAKALOKO na rin SIYA.
OO, MARAMING TULAD NIYANG MANGMANG na NAPANIWALA sa mga KAMANGMANGAN NILA pero HINDI po TAYO KASAMA sa mga IYON.
Yung mga NAPANIWALA ng PANLOLOKO NILA ay malamang na BALIK ISLAM na rin ngayon.
TAMA po ang KASABIHAN, BIRDS of the SAME FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER: SILA-SILANG mga NAGPALOKO sa MALI ay SAMA-SAMA sa KALOKOHANG PINASOK NILA.