Muslim Desperado: Fake News vs Katoliko Pinaniwalaan

TUMITINDI po ang pagiging DESPERADO ng mga MUSLIM na UMAATAKE sa KATOLIKO at sa BIBLE.

Noon po ay BINABALUKTOT LANG NILA ang mga TALATA ng BIBLIYA. Ngayon, pati FAKE NEWS o IMBENTONG BALITA LABAN sa KATOLIKO ay PINAPATULAN NA NILA.

Bunga po yan ang KAWALAN NILA ng SAGOT sa mga PAGTUTUWID NATIN sa mga KAMALIANG IKINAKALAT NILA LABAN sa SIMBAHAN at sa BIBLIYA.

+++

Narito po ang POST ng isang MUSLIM na NAGPAKILALA bilang MARTY SAN GABRIEL.

Ito ang hinahanap mong Bago brod CEBON BIBE NEW este NEWS talaga yan1 hahaha!

ah bago ba ang gusto ng Supot na ito na si Cenon Bibe?

Ok Supot di na Maliban sa Pagiging Luciferian (ayan po ang link paki copy paste na lamang po)
https://youtu.be/2eHVXmT4weM

ng Simbahang Kantotliko, ito at may bago na namang pakulo ang Santo Papa ninyo Supot! 

Pope Francis has surprised the world today by announcing that The Bible is totally outdated and needs a radical change, so The Bible is officially canceled and it’s announced a meeting between the highest personalities of the church where it will be decided the book that will replace it, its name and its content. 

(paki copy paste po ang link na yan sa ibaba)https://thereisnews.com/pope-francis-cancels-bible/

+++

A. BIBLE 'CANCELLED' NA?

NAPAPANGITI na lang po TAYO sa PAGPUPUMILIT ng mga MUSLIM na SIRAAN ang KATOLIKO at ang BIBLIYA.

Sa POST ng Muslim ay sinabi raw ng Santo Papa na "TOTALLY OUTDATED" na ang BIBLE.

Idinagdag pa ng Muslim na sinabi pa raw ng Papa na kailangan ng Banal na Kasulatan ng "radical CHANGE, so The Bible is OFFICIALLY CANCELLED."

Siguro po ay NAGLULULUNDAG sa TUWA ang mga MUSLIM dahil AKALA NILA ay NAKAPUNTOS SILA.

Sana po ay NATUWA NA SILA dahil ITUTUWID NA NAMAN NATIN ang KANILANG KAMALIAN at PANINIRA.

+++

B. THEREISNEWS.COM

SABI po ng MUSLIM ay i-COPY PASTE daw po ang LINK na IBINIGAY NIYA kaugnay sa ATAKE NILA.

Heto po yung LINK:
https://thereisnews.com/pope-francis-cancels-bible/

Paki CLICK po NINYO ang LINK na iyan na IBINIGAY NILA para hindi na kayo mag-copy paste.

MAKIKITA po NINYO na PUPUNTA KAYO sa WEBSITE ng "THEREISNEWS.COM" at MAKIKITA pa ninyo ang "ISTORYA" tungkol sa PAPA at ang pag-"CANCEL" NIYA sa BIBLIYA.

Ayan po. MERON nga pong "ISTORYA."

MABABASA rin po NINYO riyan ang KWENTONG ITO:

Pope Francis has surprised the world today by announcing that The Bible is totally outdated and needs a radical change, so The Bible is officially canceled and it’s announced a meeting between the highest personalities of the church where it will be decided the book that will replace it, its name and its content. 

Some names are already being considered and the one that has more strength is “Biblia 2000”. 

“We can not keep trying to talk our public in a totally new world with a book that has thousands years. We are losing followers and we have to go a step further in the search for the modernization of the church. to rewrite the word of God, even if it is only the Old Testament, in which there are certain passages that it is better not to repeat. ” 

The news has fallen like a bomb among the most conservative, who consider this idea the definitive clue of madness of Pope Francis.

NAKAKASINDAK po ba?

HUWAG po muna KAYONG MASINDAK. FAKE NEWS po yan.

+++

C. FICTION AT JOKE LANG

Kung PUPUNTA po kayo sa ILALIM ng WEBSITE ay MAKIKITA NINYO ang mga salitang "TAGS" at "PAGES."

Sa ILALIM po ng "PAGES" ay ang mga salitang "LEGAL WARGING."

I-CLICK po ninyo ang "LEGAL WARGING" at DADALHIN kayo sa isang LINK kung saan MABABASA NINYO kung ANO ang WEBSITE na "THEREISNEWS.COM"

Ito po ang MAKIKITA NINYO sa LINK:

Ang nasa UNANG BAHAGI po ng "LEGAL WARGING" na yan ay ganito ang SINASABI:

"The site “There is news” (https://thereisnews.com) (hereinafter referred to as TIN) is a humor site whose purpose is entertainment. 

"The content of TIN is fiction and does not correspond to reality. 

"All references, names, brands or institutions that appear on the site are used as contextual elements, as in any novel or fiction account."

"HUMOR SITE" daw po ang THEREISNEWS.COM na BATAYAN ng PANINIRA ng MUSLIM sa KATOLIKO at sa BIBLE. Sa madaling salita ay KATATAWANAN o KALOKOHAN.

"FICTION" din daw po ang NILALAMAN ng WEBSITE na YAN.

Ibig sabihin, ang PAMBATIKOS ng MUSLIM sa KATOLIKO at sa BIBLE ay GAWA-GAWA at KALOKOHAN lang.

+++

D. MUSLIM DESPERADO

GANYAN po KADESPERADO NA ang mga MUSLIM na UMAATAKE sa mga KRISTIYANO at sa BANAL na KASULATAN.

HINDI NILA KAYANG TUTULAN o PASINUNGALINGAN ang mga PAGTUTUWID NATIN sa KANILA kaya pati mga FAKE NEWS ay PINAPATULAN na NILA.

Sabagay, NOON pa naman po ay PURO NA IMBENTO at KASINUNGALINGAN ang IBINABATO NILA sa ATIN. WALA NANG BAGO sa KANILA.

Quran: Was The Book 'Sent Down' to Muhammad?

MUSLIMS who attack the Bible and Christianity claim that the Holy Book is man-made. They then claim that only the Quran is God's true word.

Muslim even boast that the QURAN was "NEVER ALTERED, NEVER CHANGED" from the time that Allah "SENT DOWN" THE BOOK to their prophet. They say, "NOT A LETTER" was added or removed from that time.

However, TWO HADITHS or EARLY TRADITIONS of ISLAM TELL a DIFFERENT STORY, which CONTRADICTS the claims of Muslims about the Quran.

+++

A. THE BOOK 'SENT DOWN'?

The Quran says in at least 25 verses that it was "THE BOOK" that was "SENT DOWN" by God to Islam's prophet and to mankind.

In Quran 2:176, it says:

"That is because Allah has SENT DOWN THE BOOK (the QUR'AN) in truth. And verily, those who disputed as regards the book are far away in opposition."

Quran 3:3 states:

"It is He Who has SEND DOWN THE BOOK (the QUR'AN) to you (O MUHAMMAD صلى الله عليه وسلم) with truth, confirming what came before it. And He sent down the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel),"

Also, in Quran 4:136

"O you who believe! Believe in Allah, and His Messenger (MUHAMMAD صلى الله عليه وسلم), and THE BOOK (the QUR'AN) which He has SENT DOWN TO HIS MESSENGER, and the Scripture which He sent down to those before (him); and whosoever disbelieves in Allah, His Angels, His books, His Messengers, and the Last Day, then indeed he has strayed far away."

These three verses claim that Allah SENT DOWN THE BOOK to MUHAMMAD. Meaning, MUHAMMAD RECEIVED THE BOOK of the QURAN -- the SAME BOOK that MUSLIMS claim to POSSESS today.

But TWO AUTHETIC, or SAHIH, TRADITIONS of ISLAM tell us that THERE WAS NO BOOK of the QURAN even after their prophet died.

One of the Hadiths even say that Muhammad DID NOT EVEN COLLECT the DIFFERENT PARTS of the QURAN; and there WAS NO SINGLE MANUSCRIPT of the Quran, much less a BOOK to talk about.

+++

B. ISLAMIC TRADITION

A HADITH is an Islamic tradition related to their prophet Muhammad. It claims as its sources primarily Muhammad and then the early Muslims whose words or testimonies were orally transmitted then later collected by Islamic clerics.

The Hadith provides later generations, scholars and students a view of EARLY ISLAM -- from the time of Muhammad to several Islamic generations after him.

It is categorized into three: SAHIH or AUTHENTIC, HASAN or GOOD, and DA-IF or WEAK.

One AUTHENTIC HADITH is the collection made by IMAM MUHAMMAD AL-BUKHARI, who is well-known and highly accepted by Muslims, according to the Islamic website SUNNAH.COM.

And among the AUTHENTIC HADITHS is SAHIH HADITH BUKHARI 60:201.

+++

C. SAHIH HADITH BUKHARI 60:201 (numbering provided to facilitate reading)

1. Narrated Zaid bin Thabit Al-Ansari: who was one of those who used to write the Divine Revelation: Abu Bakr sent for me after the (heavy) casualties among the warriors (of the battle) of Yamama (where a great number of Qurra' were killed).

2. 'Umar was present with Abu Bakr who said, 'Umar has come to me and said, The people have suffered heavy casualties on the day of (the battle of) Yamama, and I am afraid that there will be more casualties among the Qurra' (those who know the Qur'an by heart) at other battle-fields, whereby a large part of the Qur'an may be lost, unless you collect it. And I am of the opinion that you should COLLECT THE QUR'AN."

3. Abu Bakr added, "I said to 'Umar, 'HOW CAN I DO SOMETHING which ALLAH'S APOSTLE HAS NOT DONE?'

4. 'Umar said (to me), 'By Allah, it is (really) a good thing.'

5. So 'Umar kept on pressing, trying to persuade me to accept his proposal, till Allah opened my bosom for it and I had the same opinion as 'Umar."

6. (Zaid bin Thabit added:) Umar was sitting with him (Abu Bakr) and was not speaking. me). "You are a wise young man and we do not suspect you (of telling lies or of forgetfulness): and you used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle. Therefore, LOOK FOR THE QUR'AN and COLLECT IT (IN ONE MANUSCRIPT).

7. "By Allah, if he (Abu Bakr) had ordered me to shift one of the mountains (from its place) it would not have been harder for me than what he had ordered me concerning the collection of the Qur'an. I said to both of them, "HOW DARE YOU DO A THING which THE PROPHET HAS NOT DONE?"

8. Abu Bakr said, "By Allah, it is (really) a good thing. So I kept on arguing with him about it till Allah opened my bosom for that which He had opened the bosoms of Abu Bakr and Umar.

9. So I started locating Quranic material and collecting it from parchments, scapula, leaf-stalks of date palms and from the memories of men (who knew it by heart).

10. I found with Khuzaima two Verses of Surat-at-Tauba which I had not found with anybody else, (and they were):-- "Verily there has come to you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty He (Muhammad) is ardently anxious over you (to be rightly guided)" (9.128)

11. The manuscript on which the Quran was collected, remained with Abu Bakr till Allah took him unto Him, and then with 'Umar till Allah took him unto Him, and finally it remained with Hafsa, Umar's daughter.

+++

D. NO BOOK OF THE QURAN

The context of Bukhari 60:201 was AFTER THE DEATH of Islam's prophet in 632 AD. That's why Islam was already being led by ABU BAKR, the first Muslim caliph.

In No. 2 of BUKHARI 60:201, UMAR, a senior companion of Islam's prophet, approached Abu Bakr and expressed FEAR that "a large part of the Qur'an may be lost" because people "who knew the Quran by heart" were dying on the battlefield.

This is the first indication in the hadith that NO BOOK OF THE QURAN had been "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet as stated in the Quran.

Had THE BOOK of the QURAN been "SENT DOWN" to Muhammad, Umar would have had nothing to fear. They would just have to protect THE BOOK and have it copied (as another Muslim caliph would do later after ordering the REWRITING of the Quran).

The second indication that THE BOOK of the Quran was NOT SENT DOWN to Islam's prophet is UMAR WANTED ABU BAKR to "COLLECT THE QURAN."

Why would Umar demand the COLLECTION of the QURAN when THE BOOK was already "SENT DOWN" to Muhammad? Would the COLLECTION of the QURAN be BETTER than THE BOOK that was "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet?

Could it be that Umar wanted the Quran COLLECTED because THERE WAS NO BOOK of the Quran at that time? THE BOOK of the QURAN was NOT really SENT DOWN to Islam's prophet? THERE WAS NO BOOK SENT DOWN to MUSLIMS -- in CONTRAST to what the Quran says in several of its verses?

+++

E. NO SINGLE QURANIC MANUSCRIPT

Notice the reaction of Abu Bakr in No. 3, where he exclaims: "HOW CAN I DO SOMETHING which ALLAH'S APOSTLE HAS NOT DONE?"

WHAT?! Even Muhammad DID NOT HAVE the QURANIC "REVELATIONS" COLLECTED and WRITTEN in ONE MANUSCRIPT?

No wonder Abu Bakr PROTESTED. It would have made him appear BETTER than their prophet.

But then, Abu Bakr allowed Umar to CONVINCE him to do something that THEIR PROPHET DID NOT DO.

In the hadith, Abu Bakr claims that "Allah opened my bosom for it."

But doesn't that make it appear that ALLAH NEVER "OPENED THE BOSOM" of ISLAM'S PROPHET to COLLECT the QURAN into ONE MANUSCRIPT?

Did Abu Bakr claim to HAVE A BETTER "REVELATION" than WHAT THEIR PROPHET HAD?

+++

F. MUHAMMAD DID NOT DO IT

After ABU BAKR claimed that "Allah opened my bosom" to COLLECT the QURAN, he appointed a scribe named ZAID BIN THABIT to "COLLECT" the Quran and PUT IT in ONE MANUSCRIPT. (No. 6)

Zaid bin Thabit, who is described as Muhammad's "personal scribe," PROTESTED the ORDER of Abu Bakr.

In No. 7, we read Zaid bin Thabit's reaction: "HOW DARE YOU DO A THING which THE PROPHET HAS NOT DONE?"

As a scribe who "used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle (No. 6)," Zaid bin Thabit knew that Islam's prophet NEVER HAD the QURAN COLLECTED in ONE MANUSCRIPT.

The FACT that Muhammad had a SCRIBE to WRITE DOWN "Divine Inspiration" for Islam's prophet is another indication that THE BOOK of the QURAN was NOT "SENT DOWN" to HIM.

Why WRITE DOWN QURANIC "REVELATIONS" when THE BOOK had already been "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet?

Now, the FACT that Islam's prophet DID NOT COLLECT the QURANIC MATERIALS point to him NOT EVEN THINKING of HAVING IT IN ONE MANUSCRIPT or even ONE BOOK.

So, WHAT "BOOK" is the QURAN REFERRING TO when it says "THE BOOK" was "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet?

ABU BAKR, UMAR and ZAID BIN THABIT were NOT AWARE of "THE BOOK" of the QURAN when they were still alive.

Did Abu Bakr and Umar DECIDE to HAVE the QURAN COLLECTED precisely because there was NO BOOK of the QURAN that was "SENT DOWN" to their prophet?

Had there been THE BOOK of the QURAN that was "SENT DOWN" to Muhammad, Abu Bakr and Umar would have CONTRADICTED IT by having the QURAN COLLECTED, right?

+++

G. QURAN FINALLY COLLECTED IN ONE MANUSCRIPT

Despite his own protestations, ZAID BIN THABIT was CONVINCED by Abu Bakr to COLLECT the QURAN. He claimed that "Allah opened my bosom." (No. 8)

Like Abu Bakr, Zaid bin Thabit appear to have claimed that HE RECEIVED A REVELATION to COLLECT the QURAN -- something that ISLAM'S PROPHET DID NOT DO. (No. 7)

In No. 9, Zaid bin Thabit said, "I started locating Quranic material and collecting it from PARCHMENTS, SCAPULA, LEAF STALKS of DATE PALMS and from the MEMORIES OF MEN (who knew it by heart)."

It was only then that the Quran was COLLECTED in ONE MANUSCRIPT. (No. 11)

Those parts of Hadith Bukhari 60:201 are more indicators that THE BOOK of the QURAN was NOT "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet as stated by the Quran.

Why would early Muslims WRITE DOWN Quranic material on "parchments, scapula, leaf stalks" and have them in "the memories of men" if THE BOOK had already been "SENT DOWN" to Muhammad?

Why was there a need to COLLECT the Quranic materials if THE BOOK had already been SENT DOWN to MUSLIMS?

If the Quran is to be believed, Zaid bin Thabit should have just TAKEN THE BOOK of the QURAN that was "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet and COPIED IT. Right?

Why didn't Zaid bin Thabit just GET THE BOOK which the QURAN says was "SENT DOWN" to Islam's prophet? Is it because THERE WAS REALLY NO BOOK SENT DOWN to MUHAMMAD?

+++

H. THE BOOK SENT DOWN OR NOT?

Now, the questions arise about what to believe: Should the QURAN be believed that "ALLAH SENT DOWN THE BOOK" of the QURAN to ISLAM'S PROPHET?

Or should SAHIH HADITH BUKHARI 60:201 be believed pointing to the OPPOSITE of what the Quran is saying?

Can the QURAN and the HADITH be both telling the truth when they TELL OPPOSING CLAIMS pertaining to very CLEAR FACTS?

The DECISION now rests on the READER.

Quran: Where did The Book come from?

SOME Muslims have been attacking the BIBLE as "corrupt" while trying to promote the QURAN as "the word of God."


In our conversations with Muslims, they proved that the Quran is NOT the word of God. They claim that God -- Allah in Arabic -- NEVER SPOKE to any man, which includes their prophet, Muhammad. Therefore, it was NOT GOD who gave the Quran to Muslims.

Muslims claimed that it was "angel GABRIEL" (JIBRIL in Arabic) that "revealed" the Quran to ISLAM's prophet.
However, they failed to prove that "angel Gabriel" revealed the Quran to their prophet. Muslims were NOT ABLE to PRODUCE TWO WITNESSES, as required by the Quran, to prove their claim. Thus, the conclusion was that NO ANGEL REVEALED the QURAN.

Despite those facts, MUSLIMS insist that the QURAN "came from God" and that "THE BOOK" of the QURAN was "given by Allah" Himself to Muhammad.

So, the question arises: If God never gave the Quran to man and NO ANGEL revealed it to Islam's prophet, where did THE BOOK of the QURAN come from?

+++

From the Quran itself, in at least 25 verses, it says that God or Allah "SENT DOWN THE BOOK of the QURAN" to Islam's prophet and to mankind.

For example, Quran 3:3 says,

“It is He Who has sent down the book (the Qur'an) to you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) with truth, confirming what came before it. And He sent down the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel).

And in Quran 39:41, we can read:

Verily, We have sent down to you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) the book (this Qur'an) for mankind in truth. So whosoever accepts the guidance, it is only for his ownself, and whosoever goes astray, he goes astray only for his (own) loss. And you (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) are not a Wakil (trustee or disposer of affairs, or guardian) over them.So, the Quran says that THE BOOK of the QURAN "was SENT DOWN" from God and was GIVEN to Islam's prophet, Muhammad.

Is this true?

The HADITH or the TRADITION of ISLAM'S PROPHET DISAGREES.

+++

Two HADITHS, which show the early history of Islam and of the QURAN, relate how THE BOOK of Islam was COLLECTED, COMPILED, REWRITTEN and MADE INTO ONE BOOK.

These are SAHIH HADITH BUKHARI 60:201 and SAHIH HADITH BUKHARI 61:510.

The HADITHS DO NOT SHOW that THE BOOK of the QURAN was "SENT DOWN" from Allah, but REVEAL HOW THE BOOK was made by early Muslims.

You may READ these HADITHS by CLICKING on the LINK below:

QURAN: Islamic tradition reveals how The Book was made

QURAN: Islamic tradition reveals how The Book was made

SOME Muslims who are attacking the Bible and Christianity are showing interest in two HADITHS, or Islamic traditions.

One of the Muslims posted these Hadiths on our comments section.

These Hadiths narrate the EARLY HISTORY of the QURAN: how it was COLLECTED into ONE MANUSCRIPT then later REWRITTEN into ONE BOOK.

Allow me to post the HADITHS for our readers to see HOW THE QURAN was FORMED during the early years of ISLAM.

+++

First is HADITH SAHIH BUKHARI 60:201, which narrates how a companion of Islam's prophet, ZAID BIN THABIT, was ORDERED by ISLAM'S FIRST CALIPH, ABU BAKR, to COLLECT the QURAN into ONE MANUSCRIPT.

This HADITH shows that THERE WAS NO BOOK of the QURAN AFTER ISLAM'S PROPHET HAD DIED.

+++

Hadith Sahih Bukhari 60:201
Narrated Zaid bin Thabit Al-Ansari: who was one of those who used to write the Divine Revelation: Abu Bakr sent for me after the (heavy) casualties among the warriors (of the battle) of Yamama (where a great number of Qurra' were killed).

'Umar was present with Abu Bakr who said, 'Umar has come to me and said, The people have suffered heavy casualties on the day of (the battle of) Yamama, and I am afraid that there will be more casualties among the Qurra' (those who know the Qur'an by heart) at other battle-fields, whereby a large part of the Qur'an may be lost, unless you collect it. And I am of the opinion that you should COLLECT THE QUR'AN."

Abu Bakr added, "I said to 'Umar, 'HOW CAN I DO SOMETHING which ALLAH'S APOSTLE HAS NOT DONE?'

'Umar said (to me), 'By Allah, it is (really) a good thing.'

So 'Umar kept on pressing, trying to persuade me to accept his proposal, till Allah opened my bosom for it and I had the same opinion as 'Umar."

(Zaid bin Thabit added:) Umar was sitting with him (Abu Bakr) and was not speaking. me). "You are a wise young man and we do not suspect you (of telling lies or of forgetfulness): and you used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle. Therefore, LOOK FOR THE QUR'AN and COLLECT IT (IN ONE MANUSCRIPT).

"By Allah, if he (Abu Bakr) had ordered me to shift one of the mountains (from its place) it would not have been harder for me than what he had ordered me concerning the collection of the Qur'an. I said to both of them, "HOW DARE YOU DO A THING which THE PROPHET HAS NOT DONE?"

Abu Bakr said, "By Allah, it is (really) a good thing. So I kept on arguing with him about it till Allah opened my bosom for that which He had opened the bosoms of Abu Bakr and Umar.

So I started locating Quranic material and collecting it from parchments, scapula, leaf-stalks of date palms and from the memories of men (who knew it by heart).

I found with Khuzaima two Verses of Surat-at-Tauba which I had not found with anybody else, (and they were):-- "Verily there has come to you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty He (Muhammad) is ardently anxious over you (to be rightly guided)" (9.128)

The manuscript on which the Quran was collected, remained with Abu Bakr till Allah took him unto Him, and then with 'Umar till Allah took him unto Him, and finally it remained with Hafsa, Umar's daughter.

+++

This next HADITH is from SAHIH HADITH BUKHARI 61:510, which narrates how UTHMAN, the THIRD CALIPH of ISLAM ORDERED the REWRITING of the QURAN into ONE SINGLE COPY.

UTHMAN ORDERED that the PIECES of the QURAN COLLECTED by ZAID BIN THABIT in BUKHARI 60:201 be REWRITTEN -- and this REWRITTEN QURAN appear to be THE BOOK used by MUSLIMS TODAY.

+++

Sahih al-Bukhari Book 61 Hadith 510
Narrated Anas bin Malik:Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) DIFFERENCES IN THE RECITATION OF THE QUR'AN, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and the Christians did before."

So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may COMPILE the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you."

Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to REWRITE the manuscripts in perfect copies.

'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue."

They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 

'UTHMAN sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ORDERED that ALL the OTHER QUR'ANIC MATERIAL, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, BE BURNT.

Said bin Thabit added, "A Verse from Surat Ahzab was missed by me when we copied the Qur'an and I used to hear Allah's Apostle reciting it. So we searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari. (That Verse was): 'Among the Believers are men who have been true in their covenant with Allah.' (33.23)

Jibril o Gabriel: Meron bang anghel na naglahad ng Quran?

PATULOY ang PANINIRA ng ilang MUSLIM sa BIBLIYA habang PILIT nilang ITINATAAS ang QURAN bilang salita daw ng Diyos.

Pero MUSLIM din ang SUMIRA sa QURAN na PINATUNAYAN NILANG HINDI SALITA ng DIYOS.

+++

A. HINDI ALLAH ANG NAGSABI
Ayon sa mismong ARAL ng mga MUSLIM, HINDI ang ALLAH ang NAGSABI ng QURAN sa mga Muslim.

Sabi ng mga MUSLIM, hindi ang Allah ang nagsabi sa kanila ng Quran. IGINIGIIT nila na hindi puwedeng makita o marinig ng tao ang Allah kaya hindi Siya puwedeng makita o marinig ninomang tao.

GINAGAMIT pa ng mga MUSLIM ang ilang TALATA ng BIBLIYA para PATUNAYANG HINDI NAGHAYAG ang DIYOS sa TAO. Kabilang sa mga talata na gamit ng mga Muslim ay ang John 1:18, John 5:37.

So, maliwanag sa sinasabi ng mga MUSLIM na HINDI ALLAH ang NAGSABI ng QURAN sa mga Muslim—kasama na ang kanilang propeta.

Kung hindi Allah ang nagsabi ng Quran sa mga MUSLIM ay masasabi bang salita ng Allah ang QURAN?

Paano magiging salita ng Allah ang isang bagay na hindi naman Niya sinabi? Paano masasabing salita ng Allah ang Quran kung walang nakarinig na Siya ang nagsabi ng mga salita dito?

+++

B. JIBRIL o GABRIEL?
Para mapalabas na "galing" sa Allah ang Quran ay sinasabi ng mga Muslim na ang kanilang aklat ay "ibinigay ng Allah sa pamamagitan ni Anghel Gabriel" na tinatawag din nilang "JIBRIL."

Sa madaling salita ay SINASABI ng mga MUSLIM na HINDI MISMO ang ALLAH ang NAGSABI at HINDI MISMO ang ALLAH ang NAGBIGAY sa QURAN.

Ang malinaw na nagbigay—ayon sa mga Muslim—ay itong "Anghel Gabriel" o "JIBRIL."

Ang tanong: Mayroon bang patunay o saksi na itong Anghel Gabriel ang nagbigay ng Quran sa propeta ng Islam?

Sinasabi sa Quran 2:23, “… CALL YOUR WITNESSES (supporters and helpers) besides Allah, if you are truthful.” [… TAWAGIN NINYO ang INYONG MGA SAKSI, kung kayo ay tapat.]

Ayon mismo sa Quran ay TAWAGIN ang mga SAKSI na MAGPAPATUNAY na itong GABRIEL ang nagbigay ng Quran sa propeta ng Islam.

Meron bang SAKSI?

Ayon sa mga Muslim, WALANG SAKSI nung ibigay daw nitong Gabriel ang Quran sa kanilang propeta. WALANG MAGPAPATUNAY na ibinigay ng “anghel” ang Quran sa kanilang propeta.

Naniniwala at nagtitiwala lang ang mga Muslim sa SINABI ng KANILANG PROPETA.

Ang idinadahilan uli nila ay hindi raw puwedeng makita ng "ordinaryong tao" ang isang anghel.

So, WALANG PATUNAY at WALANG SAKSI na Allah ang nagsabi ng Quran. At WALA RING PATUNAY at WALA RING SAKSI na si Anghel Gabriel ang nagbigay ng Quran.

Kinontra nila ang mismong sabi ng kanilang Quran sa 2:23: “… TAWAGIN NINYO ang INYONG MGA SAKSI, kung kayo ay tapat.”

Lumalabas na HINDI SILA TAPAT.

At nakakatakot yan.

Itinataya nila ang kanilang mga kaluluwa sa isang paniniwala na WALANG PATUNAY at WALANG SAKSI.

Itinataya nila ang kanilang kaligtasan sa SALITA LANG ng kanilang propeta.

Lumalapat diyan ang sinabi ni Hesus sa Matthew 15:9: “in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.'” [walang saysay ang pagsamba nila sa akin, NAGTUTURO SILA ng mga ARAL at DOKTRINA ng TAO.]

+++

C. HINDI MAKIKITA?
Sinasabi ng mga Muslim, tanging propeta lang ang puwedeng makakita sa “anghel.” Anila, si Gabriel ay HINDI PUWEDENG MAKITA ng ORDINARYONG TAO.

Pero kinontra yan ng mismong tradisyon ng kanilang propeta, ang Hadith.

Sa isang hadith—ang Hadith Jibril—ay sinasabi na NAKITA ng mga ORDINARYONG TAO itong "Anghel Gabriel."

At salungat sa sinasabi ng mga Muslim ay sinabi mismo ng propeta nila ang dahilan kung bakit NAGPAKITA si "Gabriel."

Sinabi ng propeta nila na "That was GABRIEL who CAME TO TEACH THE PEOPLE their religion." [Iyon si GABRIEL na DUMATING PARA ITURO SA MGA TAO ang kanilang relihiyon.] Sahih Hadith Bukhari Book 2, Hadith 47

Ayun, ang layunin daw nitong "Anghel Gabriel" ay magturo sa MGA TAO.

Paano magtuturo itong “anghel” na ito sa mga tao kung hindi siya puwedeng makita at hindi puwedeng marinig ng mga tao?

Malinaw na kontrahan ang sinabi ng propeta ng Islam at ang sinasabi ng mga Muslim.

Mayroong ITINATAGO ang mga Muslim.

At ang mas kapuna-puna ay ipinakikita ng kanilang hadith na PUWEDENG MAKITA ng mga ORDINARYONG TAO itong “anghel” na sinasabi ng kanilang propeta.

PUWEDENG MAKITA. Salungat sa sinabi ng mga Muslim na “HINDI PUWEDENG MAKITA.”

Kaya kataka-taka na sa mahabang panahon—mahigit 20 taon—na nagbibigay daw ng Quran ang “anghel” na ito ay WALA KAHIT ISANG SAKSI na nakakita o nakarinig na nagbigay si Gabriel ng Quran sa propeta ng Islam.

+++

Ang malinaw na lumalabas ay WALANG PATUNAY na ang Quran ay salita ng Allah. WALA ring PATUNAY na may GABRIEL o JIBRIL na nagbigay ng Quran sa propeta ng Islam.

So, WALANG PATUNAY na galing sa Allah ang Quran.

WALA ngang PATUNAY kung merong Anghel Gabriel na nagbigay ng Quran, di po ba?

Kung WALANG PATUNAY dito sa GABRIEL o JIBRIL na NAGBIGAY daw ng QURAN e ano ang dahilan para maniwala sa "anghel" na yan? Ano rin ang dahilan para maniwala sa Quran?

Muslims prove that God did not send their prophet

When God established Christianity, He personally chose its leaders, the 12 Apostles (Mark 3:14-19). God Himself appointed the chief apostle, Peter (Mt 16:18-19; Jn 21:15-17). God Himself sent His chosen leaders to "make disciples of all nations (Mt 28:19-20).

I asked Muslims if God Himself chose their prophet Muhammad, personally talked to him and personally sent him as His messenger.

Muslims responded with the verses John 1:18, John 5:37 and 1Tim 6:16. Muslims believe that these verses show that God never showed Himself to any man and never talked to any mortal.

That means, Muslims were saying that God never showed Himself to their prophet and did not even talk to him personally.

Thus, Muslims themselves were saying that God did not personally choose Muhammad, God did not personally appoint Muhammad and God did not personally send Muhammad as His messenger.

Based on that, how then can they claim or believe that their prophet was a true prophet of God?

Muslims are the ones who prove that their prophet is not a true prophet of God.

Gen 17:23 Ismael tinuli kaya Muslim kasama sa tuli?

NAPAKITA natin na si Ismael ay hindi kasama sa lahi ni Abraham.

Bagama't naging anak sa laman, si Ismael ay pinalayas ng Diyos at inalis sa lahi ni Abraham. (Genesis 21:12)

Dahil si Ismael ay inalis sa lahi ni Abraham, hindi pwedeng sabihin ng mga Muslim na kasama rin sila sa lahi na saklaw ng tipan ng tuli.

Ang tipan ng tuli kasi ay ibinigay lang sa mga kalahi ni Abraham at maging sa mga alipin at kasambahay nila. (Genesis 17:7, 9-14)

+++

Sa kabila niyan, mapilit pa rin ang ilang Muslim na kasama sila sa tipan dahil si Ismael ay nauna pa raw tinuli matapos ibigay ng Diyos ang tipan kay Abraham sa Genesis 17:7.

Sa Genesis 17:23-26 daw ay mababasa na tinuli si Ismael.

Ginagamit nila ang tuli na iyan para kutyain ang mga Kristiyano na sinasabi nilang hindi sumusunod sa tipan ng Diyos.

Ang tanong ay sapat bang batayan ang pagtuli kay Ismael para sabihin ng mga Muslim na kasama rin sila sa lahi ni Abraham at kasama sa dapat tuliin?

Hindi.

+++

Tinuli ni Abraham si Ismael ayon sa Genesis 17:23-27.

Genesis 17:23

At ipinagsama ni Abraham si Ismael, na kanyang anak, at ang lahat na ipinanganak sa kanyang bahay, at ang lahat ng alipin na binili niya ng kanyang salapi, ang lahat ng lalake sa mga lalaking kasambahay ni Abraham, at tinuli ang lamang ng kanilang balat ng araw ding yon, ayon sa sinabi ng Diyos sa kanya.

Ayon sa talata, ang patutuli kay Ismael ay "ayon sa sinabi ng Diyos" kay Abraham.

Mababasa natin yan sa Genesis 17:13 kung saan iniutos ng Diyos ang pagtutuli sa lahat ng kalalakihan sa lahi at sambahayan ni Abraham.

Genesis 17:13

Ang ipinanganak sa bahay at ang alipin na binili ng iyong salapi, ay dapat tuliin: at ang aking tipan ay sasa iyong laman na pinakatipang walang hanggan.

Dahil si Ismael ay ipinanganak sa bahay ni Abraham ay kinailangan siyang tuliin.

At hindi lang siya ipinanganak sa bahay ni Abraham. Si Ismael ay alipin din dahil ang nanay niyang si Hagar ay alipin ni Abraham at ng asawa niyang si Sarah.

So, sumunod lang si Abraham sa utos ng Diyos dahil Diyos ang magsasabi kung sino man ang kasama o hindi kasama sa Kanyang tipan.

Dahil diyan, pwedeng-pwede ring alisin ng Diyos sa tipan ang sino mang gusto Niyang alisin.

Sa Genesis 21:12 ay inalis nga ng Diyos si Ismael sa tipan ng tuli matapos siyang alisin ng Maykapal sa lahi ni Abraham.

Genesis 21:12

At sinabi ng Diyos kay Abraham, 'Huwag mong mabigatin ito sa iyong paningin dahil sa iyong alipin; sa lahat ng sabihin sa iyo ni Sara, ay makinig ka sa kanyang tinig, sapagkat kay Isaac tatawagin ang iyong lahi.'

Ang tinutukoy diyan ng Diyos ay ang papapalayas ni Sara kay Ismael at sa nanay niyang alipin na si Hagar. (Genesis 17:10)

Sabi ng Diyos sa Genesis 21:12 ay pakinggan ni Abraham ang tinig ni Sara na nagpapalayas sa mga aliping sina Ismael at Hagar.

Sa madaling salita ay binale wala ng Diyos ang tuli na tinanggap ni Ismael sa Genesis 17:23-27. Inalis ng Diyos si Ismael sa lahi ni Abraham at kasama roon ay ang bisa ng tuli na ibinigay sa kanya.

Mapapansin din na mismong pagiging anak sa laman ni Ismael ay binale wala ng Diyos. Ayon sa Diyos, si Ismael ay "alipin" ni Abraham.

Kung sa mata at pamantayan ng tao ay anak ni Abraham si Ismael, para sa Diyos, si Ismael ay alipin lang ni Abraham. At ang pagbalewala ng Diyos kay Ismael ay tinuldukan ng Maykapal noong igiit Niya na "kay Isaac tatawagin" ang lahi ni Abraham.

Sa pananaw na pantao o panglupa, dapat kay Ismael tawagin ang lahi ni Abraham dahil siya ang "panganay." Pero dahil hindi kinilala ng Diyos si Ismael bilang anak ni Abraham ay walang bisa ang pagiging "panganay" niya. Wala ngang bisa ang panglupang pagiging anak niya at inalis pa siya ng Diyos sa lahi ni Abraham.

+++

So, sorry na lang sa mga naniniwala na kasama sila sa tipan ng tuli dahil natuli rin ang ninuno nilang si Ismael.

Dahil inalis ng Diyos si Ismael sa lahi ni Abraham at inalis sa tipan ng tuli, inalis na rin ng Diyos sa lahi ni Abraham at sa tipan ng tuli ang lahat ng kalahi ni Ismael.

Diyan natin makikita na walang batayan ang sinasabi ng ilang Muslim na kasama pa sila sa tipan ng tuli dahil tinuli si Ismael -- at nauna pa ngang tuliin.

Nagkakamali sila kung inaakala nilang unahan ang tipan at tuli. Hindi mahalaga kung sino ang nauna o nahuli. Ang mahalaga ay kung tinatanggap ng Diyos ang isang tao o isang lahi sa tipan na Kanyang ibinigay kay Abraham.

Luke 19:27: Bibliya nagtuturo ng pagpatay?

Kapag napupuna ang karahasan ng Abu Sayyaf, ISIS at Maute ay nagiging defensive ang ilang Muslim.

Agad nilang inililihis ang isyu at ibinabaling ang usapan sa Bibliya. Anila, mas marahas ang "turo" ng Bibliya.

Ibinibinigay nila ang ilang talata na nagtuturo umano ng kasamaan at karahasan. Partikular nilang tinutukoy ang Luke 19:27.

Sa talata ay mababasa: “Datapuwa't itong aking mga kaaway, na ayaw na ako'y maghari sa kanila, ay dalhin ninyo rito, at patayin ninyo sila sa harapan ko."

Yan daw ang nagpapakita na mas marahas ang Bibliya. Inuutos daw ng Bibliya ang pagpatay.

Isa na naman iyang kamalian na itinuturo ng ilang Muslim na walang sapat na kaalaman sa Bibliya.

+++

Ang Luke 19:27 ay bahagi ng mga aral ni Kristo kaugnay sa mga "huling bagay," partikular ang Paghuhukom.

Sa Luke 19:11-12 ay makikita natin na ang eksena sa Luke 19:27 ay bahagi ng isang kwento kung saan inilarawan ni Hesus ang pag-alis ng isang Ginoo (nobleman) upang tanggapin ang kanyang kapangyarihang maghari.

Iyan ay tumutugma sa pag-alis ni Hesus sa lupa at pag-akyat Niya sa Langit upang tanggapin ang lubos Niyang kapangyarihan mula sa Diyos Ama.

Sa Pagbabalik ni Hesus ay Siya na ang Hari na huhukom sa lahat ng tao. Iyon na ang Huling Araw o ang Araw ng Paghuhukom.

Sa Luke 19:27 ay mababasa natin ang parusang gagawin sa mga taong hindi kumilala sa pagiging hari ng Ginoo. At iyan ay tumutugma sa parusang gagawin ni Hesus sa lahat ng hindi kikilala sa Kanya bilang Diyos at Hari.

Lahat ng hindi kikilala kay Hesus bilang Diyos at Hari ay papatayin sa Kanyang harapan.

Doon yan magaganap sa Huling Araw o Araw ng Paghuhukom. Hindi yan sa panahon ngayon, tulad ng maling sinasabi ng ilang Muslim.

Hindi rin yan tulad ng utos ng Quran sa Chapter 47:4 kung saan sinasabihan ang mga Muslim na pugutan, patayin at sugatan ang mga hindi naniniwala sa Islam. Utos din dyan na mang-kidnap at humingi ng ransom sa ngalan ng jihad o ang "holy war" ng Islam.

+++

Sa buong mundo ay balita ang pagpatay, pamumugot, pananakit at ang kidnap-for-ransom ng ilang Muslim tulad ng ISIS, Abu Sayyaf, Boko Haram, Maute at iba pa. Yang Quran 47:4 ang batayan nila ng kanilang ginagawa.

Ang karahasang gawa ng ilang Muslim batay sa Quran 47:4 ay ginagawa na nila ngayon at sanhi ng malaking kaguluhan at kapahamakan sa maraming tao.

Sa kabaliktaran, ang Luke 19:27 na ginagamit nila para mailayo ang isyu sa marahas na utos ng Quran 47:4 ay hindi ngayon kundi sa Araw ng Paghuhukom.

Kaya mali ang sinasabi ng ilang Muslim na nagtuturo ng karahasan o pagpatay ang Bibliya. Alam nila na sa Araw ng Paghuhukom ay paparusahan ng Diyos ang mga hindi kikilala sa Kanya. At yan na nga ang sinasabi sa Luke 19:27.