Immorality: In Christianity or Islam? WHO IS THE 'MODEL' FOR CHILD SEX?

SOME MUSLIMS, like Rolan Legarda, accuse the Bible of "teaching" and "promoting" immorality.

THEY ATTACK the BIBLE and CHRISTIANS in an apparent effort to DIVERT ATTENTION from the IMMORALITY in ISLAM.

These MUSLIMS cite verses like GENESIS 19:30-38, where the DAUGHTERS of LOT committed INCEST with HIM.

THEY DISREGARD the CONTEXT of this incident, where the DAUGHTERS of LOT were FORCED to HAVE SEX with their FATHER out of FEAR that HE WAS THE LAST MAN on EARTH. (GENESIS 19:31)

Simply put, GENESIS 19:30-38 DOES NOT TEACH PEOPLE to COMMIT INCEST. It only shows the DESPERATION of LOT'S DAUGHTERS after they saw the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. 

It also tries to SHOW the ORIGINS of SOME RACES. (GENESIS 19:37-38)

+++

In other occasions, MUSLIMS who ATTACK the BIBLE cite EZEKIEL 23:2-21, or the STORY of the TWO SISTER-PROSTITUTES.

THEY HIGHLIGHT the "SEXY" language in the text, which MUSLIMS CLAIM "prove" that it is "NOT THE WORD OF GOD."

Sadly, they again IGNORE the CONTEXT of the "SEXY" language.

GOD USED DESCRIPTIVE LANGUAGE to SHOW the GRAVITY of the SIN of ISRAEL and JUDAH, which the TWO SISTER-PROSTITUTES SYMBOLIZE.

For MUSLIMS, to be CALLED or DESCRIBED as a "PROSTITUTE" is "SEXY." But during the time of EZEKIEL, to be a PROSTITUTE was to be among the LOWEST of HUMANITY.

Also, MUSLIMS DISREGARD the PUNISHMENT GIVEN by GOD to the SISTER-PROSTITUTES, which was the POINT of the STORY: INFIDELITY to GOD will NOT GO UNPUNISHED.

+++

SOME MUSLIMS also cite GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILE PRIESTS, CHILD RAPE and INCEST in SOCIETY as "proof" of CHRISTIAN IMMORALITY.

But ASK THEM to cite ONE CHRISTIAN TEACHING in the BIBLE or the CHURCH that PROMOTES ANY of those and THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE to NAME ONE.

The FACT is CHRISTIANITY and the BIBLE ABHORS or PROHIBITS such ACTS.

In CHRISTIANITY, specifically in CATHOLICISM, THOSE ACTS are considered as SINS or VIOLATIONS of CHURCH TEACHING.

+++

ONE SURE WAY of COUNTERING MUSLIMS who ATTACK CHRISTIANITY or the BIBLE using DISTORTED VIEWS of BIBLICAL TEXTS is to reFOCUS the SPOTLIGHT on their PROPHET.

While some MUSLIMS CRITICIZE and ATTACK the BIBLE or CHRISTIANS for alleged IMMORALITY, it is THEIR PROPHET who DID SEXUAL ACTS that MOST CIVILIZED PEOPLE of TODAY (even MUSLIMS) CONSIDER IMMORAL.

+++

MUSLIMS like ROLAN LEGARDA BLAME CHRISTIANS for the RAPE of CHILDREN and for INCEST.

But WHO AMONG the RELIGIOUS LEADERS MARRIED and HAD SEX with a MINOR and even became a MODEL for CHILD MARRIAGE and CHILD SEX?

This is what AISHA, the CHILD-WIFE of ISLAM'S PROPHET SAID in the HADITH or TRADITIONS of ISLAM'S PROPHET:

Narrated 'Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). (Sahih Hadith Bukhari Book #62, Hadith #64)

"CONSUMMATED" means HAD SEX.

So, according to ISLAMIC DOCUMENTS, it was ISLAM'S PROPHET who MARRIED and HAD SEX with a CHILD.

+++

Further reading of AISHA'S stories in the HADITH shows that SHE was still a LITTLE GIRL when she GOT MARRIED and HAD SEX with ISLAM'S PROPHET.

Read this LINK:
http://sagot-sa-balik-islam.blogspot.com/search/label/Aisha%20Mature%20When%20Muhammad%20Had%20Sex%20with%20Her%3F

+++

In regard to INCEST, ABU BAKR, the FATHER of AISHA, PROTESTED when ISLAM'S PROPHET said that HE WOULD MARRY the LITTLE GIRL.

Narrated 'Ursa: The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry." (Sahih Hadith Bukhari Book #62, Hadith #18)

ABU BAKR considered ISLAM'S PROPHET as his "BROTHER."

In spite of that, ISLAM'S PROPHET INSISTED that the LITTLE GIRL--whom ABU BAKR considered as their PROPHET'S NIECE--should be MARRIED to HIM.

INCEST?

+++

Because ISLAM'S PROPHET TOOK a YOUNG CHILD as HIS WIFE and HAD SEX with HER BEFORE she reached PUBERTY, HE has become the MODEL of CHILD MARRIAGE and CHILD SEX in ISLAM.

HERE is what an EXPERT in ISLAMIC LAW SAYS:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTRtIxN1kjY

+++

So, WHO and WHAT RELIGION TEACHES and PROMOTES SEX with YOUNG CHILDREN? Is it CHRISTIANITY or ISLAM?

LET US ALLOW the TEACHING and EXAMPLE of ISLAM'S PROPHET PROVIDE the ANSWER.


+++

Next time, if ANY MUSLIMS try to ATTACK CHRISTIANS and CHRISTIANITY in regard to IMMORALITY, LET us just REMIND THEM of WHAT THEIR BELOVED PROPHET DID.

I'M SURE even MUSLIMS are ASHAMED of the EXAMPLE SET by THEIR PROPHET.

Aisha Mature When Muhammad had Sex with Her?

A. Aisha's Age

APPARENTLY ashamed that their prophet Muhammad married a 6-year-old girl and had sex with her when she was 9 years old, Muslims have been coming up with various explanations to prove that the girl was already in puberty at a young age.

Muslims claim that 9-year-old girls during the time of their prophet where “big” (malaki ang bulas) or were already in puberty, or was already menstruating.

But the Hadiths, or traditions about the life of Islam’s prophet, contradict all the explanations of Muslim apologists.

The Hadiths, particularly that of Bukhari—which the Islamic world considers as the most reliable collection of stories about Islam’s prophet—clearly show that the 9-year-old Aisha was still a “little girl” or “young girl” when their prophet had taken her for his wife.

It is notable that many of the accounts that say that Aisha was a “little” or “young” girl was told by the Aisha herself.

B. The TRUTH According to the Hadith

Following are some of the Hadith accounts that show this fact and truth.

1. SAHIH (AUTHENTIC) BUKHARI BOOK 62, HADITH 163

Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet was screening me with his Rida' (garment covering the upper part of the body) while I was looking at the Ethiopians who were playing in the courtyard of the mosque. (I continued watching) till I was satisfied. So you may deduce from this event how a little girl (who has not reached the age of puberty) who is eager to enjoy amusement should be treated in this respect.

In this hadith, Islam’s prophet kept the “LITTLE GIRL” Aisha in his UPPER GARMENT. This shows the CHILD being HELD CLOSE to the BODY of Islam’s prophet.

Islamic tradition prohibits the mingling of NON-RELATIVE MALES and FEMALES, more so A FEMALE BEING HELD CLOSE to the BODY of a NON-RELATIVE MALE. This shows that the “LITTLE GIRL” was already the WIFE of Islam’s prophet when he HELD HER CLOSE to HIS BODY.

This shows that according to Aisha, she was still a “LITTLE GIRL,” one who “HAS NOT REACHED THE AGE OF PUBERTY” when the prophet of Muslims TOOK HER INTO HIS ARMS in MARRIAGE.

2.  SAHIH BUKHARI BOOK 73, HADITH 151

Narrated 'Aisha: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for 'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)  (Book #73, Hadith #151)

According to Aisha, she was still PLAYING WITH DOLLS when Islam’s prophet “used to enter (my dwelling place).” This fact prompted the highly regarded commentary FATEH-AL-BARI [also FATH-UL-BARI] to explain that “'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.”

Muslims will say that the hadith does not say that Aisha ang their prophet were already married and living together at that time.

But again, Islamic tradition prohibits NON-RELATED MALES from ENTERING the DWELLING PLACES of FEMALES. The fact that Islam’s prophet freely ENTERED the dwelling place of the “LITTLE GIRL” showed that Aisha has STILL “not yet reached the age of puberty” when they started living together.

3. SAHIH BUKHARI BOOK 92, HADITH 562

Narrated 'Aisha: After the slanderers had given a forged statement against her, Allah's Apostle called 'Ali bin Abi Talib and Usama bin Zaid when the Divine Inspiration was delayed. He wanted to ask them and consult them about the question of divorcing me. Usama gave his evidence that was based on what he knew about my innocence, but 'Ali said, "Allah has not put restrictions on you and there are many women other than her. Furthermore you may ask the slave girl who will tell you the truth." So the Prophet asked Barira (my salve girl), "Have you seen anything that may arouse your suspicion?" She replied, "I have not seen anything more than that she is a little girl who sleeps, leaving the dough of her family (unguarded) that the domestic goats come and eat it." Then the Prophet stood on the pulpit and said, "O Muslims! Who will help me against the man who has harmed me by slandering my wife? By Allah, I know nothing about my family except good." The narrator added: Then the Prophet mentioned the innocence of 'Aisha. (See Hadith No. 274, Vol. 6)

The LITTLE GIRL, Aisha, was already MARRIED and LIVING WITH Islam’s prophet when she was accused of being UNFAITHFUL to him. So, Aisha’s slave girl, BARIRA, had to testify on her behalf.

According to the hadith, Barira declared that the WIFE of Islam’s prophet was “a little girl” who even neglects her basic duties as a child.

In HADITH 48, BOOK 829, Barira is even cited as saying, “I have never seen in her anything faulty except that she (Aisha) is a girl of IMMATURE AGE.”

C. CONCLUSION

There are more hadiths that show the same thing: that Aisha was a “LITTLE GIRL” and of “IMMATURE AGE” when she became the wife of Islam’s prophet.

And these hadiths PROVE that the explanations of Muslim apologists are ALL WRONG.

The WIFE of Islam’s prophet HAD NOT REACHED the AGE OF PUBERTY when she was MARRIED and LIVED with him. She was still a “LITTLE GIRL” and NOT “BIG” as Muslims claim.

Pag-Sex sa 3-anyos, Pinayagan ng mga Hudyo?

MAY GINAGAMIT na REPERENSIYA ang mga MUSLIM para palabasin na PINAPAYAGAN ng mga PINUNO ng mga HUDYO (RABBI) ang PAG-SEX sa mga BATA.

Iyan ay SAGOT NILA sa mga PUNA tungkol sa PAG-ASAWA ng PROPETA MUHAMMAD NILA sa isang 6-ANYOS na NENE at ang PAG-SEX NIYA sa isang 9-ANYOS na PASLIT.

HETO ang REPERENSIYA NILA:

"Said Rabbi Joseph, "Come and take note: A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse. And if a Levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her. And one can be liable on her account because of the law prohibiting intercourse with a married woman. And she imparts uncleanness to him who has intercourse with her when she is menstruating, to convey uncleanness to the lower as to the upper layer [of what lies beneath]. If she was married to a priest, she may eat food in the status of priestly rations. If one of those who are unfit for marriage with her had intercourse with her, he has rendered her unfit to marry into the priesthood. If any of those who are forbidden in the Torah to have intercourse with her had intercourse with her, he is put to death on her account, but she is free of responsibility [M.Nid. 5:4]. Sanhedrin 7/55B"

+++

A. MAIKLING SAGOT:
MAGULO at MARAMING KONTRAHAN ang REPERENSIYA YAN ng mga MUSLIM.

HINDI MALINAW kung "A girl three years and one day old" ang TINUTUKOY o BABAENG MAY ASAWA.

Sabagay, MAGULO RIN naman kasi ang PANINIWALA NILA.

1. PROPETA raw ng DIYOS ang PROPETA NILANG si MUHAMMAD pero AMINADO SILANG HINDI MISMONG DIYOS ang NAGSUGO sa KANYA.

2. SALITA raw ng DIYOS ang QURAN pero INAAMIN NILA na HINDI MISMO DIYOS ang NAGSABI ng QURAN.

So, HINDI NA KATAKA-TAKA na MAGULO at MALABO rin ang mga REPERENSIYA NILA.

+++

B. MAS MAHABANG SAGOT:

MAGULO at MARAMING KONTRAHAN ang GINAMIT na "PATUNAY" ng mga MUSLIM.

1. " A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse."

Diyan ay BATA RAW ang IKINAKASAL gamit ang PAKIKIPAGTALIK.

Pero BATA nga ba ang TINUTUKOY RIYAN?

BASAHIN NINYO ang KASUNOD at MAKIKITA NINYO na BABAENG MAY ASAWA ang TINUTUKOY.
.
.
.
2. "And if a Levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her."

Ang "LEVIR" ay KAPATID ng ASAWA ng isang BABAE. Sa madaling salita ay BAYAW.

Levir (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/levir)

Le"vir\ (l[=e]"v[~e]r), n. [L.] A husband's brother; -- used in reference to levirate marriages.

PAANO NAGKAROON ng BAYAW ang isang 3-ANYOS na BATA? HINDI pa naman IKINAKASAL ang 3-ANYOS e, di ba?

MAGULO.
.
.
.
3. ETO PA ang PROOF na BABAENG MAY ASAWA ang TINUTUKOY riyan:

"And one can be liable on her account because of the law prohibiting intercourse with a married WOMAN."

KITA NINYO? "WOMAN" daw yan at HINDI CHILD.

LALONG NAGING MAGULO, di ba?
.
.
.
4. LALO pang GUGULO sa SUSUNOD na SABI ng REPERENSIYA NINYO.

"And she imparts uncleanness to him who has intercourse with her when she is menstruating."

"MENSTRUATING"?

KAILAN PA nagka-REGLA ang isang "girl three years and one day old"?

NAGKANDA-LOKO-LOKO NA ang REPERENSIYA NINYO. =)
.
+++
.
GANYAN BA ang URI ng PINAGBABATAYAN NINYONG REPERENSIYA?

MALABO pa sa SABAW ng PUSIT ang SINASABI NIYAN e. Tapos DIYAN KAYO NAGBABATAY?

Pero HINDI na AKO MAGTATAKA: NANINIWALA nga KAYO sa PROPETA NINYO na HINDI NINYO MAPATUNAYANG SINUGO ng DIYOS, di ba?

NANINIWALA rin KAYO na "SALITA ng DIYOS" ang QURAN kahit pa WALA KAYONG MAIPAKITANG PROOF kung SINABI NGA MISMO ng DIYOS YAN.

So, DATI na KAYONG MAHILIG sa MALABO at MAGULO.

HINDI na KATAKA-TAKA kung maging ang mga REPERENSIYA NINYO ay MAGULO at MALABO RIN.
.
.
.
PEACE! =)