Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Patunay na Hindi Salita ng Allah ang Quran

HINAMON tayo ng mga Muslim na PATUNAYAN na ang Quran ay HINDI SALITA ng ALLAH.

HINDI kasi mapatunayan ng mga Muslim na ang Quran ay salita ng Allah kaya ibinalik nila sa atin ang hamon.


Maraming patunay na ang Quran ay HINDI SALITA ng ALLAH. Isa na riyan ang katunayan na HINDI ang ALLAH ang NAGSABI ng QURAN sa mga Muslim.

Batay sa mismong aral ng mga Muslim, hindi ang Allah ang nagsabi sa kanila ng Quran. Ang sabi nila, hindi puwedeng makita o marinig ng tao ang Allah kaya hindi Siya puwedeng makita o marinig ninomang tao.

So, maliwanag na HINDI ALLAH ang NAGSABI ng QURAN sa kahit na sinong Muslim—kasama na ang kanilang propeta.

Kung hindi Allah ang narinig na nagsabi ng Quran ay masasabi bang ang Quran ay salita ng Allah?


Paano magiging salita ng Allah ang isang bagay na hindi naman Niya sinabi? Paano masasabing salita ng Allah ang walang nakarinig na Siya ang nagsabi?

Lalabas na tsismis o sabi-sabi lang yan.


Para mapalabas na "galing" sa Allah ang Quran ay itinuturo ng mga Muslim na ang kanilang aklat ay "ibinigay ng Allah sa pamamagitan ni Anghel Gabriel."

Sa madaling salita ay HINDI MISMO ang ALLAH ang NAGSABI at HINDI MISMO ang ALLAH ang NAGBIGAY.

Ang malinaw na nagbigay—ayon sa mga Muslim—ay itong "Anghel Gabriel."

Ang tanong: Mayroon bang patunay o saksi na ibinigay ni Anghel Gabriel ang Quran sa propeta ng Islam?

Sinasabi sa Quran 2: 23, “… CALL YOUR WITNESSES (supporters and helpers) besides Allah, if you are truthful.” [… TAWAGIN NINYO ang INYONG MGA SAKSI, kung kayo ay tapat.]

Pero ayon sa mga Muslim, WALANG SAKSI kaya WALANG MAGPAPATUNAY kung mayroong “anghel” na nagbigay ng Quran sa kanilang propeta.

Naniniwala at nagtitiwala lang ang mga Muslim sa SINABI ng KANILANG PROPETA.

Ang idinadahilan uli nila ay hindi raw puwedeng makita ng "ordinaryong tao" ang isang anghel.

So, WALANG PATUNAY at WALANG SAKSI na Allah ang nagsabi ng Quran. At WALA RING PATUNAY at WALA RING SAKSI na si Anghel Gabriel ang nagbigay ng Quran.

Kinontra nila ang mismong sabi ng kanilang Quran sa 2:23: “… TAWAGIN NINYO ang INYONG MGA SAKSI, kung kayo ay tapat.”

Lumalabas na HINDI SILA TAPAT.

At nakakatakot yan.

Itinataya nila ang kanilang mga kaluluwa sa isang paniniwala na WALANG PATUNAY at WALANG SAKSI.

Itinataya nila ang kanilang kaligtasan sa SALITA LANG ng kanilang propeta.

Lumalapat diyan ang sinabi ni Hesus sa Matthew 15:9: “in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as doctrines.'” [walang saysay ang pagsamba nila sa akin, NAGTUTURO SILA ng mga ARAL at DOKTRINA ng TAO.]


Sinasabi ng mga Muslim, tanging propeta lang ang puwedeng makakita sa “anghel.” Anila, si Gabriel ay HINDI PUWEDENG MAKITA ng ORDINARYONG TAO.

Pero kinontra yan ng mismong tradisyon ng kanilang propeta, ang Hadith.

Sa isang hadith—ang Hadith Jibril—ay sinasabi na NAKITA ng mga ORDINARYONG TAO itong "Anghel Gabriel."

At salungat sa sinasabi ng mga Muslim ay sinabi mismo ng propeta nila ang dahilan kung bakit NAGPAKITA si "Gabriel."

Sinabi ng propeta nila na "That was GABRIEL who CAME TO TEACH THE PEOPLE their religion." [Iyon si GABRIEL na DUMATING PARA ITURO SA MGA TAO ang kanilang relihiyon.] Sahih Hadith Bukhari Book 2, Hadith 47

Ayun, ang layunin daw nitong "Anghel Gabriel" ay magturo sa MGA TAO.

Paano magtuturo itong “anghel” na ito sa mga tao kung hindi siya puwedeng makita at hindi puwedeng marinig ng mga tao?

Malinaw na kontrahan ang sinabi ng propeta ng Islam at ang sinasabi ng mga Muslim.

Mayroong ITINATAGO ang mga Muslim.

At ang mas kapuna-puna ay ipinakikita ng kanilang hadith na PUWEDENG MAKITA ng mga ORDINARYONG TAO itong “anghel” na sinasabi ng kanilang propeta.

PUWEDENG MAKITA. Salungat sa sinabi ng mga Muslim na “HINDI PUWEDENG MAKITA.”

Kaya kataka-taka na sa mahabang panahon—mahigit 20 taon—na nagbibigay daw ng Quran ang “anghel” na ito ay WALA KAHIT ISANG SAKSI na nakakita o nakarinig na nagbigay si Gabriel ng Quran sa propeta ng Islam.


Ang malinaw na lumalabas ay WALANG PATUNAY na ang Quran ay salita ng Allah.

Nagdadahilan na lang ang mga Muslim sa sinasabi nilang hindi puwede makita and hindi puwede marinig ng tao ang Allah at itong “anghel.”

Gusto na lang nilang PAGTAKPAN ang katotohanan na ang QURAN AY HINDI SALITA NG ALLAH.


  1. What non-Muslim scholars said about Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him)

    Nepolean Bonaparte – Quoted in Christian Cherfils BONAPARTE ET ISLAM (PARIS 1914)
    “I hope the time is not far off when I shall be able to unite all the wise and educated men of all the countries and establish a uniform regime based on the principles of Qur'an which alone are true and which alone can lead men to happiness.”

    M.K.Gandhi, YOUNG INDIA, 1924
    "...I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and his own mission. These, and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every trouble." YOUNG INDIA, 1924

    Lamartine - Histoire de la Turquie, Paris 1854, Vol II, pp. 276-77:
    "If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results are the three criteria of human genius, who could dare to compare any great man in modern history with Muhammad? The most famous men created arms, laws and empires only. They founded, if anything at all, no more than material powers which often crumbled away before their eyes. This man moved not only armies, legislations, empires, peoples and dynasties, but millions of men in one-third of the then inhabited world; and more than that, he moved the altars, the gods, the religions, the ideas, the beliefs and souls... the forbearance in victory, his ambition, which was entirely devoted to one idea and in no manner striving for an empire; his endless prayers, his mystic conversations with God, his death and his triumph after death; all these attest not to an imposture but to a firm conviction which gave him the power to restore a dogma. This dogma was twofold, the unit of God and the immateriality of God; the former telling what God is, the latter telling what God is not; the one overthrowing false gods with the sword, the other starting an idea with words.
    "Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior, conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational dogmas, of a cult without images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual empire, that is Muhammad. As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater than he?"


    “Then woe to those who write the book with their own hands and then say: ‘This is from God’, to traffic with it for a miserable price. Woe to them for what their hands do write and for the gain they make thereby.” (Quran 2:79)

    “And when there came to them a messenger from God, Confirming what was with them, a party of the people of the book threw away the book of God behind their backs as if (it had been something) they did not know.” (Quran 2:101)
    Let us start from the beginning. No Biblical scholar on this earth will claim that the Bible was written by Jesus himself. They all agree that the Bible was written after the departure of Jesus peace be upon him by his followers. Dr. W Graham Scroggie of the Moody Bible Institute, Chicago, a prestigious Christian evangelical mission, says:

    “..Yes, the Bible is human, although some out of zeal which is not according to knowledge, have denied this. Those books have passed through the minds of men, are written in the language of men, were penned by the hands of men and bear in their style the characteristics of men….It is Human, Yet Divine,”

    Another Christian scholar, Kenneth Cragg, the Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem, says:

    “...Not so the New Testament...There is condensation and editing; there is choice reproduction and witness. The Gospels have come through the mind of the church behind the authors. They represent experience and history...”

    “It is well known that the primitive Christian Gospel was initially transmitted by word of mouth and that this oral tradition resulted in variant reporting of word and deed. It is equally true that when the Christian record was committed to writing it continued to be the subject of verbal variation. Involuntary and intentional, at the hands of scribes and editors.”

    “Yet, as a matter of fact, every book of the New Testament with the exception of the four great Epistles of St. Paul is at present more or less the subject of controversy, and interpolations are asserted even in these.”