Monday, May 17, 2010

Deedat nilinlang ang nag-Balik Islam

ISA po sa mga ARTIKULO ni AHMED DEEDAT na ILANG ULIT nang INILAGAY rito ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay ang pilit na kumukumbinsi sa mga tao na "tama" ang PAG-AASAWA nang MARAMI ng MGA LALAKE.

Ayon sa artikulo ni DEEDAT, kaya raw dapat payagan ang PAG-AASAWA nang MARAMI ng isang LALAKE ay dahil mayroon daw "SURPLUS" ng mga KABABAIHAN sa MUNDO.

Sabi ng SKOLAR ng mga BALIK ISLAM, KAWAWA naman daw ang mga BABAENG HINDI MAKAPAG-AASAWA dahil IISA LANG ang PINAPAYAGANG ASAWA ng isang LALAKE.

Heto po ang INTRODUCTION ng ARTIKULO ni DEEDAT:

SURPLUS OF WOMEN
In the “great nation of the world,” if all the men will marry, there will be a surplus of women as follows:
1. United States of America; 7,800,000
2. Great Britain; 4,000,000
3. Germany; 5,000,000
4. Soviet Russia; 7,000,000

The problem is getting compounded in the United States of America because 98% of INMATES in their Prison cells are Males. What is worse for unmarried American Women, 25 million American men are GAYS (homosexuals). If you are one of those women mentioned above, what would you do? In Islam, whether she is no. 2, 3, or 4 her rights will be the same as those of the first wife, and likewise the rights of her Children.


PANLOLOKO po at PANLILINLANG ang SINASABI ni DEEDAT diyan.

Sa nauna nating COMMENT sa ARTIKULO ng SKOLAR ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay TINUMBOK NATIN ang KALOKOHAN ng ARAL na IYAN.

Bakit po KALOKOHAN ang ARAL na IYAN ni DEEDAT?

Una, ang ARAL na ISINUSULONG ni DEEDAT at ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay NAKAUGAT sa ARAL ng mga MUSLIM kung saan PINAPAYAGAN ang mga LALAKE na MAG-ASAWA nang HANGGANG APAT.

Kung susundin natin ang SINASABI ni DEEDAT na DAPAT PAYAGAN ang LALAKE na MAG-ASAWA nang HIGIT sa ISA dahil MAS MARAMI ang BABAE ay lalabas na PALPAK ang NANGYAYARI sa MGA BANSANG MUSLIM, lalo na sa SAUDI ARABIA.

Sa MARAMI po kasing BANSANG MUSLIM ay NAKAHIHIGIT ang BILANG ng mga LALAKE kaysa sa BILANG ng mga BABAE.

Heto po ang DATOS mula sa isang PAG-AARAL kaugnay riyan:

1 United Arab Emirates
LALAKE=3,063,000
BABAE=1,433,000
2.14 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

2 Qatar
LALAKE=547,000
BABAE=265,000
2.06 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

3 Kuwait
LALAKE=1,612,000
BABAE=1,075,000
1.50 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

4 Bahrain
LALAKE=414,000
BABAE=313,000
1.32 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

5 Oman
LALAKE=1,443,000
BABAE=1,124,000
1.28 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

6 Saudi Arabia
LALAKE=13,259,000
BABAE=11,314,000
1.17 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

7 Jordan
LALAKE=2,964,000
BABAE=2,739,000
1.08 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

8 Timor-Leste
LALAKE=492,000
BABAE=455,000
1.08 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

9 Libya
LALAKE=3,020,000
BABAE=2,834,000
1.07 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

10 Afghanistan
LALAKE=15,404,000
BABAE=14,459,000
1.07 LALAKE sa BAWAT ISANG BABAE.

Paki PANSIN po na 9 sa 10 BANSA na MAS MARAMI ang mga LALAKE ay MGA BANSANG MUSLIM.

MALINAW po sa DATOS na iyan na WALANG "SURPLUS OF WOMEN" sa mga BANSANG MUSLIM na NABANGGIT. Ang mayroon ay ang "SURPLUS OF MEN."

Kung tama si DEEDAT at ang mga TAGASUNOD NIYANG BALIK ISLAM ay HINDI po ba DAPAT AY PAYAGAN ng mga BANSANG MUSLIM ang MGA BABAE na MAG-ASAWA nang HIGIT sa ISA?

Ang tanong ay PINAPAYAGAN BA ng mga BANSANG MUSLIM ang MGA BABAE NILA na MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI?

HINDI po.

Bakit HINDI?

E kasi po, LIKAS na PALPAK at BALUKTOT lang talaga ang PANGANGATWIRAN ni DEEDAT at ng mga ALAGAD NIYANG BALIK ISLAM. MISMONG mga BANSANG MUSLIM ay HINDI UMAAYON sa PILIPIT NIYANG PAG-IISIP.

Kung NANINIWALA kasi ang mga BANSANG MUSLIM sa KWENTO ni DEEDAT ay DAPAT po sa UAE ay DALA-DALAWANG LALAKE ang ASAWA ng ISANG BABAE.

Sa SAUDI naman ay DAPAT na may mga BABAE na MAY DALAWANG ASAWA.

Ang kaso po ay HINDI GANOON ang SITWASYON sa mga BANSANG MUSLIM na IYAN. PATUNAY na PALPAK ang ARAL ni DEEDAT at ng mga BALIK ISLAM.

SINO lang po ang NALOLOKO ni DEEDAT at ng mga TAGASUNOD NIYANG BALIK ISLAM?

Ang NALOLOKO lang NILA ay ang mga WALANG MALAY at WALANG ALAM na mga TAO na NAPAKADALING MAPANIWALA sa KANILANG mga MAPANLINLANG na KWENTO.

NAPANIWALA rin ni DEEDAT ang mga LALAKE na MAHILIG sa BABAE.

ISIPIN nga naman po ninyo, kung MATINDI ang KAMUNDUHAN ng isang LALAKE ay PUWEDE SIYANG MAG-ASAWA nang HANGGANG APAT! GRABE! Di po ba?

IYAN po ang ILAN sa mga URI ng NALINLANG ng KWENTO ni DEEDAT. SILA ang ILAN sa MGA URI ng TAO na nag-BALIK ISLAM.

Ngayon, HETO po ang MASAKLAP para sa MGA NALINLANG ni DEEDAT at UMAASA ngayon na PUWEDE SILANG MAKATIKIM nang MARAMING BABAE: Ang PUWEDE LANG MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI ay YUNG MARAMING PERA.

KUNG WALANG PERA ang NAG-BALIK ISLAM ay TUTUNGANGA NA LANG SIYA at MAIINGGIT habang ang MAYAYAMANG BALIK ISLAM ay NAGPAPAKASAWA sa KAMUNDUHAN.

Pero may "SOLUSYON" pa rin diyan ang mga LUMILINLANG sa mga nag-BALIK ISLAM.

Kung HINDI RAW MAKAPAG-ASAWA nang ISA o APAT DITO sa LUPA ay MAY 72 BATAM-BATA at HINDI KUMUKUPAS na VIRGIN na NAGHIHINTAY sa mga BALIK ISLAM sa "PARAISO."

Kaya po ba may ILAN na NAGPAPAKAMATAY MAKAPASOK LANG sa "PARAISO"?

Ang tanong ay DIYOS BA ang NAGSABI na MAY 72 BIRHEN na NAGHIHINTAY sa mga BALIK ISLAM sa "PARAISO"?

Hindi po ba MISMONG MGA BALIK ISLAM ang NAGSASABI na NEVER KINAUSAP ng DIYOS ang MISMONG PROPETA NILA? PAANO NILA MASASABI na GALING SA DIYOS ang ARAL na IYAN?

Hindi po kaya NILILINLANG NA NAMAN LANG ng mga SKOLAR ng BALIK ISLAM ang MGA TAO at PINAAASA sa MGA "BIRHEN" na WALA NAMAN TALAGA?

Hindi ba DAPAT ay PATUNAYAN MUNA NILA na DIYOS NGA ang NAGSABI na MAY 72 BIRHEN na NAGHIHINTAY sa mga BALIK ISLAM? Hindi ba DAPAT ay IPAKITA muna NILA na DIYOS MISMO ang NAGSABI na MAYROON NIYAN.

Kung HINDI NILA IYAN MAIPAKIKITA ay ANO ang DAHILAN ng mga HINIHIKAYAT NILANG MAG-BALIK ISLAM para MANIWALA sa KWENTO NILA? Tama po ba?

218 comments:

  1. Cenon Bibe;
    SINO ba namang MATINO at MATALINO ang AANIB sa HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS?

    Muslim;
    Hoy! MangMang at GogO na Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! ano nga ang sabi mo? na MATINO at MATALINO ka?! eh bakit ang sabi ng Bibliya mo ay GagO at Sinto-sinto ka?! Ibig bang sabihin nitong ay SinaSalungat ka rin ng Bibliya mo? hindi nga ba ikaw lang naman itong SumaSalungat sa Bibliya mo? bakit tila ngayon ginagantihan ka ng iyong Bibliya at Bibliya na naman itong SumaSalungat sa mga pinaSasaBi mo?!


    Cenon Bibe;
    Kaya nga KRISTIYANO KAMI e.


    Muslim;
    Bakit si Kristo ba Kristyano ang kanyang Practice at Relihiyon? Sige patunayan mo ngayon Biblically na Kristyano nga si Kristo! si Abraham ba, si Adan, si Moses, si David si Solomon etc! etc! sila ba na mga Propeta ng Dios, I mean Propeta ng Totoo at nag-iisang Dios; ang mga practice ba nila at paniniwala ay katulad ng sa inyo? at sial ba ay talagang mga Kristyano? sige patunayan mo! Now ngayon anong ang posibilidad ng kaligtasan ng naunang mga Tao kong sila ay hindi pala Kristyano! Ibig bang sabihin nito ang mga pinapalaganap na aral ni Abraham, Moses, David at ang iba pa ay hindi galing sa Dios dahil ito ay naman Kristyanismo?! mag-isip ka naman Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na paka MangMang mo naman talaga!


    Cenon Bibe;
    KAYO LANG ang UMANIB sa HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS at NANINIWALA sa mga ARAL na HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTURO.

    Muslim;
    Papaano mo nalalaman yang pinagsasabi mo? Demonyo ba ang may sabi sayo nyan? ha? Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? Ngayon kong kaya mong patutunayan na Kristyanismo nga ang daladal ng mga naunang Propeta ay baka may maniniwala pa sayo! Pero Bible proved that Christianism started in the time of Paul and not in the Lifetime of Jesus! so to speak!

    ReplyDelete
  2. CENON BIBE:
    Hindi ba PAG-AASAWA ng MARAMI ang UGAT ng FEMALE-MALE RATIO na IPINAKIKITA MO? NAKALIMUTAN MO AGAD porke NAPAHIYA KA?

    Hindi ba MGA BANSANG MUSLIM ang NAGTUTURO na DAPAT MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI ang LALAKE? Ha?

    Muslim;
    Hoy! GagO na Demon este Cenon Bibe pala yan sabi ng iyong Bibliya Jer 10:8. Kapanahunan pa ng Bibliya nakakApag-asawa na sila ng HIGIT sa ISA noon pa man. Abraham ay mayrrong higit sa iisang asawa! si Moses ay mayroong higit sa isa ang asawa, David mayroong higit sa iisang asawa! si Solomon ay napakaraming asawa! etc! etc! etc! siguro nAman hindi ko na kailangan pang ilahad ang mga talata dito since karamihan naman sa inyo ay may mga Bibliya. at siguro naman ay alam na ninyo ang mga ito! Sa makatwid po mga ipokrito kayo kasi ang lahat ng mga ito ay malinaw na mababasa at nakasulat mismo sa inyong Bibliya!

    ReplyDelete
  3. CENON BIBE:
    Hindi ba PAG-AASAWA ng MARAMI ang UGAT ng FEMALE-MALE RATIO na IPINAKIKITA MO? NAKALIMUTAN MO AGAD porke NAPAHIYA KA?

    Hindi ba MGA BANSANG MUSLIM ang NAGTUTURO na DAPAT MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI ang LALAKE? Ha?


    Muslim;
    Sabi nitong TangA at MangMang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala at ganito po;

    "Hindi ba MGA BANSANG MUSLIM ang NAGTUTURO na DAPAT MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI ang LALAKE?"

    Ang masasabi ko lamang po kay GagO at Sinto-Sinto (ayon sa sinasabi ng kanyang Biliya sa kanya sa Jer. 10:8) na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay MangMang GagO talaga sya pagdating sa kanyang Bibliya. kasi po hindi pa po pala alam nitong mangMang na ito na ang Pag-aasawa ng Higit sa isa ay nagmula pa sa Panahon ni Abraham! noon may asawa sya na ang pangalan po ay si Sarah tapus nagka-Anak si Abraham kay HagaR at yon po ay si Ismael. patunay mula sa Bibliya ng panibagong asawa ni Abraham;

    Gen. 25:1
    "Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah."

    V.S.

    1Chronicles 1:32
    "Now the sons of Keturah, Abraham's concubine: she bare Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan; Sheba, and Dedan."

    KETURAH: The third wife of Abraham "Then again Abraham took a WIFE, and her name was Keturah GENESIS 25:1 Keturah being the WIFE of Abraham is being contradicted in the self-same "Word of God" — i.e. I CHRONICLES 1:32, where Keturah is described as Abraham's CONCUBINE. Here is an extra contradiction in the Bible, unless 'WIFE" and "CONCUBINE" are synonymous terms.

    Ang gulo po talaga ano po? kaya po siguro nagkawindang-windang Hinggil sa totoong paniniwala at Pagkilala sa Nag-iisa at tunay na Dios ang mga tao ngayon!

    GOD: Is not a fabricator of confusion—
    (a) "For God is NOT the author of confusion . ." I CORINTHIANS 14:33

    Contradicted by".
    (b) " . . I make peace, and CREATE EVIL . . ." ISAIAH 45:7 (by But the spirit of the Lord departed from Saul and AN EVIL SPIRIT from the Lord troubled him. I SAMUEL 16:14

    ISAIAH 45:7
    "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."

    I SAMUEL 16:14
    "But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him."

    (c) "And for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion, that they should BELIEVE A LIE." 2 THESSALONIANS 2:1 1

    2 THESSALONIANS 2:11
    "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:"

    Bagamat isa sa mga privileged ng Isalam ay katulad din naman ng mga nauna pa pong mga Tao na kong saan tumatalima at sumusunod sa mga kautusan ng dios ay nagdudoon pa rin po ang pag-aasawa ng higit sa isa. Pero hindi po kaya alam nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang ang Pag-aasawa ng higit sa isa ay nasa at makikita sa Hole este Holy Book na daladala nya? ito po ang iilan sa mga patunay ng kanya mismong Bibliya;

    POLYGAMY: Solomon the wise had a thousand wives and concubines
    (a) "And he (Solomon) had seven hundred wives, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart (towards other gods). "KINGS 1 1:3

    (b) Abraham the friend of God had more than one wife; and so had Israel (Jacob) and David the king. There is not a single word of reproach in the "Book of God" the Holy Bible against polygamous marriages.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cenon Bibe;
    Kung tama si DEEDAT at ang mga TAGASUNOD NIYANG BALIK ISLAM ay HINDI po ba DAPAT AY PAYAGAN ng mga BANSANG MUSLIM ang MGA BABAE na MAG-ASAWA nang HIGIT sa ISA?

    Muslim;
    Hahahahahahaha! MangMang! ka talaga Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! Babae papayagang mag-aasawa ng higit sa IISA? ok ka lang Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! Basahin mo ang buong Bibliya kong mayroon bang ganoong pangyayari?! taliwas ka talaga sa mga nakasulat sa iyong Bibliyang demonyo ka! Palibhasa ang paniniwala mo na si Maria na Ina ni Jesus na syang babae na pinapala ng Lahat ay nagkakroon daw po ito dear readers of this blog ng Dalawang ASAWA sa iisang panahon, Kong maaalala nyo po sinasabi po nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na si Maria na ina ni Jesus at ang Espiritu Santo ay mag-ASAWA Tapus po hindi pa man naipanganak nitong si Maria ang kanyang Binubuntis ay nag-AASAWA na naman daw po itong muli at ito ay si Jose na isa na pong 90 years old noon.

    Ito Demon este Cenon Bibe pala, ang lalaki kahit na higgit pa sa iisa ang kanyang asawa ito ay nakakasiguro na ang Anak na iluluwal ng kanyang asawa ay siguradong sa kanya talaga! (full blooded na sa kanya talaga!)

    Ang Babae kaya, kong pagbibigyan nating ang KATANGAHANG gusto nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala kapag may dalawang asawa kaya ang isang babae kapag ito ay naBuntis sino kaya sa dalawang ASAWA na lalaki nito ang pwedeng maging full blooded na ama? ha? gets mo na ba Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? Demon este Cenon Bibe pala you are creating more problem than a solution sa gusto mong mangyari! And God knows best pagdating sa mga bagay na ito! at hindi mo alam ito Demon este Cenon Bibe pala eh Demonyo ka kasi eh. Puro kaDamonyohan lamang yan nalalaman mo! kagaya nitong gusto mo na mangyari ngayon, bukod pa doon ang pagSalungat ang PagKontra mo sa mga sinasabi ni Kristo at ang tuwiran mong Pagkontra sa mga malinaw na nakasulat sa Bibliya!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Muslim;
    Bakit si Kristo ba Kristyano ang kanyang Practice at Relihiyon? Sige patunayan mo ngayon Biblically na Kristyano nga si Kristo!

    Anonymous Christian;
    Pinakita mo na naman ang kawalan mo ng talino at unawa.
    At sa sobrang kawalan mo ng alam ay naisipan mo pa itanong na kung kristiyano ang practice at relihiyon ni Hesu Kristo?
    Nakakatawa ka sa babaw ng unawa mo.

    Ganito lang ka-simple yan eh ibabalik ko sa iyo ang tanong mo para makita mo kung gaano kawalang kwenta at kawalang talino ang sinasabi mo.

    itanong mo sa sarili mo kung muslim ba ang relihiyon at practice ng Diyos nyo? Nasa Koran nyo ba na isang muslim ang Diyos nyo at ito ang pinapractice nya?

    Siguro naman ay na-realize mo na kung gaano kawalang kwenta at kawalang talino ang tanong mo.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Muslim;
    si Abraham ba, si Adan, si Moses, si David si Solomon etc! etc! sila ba na mga Propeta ng Dios, I mean Propeta ng Totoo at nag-iisang Dios; ang mga practice ba nila at paniniwala ay katulad ng sa inyo?

    Anonymous Christian;
    Sige ituloy mo lang yan sinasabi mo dahil nakikita naming mga reader kung anong klase unawa meron kayo.
    Si Adan, Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon... propeta? Saan nyo natutunan yan?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Muslim;
    Now ngayon anong ang posibilidad ng kaligtasan ng naunang mga Tao kong sila ay hindi pala Kristyano! Ibig bang sabihin nito ang mga pinapalaganap na aral ni Abraham, Moses, David at ang iba pa ay hindi galing sa Dios dahil ito ay naman Kristyanismo?!

    Anonymous Christian;
    Ibalik din ulit natin sa inyo ang katanungan.
    Ano ang posibilidad ng kaligtasan ng mga naunang tao kung ang relihiyon muslim ay di na naiiimbento?

    Napapansin na sana ninyo kung gaano kawalang alam at talino sa mga pinagsasabi nyo.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Muslim;
    Bagamat isa sa mga privileged ng Isalam ay katulad din naman ng mga nauna pa pong mga Tao na kong saan tumatalima at sumusunod sa mga kautusan ng dios ay nagdudoon pa rin po ang pag-aasawa ng higit sa isa.

    Anonymous Christian;
    Kailan ba inutos ng Diyos na maari sila mag asawa ng higit sa isa?
    Sige pakibigay kung kailan inutos ito ng Diyos?
    Sino ang kausap ng Diyos ng sabihin nya na maaari kayo mag asawa ng higit sa isa?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous Christian;
    Pinakita mo na naman ang kawalan mo ng talino at unawa.
    At sa sobrang kawalan mo ng alam ay naisipan mo pa itanong na kung kristiyano ang practice at relihiyon ni Hesu Kristo?
    Nakakatawa ka sa babaw ng unawa mo.


    Muslim;
    Eh pinangangalandakan ng MangMang at Tanga mong iniIdolo na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na galing daw sa dios ang Relihiyon nya ang Katolisismo! di ba marapat lamang na ito din ang Relihiyon at Practice ni Kristo? oh di ba? Bakit ikaw ba kailan ka ba Tumino at kailan ka nagkaroon ng Talino dyan sa kinaaaniban mo? ha? May talino ka ba kahit kaunti lamang? Sumagot ka! Kong may kaunti kang talino ayon sa kamangmangan mong pinasasaabi ngayon sige Tatanungin kita hinggil sayong Bibliya mo! hindi na po tayo lalayo pa, Patungkol sa Bibliya mo mismo ang itataNong ko sayo! kasi itong katanunganG ito ay hindi talaga masagot-sagot nyang iniIdolo nyong MangMang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala; baka ikaw alam mo ang kasagutan hinggil dito! Sige sagotin mo ito;

    ILANG WORDS AND LETTERS MERON ANG BIBLIYA MO?

    sige sagotin mo yan ha? di nga ba pinangangalandakan mong Matalino ka? bueno tingnan natin ngayon kong tutoo nga ang pinagSasabi mo!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hahahaha kung di magmura itong muslim na ito ay pababa ng pababa ang IQ na ginagamit nito sa pagkikipagtalakayan hahahha..

    Hindi na makatutol sa pagtutol ni bro cenon laban sa isang iskolar ng islam na si deedat ay nagmumura na lamang ito si muslim..Kaya nga ako dapat ihanap ng grade two itong muslim na ito dahil yun lang ang match nya eh hahaha..

    ReplyDelete
  11. ibalik natin kay muslim ilang letra ang koran..pakisabi n din kung alin ang totoo sa version nyo ha hahahahaa..

    ReplyDelete
  12. Muslim;
    si Abraham ba, si Adan, si Moses, si David si Solomon etc! etc! sila ba na mga Propeta ng Dios, I mean Propeta ng Totoo at nag-iisang Dios; ang mga practice ba nila at paniniwala ay katulad ng sa inyo?

    TingNan nyo po ang link na ito;

    http://islam.about.com/od/prophets/p/prophets.htm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_of_Islam


    Anonymous Christian;
    Sige ituloy mo lang yan sinasabi mo dahil nakikita naming mga reader kung anong klase unawa meron kayo.
    Si Adan, Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon... propeta? Saan nyo natutunan yan?

    Muslim;
    huH!? alam mo ba kong ano yang samahan iong inaaniban mo? tila wala ka talagang alam ah?!

    ito TingnaN mo itong LINKI na ito alang-alang sa KaTangahang Taglay mo!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_of_Christianity

    Main list
    A
    * Aaron (Exodus 7:1)
    * Abel (Luke 11:50-51)
    * Abraham (Genesis 20:7)
    * Agabus (Acts 21:10)
    * Agur (Book of Proverbs 30:1)
    * Ahijah (1 Kings 11:29)
    * Amos (Amos 7:8)
    * Anna (Luke 2:36)
    * Azariah (2 Chronicles 15:1)


    B
    * Barnabas (Acts 13:31)


    D
    * Daniel (Matthew 24:15)
    * David (Hebrews 11:32)
    * Deborah (Judges 4:4)

    E

    * Elijah (1 Kings 18:22)
    * Elisha (1 Kings 19:16)
    * Enoch (Jude 1:14)
    * Ezekiel (Ezekiel 1:3)

    G

    * Gad (2 Samuel 24:11)
    * Gideon (Hebrews 11:32)

    H

    * Habakkuk (Habakkuk 1:1)
    * Haggai (Haggai 1:1)
    * Hosea (Hosea 1:1)
    * Huldah (2Kings 22:14)

    I

    * Iddo (2 Chronicles 900:1)
    * Isaiah (Isaiah 13:37)

    J

    * Jacob (Genesis 28:11 - 16)
    * Jehu (1 Kings 16:7)
    * Jeremiah (Jeremiah 1:11)
    * Joel (Joel 1:1)
    * John the Baptist (Luke 7:28)
    * John of Patmos (Revelation 1:1)
    * Jonah (Jonah 1:1)
    * Joshua (Joshua 1:1)
    * Judas Barsabbas (Acts 15:32)
    * Jesus

    L

    * Lucius of Cyrene (Acts 13:1)Jhon lucianus

    M

    * Malachi (Malachi 1:1)
    * Manahen (Acts 13:1)
    * Micah (Micah 1:1)
    * Micaiah (1 Kings 22:8)
    * Miriam (Exodus 15:20)
    * Moses (Deuteronomy 34:10)

    N

    * Nahum (Nahum 1:1)
    * Nathan (2 Samuel 7:2)
    * Noah (Genesis 7:1)

    O

    * Obadiah (Obadiah 1:1)
    * Oded (2 Chronicles 15:3)

    P

    * Philip the Evangelist (Acts 8:26) Note: His four daughters also prophesied (Acts 21:8, 9)

    S

    * Samuel (1 Samuel 3:20)
    * Shemaiah (1 Kings 22:12)
    * Silas (Acts 15:32)
    * Simeon Niger (Acts 13:1)

    T

    * The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11:3

    Z

    * Zechariah son of Berechiah (Zechariah 1:1)
    * Zechariah son of Jehoiada (Luke) 11:50-51)
    * Zephaniah (Zephaniah 1:1)

    ReplyDelete
  13. implyCatholic said...

    ibalik natin kay muslim ilang letra ang koran..pakisabi n din kung alin ang totoo sa version nyo ha hahahahaa..

    Muslim;
    Hahahahahahaha! May nag-react na isang mangmaNg din pati sya di nya rin alam ang nilalaman ng kanyang Bibliya kasi, Tulad ng kanyang iniIdolo na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay nangangamote din sa katanungaN kong iyan! eh papaano kasi eh pari-pariho namang mga MangMang ang mga ito!

    Hindi alam nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang nilalaman ng kanyang Bibliya at ipinangangalandakan din nitong MangMang na ito na ang tunay daw na Bibliya ay na g kanyang 73 books of the Bible! hehehehehe! bakit ang Bibliya ba na 66 book ay isang gawa-gawa lamang ng kong sino-sino? alin ba talaga ang tutoong Bibliya ang 73 books of the Bible ba o ang 66 books of the Bible? pareho naman pong Bibliya bakit may 73 at 66 books of the Bible pa? Kay ba nilang patunayan ito Biblically na ang kanilang 73 books of the Bible lamang ang tama?

    Puro KaTangahan at KamangMangan lamang talaga ang nalalaman nitong mga Bugok na ito pagdating sa kanilang Bibliya! mantakin nyo po Bibliya nila mismo mangMang sila at walang nalalaman?! nakakatwa po talaga ang mga ito!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Prophets of Christianity

    Secondary list

    * Eldad (Numbers 11:26)
    * Eliezer (2 Chronicles 20:37)
    * Elisabeth, mother of John the Baptist (Luke 1:41)
    * Hagar (Genesis 16:10-11)
    * Jahaziel (2 Chronicles 20:14)
    * Joseph (Genesis 37:5 - 11)
    * Joseph, fosterfather of Jesus (Matthew 1:20)
    * Mary, mother of Jesus (Luke 1:26-28)
    * Medad (Numbers 11:26)
    * King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon (Daniel 2:1)
    * King Saul (1Samuel 10:10)
    * Simeon of Jerusalem (Luke 2:25, 26)
    * King Solomon (1Kings 3:5)
    * The seventy elders of Israel (Numbers 11:25)
    * Zechariah, father of John the Baptist (Luke 1:67)

    ReplyDelete
  15. ILANG WORDS AND LETTERS MERON ANG BIBLIYA MO?

    sige sagotin mo yan ha? di nga ba pinangangalandakan mong Matalino ka? bueno tingnan natin ngayon kong tutoo nga ang pinagSasabi mo!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ay nakupo. INULIT na naman nitong Bulok-Islam ang kanyang WALANG KWENTANG TANONG! OO na. HIndi ko alam ang sagot diyan! O masaya ka na? Oops, teka lang. Bago ka magcelebrate e sagotin mo muna ito:

    Ikaw, alam mo rin ba kung ilang words and letters ang bible at ang Koran? Alam mo ba kung ilang basong tinta ang ginamit sa pag print ng bible at ng Koran? Alam mo ba kung ilang atoms ang napapaloob sa lahat ng pages ng bible at ng Koran?

    O sige, sagot hanggat kaya mo! Isalba mo naman ang kababawan ng isip mo, Mr Bulok-Islam!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Balik-islam:
    ILANG WORDS AND LETTERS MERON ANG BIBLIYA MO?

    Chris:
    Brod. para ito sa mga totoong muslim, baka sakaling may muslim na bumibisita sa blog na ito, ikaw kasi sampid ka lang at salot sa islam. Ang totoong muslim kasi na kilala ko hindi polluted ang bunganga kagaya mo.

    TRICKY ang tanong na "ilang words ang bumubuo sa Biblia", at alam kong sa puso mo ay alam mo 'yan, pero dahil pinamamahayan ni Satanas ang dibdib mo, inuulit-ulit mo 'yan.

    Marami na kasing versions ng Bible ngayon, ALIN BA DUN ANG TINATANONG MO? Wala na ang mga orginal na autographs, pero existing pa rin ang mga manuscripts. Ang Bible sa kabuuan para sa kaalaman mo, isinulat sa humigit-kumulang 1500 taon ng iba't-ibang author. Naisalin sa mahigit 2000 languages (+ diff. dialects), at ITO ANG AKLAT NA KINASIHAN NG DIOS (na lumikha ng lahat ng bagay). Tapos magtatanong ka, ILAN BA ANG WORDS SA BIBLE? Tanong 'yan ng TUSO, at istilo 'yan ni Satanas (na dios mo).

    O baka itanong mo na naman TUSONG balik-islam, "alin ba ang tunay, 66 or 72 books"? That's another set of long arguments, and that's non of your business.

    Hindi naman kasi ito kagaya ng islam at mga judio na SOBRANG NAKASALIG SA 'NASUSULAT'. O diba GAYA-GAYA lang naman talaga ang islam sa mga Judio? At inggit na inggit pa - kasi sila ang totoong LAHI NI ABRAHAM, sa kanila ibinigay ang KAUTUSAN, ang mga propeta, at ang ISLAM, COUNTERFEIT ng JUDAISMO.

    Pero tapos na 'yon brod. si Cristo ang hangganan ng kautusan: Romans 10:4 "For Christ is the END of the LAW unto righteousness to every one that believeth."

    At kahit marami pang salin ang Biblia, hindi nito binabago ang mensahe: Si Cristo ang Anak ng Dios na buhay!

    John 14:6 "Sinabi sa kaniya ni Jesus, Ako ang daan, at ang katotohanan, at ang buhay: sinoman ay di makaparoroon sa Ama, kundi sa pamamagitan ko."

    Sagot ka balik-islam (na salot ng islam).

    ReplyDelete
  17. Balik-islam (na salot sa islam):
    huH!? alam mo ba kong ano yang samahan iong inaaniban mo? tila wala ka talagang alam ah?!

    ito TingnaN mo itong LINKI na ito alang-alang sa KaTangahang Taglay mo!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_of_Christianity

    Chris:
    HAHAHAHAH! Natawa na naman ako. Sa WIKIPEDIA naman pala natutunan eh! Hahahah!

    ReplyDelete
  18. BULOK-ISLAM SAID:
    alin ba talaga ang tutoong Bibliya ang 73 books of the Bible ba o ang 66 books of the Bible?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Pambihira ka talaga Mr Bulok-Islam! Nagkokomento ka sa isang bagay na hindi mo alam!

    Ok, para magkakaroon ng kwenta yang tanong mong yan, patunayan mo muna sa amin na alam mo ang pinagsasabi mo! Magbigay ka ng historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang bible! Pag nagawa mo na yan saka ka na lang mag komento ulit, para di masayang oras mo.

    ReplyDelete
  19. salot sa islam;
    Papaano mo nalalaman yang pinagsasabi mo? Demonyo ba ang may sabi sayo nyan? ha? Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? Ngayon kong kaya mong patutunayan na Kristyanismo nga ang daladal ng mga naunang Propeta ay baka may maniniwala pa sayo! Pero Bible proved that Christianism started in the time of Paul and not in the Lifetime of Jesus! so to speak!

    Chris:
    Saan mo na naman natutunan 'yan Mr. Bugok? Sa wikipedia na naman? o kay Deedat (N.R.I.P.) na malisyoso? Kayo talagang mga SAMPID sa islam, para kayong mga ALIPING TAGAHIMOD nitong si deedat.

    Umiiral na po ang Kristyanismo bago pa suguin si Apostol Pablo. Sa katunayan isa s'ya sa matinding TAGAUSIG ng Iglesia bago s'ya maging Apostol:

    Gawa 8:1 "At si SAULO ay SUMANGAYON sa kaniyang pagkamatay. At nang araw na yao'y nangyari ang isang malaking paguusig LABAN SA IGLESIA na nasa Jerusalem; at silang lahat ay nagsipangalat sa lahat ng mga dako ng Judea at Samaria, MALIBAN NA SA MGA APOSTOL."

    8:3 "Datapuwa't PINUKSA NI SAULO ang iglesia, na pinapasok ang bahay-bahay, at KINAKALADKAD ang mga lalake't mga babae, at sila'y ipinapasok sa bilangguan."

    Si Pablo po ba ang NAGUMPISA ng Kristyanismo??? O sadyang KALABAN lang ni Cristo itong MANGMANG na balik-islam na puro HIDWA ang natutunan mula kay deedat?

    Oooops teka uunahan na kita: alam ko HALOS SAMBAHIN mo na si deedat dahil sa sobrang paghanga mo eh. Napakamalisyoso pa naman ng deedat na 'yan.

    Gawa 24:5 "Sapagka't nangasumpungan namin ang taong ito'y isang taong mapangulo at mapagbangon ng mga paghihimagsik sa gitna ng lahat ng mga Judio sa buong sanglibutan, at NAMIMINUNO sa SEKTA ng mga Nazareno:"

    Isa po ito sa mga PANLANSING NI DEEDAT. Ito po ay AKUSASYON LAMANG ng mananalumpati/ orator/ lawyer na si TERTULLUS. Siya po ay kasama ng mga Judio na nagsasakdal kay Pablo sa harap ni Gobernador Felix. Hindi po kasi kinilala ng mga pinuno ng Judio ang relihiyong Kristyanismo. Hindi po nila kinilala si Jesus bilang Cristo, kaya ganon na lang ang GALIT nila kay Pablo na nangangaral sa pangalan ni Cristo. Kung bakit naman po tinawag na SEKTA NG MGA NAZARENO, ay dahil nga po sa hindi nila kinilala ang Panginoong Jesus bilang Messiah, kundi isang taong taga-Nazareth lang, o Nazareno. Sa paggamit naman po ng salitang 'SEKTA', karaniwan na po ito sa mga Judio, gaya ng pagtawag nila sa SEKTA NG SADUCEO, o SEKTA NG FARISEO.

    HINDI PO TOTOONG SI PABLO ANG NAGUMPISA NG KRISTYANISMO. MAHALAY NA AKUSASYON LAMANG PO IYAN NG mga (salot na) balik-islam NA POLLUTED ANG MGA UTAK (kung meron man).

    ReplyDelete
  20. Muslim;
    ILANG WORDS AND LETTERS MERON ANG BIBLIYA MO?

    sige sagotin mo yan ha? di nga ba pinangangalandakan mong Matalino ka? bueno tingnan natin ngayon kong tutoo nga ang pinagSasabi mo!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ay nakupo. INULIT na naman nitong Bulok-Islam ang kanyang WALANG KWENTANG TANONG! OO na. HIndi ko alam ang sagot diyan! O masaya ka na? Oops, teka lang. Bago ka magcelebrate e sagotin mo muna ito:


    Muslim;
    Walang Kwentang Tanong ba kamo? eh wala din naman kayong kwentA eh! mangMang kayao kahit sA mismong Bibliya ninyo! Eh dapat talagang uUlitin ang isyong yan Hindi nyo masagot-sagot yan eh! Oh din ba? Bible nga yang hawak ninyo pero mga MangMaang naman kayo sa inyong Bibliya! Hoy Estupidong MANNY CRUZ sagotin mo nalang at huwag ka ng magpalusot! kaya nga yong iniIdolo nyong MangMang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala nilalampaso sa issue na yan eh! papaano kasi nagyayabang pa na isang Bible Expert daw sya! ayon lumagpak tuloy ang GagOng si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ikaw, alam mo rin ba kung ilang words and letters ang bible at ang Koran? Alam mo ba kung ilang basong tinta ang ginamit sa pag print ng bible at ng Koran? Alam mo ba kung ilang atoms ang napapaloob sa lahat ng pages ng bible at ng Koran?

    Muslim;
    Ang nilalaman ng inyong Bibliya at ang nilalaman ng aming Qur'an ay alam ko. itatanong ko ba naman yon kong di ko alam? Estupido ka talaga! Pero hindi ko alam na Bukod sa pagiging MangMang mo ay naPakaTanga mo pa pala talaga! May mga katanungan ka na hindi na dapat sagotin gayan ng mga ito;

    "ilang basong tinta ang ginamit sa pag print ng bible, ilang atoms ang napapaloob sa lahat ng pages ng bible"

    kasi ultimo ang Sto Papa ninyo o kahit si Kristo kapag tinatanong mo ng ganitong klaseng katanungan eh masasampal kang talaga!
    Patunay na ultimo si Kristo hindi alam sagotin ang katanungan mo ay sya mismo hindi nya alam ang kanyang pagbabalik namang muli; basa:
    Matt 24:36
    "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only."

    ReplyDelete
  21. Combat Kit Against Bible Thumpers

    1. AIDS AND HOMOSEXUALITY: The Holy Bible gives the cause of this cancer and blight: " Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. Romans 1:22-27

    2. ARABS AND ARABIA: In the Christian Bible. (a) the burden upon Arabia" ISAIAH 21:13. "Burden" = responsibility. God has imposed upon the Muslims, the duty to deliver His Message to mankind. ISAIAH mentions this after having seen the vision of a chariot of asses and a chariot of camels (ISAIAH 21:7) The chariot of asses turned out to be Jesus (PBUH) who entered Jerusalem riding on two donkeys (Matthew 21:7) Who then was of the "Chariot of Camels"?

    It could be none other than Muhummed (PBUH) who came about six hundred years after the advent of Jesus Christ (PBUH). If this conclusion is not accepted, then this prophesy would still remain unfulfilled.

    (b) " . . the villages that Kedar doth inhabit ISAIAH 42:11 Kedar being Ishmael's offspring. "Arabia, and all the princes of Kedar. . ." EZEKIEL 27:21

    The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia quotes the following from A.S. Fulton:

    ". . . Of the Ishmaelite tribes, Kedar must have been the most important and thus in later times the name came to be applied to all the wild tribes of the desert. It is though Kedar (Arab Keidar) that Muslim genealogists trace the descent of Muhummad from Ishmael."

    (c) ". . . he (Muhummed pbuh) shined forth from mount Paran (in Arabia), and he came with ten thousand saints. DEUTERONOMY 33:2. (Referring to the conquest of Makkah). (d) " . . and I (God Almighty) will move them (the Jews) to jealousy with those (the Arabs) which are NOT A PEOPLE (a non-entity): I will provoke them (the Jews) to anger with a FOOLISH NATION," |the pre-Islamic Arabs) DEUTERONOMY 32:21

    3. ABRAHAM: He wedded his own sister (Sarah.) (?) (a) "Why saidst thou (O Abraham), she is my sister? So l might have taken her to me to WIFE . . . now take her (Sarah) and go thy way. GENESIS 12:19 (b) "And yet INDEED she (Sarah) is my sister (!) and she became my (Abraham's) WEE" GENESIS 20:12 Hagar Abraham's wife! " . . and (she, Sarah) gave her (Hagar) to her husband TO BE HIS WIFE GENESIS 16:3

    Unfulfilled prophecy (a) "And I will give unto thee (O Abraham), the land wherein thou art a stranger, ALL THE LAND OF CANAAN (Palestine), for an ever-lasting possession, and I will be their God GENESIS 17:8. Also GENESIS 13:15 and EXODUS 32:13. Poor Abraham (pbuh) did not receive a single square foot of land FREE! (b) "And he (God Almighty) gave him (Abraham) NO inheritance in it, NO, NOT SO MUCH TO SET HIS FOOT UPON; but he (God) promised that he would ,give it to him for a possession . . ." ACTS 7:5

    ReplyDelete
  22. 4. ABSURDITIES: in the Book of God (?) the Holy Bible (a) A TALKING ass. NUMBERS 22:27-28 (b) FOUR footed fowls. LEVITICUS 11:20 (c) Birth of females a DOUBLE pollution LEVITICUS 12:1,2,5 (d) Shamgar KILLS 600 with an ox goad JUDGES 3:31 (e) Samson KILLS A THOUSAND with the jaw bone of a donkey. JUDGES 15:15-16 (f) A SEVEN HEADED leopard REVELATION 13:1-2 (g) To eat SHIT and drink PISS. 2 KINGS 18:27 and ISAIAH 36:12 (h) DUNG on your faces. MALACHI 2:3 (i) To eat cake with SHIT. EZEKIEL 4:12-15 (j) Samson has SEX with a whore in Gaza JUDGES 16:1 (k) Ruth COHABITS with Boaz in the barn. RUTH 3:4-l5 (1) David SLEEPS with a young virgin l KINGS 1 1:1,3

    5. ALCOHOL: devilish advice in God's (?) Book? (a) "Alcohol is for people who are DYING, for those who are in MISERY. Let them drink and FORGET their poverty and unhappiness." (From the "Good News Bible In Today's English") PROVERBS 31:6-7 Alcohol recommended in preference to water! (b) "Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities 1 TIMOTHY 5:23 What does the AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) say? (c) Alcohol is the Devil's handiwork says the . . . Holy Qur-an 5:93

    6. APOSTASY: " . . neither shall thine eye pity him (the apostate), neither shalt thou spare him, neither shalt thou conceal him: "But thou shalt SURELY KILL HIM: thine hand shall be first upon him TO PUT HIM TO DEATH . . .DEUTERONOMY I 3 -8 9

    7. BACA IS MECCA: the holy Ka'ba built by the prophet Abraham (PBUH) and his son Ishmael (PBUH) is in Mecca.

    The name Mecca (Makkah) is mentioned in the Holy Qur'an in 48:24. Another name for Mecca is Bakka, depending on the dialect of the tribe: this is also mentioned once, in Sura 3:96

    "Verily, the first house (of worship) appointed for mankind was that in Bakka (Mecca), full of blessing, and guidance for all people." Amazingly enough, this word Bakka is mentioned by the prophet David (PBUH) in the Bible:

    "Who passing through the valley of Baca make it a well, the rain also filleth the pools." (Psalm 84:6)

    The well here is the well known well of Zam-Zam, still present now, close to the Ka'bah; after thousands of years.

    ReplyDelete
  23. 8. BASTARD: This word occurs in the Bible THREE times (a) "The BASTARD shall not enter the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation . . . DEUTERONOMY 23:2 (b) "And a BASTARD shall dwell in Ashdod . .ZECHARIAH 9:6 (c) "But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then ye are BASTARDS and not sons. " HERREWS 12:8

    9. CIRCUMCISION: A perpetual pact with God�(a) "He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money (your slaves), MUST needs be circumcised and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an EVERLASTING covenant. " GENESIS 17:13 (b) The uncircumcised to be "CUT OFF" (to be killed).GENESIS 17:14

    10. CONTRADICTIONS: In the Bible�(a) The "Lord" tempted David . . . 2 SAMUEL 24:1 or "Satan provoked David . . . I CHRONICLES 21:1 (b) 700 or 7000? "Horsemen" or "Footmen" . . . ? 2 Samuel 10:18 vs 1 CHRONICLES 19: 18 (c) Solomon had 2000 baths or 3000 baths? 1 KINGS 7-26 vs 2 CHRONICLES 4:5 (d) Solomon had 4000 stalls of horses or 40000? 2 CHRONICLES 9:25 vs 1 KINGS 4:26 (e) Did Saul enquire of the Lord or didn't he? 1 SAMUELS 28:6 vs 1 CHRONICLES 10:13-14 (f) Heaven, no man hath ascended JOHN 3:13 Contradicted by. 2 KINGS 2:11 Elijah ascended, and GENESIS 5:24 Enoch ascended. (g) Jesus lost "None" of his disciples JOHN 18:9 Contradicted by. He lost only "One" JOHN 17:12 (h) ALL are sinners 2 CHRONICLES 6:36 Contradicted by: "Whosoever is born of God DOTH NOT commit sin. . ." 1 John 3:9

    11. DAVID: "Man after God's own heart"�Commits adultery with Bath-sheba the wife of Uriah: (a) "And David sent messengers, and took her (Bathsheba); and she came in unto him, and he LAY (had intercourse) with her. . . 2 SAMUEL 11:4 (b) David wickedly caused the death of Uriah, the husband of Bath-sheba. 2 SAMUEL 11:6-25 (c) David shamelessly dances NAKED, see in index under "PROPHETS, but naked."

    ReplyDelete
  24. 12. ELOHIM: In Hebrew it literally means "gods". This word Elohim is consistently translated as "gods" in one hundred and ninety-six places in the Old Testament. The Christians however make an exception when this term occurs the very first time in the Holy Bible. Amazingly this they do in the very first book, the very first chapter and the very first verse of their so-called book of God:

    "In the beginning God (literally it should have been gods) created the heaven and the earth."

    13. GENEALOGY OF JESUS: The Christians have contrived two separate lists of the ancestors of Jesus (PBUH); a. Matthew 1:1-16 and b. Luke 3:23-38. In these two lists consisting of sixty-six names, there is only one name which is common to both and that is of Joseph the carpenter, and he should never have been mentioned since he was never responsible for the conception of Jesus (pbuh).

    14. GOD: Qualities ill-befitting God�(a) A hissing God (?) ISAIAH 5:26, 7: 18, ZECHARIA 10:8 (b) A "roaring" God (?) ISAIAH 42:13, JEREMIAH 25:30 (c) A "barber" God (?) ISAIAH 7:20 (d) A "penitent" God (?) JEREMIAH 15:6, GENESIS 6:6 (e) A God "riding" a cherub (?) 2 SAMUEL 22:11 (f) A God murders 50,070 for looking into a box (?) SAMUEL 6:19

    15. GOD WITH A SMALL "g": In Arabic, Hebrew and Greek there is no differentiation between a capital "G" for God, and a small "g" for god, as in the languages of the Western countries today; yet the Christians have played fast and loose when translating the Bible i.e.

    (a) " In whom the god (the Devil) of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not "2 Cor 4:4 (b) "And the Lord said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh, and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. " Exodus 7:1 Compare the above with JOHN 1:1, where the Christians have used capital "G"'s and "W"'s when referring to Jesus.

    16. GOD: His contradictory attributes�B> (a) "No man hath seen God at any time John 1: 18 (b) " (God) whom no man hath seen, nor can see .,."I TIMOTHY 6:16 (c) "And he (God) said, Thou canst see my face: for there shall no man see me, and 1ive. EXODUS 33:20

    Contradicted by: (a) "And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend Exodus 33:11 (b) 'And they (Moses, Aaron and seventy others) saw the God of Israel . ." EXODUS 24:10 (c) "And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved GENESIS 32:30

    And as a special favour God shows his back parts to Moses "And I (God) will take away my hand and thou shalt see my back parts . . . " EXODUS 33:23

    ReplyDelete
  25. 17. GOD: Is not a fabricator of confusion�(a) "For God is NOT the author of confusion . ." I CORINTHIANS 14:33 Contradicted by". (b) " . . I make peace, and CREATE EVIL . . ." ISAIAH 45:7 (by But the spirit of the Lord departed from Saul and AN EVIL SPIRIT from the Lord troubled him. I SAMUEL 16:14 (c) "And for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion, that they should BELIEVE A LIE." 2 THESSALONIANS 2:1 1

    18. GOD: Further contradictory qualities� (a) GOD AS AN OMNIPOTENT BEING: "And Jesus saith . for with God ALL THINGS are possible MARK 10:27, also MATTHEW 19:26 Contradicted by. "And the Lord was with Judah, and he drove out the inhabitants of the mountain, but COULD NOT drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had Chariots OF IRON." JUDGES 1:19 (b) GOD'S ANGER ABIDETH FOR A MINUTE: For his (God's) anger endureth but a MOMENT." PSALMS 30:5 . Contradicted by: " And the lord's anger was kindled against Israel and he made them (the Jews) wander in the wilderness FORTY YEARS..." NUMBERS 32:13 (c) GOD DOES NOT SHOW ANY SELF-REPROACH: "God is not a mar, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent . . ." NUMBERS 23:19 Contradicted by. " . . and the Lord REPENTED that he made Saul king over Israel " SAMUEL 15:35 Also: ; And the Lord REPENTED of the evil which he thought to do unto his people (Israel)" EXODUS 32:14 (d) GOD'S MERCY ENDURETH FOR EVER "For the Lord is good; and his mercy is Everlasting." PSALMS 100:5 Contradicted by: "I (God) remember that which Amalek did to Israel (four hundred years before) . . . Now go and smite Amalek and UTTERLY DESTROY ALL they have, and spare them not, but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling ox and sheep, camel and ass (the donkey) I SAMUEL 15:3 (e) GOD DWELLS IN LIGHT: " . . (God) dwelling in the LIGHT which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see . . " 1 TIMOTHY 6:16 Contradicted by: "Then spake Solomon, the Lord said that he would dwell in the Thick Darkness." 1 Kings 8:12 (f) GOD DOES NOT ENTICE MAN: 'Let no man say he is tempted, I am TEMPTED of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, NEITHER TEMPTETH he any man" JAMES 1:13 Contradicted by: 'And it came to pass after these things, that God DID TEMPT Abraham . " GENESIS 22:1

    19. HOLY GHOST: Every sect and denomination of Christian cults claim the "Gift" of the HOLY GHOST. This gift is so cheap that 75,000,000 "BORN AGAIN" Christians of America are also boasting this possession. (a) "and he (John the Baptist) shall be filled with the HOLY GHOST, even from his mother's womb. LUKE 1:15 I have not yet been able to establish what this phrase means from his mother's womb . . ." really Alas, poor Jesus (peace be upon him) had to mark time for THIRTY YEARS after his birth to obtain his gift of the HOLY GHOST on his baptism at the hands of John the Baptist (MATTHEW 3:16). (b) " and Elizabeth was filled with the HOLY GHOST. LUKE 1:41 (c) "And his father Zacharias was filled with the HOLY GHOST . . ." LUKE 1:67 (d) "he (Jesus pbuh) breathed on them, and saith unto them, receive ye the HOLY GHOST." JOHN 20:22 (e) "But he that shall blaspheme against the HOLY GHOST �hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation." MARK 3:29. HOLY GHOST: The words "Holy Ghost" here, should read the ''HOLY SPIRIT,'' a reference to the Holy Prophet of Islam, the Holy Prophet Muhummed (pbuh). For a detailed exposition obtain the FREE copy of my Book �"Muhummed (pbuh) the natural successor to Christ (pbuh).''

    ReplyDelete
  26. 20. INCEST: "Sexual intercourse between two persons who are too closely related." (New Collins Dictionary). For example, between father and daughter, son and mother, father-in-law and daughter-in-law, brother and sister, etc. INCEST IN GOD'S BOOK (?) BETWEEN A FATHER AND HIS DAUGHTERS: (a) "That night they (both the daughters of Lot) gave him (their father Lot) wine to drink and the older daughter had INTERCOURSE with him ... "The next day the older daughter said to her sister, I slept with him last night. now let's get him drunk again tonight, and you sleep with him. Then each of us will have a child by our father. So that night they got him drunk and the younger daughter had INTERCOURSE with him ... "In this way both of Lot's daughters became PREGNANT by their father. " GENESIS 19:33-35 (From the "Good News Bible- In Today's English"). In the older Versions, like the King James and the Roman Catholic Versions, "SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" is vaguely described as "COLLECTING THE SEED OF OUR FATHER." INCEST BETWEEN MOTHER AND SON: (b) "While Jacob (Israel) was living in the land, Reuben (his firstborn, his eldest son) had SEXUAL

    INTERCOURSE with Bilhah, his father's concubine. GENESIS 35:22. The older Versions of the Bible, use the word, "lay" for SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. INCEST BETWEEN FATHER-IN-LAW AND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW: (c) "When Judah saw her (Tamar, his daughter-in-law), he thought she was a prostitute, because she had covered her face. "He went over to her at the side of the road and said, "ALL RIGHT, HOW MUCH DO YOU CHARGE?" (He did not know that she was his daughter-in-law) {The words in parenthesis i.e. within brackets from He did not know to daughter-in-law are not in the original Hebrew manuscripts. They are the editors g loss.}

    "She said, what will you give me?" (To have sex with me) 'He answered, I WILL SEND YOU A YOUNG GOAT FROM MY FLOCK "She said, "All right, if you will give me something to keep as a pledge until you send the ,goat. ' . . He gave them (the pledges) to her. Then had INTERCOURSE, and she became pregnant GENESIS 38: 15-18 (Quoted from the ''Good News Bible"). CONCUBINE and WIFE are synonymous terms in the Bible. Look for it in the index under ''KETURAH" (the third wife of Abraham). Out of this incestuous relationship between a father-in-law and his daughter-in-law, twins were born, who were destined to become the great-grand-fathers of Jesus Christ see Matthew 1:3; "And Judas begat Phares and Zarah of Thamar . . . INCEST AND RAPE BETWEEN BROTHER AND SISTER (d) " . . he took hold of her (Thamar, his sister, not to be confused with Tamar in "c" above,, and said unto her, Come lie with me (have sex with me), my sister. "And she answered him, Nay, my brother (Amnon, one of the sons of David, the man after God's own heart) do not force me . . . "But he would not listen to her, and since he was stronger than she was, he overpowered her and RAPED her (his sister). " 2 Samuel 13:5-14 WHOLESALE RAPE AND INCEST BETWEEN SON AND HIS MOTHERS! (e) So they set up a tent for Absalom (another son of King David) on the palace roof, and in the sight of everyone, Absalom went in and had INTERCOURSE with his father's concubines " 2 SAMUELS 16:22

    ReplyDelete
  27. ". . . In the sight of every one" is rendered in the King James Version as "in the sight of all Israel." This is a fulfillment of God's promise to David the King:

    "Thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee (David) out of thine own house, and I will take THY WIVES before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbor (actually thy son) and he shall lie (have sexual intercourse) with thy wives in the sight of sun (for the whole world to watch the fun).

    For thou didst it secretly (with Bath-Sheba the wife of Uriah): but I will do this thing before ALL Israel, and before the sun." 2 Samuel 12:11-12

    You can well guess where "Penthouse" and "Playboy" got their inspiration from. Wherefrom if not from the Book of Books?

    (f) For other various types of incest see LEVITICUS 18:8-18. 20:11-14 and 17-21. Concubine seems synonymous to the word wife in the Bible. Look for this reference in index under "Keturah" the third wife of Abraham.


    21. ISHMAEL OR ISAAC?: A controversy has raged between the people of the Bible and the House of Islam as to which of the sons of Abraham (pbuh), Ishmael or Isaac was offered as a sacrifice.

    The Bible is quite clear in designating the offering:

    "And he (God Almighty) said, take now thy son, THINE ONLY SON . . ., whom thou lovest, and et thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering . . ." Genesis 22:2.

    If at anytime, an offspring of Abraham (pbuh) can be described as "thine only son: it could only be Ishmael, because for more than thirteen years, he was the only son and seed of Abraham.

    God Almighty acknowledges Ishmael as the "son and seed" of Abraham in no less than twelve places in the Book of Genesis alone. At no time was Isaac the only son and seed of Abraham!

    The false pen of the scribe was in the hand of the Jews who edited the Books of Moses (pbuh), as the prophet Jeremiah bewails:

    "How do ye say, We are wise, and the law (the Torah) of the Lord is with us? Lo, certainly in VAIN made he it; the PEN OF THE SCRIBE IS IN VAIN." Jeremiah 8:8

    When the Jews are found to convert an Israelite into an Ishmaelite when no motives are involved, then how much easier for them to change the word "you only son Ishmael" to : your only son Isaac!"

    Confirm the Jewish sickness in your Bible:

    "Amasa was a man's son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite . . . " 2 Samuel 17:25

    Contadicted by

    ". . . and the father of Amasa was Jether (dame as Ithra) the Ishmaelite." 1 Chronicles 2:17

    ReplyDelete
  28. 22. ISRAELITES: Insatiable whores�(a) "Thou hast played the WHORE also with the Assyrians, because thou (the Israelites) wast UNSATIABLE; yea, thou hast played the HARLOT with them, and yet couldest NOT BE SATISFIED." EZEKIEL 16:28

    WHOREDOMS OF THE 2 SISTERS �AHOLA AND AHOLIBA: (b) "And she kept LUSTING in the style of concubines belonging to those whose fleshly member (genitals) is as the fleshly member (genitals) of male asses (donkeys) and whose GENITAL ORGAN is as the GENITAL ORGAN of male horses. EZEKIEL 23:1-49 (New World Translation) (c) " . . for the spirit of WHOREDOMS hath cause them (the Jews) to err, and they have gone a WHORING from under their God " HOSEA 4:12, 6:10, and 9:1

    23. JEHOVAH: It is an amazing fact, that if Jehovah is the name of God as the Jehovah's Witnesses so boldly claim, then this high-sounding word does not occur even once in the original manuscripts of the twenty-seven books of the New Testament.

    For further details obtain a FREE copy of my book - "What is His Name?" from the IPCI.

    24. JEREMIAH: Made a prophet before his birth (a) "Before I formed thee in the belly (of your mother) I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." Jeremiah 1:5

    JEREMIAH DECEIVED BY GOD (?): (b) "O Lord, thou hast DECEIVED me, and I was DECEIVED: thou art stronger than 4 and hast PREVAILED: I am in derision daily, everyone mocketh me. JEREMIAH 20:7

    ReplyDelete
  29. 25. JESUS (pbuh): HIS FIRST MIRACLE IN THE HOLY BIBLE AND THE HOLY QUR'AN: To turn water into wine at the marriage feast at Cana JOHN 2:9 In the Holy Qur'an his first Miracle was to defend his mother, as an infant, against the false accusations of his enemies. SURAH MARIAM 19:30-33

    HIS INVECTIVES AGAINST THE ELDERS OF HIS PEOPLE: (a) Ye hypocrites. . . MATTHEW 23:13 "Ye wicked and adulterous generation Matthew 12:39 "Ye whited sepulchers . . . MATTHEW 23: 27 "Ye generation of vipers . . . " MATTHEW 23:33 (b) He calls his mother "WOMAN" JOHN 2:4, the same manner in which he addresses a prostitute, ". . . WOMAN where are those thine accusers?" JOHN 8:10 "THE PRINCE OF PEACE," boasts that he had not come to bring peace on earth but fire and division! "I came to set the earth on fire, and how I wish that it were ALREADY KINDLED. 'Do you supposed that I came to bring peace to the world? No, not peace BUT DIVISION." I LUKE 12:49 and 51 (JESUS) NOT GOD! Jesus would not allow anyone even to call him "good", let alone call him god, even with a small "g". "Small "g" See in the index for "GOD" with a small "g".

    "One came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 'And Jesus said unto him, WHY CALLEST THOU ME GOOD? there is NONE GOOD BUT ONE. THAT IS GOD" MATTHEW 19:16-17

    (JESUS') POWER NOT HIS OWN: (a) And Jesus came and spoke unto them, saying, All power is GIVEN unto me in heaven and In earth MATTHEW 28: 18 (b) 'T can of mine own self DO NOTHING: as I hear, I judge . . . JOHN 5:30 (c) " . . I by the FINGER OF GOD cast out devils . . (d) "And Jesus lifted up his eyes (towards heaven) and said, Father, I thank thee that THOU HAST HEARD ME. "And I know that THOU HEAREST ME ALWAYS: but because of the people which stand by I said my supplication aloud that THEY MAY BELIEVE that thou hast sent me. "And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, lazarus, come forth "And he that was dead came forth . . .JOHN 11 :41-43

    Who then gave life back to Lazarus? The answer is "GOD!" For God heard the prayer of Jesus, as always!",,,

    LISTEN NOW TO PETER'S TESTIMONY: (e) "Ye men of Israel (Jews!) hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, A MAN approved of God, , , _ (meaning a prophet) among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which GOD DID BY HIM in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know." ACTS 2:22

    WAS LUKE INSPIRED BY GOD TO SAY THAT JESUS (PBUH) WAS THE SON OF JOSEPH? "And Jesus himself began to be ABOUT ("about" the Holy Ghost did not know for sure) thirty years of age, being (AS WAS SUPPOSED) the son of Joseph . . . LUKE 3:23

    The words "(as was supposed)" appearing in brackets are not in the original Greek manuscript of Luke! These words are a gloss of the translators.

    In the different vernacular languages of the world, like Arabic, Afrikaans, Zulu, etc. the words "as was supposed" are retained in the translations but the brackets are removed. Thus by removing the brackets the words become the declaration of Luke, and if Luke was inspired then the words are transmuted into an utterance of God. This is how easily the word of man is transformed into the word of God in Christianity.

    JESUS (PBUH), TOO SELF-CONSIDERATE: "There came R woman with a box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his (Jesus' Pbuh) head . . "But when his DISCIPLES saw it, they had INDIGNATION, SAYING, to WHAT PURPOSE IS THIS WASTE? "For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor. (When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me. "For ye have the POOR ALWAYS WITH YOU; but me ye have not always." MATTHEW 26:7-11

    ReplyDelete
  30. 26. JESUS (pbuh) A "GOD"?: Powerless (a) "I can of mine own self W NOTHING . . ." JOHN 5:30

    HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE HEREAFTER (b) "But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, NEITHER THE SON, but the Father " MARK 13:32 HE WAS IGNORANT OF THE SEASONS (c) 'And seeing a fig tree afar of having leaves, he came if happily he might find any thing there on. and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves, FOR THE TIME OF FIGS WAS NOT YET." MARK 11:13

    JESUS (PBUH) AS A THIRSTY "GOD'? (d) " . . (Jesus) saith, I THIRST." JOHN 19:28 JESUS (PBUH) AS A WEEPING "GOD'? (e) Jesus WEPT. JOHN I 1:3 5 Remember that this is the shortest sentence in the Bible! (Only two words)

    IMAGINE A "GOD" BEING TEMPTED by THE DEVIL (?) (f) "Where he (Jesus) stayed forty days, being tempted by Satan" MARK 1:13

    27. JESUS (pbuh) (A RACIST): Only came for the Jews (a) these twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them saying GO NOT into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans ENTER YE NOT. "But go ye rather unto the lost sheep of THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL (to the Jews only)." MATTHEW 10:5-6 (b) "But he (Jesus) answered and said, I am NOT SENT but unto the lost sheep of the HOUSE OF ISRAEL (the Jews only). "Then came she (the Canaanite woman) and worshipped him, saying Lord, help me (to cure my daughter). "But he answered and said, it is not meet to take the children's bread and CAST IT TO DOGS (the non-Jews). " MATTHEW 15:24-26

    28. JESUS (pbuh) (SUNDRY TIDBITS): JESUS' (PBUH) SECOND COMING, NEVER MATERIALIZED: "But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye unto another, for VERILY I say unto you, Ye shall NOT HAVE GONE over the cities of Israel till the SON OF MAN (as referring to himself) BE COME." MATTHEW 10:23

    The disciples of Jesus fled and they fled, and have now perished for two thousand years, with no sign of the return of Jesus.

    JESUS (PBUH) SPOKE IN PARABLES TO DECEIVE THE UNINITIATED: . . all these things are done in parables. That seeing they may see, and NOT perceive; and hearing they may hear, and NOT understand, LEST at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven " MARK 4: 11-12

    HATE AS FOUNDATION OF HIS (Jesus) FAITH: "If any man come to me, and HATE NOT his father, and mother, and wife, and children. . . HE CANNOT be my disciple." LUKE 14:26

    PETER CONTRADICTS JESUS (PBUH) REGARDING HIMSELF AS IF THE ONLY WAY:" "Jesus saith unto him, Z am the way, the truth, and the life. no man cometh unto the father but by me. JOHN 14:6 Contradicted by: "Then Peter opened his mouth . . . But IN EVERY NATION he that feareth him (God), and works righteousness, IS ACCEPTED with him (God)." ACTS 10:34-35

    ReplyDelete
  31. 29. JEWS: A rebellious people "Ye have been rebellious against the Lord from the day that I knew you DEUTERONOMY 9:24

    A STIFF NECKED PEOPLE: 'For I know thy rebellion, and thy stiff neck behold, while I am yet alive with you this day, Ye have been rebellious against the Lord, and how much more after my death? DEUTERONOMY 31:27

    A SECOND BONDAGE IN EGYPT: 'And the Lord shall bring you (the Jews) into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spate unto you (Jews), Thou shall see it no more again. and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and NO MAN shall buy you DEUTERONOMY 28:68 . . now will he (the Lord) remember their (the Jews') iniquity, and visit their the Jews') sins: they shall RETURN to Egypt (for a second bondage). HOSEA 8:13

    THE JEWS TO BE SUBSTITUTED: "Therefore said I (Jesus)\ unto you (Jews), The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. MATTHEW 21:43

    30. KETURAH: The third wife of Abraham "Then again Abraham took a WIFE, and her name was Keturah GENESIS 25:1 Keturah being the WIFE of Abraham is being contradicted in the self-same "Word of God" �i.e. I CHRONICLES 1:32, where Keturah is described as Abraham's CONCUBINE. Here is an extra contradiction in the Bible, unless 'WIFE" and "CONCUBINE" are synonymous terms.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 31. MASSACRE: At the hands of the Jews�(a) "Now therefore KILL every male among the little ones, and KILL every woman (female) that hath known man by lying (having sex) with him. "But keep ALIVE for yourselves all the GIRLS and all the women who are VIRGINS." NUMBERS 31:17-18 "And the Jews salvaged for themselves 32,000 virgins, verse 35; see also verse 40. (b) But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou (o Jews) shall save alive NOTHING that BREATHES. DEUTERONOMY 20:16 (c) 'And they (the Jews) UTTERLY DESTROYED all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, ox and sheep, and ASS, with the edge of the sword " JOSHUA 6:21 (Even donkeys were not spared) (d) "He (Joshua) let NONE remain alive." Joshua 10:28

    32. MELCHIDESEK: This High Priest of Salem has qualities which outshines, even Jesus Christ (peace be upon him). "Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life. . . HEBREWS 7:3 (These attributes only befit God!)

    33. MESSIAH TRANSLATED "CHRIST": Messiah is a very common noun in Hebrew. Translated into Greek it became "Christos", which in plain English means ANOINTED Every where the word "anointed" appears in the English translation of the Bible (any Version) that word in the Hebrew original is invariably the word "MESSIAH"! Here are a few ready examples (a) "I am the God of Beth-el, where thou ANOINTEDEST (messiah) the PILLAR. . ." (Christ Pillar!) Genesis 31:13 (b) 'And Moses took the ANOINTING (Messiah) OIL, and ANOINTED (Messiah) the TABERNACLE. . .'' (Christ Oil! and Christ Tabernacle!) LEVITICUS 8:10 (c) . . he (the Lord) shall give strength unto his king and exalt the HORN of his ANOINTED (messiah) . . �(Christ Horn!) I SAMUEL 2:10 (d) "Thou art the ANOINTED (Messiah) CHERUB (Christ Cherub!) EZEKIEL 28:14 (e) thus saith the Lord to his ANOINTED (messiah) CYRUS. . . (Christ CYRUS!) ISAIAH 45:1 (God addresses even a pagan king as His Messiah!)

    34. MUHUMMED (pbuh): Is a true prophet of God according to the Bible (a) " . . Every spirit (meaning every prophet) that confesses that Jesus Christ is come in flesh is of God 1 JOHN 4.2 Compare with Holy Qur'an 3:45 and many other Qur'anic references where Jesus (pbuh) is referred to as the CHRIST.

    MUHUMMED (PBUH) MENTIONED BY NAME IN THE BIBLE: (b) "his mouth is most sweet: yea, he is (Muhummed-im) altogether lovely, this is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem. SONG OF SOLOMON 5:16 From the original Hebrew manuscript the word "MUHUMMEDIM", is translated as "altogether lovely' which is actually the word MUHUMMED with "im" added. "IM" is the plural of respect in the Hebrew language.

    MUHUMMED A "COMFORTER" LIKE JESUS, PEACE BE UPON THEM (c) "And I will pray the father, and he shall give you ANOTHER Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever. JOHN 14:16

    Jesus (pbuh) was the first Comforter, and ANOTHER would have to be one like him, of the same kind as Jesus, a man and not a Ghost.

    ReplyDelete
  33. 35. ONANISM: "The withdrawal of the penis from the vagina before ejaculation." (The New Collins Dictionary). Medical term �"coitus interruptus." "And Judah said to Er's (deceased) brother Onan. Go and sleep (have sex) with your brothers widow. . . "But Onan knew that the children would not belong to him ie. would not carry his name), so when he had INTERCOURSE with his brother's widow (Tamar), he let the semen (the older Versions call it "seed") spill on the ground, so that there would be no children (no name) for his brother. GENESIS 38:8-9

    36. Original Sin: he Christina dogma that sin is inherited is against all ethics, morality and common sense. It is against the explicit pronouncement of God:

    "The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son (the progeny of Adam) shall not bear the iniquity of the father (Adam), neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die." Ezekiel 18:20-21

    (a) In Islam the notion of original sin is regarded as inconsistent with the justice of Allah. How could a just and loving God make an innocent child responsible for, or at least bear the guilt for the sins of a distant ancestor? (Steve A. Johnson)

    (b) No heathen tribe has conceived so grotesque an idea, involving as it does the assumption, that man was born with a hereditary stain upon him, and this stain for which he was not personally responsible was to be atoned for, and that the creator of all things had to sacrifice His only begotten son to neutralize this mysterious curse. (Major Yeats Brown)

    That Jesus (pbuh) himself regarded children as innocent and pure, and NOT BORN IN SIN, is clear from his reported saying:

    "Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not, for such is the kingdom of God . . ." Mark 10:14

    ReplyDelete
  34. 37. Paul: On his own admittance being cunning, used deceit "But be it so, I did not burden you nevertheless, being crafty, I CAUGHT YOU WITH GUILE." 2 CORINTHIANS 12:16 (GUILE: means ruse, sharp practice, treachery, trickery and wiliness.)

    38. PIGS: See "Swine" in the index

    39. POLYGAMY: Solomon the wise had a thousand wives and concubines (a) "And he (Solomon) had seven hundred wives, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart (towards other gods). "KINGS 1 1:3 (b) Abraham the friend of God had more than one wife; and so had Israel (Jacob) and David the king. There is not a single word of reproach in the "Book of God" the Holy Bible against polygamous marriages.

    40. PROPHESIES: Empty threats�(a) "But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou 1� Adam) shalt not eat of it. for IN THE DAY that thou eatest thereof thou shalt SURELY DIE." GENESIS 2:17

    Contradicted by*. (b) And all the days that Adam lived were NINE HUNDRED AND THIRTY YEARS: and he died" GENESIS 5:5 Amazing! In the language of God (?) "In the day" does not mean That very day" but centuries later (?). According to the Holy Bible the devil was more truthful about the consequence of eating the "forbidden fruit," he had assured Eve�(c) ( And the serpent (the devil) said unto the woman, Ye shall NOT SURELY DIE." GENESIS 3:4

    41. PROPHETS (BUT NAKED): If such are the priests, God bless the congregation�(a) "And he (Noah) drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he lay NAKED within his tent." GENESIS 9-21 (b) 'And he (Saul) stripped off his clothes also, and prophesied before Samuel in like manner, and lay down NAKED all that day and all that night Wherefore they say, Is Saul also among the prophets? " 1 SAMUEL 19:24 (c) "How glorious was the king of Israel (David) to day, who UNCOVERED (became naked) himself to day in the eyes of the handmaids of his servants, as one of the vain fellows shamelessly UNCOVERS himself 2 SAMUEL 6:20 (d) And the Lord said, like as my servant ISAIAH hath walked NAKED and barefoot three years . . . " . . young and old, NAKED and barefoot, even with their buttocks UNCOVERED, to the shame of Egypt. ISAIAH 20:3-4

    ReplyDelete
  35. 42. RAPE: Brother rapes and commits incest with his sister�(a) Howbeit he (Amnon, one of the sons of David) would not hearken unto her this sister Tamar's voice: but, being stronger than she, forced (raped) her, and LAY (had sex) with her." 2 SAMUEL 13:14 Son commits incest and rapes his mothers wholesale! (b) "So they spread Absalom (another of the sons of David) a tent upon the top of the house; and Absalom WENT IN (had intercourse) unto his father's concubines (same as "wives", see KETURAH in the index) in the sight of ISRAEL" 2 SAMUEL 16:22

    43. SABBATH: Sabbath as a standing insult to God in the Bible�" . . for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested and WAS REFRESHED." EXODUS 31:17 On the contrary the Holy Qur'an states: "His throne doth extend Over the heavens And the earth, and He feeleth No fatigue in guarding And preserving them For He is the most High, The Supreme (in glory)." Holy Qur'an 2:255

    44. SARAH: The Holy Bible does not even spare God from illicit sexual aspersions being ascribed to Him: In the case of the conception of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), God Almighty arranged for Mary to conceive Jesus by the intervention of the Holy Ghost, as witnessed in the Bible: (a) "The Holy Ghost shall COME UPON thee (the question is, how?) and the power of the most High shall OVERSHADOW thee (again, how?). LUKE 1:35 Whereas in the case of Isaac, his conception took place in the womb of Sarah by the direct intervention of God himself, as recorded in His (?) Holy Book: (b) "And the Lord VISITED Sarah, as he had PROMISED and FULFILLED what he had SPOKEN. And Sarah CONCEIVED . . . " GENESIS 21:1-2

    45. SLAVERY: Sanctioned by God�"ye, shall take them (the slaves) as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them (the slaves) for a possession, they shall be ,your BONDMEN (slaves) for ever . . . LEVITICUS 25:46

    46. SODOMY: The Bible's reason why human beings become lesbians and homosexuals 'Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and WORSHIPPED and SERVED the creature (like men and monkeys) more than the Creator . . . "BECAUSE THEY DO THIS (worshipping men and monkeys), God has given them over to shameful passions. Even women pervert the natural use of their sex by unnatural acts (like lesbianism and bestiality). "In the same way. . . the men burn with passion for one another (as sodomites and homosexuals) . . . ROMANS 1:25-27 (The Good News Bible).

    47. SONS OF GOD: The Bible ascribes sons by the tons to God. (a) 'Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the SON OF GOD." LUKE 3:38 (b) "That the SONS OF GOD saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took wives of all which they chose. ". . when the SONS OF GOD came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown." GENESIS 6:2 and 4 (c) " . . Thus- saith the Lord, Israel is MY SON even my FIRSTBORN." EXODUS 4:22 (d) " . . and Ephraim is my FIRSTBORN," JEREMIAH 31:9 (e) " . . Thou (o David) ART MY SON; this day have I (God) BEGOTTEN thee. " PSALMS 2:7 (TONS A ton is 2000 lbs weight, that is about a thousand kilograms.) ("FIRST BORN:" How can there be two "firstborns"?) ("BEGOTTEN" How can God beget David at the age of forty? "This day'?)

    (f) "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the SONS OF GOD. ' ROMANS 8:14

    ReplyDelete
  36. 48. SWINE: The flesh of the swine forbidden _ (a) "Of their flesh (of the swine) shall ye NOT EAT, and their carcass ye shall NOT TOUCH; they are unclean to you " LEVITICUS 11:8

    Jesus (pbuh) destroyed 2000 pigs to heal one man�(b) "And forthwith Jesus gave them leave (permission). And the unclean spirits (the devils) went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea (they were about two thousand); and were choked in the sea MARK 5:13

    49. TRINITY: According to the Athanasian Creed:

    "The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God."

    In this Holy Trinity: "The three Persons are CO-EQUAL and CO-ETERNAL: all alike are UNCREATED and OMNIPOTENT." (The Catholic Encyclopedia)

    Thus the Trinity is considered to be: (One God in three Persons."

    There is only one verse in the whole of Holy Scripture called the Bible which unequivocally supports this Christian dogma, and that is:

    "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost; and these three are one. " The first Epistle of John 5:7

    Dr C.I, Scofield, D.D. backed by eight other D.D.'s in a footnote to this verse opine:

    "IT IS GENERALLY AGREED THAT THIS VERSE HAS NO MANUSCRIPT AUTHORITY AND HAS BEEN INSERTED."

    The fundamentalist Christians still retain this fabrication whereas, in all the modern translations including the Revised Standard Version (RSV) this pious fraud has been unceremoniously expunged, thus confirming this Qur'anic refutation:

    "They do blaspheme who say: God is one of three In a Trinity: for there is no God except one God. If they desist not from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them." Holy Qur'an 5:76.

    Thank God! The Christians are willy-nilly discovering pagan forgeries in their "word of God", but they are still dragging their feet.

    50. WHORRING: See under "ISRAELITES" in the index.

    51. WINE: Look for "Alcohol" in the index.

    52. WOMEN: Forbidden to open their mouths in the Church�

    (a). . for it is a SHAME for women to speak in the Church" 1 CORINTHIANS 14:34-35

    (b) To chop off her hands for saving her husband's life. Deuteronomy 25: 11-12.

    (c) Her husband to rule over her. Genesis 3:16. The head of the woman is the man. 1 Corinthians 11:3. Man can sell his daughter. Exodus 21:7.

    53. WORD OF GOD: Not to add or delete a word from it.

    "Whatsoever thing I command you, observe to do it; and thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it." Deuteronomy 12:32.

    54. WORSHIP: The word "worship" in Mark 5:6 and many other places means to adore, to adulate, to respect, to revere. Compare the same verse with LUKE 8:28 where the word "worship' is alternatively recorded as "FELL DOWN BEFORE HIM."

    ReplyDelete
  37. 50,000 Errors in the Bible? pls check this LINK out.;

    http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-bible-50000-errors.htm

    ReplyDelete
  38. The God That Never Was.

    Islam is the only religion which teaches the existence of a PERFECT God. A
    perfect God means that there is no sharer in His Nature and His Attributes:

    "Say: He is God, the One and Only; God, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth
    not, nor is He begotten; and there is none like unto Him." (Holy Qur'an,
    112:1-4)

    There has appeared a man in Benoni. He is not qualified in theology, but is
    fondly cherishing the self-delusion that he is an apostle of Christ,
    appointed by God to convert Muslims to Christianity. Because he is a lawyer
    by profession, he is adept at juggling with words and quoting the Holy Qur'an
    totally out of context without knowing a word of Arabic. He wants Muslims to
    believe that Jesus was also a God, a belief that is abhorrent to us, because
    it is an antithesis of the Absolute perfection of Allah Subhaanahoo Wa Ta
    'Aala!

    Thus intent upon reversing the process of Truth, which is: "And say: The
    Truth has come and falsehood vanished. Surely falsehood is ever bound to
    vanish." (Qur'an, 17:81). In this he will never succeed because the process
    of Truth is irreversible.

    TWO REASONS

    He has given two reasons to prove that Jesus is God, viz: (i) "When we say
    Jesus is deity (or even God for that matter), we do not make him the Father!
    He is one with the Father and therefore HE SHARES HIS NATURE", and (ii) "HE
    IS IN EVERY WAY LIKE THE FATHER but he is not the Father".

    In short, according to him, Jesus is God because He SHARES THE NATURE OF GOD,
    and HE IS IN EVERY WAY LIKE GOD. These two reasons given by him to prove the
    divinity of Jesus are so puerile that they speak volumes of his legal
    training.

    Numerous quotations from the Bible are given below to prove that Jesus
    neither SHARED THE NATURE OF GOD, nor is he IN EVERY WAY LIKE GOD. He can,
    therefore, NEVER be GOD. We have given the quotations from the Bible without
    comment, because the Bible speaks for itself! TO SAY THAT JESUS IS GOD OR SON
    OF GOD IS NOT ONLY A MOCKERY OF GODHOOD, BUT BLASPHEMY OF THE LOWEST ORDER
    AND AND INSULT TO THE INTELLIGENCE OF MEN! (Note: Unless otherwise stated,
    all quotations from the Bible are given from the Authorized Version. In our
    headings and subheadings we have referred to Jesus as "God" in inverted
    commas in order to show the ABSURDITY of the claim of this man that Jesus is
    God!)

    ReplyDelete
  39. THE BIRTH OF "GOD"

    "God" was created from the seed of David: "Concerning his Son Jesus Christ
    our Lord, which was made of the SEED of David according to the flesh."
    (Romans, 1:3)

    "God" was the fruit of the loins of David: "Therefore being a prophet, and
    knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his
    loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his
    throne." (Acts, 2:30)

    The Ancestors of "God": "The generations of Jesus Christ, the son of David,
    the son of Abraham." (Matthew, 1:1)

    The Sex of "God": "And when eight days were accomplished for the
    circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus." (Luke, 2:21)

    How Mary Conceived and Delivered "God". Mary conceived Jesus like any other
    woman: "The days were accomplished that she should be delivered," (Luke,
    2:6) which means that she went through all the normal stages of pregnancy.
    Nor was her delivery any different from other expectant mothers: "And she
    being with child cried, travelling in birth, and pained to be delivered."
    (Revelation, 12:2)

    "God" Sucked The Paps of a Woman: "And it came to pass, as he spake these
    things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto
    him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast
    sucked." (Luke, 11:27)

    The Country of Origin of "God": "Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in
    the days of Herod the king. (Matthew, 2:1)

    The Occupation of "God": "Jesus was a carpenter by trade." (Mark, 6:3),
    "and the son of a carpenter." (Matthew, 13:55)

    The Transport of "God": "Behold, thy king cometh unto thee, meek, and
    sitting upon an ass." (Matthew, 21:5) "And Jesus, when he had found a young
    ass, sat thereon." (John, 12:14)

    The Wining and Dining of "God": "The Son of man came eating and drinking,
    and they say, behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of
    publicans and sinners." (Matthew, 11:9; Luke, 7:34)

    The Poverty of "God": "And Jesus saith unto him, the foxes have holes, and
    the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his
    head." (Matthew, 8:20)

    The Meagre Possessions of "God": "Shoes of Jesus" (Luke, 3:16), "Garments
    and coat of Jesus" (John, 19:23)

    "God" Was a Devout Jew: "And in the morning, rising up a great while before
    day, he went out, and departed into a solitary place, and there prayed."
    (Mark, 1:35)

    "God" Was a Loyal Subject: Jesus was a good citizen, he was loyal to Caesar.
    He said: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and
    unto God the things that are God's." (Matthew, 22:21) He paid his tax
    regularly. (Matthew, 17:24-27)

    ReplyDelete
  40. THE FAMILY OF "GOD"

    "God" Was the Son of Joseph: "Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him,
    we have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write,
    Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph" (John, 1:45)

    Brothers and Brothers-in-law of "God": "And when he was come into his own
    country, he taught them in their
    synagogue, insomuch that they were astonished, and said, whence hath this man
    this wisdom, and these mighty works? Is not this the carpenter's son? Is
    not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and
    Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence hath
    this man all these things? (Matthew, 13:54-56)



    THE DEVELOPMENT OF "GOD"

    Spiritual Development of "God": "And the child grew, and waxed strong in
    spirit, filled with wisdom." (Luke, 2:40)

    Mental, Physical and Moral Development of "God": "And Jesus increased in
    wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man." (Luke, 2:52)

    "God" Was 12 Years Old When His Parents Took Him to Jerusalem: "Now his
    parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover. And when
    he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the
    feast." (Luke, 2:41-42)

    The Powerless "God" (Jesus) said: "I can of mine own self do nothing."
    (John, 5:30)

    "God" Was Ignorant of the Time. Jesus said: "But of that day and that hour
    knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but
    the Father." (Mark, 13:32)

    "God" Was Ignorant of the Season: "And on the morrow, when they were come
    from Bethany, he (Jesus) was hungry: and seeing a fig tree afar off having
    leaves, he came, if haply he might find anything thereon: and when
    he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not
    yet." (Mark, 11:12-13)

    "God" Was Unlettered: "Now about the midst of the feast Jesus went up into
    the temple, and taught. And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man
    letters, having never learned?" (John, 7:14-15)

    "God" Learnt Through Experience: "Learned he obedience by the things which
    he sufered." (Hebrews, 5:8)

    ReplyDelete
  41. THE TEMPTING OF "GOD"

    The Devil Tempted "God" For 40 Days: "And immediately the spirit driveth him
    into the wilderness. And he was there in the wilderness forty days, tempted
    of Satan." (Mark, 1:12-13)

    The Devil Tempted "God" Continuously: "And when the devil had ended all the
    temptation, he departed from him for a season." (Luke, 4:13)

    Like the Sinners, "God" Was Tempted In All Things: "But (he) was in all
    points tempted like as we are, yet without sin." (Hebrews, 4:15)

    True God Cannot be Tempted With Evil: "God cannot be tempted with evil,
    neither tempteth he any man." (James,
    1:13)

    Only The Ungodly Are Tempted With Evil: "But every man is tempted, when he
    is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed." (James, 1:14)


    THE MISSION OF "GOD"

    The Confession and Repentance of "God": before the beginning of his public
    ministry: "Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist" (Matthew, 3:13), "which
    signified the confession of sins" (Matthew, 3:6), "and repentance from sins
    (Matthew, 3:11).

    "God" Did Not Come to Save the Sinners: "And when he was alone, they that
    were about him with the twelve asked of him the parable. And he said unto
    them, unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but
    unto them that without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing
    they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not
    understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should
    be forgiven them." (Mark, 4:10-12)

    ReplyDelete
  42. THE RACIAL "GOD"

    "God" Was a Tribal Jew: "The lion of the tribe of Juda." (Revelation, 5:5)

    "God" Came For The Jews Only: "But he answered and said, I am not sent but
    unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Matthew, 15:24)

    Racial Discrimination of "God": "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and
    commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any
    city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the
    house of Israel." (Matthew, 10:5-6)

    According to "God", The Gentiles Are Dogs: "It is not meet to take the
    children's bread, and to cast it to dogs." (matthew, 15:26)

    The Kingdom of "God": And he (Jesus) shall reign over THE HOUSE OF JACOB for
    ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end." (Luke, 1:33)

    The Titles of "God": "The king of the Jews" (Matthew, 2:2), "The king of
    Israel" (John, 1:49; 12:13)


    A "GOD" UNLIKE THE GOD

    A Hungry "God": "And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was
    afterward an hungered." (Matthew 4:2), "Now in the morning as he returned
    into the city, he hungered." (Matthew, 21:18), "and on the
    morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry." (Mark, 11:12)

    A Thirsty "God": "(He) saith, I thirst." (John, 19:28)

    A Sleepy "God": "He was asleep." (Matthew, 8:24), "He fell asleep" (Luke,
    8:23), "And he was in the hinder part of the ship, asleep on a pillow."
    (Mark, 4:38)

    A Weary "God": Jesus therefore, being wearied with his journey, sat thus on
    the well." (John, 4:6)

    A Groaning "God": "He groaned in the spirit, and was troubled." (John,
    11:33), "Jesus therefore again groaning in himself cometh to the grave."
    (John, 11:38)

    A Weeping "God": "Jesus wept." (John, 11:35)

    A Sorrowing "God": "And (he) began to be sorrowful and very heavy." (Matthew
    26:37). "Then saith he unto them, my soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto
    death." (Matthew, 26:38)

    A Hysterical "God": "And (he) began to be soreamazed and to be very heavy."
    (Mark, 14:33)

    A Weak "God": "And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven,
    strengthening him." (Luke, 22:43)

    ReplyDelete
  43. THE WARRING "GOD"

    The Strong-Arm Method of "God": "And he went into the temple, and began to
    cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought." (Luke, 19:45). "And
    the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, and found in
    the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of
    money sitting: and when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them
    all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the
    changers' money, and overthrew the tables." (John, 2:13-15)

    The "God" of War: Jesus said: "Think not that I am come to send peace on
    earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." (Matthew, 10:34)

    The Sabre-Rattling "God": Jesus said: "And he that hath no sword, let him
    sell his garment, and buy one." (Luke, 22:36)


    The "GOD" ON THE RUN

    "God" Was Panic-Stricken: "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for
    he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him." (John, 7:1)

    "God" Walked in Fear of the Jews: "Then from that day forth they took
    counsel together for to put him to death. Jesus therefore walked no more
    openly among the Jews." (John, 11:53-54)

    "God" Has Shown a Clean Pair of Heels: "Therefore they sought again to take
    him: but he escaped out of their hand." (John, 10:39)

    "God" Fled in Disguise: "Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus
    hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and
    so passed by." (John, 8:59)

    ReplyDelete
  44. THE CAPTURE OF "GOD"

    A Friend Betrayed the Secret Hiding Place of "God": "And Judas also, which
    betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus off-times resorted thither with his
    disciples. Judas then, having received a band of man and officers from the
    chief priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and
    weapons." (John, 18:2-3)

    "God" Was Arrested, Bound and Led Away: "Then the band and the captain and
    officers of the Jews took Jesus, and bound him, and led him away." (John,
    18:12-13)

    "God" Was Humiliated: "And the men that held Jesus mocked him, and smote
    him. And when they had blindfolded him, they struck him on the face."
    (Luke, 22:63-64). "Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and
    others smote him with the palms of their hands." (Matthew, 26:67)

    "God" Was Defenseless: "One of the officers which stood by struck Jesus with
    the palm of his hand", he said: "Why smitest thou me?" (John, 18:22-23)

    "God" Was Condemned to Death: "And they all condemned him to be guilty of
    death." (Mark, 14:64). "They answered and said, he is guilty of death."
    (Matthew, 26:66)

    The Dumb and Docile "God": "He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like
    a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth." (Acts, 8:32)


    THE SUPPOSED END OF "GOD"

    The Dying "God": "And Jesus cried with a loud voice, and gave up the ghost."
    (Mark, 15:37)

    The "God" That Was Supposed Dead and Defunct: "Christ died." (Romans, 5:6).
    "He was dead". (John, 19:33)

    The Supposed Corpse of "God": "he (Joseph of Arimathaea) went to Pilate, and
    begged the body of Jesus. Then Pilate commanded the body to be delivered."
    (Matthew, 27:58)

    The Shroud of "God": "And when Joseph had taken the body, he wrapped it in a
    clean linen cloth." (Matthew, 27:59)

    The Orbituary of The Late And Lamented "God": "Now when the centurion saw
    what was done, he glorified God, saying, certainly this was a righteous man."
    (Luke, 23:47)


    EPILOGUE

    According to this self-appointed apostle of Christ, Jesus is God because: (i)
    "HE SHARED THE NATURE OF GOD", and (ii) because "IN EVERY WAY HE IS LIKE
    GOD". But according to the quotations of the Bible given above, we find that
    Jesus did neither SHARE THE NATURE OF GOD nor is he IN EVERY WAY LIKE GOD.
    He is, therefore, definitely NOT God! The onus to prove that Jesus is God
    now rests with this Christian. Either he must prove that Jesus is God, or he
    must admit that he is a polytheist, i.e., a believer in more than one God.
    WITH ALL THE TRICKS AND VERBAL LEGERDEMAIN OF HIS PROFESSION, HE WILL NEVER
    BE ABLE TO PROVE THAT JESUS IS GOD!!

    He and his fellow-preachers in Christ, will never succeed in convincing the
    Muslims that Jesus was anything other than a natural man and a prophet of
    God, sent unto the house of Israel to bear the good news of the coming of the
    KINGDOM OF GOD, which prophecy was fulfilled with the advent of the Holy
    Prophet Muhammed (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wa Sallam)!

    ReplyDelete
  45. CRUCIFIXION OR CRUCI-FICTION
    By Ahmed Deedat

    CHAPTER 1

    THE ONLY SALES-POINT

    "MOST INFLUENTIAL MEN"

    Recently, an American historical researcher and mathematician, Michael H. Hart, published a book : "THE 100, THE TOP HUNDRED OR THE GREATEST HUNDRED IN HISTORY." In his book he gives the names of the 100 "Most Influential Men in History" and his reasons for their positions in his list. Amazingly, he (most probably a Christian) puts Muhummed (peace be upon him) FIRST1 in his hundred, and with good reasons too. And with equally good reasons he places Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), the man accepted as "Lord" and "Saviour" by nearly all his fellow Americans, number THREE.

    1. You can read this chapter here – Muhammed (pbuh) No.1, A Chapter by Michael H. Hart. I have also placed the chapter on Jesus Christ along side it

    REAL FOUNDER OF CHRISTIANITY

    Though there are at the moment 200 million more nominal Christians in the world than the 1000 million Muslims, Mr. Hart divides the credit for founding Christianity between Paul and Jesus, and he gives the greater portion to Paul. Hence the 3rd position for Jesus. Every knowledgeable Christian concedes that the real founder of Christianity is St. Paul and not Jesus Christ (peace be upon him).

    REASON FOR DIFFERENCE

    In any event, if there is any division between a Muslim and a Christian on the grounds of dogma, belief, ethics or morality, then the cause of such conflict could be traced to an utterance of Paul found in his books of Corinthians, Phillipians, Galatians, Thessolanians, etc., in the Bible.

    As against the teaching of the Master (Jesus) that salvation only comes through keeping of the commandments (Mathew 19:16-17), Paul nails the law and the commandments to the cross Paul nails the law and the commandments to the cross (Colossians 2:14) 1 and claims that salvation can only be obtained through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ:-

    "If Christ be not risen from the dead, then our preaching is vain, and your faith is also vain."

    (1 Corinthians 15:14)

    1. One of the multifarious letters/correspondence of Paul among the 27 Books of the New Testament.

    ReplyDelete
  46. THE KING-PIN OF CHRISTIANITY

    According to St. Paul, there is nothing that Christianity can offer mankind, other than the blood and gore of Jesus. If Jesus did NOT die, and he was NOT resurrected from the dead, then there can be NO salvation in Christianity! "For all your good deeds", says the Christian dogmatist, "are like filthy rags" — (Isaiah 64:6).

    NO CRUCI-FICTION — NO CHRISTIANITY

    "THE DEATH OF JESUS ON THE CROSS IS THE CENTRE OF ALL CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY. . . ALL CHRISTIAN STATEMENTS ABOUT GOD, ABOUT CREATION, ABOUT SIN AND DEATH HAVE THEIR FOCAL POINT IN THE CRUCIFIED CHRIST. ALL CHRISTIAN STATEMENTS ABOUT HISTORY, ABOUT THE CHURCH, ABOUT FAITH AND SANCTIFICATION, ABOUT THE FUTURE AND ABOUT HOPE STEM FROM THE CRUCIFIED CHRIST", says Professor Jurgen Moltmann in his — "The Crucified God".1

    1. "GOD": The bulk of Christendom accept Jesus Christ as God incarnate — God in human flesh. According to the Christian dogma, Jesus must die as God, for a million human sacrifices cannot redeem mankind from their sin.

    In a nutshell. No CrucifixionI — No Christianity! This is the experience of us Muslims, in this ocean of Christianity, which is South Africa. A thousand sects and denominations of Christianity are vying with one another to redeem the "heathen" (as they say) from hell-fire. However, in this battle no Christian priest, parson or predikant, or hot-gospeller, local or imported, will ever endeavour to teach the Muslim something about hygiene; for we Muslims can claim to be the most hygienic people (I am talking about personal hygiene). Nor do they endeavour to teach us about hospitality; for we are the most hospitable of people. Nor about ethics or morality; for we are the most moral people — (as a whole) i.e. we don't drink, we don't gamble, we don’t date, court or dance; we pray 5 times a day, we fast for one whole month during the Muslim Holy month of Ramadaan; and we take pleasure in being a charitable people. Despite any of our shortcomings, we venture to suggest that there is not another group of people that can "show a candle" to us in brotherhood, in piety or in sobriety.

    BLOOD FOR SALVATION

    "Yes! Yes!" says the Christian missionary, "but you do not have salvation." Because salvation comes "only through the blood of the lord Jesus". "All your good works are like filthy rags", he says. "If only you Muslims would accept the redeeming blood of Jesus, and take Jesus as your 'Personal Saviour', you Muslims, then would be like angels walking the earth."

    AN ANSWER SUPREME

    What are we Muslims to say to this Christian claim? Nothing better than Allah's shattering reply to the Jewish boast!.



    (SURA NISAA) Holy Qur’an 4:157

    1. Allah: Allah is the name of God Almighty in the Semitic languages, i.e. in the language of Moses, Jesus and Muhummed (May the peace of God be upon them all). Read — "What is His Name?" for elaboration.

    2. "Full of Doubts!" — In a state of confusion.

    3. "Without Knowledge!" — In ignorance.

    4. "Only follow Conjecture!" — Guess work—Fiction!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Could anyone have been more EXPLICIT, more EMPHATIC, more DOGMATIC, more UN-COMPROMISING in rejecting the dogma of a faith than this? "IMPOSSIBLE!" is the answer. The only One Who could, would be the All-Knowing, the Omniscient, the Omnipotent Lord of the Universe — GOD ALMIGHTY Himself!

    The Muslim believes this categorical Quranic statement to be from God. Hence he asks no questions and seeks for no proof.

    Had the Christians accepted the Holy Quran as the Word of God, the problem of the crucifixion would never have arisen. They vehemently oppose the Quranic teaching and attack everything Islamic. In the words of Thomas Carlyle — "THEY (the Christians) HAVE BEEN TRAINED TO HATE THE MAN MOHAMED AND HIS RELIGION.

    CHAPTER 2

    CALL YOUR WITNESSES

    HIGH-PRESSURE SALESMANSHIP

    In trying to prove their dogmas 1, they invent shocking statements and posers — one of which has been used as the title of this book — "CHRIST CRUCIFIED - Hoax or History?" 2 No doubt it sounds provocative; but it is a borrowed title — from the Christian's own extravagances; from his own vocabulary.

    Garner Ted Armstrong, the Executive Vice-President and Co-Publisher of the "PLAIN TRUTH" (a Christian Magazine from America, which boasts a current, FREE, world-wide circulation of 6 million copies a month) 3, attempts to answer his own puzzle under the heading:

    "WAS THE RESURRECTION A HOAX?" This is the typical American way of selling religion. He elucidates his poser -"HOAX?" - with the words, "THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH IS EITHER THE SUPREME FACT OF HISTORY OR A FLAGRANT. DELIBERATE FABRICATION FOISTED OFF ON THE FOLLOWERS OF CHRISTIANITY."

    Another budding, young "Billy Graham" from America, Josh McDowell effuses in his book "THE RESURRECTION FACTOR", saying, "I WAS FORCED TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST IS EITHER ONE OF THE MOST WICKED, HEARTLESS, VICIOUS, HOAXES EVER FOISTED UPON THE MINDS OF MEN, OR IT IS THE MOST FANTASTIC FACT OF HISTORY." Since it is not possible for an Oriental to match American superlatives and extravagant verbiage, I do not have to apologise for humbly borrowing their words for the title of my book: "CHRIST CRUCIFIED -Hoax or History?" 4

    1. Dogma: "Principle, tenet, doctrinal system; arrogant declaration of opinion." — Oxford Dictionary.

    2. Original title of this book.

    3. As claimed in their February 1984 issue.

    4. Now changed to — "CRUCIFIXION or CRUCI-FICTION?"

    ReplyDelete
  48. CHRISTIAN OBJECTION

    To the Muslim belief that Jesus Christ was "neither killed nor crucified", the Christian objects, "how can a man (Muhummed pbuh) a thousand miles away from the scene of a happening, and 600 years after an event, pronounce as to what had transpired?" The Muslim says that the words Muhummed (pbuh) uttered were not his own, but that the Words were "put into his mouth" by the All-Knowing, All-Seeing God. The Christian retorts that he is not prepared to accept the metaphysical aspect of Muhummed's revelation; moreso, in view of the written records by "eye-witnesses" (?) and "ear-witnesses" (?) as regards the happenings on that Easter week-end some two thousand years ago.

    The Christian plea is valid. Their logic is good. To entertain their plea we will call up their witnesses and cross examine them to discover the truth or falsity of the matter from their own authorities. Admittedly, the key witnesses in the case are Matthew, Mark, Luke and John — the alleged authors of the Canonical Gospels. But they have all died and are in their graves. "Yes, that is true, but we have in our possession their sworn affidavits!" says the Christian.

    DEMAND FOR PROOF

    When confronted by the extravagant and conflicting claims of the Jews and the Christians to their exclusive rights to salvation, Allah subha nahu wa-ta aala1 commands us to demand for proof. He says:

    (SURA BAQARA)Holy Quran 2:111

    And they have produced the only proof they have; in over fifteen hundred different languages! Eleven different dialects of the Bible for the Arabs alone! Are we going to swallow them hook, line and sinker? No! It is presupposed that when Allah commands us to demand for proof, that we would be in a position to analyse the proof, once it is produced. Otherwise, it makes no sense to demand for proof; it would be nonsense!

    1. subha nahu wa-ta aala meaning, Glory Be To Him!

    ReplyDelete
  49. CHAPTER 3

    ESTABLISHING GOD'S KINGDOM

    THIRD-PARTY EVIDENCE — "ACCORDING TO . . ."

    The amazing thing about the Christians' sworn affidavits (writings attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) is that not a single one of them is duly attested. Not a single one bears the signature, mark or thumb-print of its author in the so-called originals. They now boast of being in possession of over 5000 "originals" of which no two "originals" are identical. Amazing! Little-wonder the Christians themselves label their Gospels as — "The Gospel according to St. Matthew", "The Gospel according to St. Mark", "The Gospel according to St. Luke" and "The Gospel according to St. John".

    When Christian scholars are asked why the words "according to" 1 are repeated at the beginning of every Gospel, the obvious implication is that they are not autographed. It is only assumed that they are authored by the names the Gospels carry today. The translators of the "New International Version" have unceremoniously expunged the "According to’s" from the four Gospels in their latest translation. Of the alleged Gospel writers, viz., Matthew, Mark, Luke and John it can be categorically stated that 50% were not even the elected Twelve Disciples of Jesus (pbuh).

    1. "According to"; This aspect is dealt with in detail in the book — "Is the Bible God's Word?"

    PRIMA-FACIE CASE

    I dare humbly claim that such unattested documents would be thrown out of hand, in any Court-of-Law, in any civilised country, in just two minutes. Furthermore, one of the alleged witnesses, St. Mark, tells us that at the most critical juncture in the life of Jesus — "All his disciples forsook him and fled"- (Mark 14:50). Please ask your Christian friend, "Does "all" mean all in your language, you Englishman?" (This applies to the North American as well) And he will no doubt say — "Yes!"; "Does "almal" mean almal in your language, you Afrikaner?" And no doubt he will say — "ja!" (pronounced Yaa); "And does "bonke" mean bonke in your language, you Zulu?" And he will say — "Ahe!" This is true of every language. Why not memorise this verse from the Bible in your own dialect? Even in some additional languages?

    So the so-called "eye-witnesses" were not really eyewitnesses to the happenings, unless St. Mark is not telling us the whole truth, the "gospel truth". Yet he is supposed to be speaking under oath! You will agree that a case based on such hearsay evidence would be thrown out of Court, TWICE in two minutes, in any Court-of-Law, in any civilised country; that is TWICE in just 120 seconds flat! But a ghost (dogma) of two thousand years standing, upon which hangs the salvation of 1200 million Christians, should not be summarily dismissed. It deserves a little more circumspection. We will therefore entertain the alleged testimonies of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John as if they were duly attested.

    WHERE DO WE BEGIN?

    At the beginning of course! — exactly as the Bible does ("In the beginning. . ." - Genesis 1:1) — just 24 hours before the cataclysmic events of "a thunderstorm; an eclipse of the sun; an earthquake; rocks being rent; the veil of the temple being torn from the top to bottom; graves being opened and sleeping corpses marching through the streets of Jerusalem . . ." as narrated by the Christians' Witnesses. What a scenario for a billion dollar, record-breaking, film production!

    We must not forget that the Jews are in the dock, alleged for the murder of Jesus Christ; and we as Muslims are constrained to defend them against the Christian charge, because justice must be done. Whatever their sins of commission and omission, Allah exonerates them from the charge of murder. He says:

    ReplyDelete
  50. FOR OF A SURETY

    THEY KILLED HIM NOT.

    (Holy Qur’an 4:157)

    PLAYING THE "CRUCI-FICTION" CARD

    The Christian world has been unjustly persecuting, and hounding and killing our Jewish cousins for nearly two thousand years for a murder they did not commit. Attempted murder? — may be! But murder? — NO! By absolving the Jew of a crime he did not commit, we are also taking the wind out of the hot-gospellers' and the Bible-thumpers' sail. In the battle for the hearts and minds of mankind, "cruci-FICTION" is the only card the Christian holds. Free him from his infatuation and you will have freed the Muslim world from missionary aggression and harrassment.

    AROUND THE TABLE

    On the eve of the Passover Feast, Jesus and his twelve disciples are seated around a huge Table with their host — the "beloved disciple", whose name also happened to be JOHN. Johns' and Jesus' 1 were names, common among the Jews in the year 30 A.C. as Toms, Dicks, Johns and Jimmys are with us in the twentieth century. There were at least 14 men at the table (count them if you wish) and not the unlucky thirteen of Western superstition. 2

    1. Of the three candidates for the 3 crosses at Golgotha on the 1st Easter week-end, there were 2 Jesus'. The one released was Jesus Barabbas. See "Christ in Islam".

    2. A country as advance as South Africa, like an adjunct of the U.S.A., has no Row 13 on any of its Aeroplanes!!

    MARCH INTO JERUSALEM

    Jesus (pbuh) made his triumphant royal entry into Jerusalem at the head of an excited and enthusiastic following, with high hopes of establishing the "Kingdom of God" any minute; riding a donkey to fulfill prophecy (Zechariah 9:9) –

    Tell ye the daughter of Zion, behold, thy KING cometh. . .
    sitting upon an ass. . .
    And a great multitude spread their garments. . .
    and branches in the way. . .
    and the multitude cried, saying,
    "Hosanna to the SON OF DAVID. . .
    Hosanna in the highest . . ."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 21:5-9

    Let Luke the beloved physician, add his strokes to clarify the picture.

    ". . . because he was near to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should IMMEDIATELY appear"-
    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 19:11

    HEAVENLY KINGDOM???

    "But those mine enemies, who would not that I should REIGN over them, bring them hither, and SLAY them before me"-

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 19:27.

    . . . Blessed be the KING who cometh in the name of the Lord. . .

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 19:38.



    And John adds that the excited throng exclaimed —

    "Hosanna!
    Blessed is the KING of ISRAEL, that cometh in the name of the Lord"-

    (HOLY BIBLE) John 12:13.

    "The Pharisees said. . . Behold, the world is gone (mad) after him (Jesus)"-

    (HOLY BIBLE) John 12:21.

    "NOW is the judgement of this world; N-O-W shall the prince of this world be CAST OUT"-

    (HOLY BIBLE) John 12:31.

    Who would withstand such heady-wine of impending glory? Little wonder that Jesus was tempted physically to oust those that bought and sold within the temple precincts. He overthrew the money-changer's tables and drove them out with a "whip of cords"-(John 2:15).

    ReplyDelete
  51. AN ABORTED COUP

    The overthrow of the Temple Authority was imminent, and a forerunner to the expulsion of the Romans, heralding the "Kingdom of God." But alas his high hopes did not materialise. The whole performance fizzled out like a damp squib, despite all the "Hosannas" and hoorays to the "Son of David" and the "King of Israel." All this ballyhoo was only forty years premature. Jesus had failed to heed the warning of the Pharisees to curb the over exuberance of his disciples (Luke 19:39). He had miscalculated. Now he must pay the price of failure. His nation was not ready for any sacrifice, in spite of all their infantile clamour.

    JEWISH REASONING

    The Jewish leaders reasoned that this one man had almost brought the nation to destruction. Therefore,

    "It is expedient for one man to die for the nation –

    (HOLY BIBLE) John 11:50.

    But with all the mass hysteria surrounding him, it was also NOT expedient to apprehend Jesus in public. They waited for the opportunity of a clandestine arrest. As luck would have it they found in Judas, an elected disciple of Jesus (pbuh), a traitor who would sell his Lord and Master for thirty miserable pieces of silver.



    JUDAS WAS DISGRUNTLED

    In the opinion of Christian divines it was the greed of gold which enticed Judas to do his dastardly deed. But he had more money-sense then the Christians gave him credit for. As a purser for the elect group of Jesus he had endless opportunities of pinching pennies permanently. Why jeopardise that for all times for 30 paltry pieces? There is more to that than meets the eye. Judas was disgruntled, after all those mass demonstrations on Jesus' regal entry into Jerusalem — those hot out-pourings of: "The HOUR is come — and NOW is — the Prince of this World will be CAST OUT — I should REIGN over them — bring them HITHER and SLAY THEM before me." Jesus had now developed cold-feet. If only Jesus could be provoked, he might react with miracles, and bring down fire and brimstones from Heaven upon his enemies; and, of course, the legions of angels (which he boasted were at his disposal), which would enable him and his disciples to rule the world.

    From close contact with the Master, he had learned that Jesus was kind, tender and loving. But, he was not a mealy-mouthed man; he was no milk-and-water Messiah. But Judas could not understand the "hot and cold" blowings of Jesus. Perhaps if Jesus was accosted, he would yet deliver the goods. To this end Judas schemed.

    THE TRAITOR KNOWN

    The furtive looks and the suspicious behaviour of Judas had revealed everything to Jesus (pbuh). He did not need the Holy Ghost to interpret the misgivings in Judas’s mind. At the Table in the Upper-room where Jesus and his disciples were having that "Last Supper", Jesus dismissed Judas with the words:

    ". . . What thou doest, do quickly."

    (HOLY BIBLE) John 13:27

    And Judas took off to put the seal on the deal to the stab-in-the-back.

    ReplyDelete
  52. CHAPTER 4

    PREPARATION FOR JIHAAD

    POLICY CHANGE

    Jesus will not be a sitting-duck for a clandestine arrest by the Jews. He prepares his disciples for the impending showdown. Discreetly, so as not to frighten his disciples, he introduces the subject of defence. Gently he begins:

    "When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye anything?" And they said, "Nothing" Then said he unto them, "But now, he that hath no purse, let him take it, and likewise his bag; and he that hath no SWORD, let him sell his garment and buy one!"

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 22:35-36

    This is a preparation for Jihaad, a Holy War — Jews against Jews! Why! Why this somersault? Did he not advise them to "turn the other cheek"; "to forgive seventy times seven" (70 x 7 = 490)? Did he not send his chosen Twelve with the advice:

    "Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves; be ye, therefore, as wise as serpents, (?) and as
    harmless as doves."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 10:16

    TO ARMS! TO ARMS!

    The situation and the circumstance have changed and as with any wise and able general, the strategy must also change. The disciples were already armed. They had some foresight. They had not left Galilee with bare knuckles. They responded:

    ". . . Lord, behold, here are two SWORDS." And he said unto them, "It is enough".

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 22:38

    The missionary, so as to retain the impression of the "meek and gentle Jesus", "the Prince of Peace", pleads that the SWORDS were spiritual! If the swords were spiritual, then the "garments" must also be spiritual. If the disciples of Jesus were to sell their SPIRITUAL garments to buy SPIRITUAL swords, in that case they would all become SPIRITUALLY naked! Furthermore, one does not lop off peoples physical ears with spiritual swords —

    "And, behold, one of those who were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his SWORD, and
    struck a servant of the high priests, and cut off his ear."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 26:51

    The only purpose of swords or guns is to maim and to kill. People did not carry swords to pare apples and bananas in the time of Christ.

    WHY COUPLE OF SWORDS ENOUGH?

    If this was a preparation for war, then why should two swords be "enough"? The reason is that Jesus was not contemplating a battle against the legions of Rome. Since his "friend" Judas was in league with the Temple authorities, he was expecting a clandestine, underhand attempt by the Jewish oligarchy to seize him. It would be a question of Jews against Jews. In such a battle against the Jewish temple servants and the riff-raff of the town, he would prevail. Of that he was sure. He had with him Peter (the Rock) and John and James (the sons of Thunder) together with the other eight, each vying with one another to go to prison for him; to die for him. 1 These were all Galilians. They had a reputation of Zealotism, terrorism and repeated insurrections against the Romans.

    Armed with sticks and stones, and the swords, and fortified with the spirit of self-sacrifice which they had avowed for their Master, he was sure to knock hells into any Jewish rabble that dare confront him.

    1. "Likewise also said all the disciples."- (Mathew 26:35)

    ReplyDelete
  53. A MASTER TACTICIAN

    He had proved himself a skilful strategist and planner, alert and resourceful. This was not the time to sit and twiddle thumbs; to be a sitting-duck, cooped up with his disciples in the upper-room! No, not for him. He leads his platoon, in the middle of the night, to Gethsemane-Gethsemane — an olive press — a courtyard built of stone walls some 5 miles out of town.

    On the way, he unburdens to them the seriousness of the situation. The implications and the explosive nature of the coup that failed. Now he must bear the wrath of the powers that be. The price of failure!

    You do not have to be a military genius to appreciate that, Jesus (pbuh) deploys his forces as a master tactician, in a manner that would bring credit to any Officer out of "Sandhurst"1. He places eight of the eleven disciples at the entrance to the courtyard, commanding them:

    "... Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 26:36

    1. A leading military academy in England.

    The question that would bug any thinker is: "Why did they all go to Gethsemane? To pray? Could they not have prayed in the upper-room? Could they not have gone to the Temple of Solomon, a stone's throw from where they were, if prayer is all that they wanted to do? No! They went to the Garden so that they might be in a better position to defend themselves!

    Observe, Jesus does not take the eight with him to pray. He positions them strategically at the entrance to the courtyard; armed to the hilt, as the circumstances would allow:

    "And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee. . .
    Then saith he unto them. . .
    tarry ye here and watch with me."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 26:37-38

    Where is he taking Peter and John and James now? Further into the Garden! To pray? No! To make an inner line of defence — he had put eight at the Gate, and, now these zealous Zealots (the fighting Irishmen of their day), armed with SWORDS, to "wait and watch " — TO KEEP GUARD! The picture is very vivid; Jesus leaves nothing to our imagination. A-n-d HE (alone) prayed!



    JESUS PRAYS FOR RESCUE

    ". . . and began to be sorrowful and very depressed. Then saith he unto them, ‘my soul is exceedingly sorrowful, even unto death' . . ."

    "And he went a little further, and fell on his face (Exactly as the Muslim does in Salaat), and prayed, saying, "O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt."
    (This is the quality of a good Muslim who submits his will to the will of God).

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 26: 37-39

    "And being in an agony, he prayed more earnestly;
    and his sweat was, as it were, great drops of blood falling down to the ground’’

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 22:44

    ReplyDelete
  54. MESSIAH SOBS FOR HIS PEOPLE

    Why all this bewailing and lamentation? Is he crying to save his skin? It would be highly cynical on his part to do that! Did he not advise others:

    "And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out . . . And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee; for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 5:29-30

    We would be doing Jesus a grave injustice if we thought that he was crying like a woman to save his body from physical harm. He was crying for his people — the Jews. They held a queer logic, that if they succeeded in killing any would-be Messiah (Christ), it would be a sure proof of his imposture. For God Almighty will never allow His truly "anointed one" (Christ) 1 to be killed — (Deuteronomy 18:20). Hence the insistence of the Jews as a people, as a whole, in rejecting Jesus, the son of Mary, as their promised Messiah — "The eternal rejection."

    1. Messiah. "Anointed," Christos, "Christ." For full explanation, see — "Christ in Islam."

    IMAGINATIVE VERSION

    This harrowing sob-story, the blood-curdling cries and lamentations would evoke sympathy in the hardest of hearts. And the hot-gospeller and the Bible-thumper is not averse to its effective exploitation. We are told that Jesus was destined to die for the sins of mankind. That he was "being prepared for this vicarious sacrifice before the foundation of the world". That even before the material universe came into being, there was a contract between "Father and son," and that in the year 4000 A.A. (After Adam) 1, God himself in the form of Jesus, as the second person from the enigmatic Trinity2, was to get himself hanged to redeem mankind from the Original Sin and their actual sins.

    1. According to Christian calculations the world and everything in it is 6000 years old.

    2. "Trinity": The closest approximation to the Christian dogma of the trinity as found in the Bible — "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one" - (1st Epistle of John 5:7) — has now been unceremoniously thrown out as fabrication in the R.S.V., the most up-to-date translation of the Bible. See — "Is the Bible God's Word?" for further Biblical interpolations.

    JESUS UNAWARE OF HEAVENLY CONTRACT

    From the "call to arms" in the upper-room, and the masterful deployment of forces at Gethsemane, and the blood-sweating prayer to the God of Mercy for help, it appears that Jesus knew nothing about the contract for his crucifixion. It reminds one of the Biblical Abraham, leading his son to the slaughter with the bluff that the Lord will provide a 'scape-goat.'

    ReplyDelete
  55. AN UN-WILLING VICTIM

    If this was God's plan for a vicarious atonement to redeem mankind, then obviously He had chosen a wrong substitute. This candidate was most reluctant to die. Arming! Wailingi Sweating! Crying! Complaining! 1 Contrast these responses with those of Lord Nelson, a war-hero, who gave up the ghost with these undying words:

    "THANK GOD, I HAVE DONE MY DUTY!". There are millions today, who would happily immolate themselves for king and country, with smiles on their faces, with shouts of "Amandhia!" or "Allahu-akbar!" or "God save the Queen!" Jesus was an un-willing victim. If this was God's scheme of salvation, then it was a heartless plot. It was murder in the first degree, and not redeeming self-sacrifice.

    Major Yeats-Brown, in his "Life of a Bengal Lancer", summarises the Christian Doctrine of the Atonement in just a single sentence:

    "NO HEATHEN TRIBE HAS CONCEIVED SO GROTESQUE AN IDEA, INVOLVING AS IT DOES THE ASSUMPTION, THAT MAN WAS BORN WITH A HEREDITARY STAIN UPON HIM: AND THAT THIS STAIN (FOR WHICH HE WAS NOT PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE) WAS TO BE ATONED FOR: AND THAT THE CREATOR OF ALL THINGS HAD TO SACRIFICE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON TO NEUTRALISE THIS MYSTERIOUS CURSE."

    3. "Eli, Bi, La'ma sabach'thani? ... Why hast thou foresaken me?" For fuller explanation of this cry, see "What is His Name?"

    GOOD FOR EXPORT

    "No heathen tribe!" proclaims this Britisher. But the mighty nations of the West, live and die by this "Fiction". If it is no longer fit for home consumption, then it is still good for export! More than 62,000 full-time missionaries (Modern-day Crusaders) are raising the dust throughout the world. Harassing the "heathen" as they call them. Over 40% of these cultists are "born-again" Americans! 1

    Strange as it may sound, after every outpouring of prayer, Jesus Christ found his disciples lulled to sleep at their post. Again and again he bewailed:

    "What could ye not watch with me for one hour?" — (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 26:40.

    "And again he (Jesus) went away, and prayed, and spoke the same words. And when he returned, he found them sleep again …" — (HOLY BIBLE) Mark 14:39-40.

    Poor St. Mark bemoans that the disciples could give no excuse for their lassitude, their somnambulism. He records:

    "neither knew they what to answer him", — (HOLY BIBLE) Mark 14:40

    However, the most lucid, the most coherent and systematic of all Gospel writers, St. Luke, hazards a guess for this anomaly. He says:

    "And when he (Jesus) rose from prayer, and was come to his disciples, he found them sleeping for SORROW."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 22:45

    1. "Born-Again:" The latest cult among the Christians. Billy Graham claims that there are 70 million such cultists in America. Immaculate people, veritable angels! Yet in that nation over a quarter million "gays" gathered in San Fransisco last June on a pilgrimage, led by 50 lesbians on motorbikes. In New York, there are only one million more women than men and of the "men" it is said that one third are sodomites! Overall there are 10 million "problem drinkers" (meaning DRUNKARDS), in the U.S.A. If all this is true with 70 million veritable angels ("Born-Again") in their midst, then it gives a lie to Paul's : "…a little leaven leaveneth the whole ..." — (1 Cor. 5:6). Here in the Christian West not even one third can ferment the loaf. Strange!

    ReplyDelete
  56. UNUSUAL REASONING

    St. Luke, though he was never one of the elected Twelve disciples of Christ, holds numerous distinctions according to Christians. Among them, the "most historical", the beloved "physician", etc. As a Physician, his theory of men "SLEEPING FOR SORROW" is unique. Cries and waitings, sobs and sorrows were in abundance from Jerusalem to Gethsemane on the lips of Jesus (pbuh) which would shock and alert to wakefulness any un-ebriated1 person. Why were the "lullabies" of woe, lulling the disciples to slumber? Was their psychological make-up any different from that of twentieth century man? Professors of physiology opine that under shock, stress and fear the adrenal gland secretes a hormone into the bloodstream — nature's own injection — which chases away all sleep. Is it not possible that the disciples of Jesus had eaten too much and drunk too much: remembering that food and drink was all "on the house," 2, i.e. FREE!

    1. "Un-ebriated": a sober person, not drunk.

    2. Note to translators: please do not attempt a literal translation of English idiom and figures of speech.

    CHAPTER 5

    DISCRETION OR VALOUR?

    SECOND MISCALCULATION

    Jesus had doubly miscalculated:-

    1. Regarding the enthusiasm demonstrated by the disciples in that upper-room. Believing that he would only have to contend with the Jews in a clandestine arrest.

    2. The Jews were more wily then he had thought. They brought with them Roman soldiers.

    The Christian scholars are no less wily in their translations and manipulations of the Bible. They have changed the words "Roman soldiers" to simply "soldiers" and from the word soldiers to now "band of men" and "the guard".

    "Judas then, having received a BAND OF MEN1 and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, cometh there with lanterns and torches and weapons"

    (HOLY BIBLE) John 18:3

    1. "Band of men": here and in verse 12 following, the words in the so-called original manuscripts are speira and chiliarchos respectively. Both Roman military terms, meaning "cohort" and "tribune". "That John is the first Evangelist to mention Roman soldiers among the party which went out to arrest our Lord . . ." See Knox's — "A New Testament Commentary", page 260.

    ReplyDelete
  57. CAUGHT NAPPING

    The disciples were caught as the Englishman would say with their "pants down".1 Literally they were caught napping. The enemy trod over them roughshod. Only one of the soldiers of Christ had the presence of mind to ask:

    ". . . Master, shall we smite them with the sword?"

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 22:49

    But before Jesus could attempt a reply, the impetuous Peter struck out with his sword and cut off the right ear of one of the enemy. Jesus had not anticipated Roman soldiers. Realising that the tables were turned against his misconceived strategy, he advises his disciples:

    ". . . Put up again thy sword into its place; for all they that TAKE THE SWORD shall PERISH WITH THE SWORD."
    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 26:52

    1. "Pants down": a figure of speech, meaning caught in an unguarded moment; unawares.

    CHANGE OF STRATEGY

    Did Jesus not know the truth of this statement when he ordered his disciples to sell their garments and buy SWORDS? He surely did! Then why the contradiction now? . There is really no contradiction! The situation changes, so the strategy must also change. He had sense enough to realise that against trained and well-equipped Roman soldiers it would be suicidal for his sleepy warriors to offer even a pretence of resistance.

    PRINCE OF PEACE???

    Why do not the Christian controversialists give their "Lord and Master" credit for this simple common-sense? Because they have been programmed for a period of two thousand years that Jesus, the "lamb", the "prince of peace", couldn't harm a fly. They overlook the other side of his nature which demanded blood and fire! They forget his instructions to his soldiers regarding those of his enemies who would not like him to rule over them, to bring them forth:

    . . . and SLAY1 them before me."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 19:27

    "Think NOT that I am come to send PEACE on earth; I. came NOT to send PEACE, but a SWORD."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 10:34

    "I am come to send FIRE on the earth; and what will I, if it be already kindled?
    Suppose ye that I am come to give PEACE on earth? I tell you, NAY; but rather DIVISION."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Luke 12:49 & 51

    In view of these solemn pronouncements and his repeated vitriolic outbursts against the learned men of his time, if the sword of Peter had prevailed, we would have witnessed a massacre without compunction, equal to that of his ancestor Joshua (meaning Jehova — Saviour)2 who utterly destroyed all that was in Jericho:

    "both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the SWORD."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Joshua 6:21

    And the Gospel writers would not have been slow in putting words into the mouth of Jesus, word for word, as fulfilment of prophecies VATICINIUM EX EVENTU (prophecies after the event) as recorded3 of his "father" (?) David.

    1. Means to KILL. Breaking the commandment — "Thou shalt not kill. — (Exodus 20:13)

    2. Joshua: a type of Christ, says C.I. Scofield, D.D. in his Bible commentary.

    3. His "father's" record: 'The conquered Ammonities he treated with even greater ferocity, tearing and hewing some of them in pieces with harrows, axes, and saws; and roasting others in brick-kilns". Maitlands comment on 2 Samuels Chs. 8 to 12 in "Jewish Literature and Modern Education" - (page 21).

    ReplyDelete
  58. FAILURE, AND TRIAL

    The march on Jerusalem had fizzled out. The sabre-rattling in the Garden had proved abortive. As there is a reward for success, likewise there is a price for failure. The odds are heavy! Hence the trial, the tribulation, the turmoil and the sweat and blood.

    With heavy hands, the Roman soldiers dragged Jesus (pbuh) from Gethsemane to Annas, and from Annas to Caiphas the High Priest, and on to the Sanhedrin as directed by the Jews, for trial and execution.

    Whilst Jesus was being manhandled and buffeted towards his doom, where were his heroes who were beating their breasts with the war-cry: "Master, we are prepared to die for you. Master, we are prepared to go to prison for you!" ? St. Mark, the first of the Gospel writers, un-ashamedly and without any apology reveals:

    "AND THEY ALL FORSOOK HIM, AND FLED."

    (HOLY BIBLE) Mark 14:50

    The authors of the 27 books of the New Testament could not find a similar dastardly desertion in the Jewish Bible1 to fulfil prophecy. If there was, they would have been quick to exploit it.

    1. The Old Testament

    GLOATING OVER DEFEAT

    In a debate between Islam and Christianity, on SABC T.V. one of the participants, claiming to be "reborn", gloated over the word DESERTION. He articulated the word with such relish —D-E-S-E-R-T-I-O-N — which must have left a taste of triumph in the mouth of the cultists, instead of the bitterness of shame and defeat. The Bible-thumpers have developed a new sickness of glamorising despicability and ignominy. Everyone, male or female, of these cultists, will not fail to relate their peccadillos, their adulteries and bestialities, their drinkings and druggings. It appears that one must have been part of the dregs of humanity to become a candidate for this "born again" cult.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Hoy Balik-islam na SALOT sa totoong Islam, HANGGANG COPY-PASTE NA LANG BA ANG KAYA MO? Panis na 'yang PAMPHLET na 'yan (CRUCIFIXION or CRUCIFICTION?) pinuno mo itong BLOG ng COPY-PASTE mo palibhasa BOBO ka ALIPING TAGAHIMOD ka ni AHMED DEEDAT (N.R.I.P). Panis na ang mga PALPAK na akusasyon n'yang taong 'yan. Bakit hindi mo rin i-google ang mga SAGOT d'yan KUNG TALAGANG PATAS KA AT hindi BULAG NA TAGASUNOD NI DEEDAT? eto oh COPY-PASTE mo: (tutal hanggang copy-paste ka lang naman eh)

    http://www.answering-deedat.org/blog/

    Hindi naman kasi ako kagaya mo na WALANG PINAG-ARALAN kaya ang alam lang eh CTRL-C / CTRL-V heheheh.

    ReplyDelete
  60. mga muslim kmusta na ang propeta mohammad nyung pedhopile (piss be upon him) wala kaya syang tigil ng kakatira sa 72 virgins sa paraiso nyo?? hehehe.. o bka pinasabog n nya nag suicide bomber na heheeh patay na mamamatay pa ulit heheheh

    ReplyDelete
  61. Anonymous Christian;
    Ang mga copy-paste na ito ay iisa lang ang layunin.
    Ang siraan siHesu Kristo at sa itinatag nyang Simbahan.

    Pansinin nyo na PERSONAL NA OPINYON lang ito ng kung sino man nagsulat nito.
    At PURO KWENTO lamang.

    Kaya pansinin nyo din kung paano ginamit ang putol putol na talata ng bibliya bilang patunay sa mga KWENTO nila.

    Kung di mo aalamin at babasahin ang buong chapter ng bibliya kung saan sila kumuha ng putol na talata ay maliligaw ka ng sinasabi nila.

    Sa ating mga katoliko, magandang oportunidad din ito upang malaman natin ang paninira na ginagawa nila kay Hesu Kristo at sa Simbahan.

    At mula dyan ay maipapakita natin na mali ang kanilang mga pinagsasabi at ang katotohanan ng Iglesia Katolika.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Drinking Camel’s Urine will make you healthy??
    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 234:
    Narrated Abu Qilaba:

    Anas said, "Some people of 'Ukl or 'Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the Prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) camels and to drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they went as directed and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of the Prophet and drove away all the camels. The news reached the Prophet early in the morning and he sent (men) in their pursuit and they were captured and brought at noon. He then ordered to cut their hands and feet (and it was done), and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron, They were put in 'Al-Harra' and when they asked for water, no water was given to them." Abu Qilaba said, "Those people committed theft and murder, became infidels after embracing Islam and fought against Allah and His Apostle ."

    Volume 2, Book 24, Number 577:
    Narrated Anas:
    Some people from 'Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them, so Allah's Apostle (p.b.u.h) allowed them to go to the herd of camels (given as Zakat) and they drank their milk and urine (as medicine) but they killed the shepherd and drove away all the camels. So Allah's Apostle sent (men) in their pursuit to catch them, and they were brought, and he had their hands and feet cut, and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron and they were left in the Harra (a stony place at Medina) biting the stones.

    The prophet of Hajj Allah doesn’t want you to wet your pants but he tells you to go and drink camel urine!!! Look how these guys acted after drinking the urine of the camel, as prescribed by Doctor Muhammad. They became so mentally crazy until they went and killed the Prophet’s Shepard and drove away his camels!! Urine as a medicine remedy? Since Muslims follow the teachings us Muhammad surely then if they become sick and can’t find medicine they must drink camel urine??? Beware of all hospitals in Islamic countries!!! Anybody will probably go insane if they drunk camel urine like these men!!! Look at Muhammad’s punishment for them, “cutting their hands and feet along with blinding them”! He was the one that prescribed the Urine remedy for them!!! I wonder would any modern Muslim drink camel urine as a medical remedy? The bible never told us to do this!! Urine on your clothes will bring punishment from Hajj Allah, (little kids as well) and then Muhammad the prophet of Allah tells us that in order to feel better you have to drink camel urine!!! It seems like Hajj Allah cares more about animal urine (note it is used as medicine) compared to human beings (including kids and people with bladder problem) who mistakenly urinate on themselves. I guess Muhammad never made this mistake ever in his life even as a kid!!! Does God inspire this? Surely can’t be.
    Volume 1, Book 4, Number 239:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah's Apostle said, "We (Muslims) are the last (people to come in the world) but (will be) the foremost (on the Day of Resurrection)." The same narrator told that the Prophet had said, "You should not pass urine in stagnant water which is not flowing then (you may need to) wash in it."

    Unbelievable!!! Doctor Muhammad in his great wisdom instructs us that after urinating in water we could bath in it!!! Urine isn’t clean, it is a waste produced naturally by the human body, why would someone want to wash him or herself in urinated water? Even in flowing water the smell and the filth takes time to leave!!! This is starch barbarianism!! Is this how we want the world to be!! Follow Islam, drink Urine and then bath in it!!! Also don’t forget to make sure that your toddler doesn’t die young or Hajj Allah will allow him or her to be tortured in their grave!! Here is more medicine from Doctor Muhammad, prophet of Hajj Allah.

    ReplyDelete
  63. SABI po NATIN:
    SINO ba namang MATINO at MATALINO ang AANIB sa HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS?

    PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Hoy! MangMang at GogO na Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! ano nga ang sabi mo? na MATINO at MATALINO ka?! eh bakit ang sabi ng Bibliya mo ay GagO at Sinto-sinto ka?!

    CENON BIBE:
    Kung MANGMANG at GOGO ako tulad ng sinasabi mo e di dapat e BALIK ISLAM na AKO.

    Ang kaso, IKAW ang BALIK ISLAM, di ba?

    Kaya nga IKAW ang TINUTUMBOK ng JER10:8 dahil UMANIB KA sa ALAM MONG HINDI NAMAN DIYOS ang NAGTAYO.

    AMINIIINNNN!!! HEHE

    ReplyDelete
  64. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    Bakit si Kristo ba Kristyano ang kanyang Practice at Relihiyon? Sige patunayan mo ngayon Biblically na Kristyano nga si Kristo!

    CENON BIBE:
    KAYA KA BALIK ISLAM e dahil MANGMANG ka e.

    Si KRISTO ang NAGTAYO ng KRISTIYANISMO.

    Sabi Niya sa Mt16:18:
    And so I say to you, you are Peter[ang UNANG PAPA], and upon this rock I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.

    NANGAKO rin si HESUS na SASAMAHAN NIYA ang KANYANG IGLESIA HANGGANG sa KATAPUSAN ng PANAHON.

    Sabi Niya sa Mt28:20
    And behold, I AM WITH YOU ALWAYS, UNTIL THE END OF THE AGE."

    ALAM KO na NAIINGGIT KA LANG dahil WALA KANG MAIPAGMAMALAKING GANYAN.

    HINDI MO NGA MAIPAGMALAKI na PINANSIN at KINAUSAP ng DIYOS ang PROPETA MO, di ba?

    Ngayon, kung RELIHIYON ni KRISTO ang ITINATANONG MO, SIYA ay isang HUDYO.

    At HINDI LANG SIYA HUDYO, SIYA ang HARI ng mga HUDYO.

    Sabi sa Matthew 27:11
    Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "YES, it is as you say," Jesus replied.

    Ang MGA HUDYO ang KAAWAY NINYO, di ba?

    Kung gayon ay KAAWAY NINYO si KRISTO.

    Kaya nga TINALIKURAN MO si KRISTO at UMANIB sa RELIHIYON na HINDI NA ITINAYO ng DIYOS kundi KAAWAY PA ng RELIHIYON ni KRISTO.

    TAMA?

    Samantala, KAMING MGA KRISTIYANO ang KATUPARAN ng LAHAT ng PANGAKO ng DIYOS na HINDI TINANGGAP ng mga HUDYO at HINDI NINYO TATANGGAPIN.

    ReplyDelete
  65. MANGMANG NA BALIK ISLAM:
    si Abraham ba, si Adan, si Moses, si David si Solomon etc! etc! sila ba na mga Propeta ng Dios, I mean Propeta ng Totoo at nag-iisang Dios; ang mga practice ba nila at paniniwala ay katulad ng sa inyo? at sial ba ay talagang mga Kristyano? sige patunayan mo!

    CENON BIBE:
    Sila ABRAHAM, ADAN, DAVID at SOLOMON ay HINDI MGA PROPETA NG DIYOS.

    KAYO LANG na mga MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM ang NANINIWALA na PROPETA ang mga IYAN.

    Pero SILA ay mga PINILI ng TUNAY at NAG-IISANG DIYOS.

    SILA, kasama na si MOISES, ang MGA AMA o PATRIARCA ng ISRAEL o ng BAYAN na PINILI ng DIYOS.

    Ang ISRAEL ang KAAWAY NINYO, TAMA?

    Sa madaling salita, KAAWAY KAYO ng BINHI NINA ADAN, ABRAHAM, MOISES, DAVID at SOLOMON.

    Kaya WALA KAYONG KAUGNAYAN sa KANILA. NILOLOKO LANG NINYO ang SARILI NINYO sa PANINIWALANG MAY KALIGTASAN KAYO dahil sa KANILA.

    SILA ay NANIWALA sa DIYOS ng ISRAEL.

    KAYO BA NANINIWALA sa DIYOS ng ISRAEL? HINDI, DI BA?

    SILA ay NANIWALA sa PAGDATING ng MESIAS.

    KAYO BA NANINIWALA sa MESIAS? HINDI, di ba?

    Kaya WALA KAYONG KAUGNAYAN sa mga BINANGGIT MO.

    NILOLOKO MO NA LANG ang MUKHA MO dahil SOBRANG NAPAPAHIYA KA sa PINASOK MO na HINDI NAMAN ITINAYO ng DIYOS. TAMA?

    ReplyDelete
  66. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    Now ngayon anong ang posibilidad ng kaligtasan ng naunang mga Tao kong sila ay hindi pala Kristyano! Ibig bang sabihin nito ang mga pinapalaganap na aral ni Abraham, Moses, David at ang iba pa ay hindi galing sa Dios dahil ito ay naman Kristyanismo?! mag-isip ka naman Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na paka MangMang mo naman talaga!

    CENON BIBE:
    TIYAK na LIGTAS ang mga NAUNANG ISRAELITO o HEBREO na NANATILING TAPAT sa KALOOBAN ng DIYOS.

    KRISTIYANO na rin sila dahil NANIWALA SILA sa PAGDATING ng KRISTO o ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS.

    Sa GENESIS na UNANG AKLAT kung saan NAI-RECORD ang PANGAKO ng DIYOS kay ADAN at EBA ay NAROON NA ang PANGAKO ng PAGDATING ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS.

    Sabi ng DIYOS sa Gen3:15
    I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; He will strike at your head, while you strike at his heel."

    IYAN ang UNANG PAHAYAG ng PAGDATING ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS. NANIWALA RIYAN si ADAN at ang MGA UNANG TAO hanggang sa DUMATING na nga ang TAGAPAGLIGTAS na si HESUS.

    Kaya ang LAHAT ng HEBREO o ISRAELITA o HUDYO na NANIWALA sa PAGDATING ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS o ng KRISTO ay TIYAK na LIGTAS.

    KAYO BA NANINIWALA rin sa PAGDATING ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS? Hindi, di ba?

    Kaya nga TIYAK na KAYONG IMPIERNO dahil HINDI KAYO NANIWALA kay KRISTO.

    Sabi sa John 3:16-18
    For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who BELIEVES IN HIM MIGHT NOT PERISH BUT MIGHT HAVE ETERNAL LIFE.

    For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him.

    Whoever believes in him will not be condemned, but WHOEVER DOES NOT BELIEVE HAS ALREADY BEEN CONDEMNED, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.

    NAKIKITA MO, MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM?

    At dahil TUMALIKOD KA PA sa TAGAPAGLIGTAS na HININTAY mula sa panahon ni ADAN, ABRAHAM, at iba pa ay TINIYAK MO NANG MATUTUTONG ang KALULUWA MO sa IMPIERNO.

    ReplyDelete
  67. SABI po NATIN:
    KAYO LANG [mga BALIK ISLAM] ang UMANIB sa HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS at NANINIWALA sa mga ARAL na HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTURO.

    PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Papaano mo nalalaman yang pinagsasabi mo? Demonyo ba ang may sabi sayo nyan? ha? Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? Ngayon kong kaya mong patutunayan na Kristyanismo nga ang daladal ng mga naunang Propeta ay baka may maniniwala pa sayo! Pero Bible proved that Christianism started in the time of Paul and not in the Lifetime of Jesus! so to speak!

    CENON BIBE:
    Ang DEMONYO ay TULAD MO na WALANG ALAM. Kaya ka nga NAITALIKOD kay KRISTO at UMANIB PA sa HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS, di ba?

    NAIPALIWANAG KO NA sa ITAAS kung PAANO UMASA sa PAGDATING ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS ang mga UNANG TAO at PROPETA.

    Si ADAN MISMO ang BINIGYAN ng DIYOS ng PANGAKO ng PAGDATING ng TAGAPAGLIGTAS o KRISTO (Gen3:15).

    Si MOISES ang PINANGAKUAN ng PAGDATING ng PROPETANG TULAD NIYA na MAGDADALA ng SALITA ng DIYOS sa MGA TAO (Deut 18:15, 18)

    Si PROPETA ISAIAS ay NAGPAHAYAG kung PAANO ISISILANG ang TAGAPAGLIGTAS (Is 7:14)

    LAHAT IYAN na PAHAYAG ng mga NAUNANG ALAGAD ng DIYOS ay NATUPAD kay KRISTO HESUS, ang MESIAS.

    Si KRISTO ang NAGTAYO ng KRISTIYANISMO o ang RELIHIYON na KATUPARAN ng LAHAT ng PANGAKO ng DIYOS sa MGA NAUNANG TAO.

    TINITIYAK KO sa LAHAT ng mga TAGASUBAYBAY RITO na NEVER MONG MASASAGOT at NEVER MONG MATUTUTULAN ang mga PATOTOO kong IYAN.

    NASAAN naman ang PATUNAY MO na NAGSIMULA LANG ang KRISTIYANISMO sa PANAHON ni PABLO? IPAKITA MO RITO para LANTARAN KANG MAPAHIYA. Sige na.

    HIHINTAYIN NAMIN ha.

    ReplyDelete
  68. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Kapanahunan pa ng Bibliya nakakApag-asawa na sila ng HIGIT sa ISA noon pa man. Abraham ay mayrrong higit sa iisang asawa! si Moses ay mayroong higit sa isa ang asawa, David mayroong higit sa iisang asawa! si Solomon ay napakaraming asawa! etc! etc! etc! siguro nAman hindi ko na kailangan pang ilahad ang mga talata dito since karamihan naman sa inyo ay may mga Bibliya.

    CENON BIBE:
    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na MARAMING ASAWA si ABRAHAM at MOISES?

    Kung totoong MARAMING ASAWA si MOISES ay ANU-ANO ang PANGALAN ng mga ASAWA NIYA? SABIHIN MO RITO HA?

    Si ABRAHAM ay DALAWA LANG ang NAGING ASAWA: si SARAH at KETURAH.

    Si KETURAH ay NAGING ASAWA ni ABRAHAM nung NAMATAY NA si SARAH.

    Kahit sa AMING MATITINO at MAAYOS na TAO ay PINAPAYAGAN ang PAG-AASAWA ng TAO kung PATAY NA ang ASAWA NIYA.

    Si HAGAR ay HINDI ASAWA ni ABRAHAM. Si HAGAR ay isang MALANDING ALIPIN na NAKISIPING sa HINDI NIYA ASAWA.

    NEVER ITINURING ng DIYOS na ASAWA ni ABRAHAM si HAGAR. NEVER ding TINAWAG ni ABRAHAM na ASAWA NIYA si HAGAR.

    NEVER MONG NAPATUNAYAN na ASAWA nga ni ABRAHAM si HAGAR. PATULOY MO NA LANG NILOLOKO ang MUKHA MO sa BAGAY na ALAM MONG MALI at PALPAK.

    ReplyDelete
  69. MAKAMUNDONG BALIK ISLAM:
    Sa makatwid po mga ipokrito kayo kasi ang lahat ng mga ito ay malinaw na mababasa at nakasulat mismo sa inyong Bibliya!

    CENON BIBE:
    IPAKITA MO na SINABI ng DIYOS na PUWEDENG MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI ang isang LALAKE. DALIAN MO LANG HA.

    TINITIYAK KO sa LAHAT ng NARITO na NEVER PINAYAGAN ng DIYOS at NEVER SINABI ng DIYOS na PWEDENG MAG-ASAWA nang HIGIT SA ISA ang ISANG LALAKE tulad ng SINASABI NITONG MAKAMUNDONG BALIK ISLAM.

    Ang mga BALIK ISLAM ang IPOKRITO.

    Ayon sa KANILA ay DAPAT DAW MAG-ASAWA nang MARAMI ang isang LALAKE dahil daw may "SURPLUS" ng BABAE.

    E BAKIT sa mga MISMONG BANSANG MUSLIM kung saan MAY SURPLUS ng mga LALAKE o MAS MARAMI ang LALAKE kaysa sa BABAE ay HINDI PINAPAYAGAN ang BABAE na MAG-ASAWA nang HIGIT SA ISA?

    HINDI po IYAN MAKIBO ng MAKAMUNDONG BALIK ISLAM dahil MALALANTAD ang KAIPOKRITUHAN ng KANILANG PANINIWALA.

    ReplyDelete
  70. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM quoting the Bible:
    Gen. 25:1
    "Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah."

    CENON BIBE:
    DIYAN po PINATUNAYAN nitong BALIK ISLAM na MANGMANG TALAGA SIYA.

    Paki pansin po ang CHAPTER kung KAILAN SINABI na NAG-ASAWA ULI si ABRAHAM. CHAPTER 25, di po ba?

    BUHAY pa po ba si SARAH sa PANAHON na IYAN?

    HINDI na po. PATAY na po si SARAH diyan.

    Katunayan, NAI-RECORD ang PAGKAMATAY ni SARAH sa CHAPTER 23 pa lang ng GENESIS.

    Sabi po sa Gen 23:1-2
    Sarah lived to be a hundred and twenty-seven years old. SHE DIED at Kiriath Arba (that is, Hebron) in the land of Canaan, and Abraham went to mourn for Sarah and to weep over her.

    NAKIKITA po NINYO?

    MAY NABANGGIT po ba riyan na ASAWA NA ni ABRAHAM si KETURAH?

    WALA po.

    NAG-ASAWA si ABRAHAM sa CHAPTER 25 pa.

    MATINDI po ang KAMANGMANGAN nitong NAGMAMARUNONG na BALIK ISLAM pero PAPATULAN na rin po NATIN para po sa KAPAKINABANGAN ng IBANG MAAARING HINDI PA ALAM ang KATOTOHANAN na IYAN.

    ReplyDelete
  71. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    Gen. 25:1
    "Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah."

    V.S.

    1Chronicles 1:32
    "Now the sons of Keturah, Abraham's concubine: she bare Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan; Sheba, and Dedan."

    KETURAH: The third wife of Abraham "Then again Abraham took a WIFE, and her name was Keturah GENESIS 25:1 Keturah being the WIFE of Abraham is being contradicted in the self-same "Word of God" — i.e. I CHRONICLES 1:32, where Keturah is described as Abraham's CONCUBINE. Here is an extra contradiction in the Bible, unless 'WIFE" and "CONCUBINE" are synonymous terms.

    Ang gulo po talaga ano po? kaya po siguro nagkawindang-windang Hinggil sa totoong paniniwala at Pagkilala sa Nag-iisa at tunay na Dios ang mga tao ngayon!

    CENON BIBE:
    WALA pong MAGULO riyan. Kaya lang NAGUGULUHAN itong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM ay dahil MANGMANG nga SIYA.

    IPINAKIKITA lang o sa 1Chr1:32 kung SAAN NANGGALING si KETURAH.

    Si KETURAH po kasi ay ISANG DATING ALIPIN ni ABRAHAM na KANYANG GINAWANG ASAWA kaya ang TAWAG sa KANYA ay CONCUBINE o "PIYLEGESH" sa HEBREO.

    TINAWAG ding CONCUBINE si KETURAH para IPAKITA na BAGO SIYA ay MAYROON NANG NAGING ASAWA si ABRAHAM, si SARAH.

    KAHIT PA PATAY NA si SARAH ay ITINUTURING pa rin na MAS MATAAS ang KATAYUAN ni SARAH at ng ANAK NIYANG si ISAAC kaysa sa mga ANAK ni KETURAH.

    GANYAN lang po iyon.

    HINDI na po KATAKA-TAKA na NALOKO itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM at NAITALIKOD kay KRISTO.

    Sa halip kasi na MAG-ARAL at MAGSURI ay NANIWALA sa mga NANINIRA sa BIBLIYA. LALO tuloy siyang NAGING MANGMANG.

    ReplyDelete
  72. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    GOD: Is not a fabricator of confusion—
    (a) "For God is NOT the author of confusion . ." I CORINTHIANS 14:33

    Contradicted by".
    (b) " . . I make peace, and CREATE EVIL . . ." ISAIAH 45:7 (by But the spirit of the Lord departed from Saul and AN EVIL SPIRIT from the Lord troubled him. I SAMUEL 16:14

    ISAIAH 45:7
    "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."

    I SAMUEL 16:14
    "But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him."

    (c) "And for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion, that they should BELIEVE A LIE." 2 THESSALONIANS 2:1 1

    2 THESSALONIANS 2:11
    "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:"

    CENON BIBE:
    Ang NALILITO lang sa mga BAGAY na IYAN ay ang mga NAGMAMARUNONG na TULAD nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM.

    MADALI pong IPALIWANAG ang mga TALATANG IYAN pero sa IBANG PAGKAKATAON para po HINDI TAYO LUMAYO sa ISYU natin NGAYON.

    Ang DAPAT lang NATING MALAMAN ay OUT OF CONTEXT ang PAGBABASA nitong BALIK ISLAM kaya NALILITO SIYA.

    Isa pa ay WALA SA KANYA ang GABAY at PATNUBAY ng ESPIRITU SANTO kaya HINDI NIYA NAUUNAWAAN ang mga SALITA ng DIYOS.

    ReplyDelete
  73. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    POLYGAMY: Solomon the wise had a thousand wives and concubines
    (a) "And he (Solomon) had seven hundred wives, and three hundred concubines: and his wives turned away his heart (towards other gods). "KINGS 1 1:3

    (b) Abraham the friend of God had more than one wife; and so had Israel (Jacob) and David the king. There is not a single word of reproach in the "Book of God" the Holy Bible against polygamous marriages.

    CENON BIBE:
    Si SOLOMON po ba ay KINASIHAN ng DIYOS sa PAGIGING MATAKAW NIYA sa BABAE?

    HINDI po.

    Si SOLOMON po ay PINARUSAHAN ng DIYOS dahil sa KANYANG POLYGAMY.

    NAHATI po ang BANSANG ISRAEL nang DAHIL sa KATAWAN NIYA sa LAMAN.

    Sabi po sa 1Kings11:1
    King Solomon, however, loved many foreign women besides Pharaoh's daughter—Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians and Hittites.

    NATUWA po ba ang DIYOS sa PAG-AASAWA ni SOLOMON ng MARAMING BABAE?

    HINDI PO. PINARUSAHAN pa po si SOLOMON.

    Sabi po sa 1Kings11:9-11
    The LORD became angry with Solomon because his heart had turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel, who had appeared to him twice.

    Although he had forbidden Solomon to follow other gods, Solomon did not keep the LORD's command.

    So the LORD said to Solomon, "Since this is your attitude and you have not kept my covenant and my decrees, which I commanded you, I will most certainly tear the kingdom away from you and give it to one of your subordinates.

    IYAN po ang IPINAGMAMALAKI nitong MAKAMUNDONG BALIK ISLAM: ang PAGSUWAY ni SOLOMON sa UTOS ng DIYOS na HUMANTONG sa KAPARUSAHAN sa KANYA at sa ISRAEL.

    Sa halip po na IWASAN ang MASAMANG EHEMPLO ni SOLOMON ay IYAN pa po ang ipino-PROMOTE nitong BALIK ISLAM.

    Kaya SINO po ang DEMON? Hindi po ba ang NAGTUTURO na TULARAN ang MASAMANG GAWA ni SOLOMON?

    SINO po ang DEMON? Hindi po ba itong MAKAMUNDONG BALIK ISLAM?

    ReplyDelete
  74. SABI po NATIN:
    Kung tama si DEEDAT at ang mga TAGASUNOD NIYANG BALIK ISLAM ay HINDI po ba DAPAT AY PAYAGAN ng mga BANSANG MUSLIM ang MGA BABAE na MAG-ASAWA nang HIGIT sa ISA?

    NAPAHIYANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Hahahahahahaha! MangMang! ka talaga Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! Babae papayagang mag-aasawa ng higit sa IISA? ok ka lang Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! Basahin mo ang buong Bibliya kong mayroon bang ganoong pangyayari?!

    CENON BIBE:
    E di UMAMIN po itong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM na MALI ang PANGANGATWIRAN ng SKOLAR NIYANG si AHMED DEEDAT, di po ba?

    HINDI NIYA NAIDEPENSA ang BALUKTOT at BULOK na PANGANGATWIRAN ni AHMED DEEDAT.

    E kasi nga po ALAM na ALAM nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na MALI at SA DEMONYO ang PANGANGATWIRAN ng SKOLAR NILANG si DEEDAT.

    Kaya po KAYONG PILIT ni NILILINLANG GAMIT ang mga PANULAT ni DEEDAT ay ALAM NA NINYO na MISMONG BALIK ISLAM ay HINDI KAYANG PANINDIGAN ang mga BALUKTOT na PANGANGATWIRAN NIYA.

    Ang PALUSOT naman ngayon ng MAKAMUNDONG BALIK ISLAM ay WALA RAW GANOONG PANGYAYARI sa BIBLIYA.

    Bakit po? Porke MAY ISANG PANGYAYARI sa BIBLIYA ay DAPAT nang GAYAHIN?

    Hindi po.

    MAY mga KWENTO po ng PAGLABAG sa UTOS ng DIYOS sa BIBLIYA.

    Ibig bang sabihin nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ay OKAY LANG na LUMABAG sa UTOS ng DIYOS?

    MALING-MALI po talaga itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.

    INUUNA kasi NIYA ang PAGMAMARUNONG kaysa PAG-UNAWA.

    INAAKALA NIYA na porke NAKAKAPAGMURA SIYA at nakaka-QUOTE ng TALATA e MAGALING NA SIYA.

    DIYAN SIYA NAGKAKAMALI, di po ba?

    LALO lang SIYANG NAGING MANGMANG dahil sa PAGMAMARUNONG NIYA.

    ReplyDelete
  75. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    taliwas ka talaga sa mga nakasulat sa iyong Bibliyang demonyo ka! Palibhasa ang paniniwala mo na si Maria na Ina ni Jesus na syang babae na pinapala ng Lahat ay nagkakroon daw po ito dear readers of this blog ng Dalawang ASAWA sa iisang panahon, Kong maaalala nyo po sinasabi po nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na si Maria na ina ni Jesus at ang Espiritu Santo ay mag-ASAWA Tapus po hindi pa man naipanganak nitong si Maria ang kanyang Binubuntis ay nag-AASAWA na naman daw po itong muli at ito ay si Jose na isa na pong 90 years old noon.

    CENON BIBE:
    At NAGSALITA po itong IPOKRITONG BALIK ISLAM na SIYA RAW SUMUSUNOD sa LAHAT ng NAKASULAT sa BIBLE. HEHEHE

    Kaya pala SIYA TUMALIKOD kay KRISTO at UMANIB sa RELIHIYON na ALAM NIYANG HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS ay dahil SUMUSUNOD SIYA sa LAHAT ng NAKASULAT sa BIBLIYA.

    IPOKRITO, di po ba?

    Tingnan po ninyo, sa KAGUSTUHAN NIYANG BASTUSIN ang BIRHENG MARIA at ang ESPIRITU SANTO ay ne-RECYCLE na naman NIYA ang BULOK NIYANG DALDAL laban sa MAHAL na INA.

    Kaya po TIYAK na TIYAK NA ang PAGPASOK NIYA sa IMPIERNO e.

    Anyway, KALULUWA po NIYA ang ITINATAPON NIYA sa IMPIERNO.

    Ngayon, KUNG MAY GUSTONG SUMAMA sa KANYA sa IMPIERNO ay UMANIB na rin po KAYO sa HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTAYO at MANIWALA sa mga ARAL na HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTURO. Mag-BALIK ISLAM na rin po KAYO.

    ReplyDelete
  76. MANGMANG NA BALIK ISLAM:
    ILANG WORDS AND LETTERS MERON ANG BIBLIYA MO?

    sige sagotin mo yan ha? di nga ba pinangangalandakan mong Matalino ka? bueno tingnan natin ngayon kong tutoo nga ang pinagSasabi mo!

    CENON BIBE:
    PABALIK-BALIK sa WALANG KWENTANG TANONG ang MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM.

    Bakit po, KAILAN PA NAPATUNAYAN nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM na MAHALAGA sa KALIGTASAN ang BILANG ng SALITA at LETRA sa BIBLIYA?

    TAMA si SIMPLYCATHOLIC, PABABAAN ng IQ ang LABAN nitong BALIK ISLAM.

    Kung ganoon ay TALO na TAYONG MGA KATOLIKO rito.

    ReplyDelete
  77. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    Muslim;
    si Abraham ba, si Adan, si Moses, si David si Solomon etc! etc! sila ba na mga Propeta ng Dios, I mean Propeta ng Totoo at nag-iisang Dios; ang mga practice ba nila at paniniwala ay katulad ng sa inyo?

    TingNan nyo po ang link na ito;

    http://islam.about.com/od/prophets/p/prophets.htm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_of_Islam

    CENON BIBE:
    OWS, talaga? At SAAN NAMAN natin MABABASA na ang TINUTUKOY MO ay ITINAYO MISMO ng DIYOS kaya DAPAT PANIWALAAN ang mga ARAL DIYAN?

    TIYAK WALA KA NANG MAISASAGOT at MAGMUMURA KA NA LANG. O, di ba?

    BISTADO at BUKING NA KAYO ng mga TAO RITO.

    SARILI NA LANG NINYO ang NILOLOKO NINYO.

    ReplyDelete
  78. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    ito TingnaN mo itong LINKI na ito alang-alang sa KaTangahang Taglay mo!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_of_Christianity

    CENON BIBE:
    NAPAKADALI po talagang MALOKO NITONG MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM.

    MAY NABASA LANG na "ABRAHAM" sa ARTIKULONG "PROPHETS of CHRISTIANITY" sa WIKIPEDIA ay NANIWALA AGAD na PROPETA NGA ng KRISTIYANISMO si ABRAHAM.

    SUBUKAN po NINYONG PUNTAHAN ang LINK na IBINIGAY ng MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM at I-CLICK po NINYO ang "ABRAHAM."

    Diyan po ay WALA KAYONG MABABASA na ITINURING na PROPETA ng KRISTIYANISMO si ABRAHAM.

    Ang MABABASA po NINYO ay ITO:
    "Abraham (Hebrew: אַבְרָהָם, Modern Avraham Tiberian ʼAḇrāhām, Arabic: إبراهيم‎, Ibrāhīm, ʼAbrəham, Greek: Ἀβραάμ) is the founding patriarch of the Israelites, Ishmaelites, Edomites, and the Midianites and kindred peoples, according to the book of Genesis.

    Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are sometimes referred to as the "Abrahamic religions" because of the progenitor role that Abraham plays in their holy books.

    In both the Jewish tradition and the Quran, he is referred to as "our Father".[2] Jews, Christians, and Muslims consider him father of the people of Israel. For Jews and Christians this is through his son Isaac,[3] by his wife Sarah; for Muslims, HE IS A PROPHET OF ISLAM and the ancestor of Muhammad through his other son Ishmael, born to him by Sarah's handmaiden, Hagar.

    NAKITA po NINYO?

    WALANG SINABI na PROPETA SIYA ng KRISTIYANO. Ang SABI sa REPERENSIYA nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM ay "PROPHET of ISLAM" si ABRAHAM. WALANG SINABI na PROPHET of CHRISTIANITY.

    Kaya po NAPAKADALING NALOKO at NAILIGAW e HINDI NAG-IISIP itong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM e.

    ReplyDelete
  79. HETO naman po ang SABI tungkol kay DAVID sa REPERENSIYANG IBINIGAY nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:

    "David Hebrew: דָּוִד, דָּוִיד, Modern David Tiberian Dāwîḏ ; beloved; Arabic: دَاوُۥدَ‎, Dāwud; Greek: Δαβιδ was the second king of the united Kingdom of Israel according to the Hebrew Bible. He is depicted as a righteous king, although not without fault, as well as an acclaimed warrior, musician and poet, traditionally credited for composing many of the psalms contained in the Book of Psalms.

    Thiele dates his life to c.1040–970 BC, his reign over Judah c.1010–1003 BC, and his reign over the united Kingdom of Israel c.1003–970 BC.[citation needed] The Books of Samuel, 1 Kings, and 1 Chronicles are the only source of information on his life and reign, although the Tel Dan stele records the existence in the mid-9th century of a Judean royal dynasty called the "House of David".

    David's life is particularly important to Jewish, Christian, and Islamic culture. In Judaism, David, or Melekh David, is the eternal King of Israel, and the Jewish people. A direct descendant of David will be the Mashiach. In Christianity David is known as an ancestor of Jesus' mother Mary, and in Islam, he is a considered to be a prophet and the king of a nation. Christianity and Islam also know him as the young warrior who slew Goliath before gaining power and ruling his kingdom. He is remembered for his eloquent speech and the beautiful recitation of God's word."


    MULI, MAY NABASA po ba KAYONG SINABI RIYAN na PROPETA ng KRISTIYANISMO si DAVID?

    WALA po.

    KATUNAYAN, IISANG GRUPO LANG PO ang KUMIKILALA kay DAVID bilang PROPETA. HULAAN po NINYO kung ANONG GRUPO iyan?

    Sabi sa MISMONG REPERENSIYA nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    "in Islam, he is a considered to be a prophet."

    Ano po? KRISTIYANO raw ba ang KUMIKILALA kay DAVID bilang PROPETA? Bakit po? KAILAN PA naging ISLAM ang KRISTIYANISMO?

    NAKAKAINIS po KAUSAP itong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM pero DAHIL PO NAGMAMALASAKIT TAYO sa mga PUWEDENG MAGOYO at MALOKO NIYA ay SINASAGOT po NATIN ang mga KAMANGMANGAN NIYA.

    MAKALIGTAS man lang po TAYO ng ISANG KALULUWA mula sa IMPIERNO ay MALAKING BAGAY na po bilang PAGLILINGKOD NATIN sa DIYOS.

    PURIHIN si KRISTO! PURIHIN ang DIYOS!

    ReplyDelete
  80. HETO po ang NAKAKATUWA, KAHIT po sa REPERENSIYA NITONG MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM ay HINDI BINANGGIT si ADAN bilang PROPETA ng KRISTIYANO.

    IMBENTO lang po TALAGA ng MGA MANGMANG ang SINASABI NITONG BALIK ISLAM na ITO.

    NAKAKAHIYA TALAGA.

    ReplyDelete
  81. SABI ni SIMPLYCATHOLIC:
    ibalik natin kay muslim ilang letra ang koran..pakisabi n din kung alin ang totoo sa version nyo ha hahahahaa..

    NAPAHIYANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Hahahahahahaha! May nag-react na isang mangmaNg din pati sya di nya rin alam ang nilalaman ng kanyang Bibliya kasi, Tulad ng kanyang iniIdolo na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay nangangamote din sa katanungaN kong iyan! eh papaano kasi eh pari-pariho namang mga MangMang ang mga ito!

    CENON BIBE:
    NATUMBOK MO, brod na SIMPLY CATHOLIC! Hehehe

    NAPAHIYA ang MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM. Tingnan mo, HINDI NAKASAGOT sa TANONG MO. HAHAHAHA!

    Kaya NAGDASAL na lang E. hahahaha!

    SUNOD na ITANONG MO kung SAAN SINABI sa BIBLE na MAHALAGA sa KALIGTASAN ang BILANG ng WORDS at LETTERS ng BIBLE.

    MAPAPAHIYA NA NAMAN yang BALIK ISLAM na IYAN. HAHAHAHA!

    ReplyDelete
  82. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    Hindi alam nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang nilalaman ng kanyang Bibliya at ipinangangalandakan din nitong MangMang na ito na ang tunay daw na Bibliya ay na g kanyang 73 books of the Bible! hehehehehe! bakit ang Bibliya ba na 66 book ay isang gawa-gawa lamang ng kong sino-sino? alin ba talaga ang tutoong Bibliya ang 73 books of the Bible ba o ang 66 books of the Bible? pareho naman pong Bibliya bakit may 73 at 66 books of the Bible pa? Kay ba nilang patunayan ito Biblically na ang kanilang 73 books of the Bible lamang ang tama?

    CENON BIBE:
    SOBRANG NAPAHIYA sa TANONG ni SIMPLYCATHOLIC itong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM kaya UMULIT na NAMAN ng NASAGOT NANG ISYU. HAHAHAHA!

    PAHIYANG-PAHIYA sa TANONG MO, SIMPLYCATHOLIC! HAHAHAHA!

    CONGRATS! NATUMBOK MO ang NAGMAMARUNONG na MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM.

    10 POINTS sa IYO, 0 ang BALIK ISLAM. YAHOOO!

    ReplyDelete
  83. NAPAHIYANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Ang nilalaman ng inyong Bibliya at ang nilalaman ng aming Qur'an ay alam ko. itatanong ko ba naman yon kong di ko alam? Estupido ka talaga! Pero hindi ko alam na Bukod sa pagiging MangMang mo ay naPakaTanga mo pa pala talaga! May mga katanungan ka na hindi na dapat sagotin gayan ng mga ito;

    CENON BIBE:
    UY! MAGALING! HAHAHAHA!

    ALAM daw NITONG NAGMAMARUNONG na BALIK ISLAM ang NILALAMAN ng BIBLIYA at ng QURAN.

    Sige nga. ILANG WORDS at LETTERS ang LAMAN ng BIBLE: Yung ORIHINAL na MANUSKRISTO sa GREEK at HEBREO, HA.

    Tapos ISUNOD MO kung ILAN ang WORDS at LETTERS sa QURAN. TUKUYIN mo rin KUNG ALING ARABIC VERSION ng QURAN ang TUNAY HA.

    Sige po, HINTAYIN NATING MAPAHIYA NA NAMAN ang NAGMAMARUNONG na BALIK ISLAM. hahahaha!

    TIYAK, MAGDARASAL este MAGMUMURA na lang uli yan.

    ReplyDelete
  84. NAPAHIYANG BALIK ISLAM:
    "ilang basong tinta ang ginamit sa pag print ng bible, ilang atoms ang napapaloob sa lahat ng pages ng bible"

    kasi ultimo ang Sto Papa ninyo o kahit si Kristo kapag tinatanong mo ng ganitong klaseng katanungan eh masasampal kang talaga!

    CENON BIBE:
    Bakit? KAILAN din ITINANONG ng SANTO PAPA ang MANGMANG MONG TANONG tungkol sa DAMI ng WORDS at LETTERS sa BIBLE? HA?

    Kaya nga HINIHINTAY KA NA sa IMPIERNO para DOON KA SAMPAL-SAMPALIN ng mga KAKOSA mong DEMONYO e. HEHE

    ReplyDelete
  85. MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM:
    Patunay na ultimo si Kristo hindi alam sagotin ang katanungan mo ay sya mismo hindi nya alam ang kanyang pagbabalik namang muli; basa:
    Matt 24:36
    "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only."

    CENON BIBE:
    NAGMARUNONG NA NAMAN ang MANGMANG. Hehehe

    ARAW at ORAS ng PAGBABALIK NIYA ang TINUTUKOY RIYAN at HINDI kung ANONG KAMANGMANGAN ng BALIK ISLAM.

    Ang SINASABI lang DIYAN ng PANGINOON ay HINDI SIYA ang MAGSASABI ng KANYANG PAGBABALIK KUNDI ang DIYOS AMA.

    MAY KANYA-KANYA kasing PAPEL ang BAWAT PERSONA ng TRINIDAD. Ang DIYOS AMA ang NAGSASABI ng BAGAY na TULAD ng GANYAN.

    Ang PAPEL ng DIYOS ANAK ay SUMUNOD sa KAGUSTUHAN ng DIYOS AMA.

    Ang PAPEL ng ESPIRITU SANTO ay IPAUNAWA sa MGA TUNAY na ALAGAD ng DIYOS ang MGA BAGAY na GANYAN.

    ALAM KO HINDI MO MAGI-GETS YAN dahil HINDI KA NAMAN TUNAY na ALAGAD ng DIYOS.

    UMANIB KA nga sa HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS, di ba? Ang mga PINANINIWALAAN MO NGA ay HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTURO, di ba?

    Kaya nga MAKAMUNDO at PALAMURA KA, di ba?

    NATUMBOK NA NAMAN BA KITA?

    SORRY ha. IYAN naman ang PAPEL MO: ang MAPAHIYA para MATUTO ang IBA.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Combat Kit Against Bible Thumpers

    CENON BIBE:
    ITO talagang mga BALIK ISLAM e MAHILIG MANLOKO.

    Kung TITINGNAN po natin ang TITULO ng ARTIKULO e parang DEPENSA sa BIBLIYA pero kung babasahin natin ay MALINAW na PANINIRA sa BIBLIYA.

    Tsk, tsk, tsk. IYAN PO ang ESTILO ng BALIK ISLAM: Ang GUMAMIT ng PANLOLOKO para MAKAKUHA ng RECRUIT sa INANIBAN NILA na HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTAYO.

    Kaya nga po TINAWAG SILANG HANGAL at SINTU-SINTO sa JER10:8,di po ba?

    ReplyDelete
  87. CENON BIBE:
    Sila ABRAHAM, ADAN, DAVID at SOLOMON ay HINDI MGA PROPETA NG DIYOS.

    Muslim;
    huH!? alam mo ba kong ano yang samahan iong inaaniban mo? tila wala ka talagang alam ah?!

    ito TingnaN mo itong LINKI na ito alang-alang sa KaTangahang Taglay mo!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_of_Christianity

    Main list
    A
    * Aaron (Exodus 7:1)
    * Abel (Luke 11:50-51)
    * Abraham (Genesis 20:7)
    * Agabus (Acts 21:10)
    * Agur (Book of Proverbs 30:1)
    * Ahijah (1 Kings 11:29)
    * Amos (Amos 7:8)
    * Anna (Luke 2:36)
    * Azariah (2 Chronicles 15:1)


    B
    * Barnabas (Acts 13:31)


    D
    * Daniel (Matthew 24:15)
    * David (Hebrews 11:32)
    * Deborah (Judges 4:4)

    E

    * Elijah (1 Kings 18:22)
    * Elisha (1 Kings 19:16)
    * Enoch (Jude 1:14)
    * Ezekiel (Ezekiel 1:3)

    G

    * Gad (2 Samuel 24:11)
    * Gideon (Hebrews 11:32)

    H

    * Habakkuk (Habakkuk 1:1)
    * Haggai (Haggai 1:1)
    * Hosea (Hosea 1:1)
    * Huldah (2Kings 22:14)

    I

    * Iddo (2 Chronicles 900:1)
    * Isaiah (Isaiah 13:37)

    J

    * Jacob (Genesis 28:11 - 16)
    * Jehu (1 Kings 16:7)
    * Jeremiah (Jeremiah 1:11)
    * Joel (Joel 1:1)
    * John the Baptist (Luke 7:28)
    * John of Patmos (Revelation 1:1)
    * Jonah (Jonah 1:1)
    * Joshua (Joshua 1:1)
    * Judas Barsabbas (Acts 15:32)
    * Jesus

    L

    * Lucius of Cyrene (Acts 13:1)Jhon lucianus

    M

    * Malachi (Malachi 1:1)
    * Manahen (Acts 13:1)
    * Micah (Micah 1:1)
    * Micaiah (1 Kings 22:8)
    * Miriam (Exodus 15:20)
    * Moses (Deuteronomy 34:10)

    N

    * Nahum (Nahum 1:1)
    * Nathan (2 Samuel 7:2)
    * Noah (Genesis 7:1)

    O

    * Obadiah (Obadiah 1:1)
    * Oded (2 Chronicles 15:3)

    P

    * Philip the Evangelist (Acts 8:26) Note: His four daughters also prophesied (Acts 21:8, 9)

    S

    * Samuel (1 Samuel 3:20)
    * Shemaiah (1 Kings 22:12)
    * Silas (Acts 15:32)
    * Simeon Niger (Acts 13:1)

    T

    * The Two Witnesses of Revelation 11:3

    Z

    * Zechariah son of Berechiah (Zechariah 1:1)
    * Zechariah son of Jehoiada (Luke) 11:50-51)
    * Zephaniah (Zephaniah 1:1)

    ReplyDelete
  88. Secondary list

    * Eldad (Numbers 11:26)
    * Eliezer (2 Chronicles 20:37)
    * Elisabeth, mother of John the Baptist (Luke 1:41)
    * Hagar (Genesis 16:10-11)
    * Jahaziel (2 Chronicles 20:14)
    * Joseph (Genesis 37:5 - 11)
    * Joseph, fosterfather of Jesus (Matthew 1:20)
    * Mary, mother of Jesus (Luke 1:26-28)
    * Medad (Numbers 11:26)
    * King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon (Daniel 2:1)
    * King Saul (1Samuel 10:10)
    * Simeon of Jerusalem (Luke 2:25, 26)
    * King Solomon (1Kings 3:5)
    * The seventy elders of Israel (Numbers 11:25)
    * Zechariah, father of John the Baptist (Luke 1:67)

    ReplyDelete
  89. CENON BIBE:
    PABALIK-BALIK sa WALANG KWENTANG TANONG ang MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM.

    Muslim;
    Walang kwenta? at pabalik-balik? eh siempre para paulit-ulit ka ding mapahiya sa KamangMangan at KaBobOhaN mo sayong sariling Bibliya! hehehehehehe! Nabuking ka nga sa mga kasinunaglingan mo dyan eh! hahahahaha! Bible Expert ka pala na walang alam sa iyo mismong Bibliya! hahahahaha! Ganoon na ba Katanga ang Samahan ninyo para ituring ka na isaang Bible Expert? hehehehehe! wala din yatang mga Utak kasi ang mga nAghirang sayo bilang isang Bible expert! Palibhasa kasi ultimo mga sinsabi ninyo ay hindi nyo alAm at tila hindi nyo ginagAmitan ito ng kahit kaunting Pag-iisip! Mantakin nyo po si Maria na Ina ni Jesus at ang Espiritu Santo daw po ay mag-asawa? hahahahahahaha! tapus wala naman po'ng nakatala mula sa kanilang Bibliya kong ang Mag-asawang Maria at ang Espiritu Santo Ay Hiwalay na ay itong si Maria nag-asaw na naman po'ng muli sa isang Matanda na 90 years old na noon na si Joseph! Oh ito po ba ang KatangiTangi at Tamang gawain? ha? Demon este Cenon Bibe pala!? Sumagot ka!

    Kaya ganoon na lamang po ang Pagpupumilit nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na iapply ang ganitong KaBaboyan sa Islam! Gusto nitong Demonyong ito na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na pati ang mga Babae sa Islam ay mag-aasawa na din ng higit sa isa! Tulad ng Pinagpipilitan nya na ginwa daw po nitong si Maria na ina ni Jesus, na nagkakaroon ng Dalawang Asawa sa iisang Panahon! at ito ay ang Espiritu Santo at si Joseph na 90 years old na noon! Ayon kay Demon este Cenon pala.

    CENON BIBE:
    Bakit po, KAILAN PA NAPATUNAYAN nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM na MAHALAGA sa KALIGTASAN ang BILANG ng SALITA at LETRA sa BIBLIYA?

    Muslim;
    Ang sabi po nitong BugoK! BobO! GagO at Sinto-Sinto ayon sa sinasabi ng kanyang Bibliya sa kanya, na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay ganito po;

    "Bakit po, KAILAN PA NAPATUNAYAN nitong MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM na MAHALAGA sa KALIGTASAN ang BILANG ng SALITA at LETRA sa BIBLIYA?"

    Hoy! MangMang na Demon este Cenon Bibe pala yon ay mahalaga! ang BILANG ng SALITA at LETRA sa BIBLIYA ay mahalaga para makakasiguro ang bawat isa kong ang Bibliyang hawak nya ay syang Authentic at Tunay na Galing sa Dios! upang gabayan ang Tao tungo sa tuwid na landas! di mo pala alam yon? bueno po babasahin po natin ang nakasulat mismo sa Bibliya ng Mangmang na ito na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala.

    Revelation 22:18-19
    18] For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall ADD unto these things, God shall ADD unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

    19] And if any man shall TAKE AWAY from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall TAKE AWAY his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    Now ngayon po, mahalaga po ba ang BILANG ng SALITA at LETRA sa BIBLIYA dear Readers of this blog o hindi? Kayo na po ang bahalang magpasya at umunawa sa kong ano ang nakasulat mismo sa inyong Bibliya ukol dyan! Kong hindi mahalaga sa inyo ang tungkol dito eh nasa sa inyo na po yan kong ang gamit ninyo ay ang 66 Books of the Bible or 73 Books of the Bible. kong hindi naman pala mahalaga sa inyo ang nilalaman ng inyong Bibliya at ang nakasulat sa Revelation 22:18-19 eh, Dios na po ang bahala sa inyo!

    Yon lamang po at maraming pong salamat!

    ReplyDelete
  90. CENON BIBE:
    ITO talagang mga BALIK ISLAM e MAHILIG MANLOKO.

    Muslim;
    Bakit ikaw ba Demon este Cenon Bibe pala hindi ba panloloko ang pagpapakilala mo na isa kang Bible Expert?! Pero kamukat-mukat mo eh MangMang at Estupido ka naman pala sa mismong Bibliya mo! Ang pagsabi mo na si Maria na Ina ni Jesus at ang Espiritu Santo na Mag-ASAWA hindi po ba panloloko yon? Kaya mo bang patunayan Biblically kong NASAAN malinaw nating mababasa ang salitang Mag-asawa o Pag-aasawa sa Pamamagitan ng Espiritu Santo at si Maria? Kong wala at hindi naman mababasa sa Bibliya ang naturang mga pangungusap hindi po ba maituturing na Panalaula ang ginaGawa mong ito kay Maria at ng Espiritu Santo? Nagtatanong lamang po! Saan at anong Talata po mula sa Bibliya na kong saan malinaw po nating mababasa o malinaw po na nakasulat ang pagiging Mag-asawa nila ni Maria at ng Espiritu Santo? meron po bang ganoon talata na magpapatunay WORD for WORD na si Maria at ang Espiritu Santo nga ay talagang mag-asawa? bueno po hintayin po natin ang malinaw na kasagutan nitong si Demon este Cenon pala!

    CENON BIBE:
    Kung TITINGNAN po natin ang TITULO ng ARTIKULO e parang DEPENSA sa BIBLIYA pero kung babasahin natin ay MALINAW na PANINIRA sa BIBLIYA.

    Muslim;
    bakit may kahit kAtiting bang binabago mula sa mga talatang nabanggit? o di kaya ay imbento mula sa sinasabi mong artikulo? Wala naman po hindi po ba? when Infact ang maituturing pa nating malaking imbento sa Bibliya na nagMula mismo sayo ay ang mga paniniwala at mga panloloko na pinagdidiinan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na ang Espiritu Santo at si Maria ay mag-ASAWA! hindi po ba? na alam naman po natin kailan man ay hindi kayang patunayan nitong MangMang at GagO na ito na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! PangaLawang punto po ay ang paniniwala ng Pagkadios ni Kristo na ayon daw sa John 10:30 dios daw po si Kristo, pero ano po ba ang nakasaad mula s nasabing talata? ito po basahin po natin;

    John 10:30
    "I and my Father are one."

    Mula po sa nasabing Talata dear readers of this blog saan at kailan po sinabi ni Kristo na dios sya mula sa nasabing Talata? meron po bang sinasabi si Kristo mula sa nasabing talata na dios sya? wala naman po di po ba? so Dagdag o karagdagan na naman po ito sa Bibliya nitong si Demon este Cenon pala dear readers of this blog! ano po ba ang sabi ng
    Revelation 22:
    18] For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall ADD unto these things, God shall ADD unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

    Aware po kaya itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ng kanyang mga ginagawa sa Bibliya?

    bueno po pangatlong punto; Matt 12:40
    "For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

    Kong mapapansin nyo po sa puntong ito malinaw po naman nating makikita na tuwirang binawasan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang actual na pangyayaring binanggit ni Kristo mula sa nasabing Talata! na magpahanggang ngayon ay nagMamaang-maangan itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala hinggil sa actual at totoong kaganapan! hindi nya daw po alam kong ilang Oras ang talagang nakapaloob sa 3 Days & 3 Nights na syang malinaw na sinasabi ni Kristo mula sa nabanggit na Talata! bueno ano po ba ang sinasabi ng Bibliya hinggil sa tuwirang pagbabawas nito dear readers of this blog? ito po ang sinasabi ng Bibliya;
    Revelation 22
    19] And if any man shall TAKE AWAY from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall TAKE AWAY his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    Now ngayon po malinaw na po ba sa inyo kong saan pupulutin itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala sA hinaharaP dear readers of this blog?

    ReplyDelete
  91. OI balik islam mahalaga pala ang bilang ng letra at salita sayo..Sigo po sirit na ako pangaralan mo po ako kung ilang letra ang biblia at ang koran..

    Sa biblia po pakibigay ng bilang ng original texts sa greek kasi yun po ang original namin..Yung iba po mga salin na..

    Sa koran naman pakibigay po ng bilang ng salita at pakitukoy naman po kung aling version ng original nyong koran hehehe..Ang alam ko kasi meron kayong 4-5 na inaakong original hahahaha..Ahhh sabi nila mahigit pa hehehe..Tama po ba?Maghihintay po ako ng pangaral mo ha..

    Salamat po pangaralan mo nga po..

    http://www.answering-islam.org/Green/seven.htm

    ReplyDelete
  92. Muslim;
    Patunay na ultimo si Kristo hindi alam sagotin ang katanungan mo ay sya mismo hindi nya alam ang kanyang pagbabalik namang muli; basa:
    Matt 24:36
    "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only."

    CENON BIBE:
    NAGMARUNONG NA NAMAN ang MANGMANG. Hehehe

    ARAW at ORAS ng PAGBABALIK NIYA ang TINUTUKOY RIYAN at HINDI kung ANONG KAMANGMANGAN ng BALIK ISLAM.

    Muslim;
    Oo nga Araw at Oras ng anyang sariling Pagbabalik ay hindi nya alam?! Tama? ngayon Tatanungin kita, isa po ba sa mga Katangian ng Tutoong Dios ang HINDI ALAM dear readers of this blog? Ito po ba ang dios na kinikilala nitong si Demon etse Cenon Bibe pala? Wala pong alam ultimo sarili nyang pagbabalik? wow! katangian pa po ba ng totong dios ito? ang hindi malalaman ang mga bagay-bagay? na ultimo sarili nyang pagbabalik ay hindi Nya alam ito? No wonDer Bibliya mismo nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay hindi nya rin po alam! hahahahahahaha!

    CENON BIBE:
    Ang SINASABI lang DIYAN ng PANGINOON ay HINDI SIYA ang MAGSASABI ng KANYANG PAGBABALIK KUNDI ang DIYOS AMA.

    Muslim;
    Pansin nyo po ba dear readers of this blog kong ilang dios na po ang binanggit nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? May nakakahiggit po sa dios na kinikilala nitong si Dewmon este Cenon Bibe pala. Na ang Ibig po nitong sabihin ang dios na kinikilala nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ay maY nakakahigit pa sa kanya!? tama po ba? at ang kinikilala nyang dios ay sunod-sunoran lamang sA Dios na nakakahigit nito? bueno ano po ba ang sinasabi ni Kristo hinggil sa NAG_IISA at TOTONG DIOS? basa po tayo ng Talata mula sa Bibliya;

    John 17:
    :3
    And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
    :4
    I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.

    Tila sa mga Pangungusap ni Kristong yan dear readers of this blog ay tila tuwirn na naman pong Sumasalungat at Kumukontra itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala kaya Kristo. Kitang-kita po, hindi po ba? bueno po bahala na po kayong magpasya ukol dito s mga Katangahan pinagsasabi nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe po na ito!

    ReplyDelete
  93. SimplyCatholic said...

    OI balik islam mahalaga pala ang bilang ng letra at salita sayo..Sigo po sirit na ako pangaralan mo po ako kung ilang letra ang biblia at ang koran..

    Sa biblia po pakibigay ng bilang ng original texts sa greek kasi yun po ang original namin..Yung iba po mga salin na..


    Muslim;
    Hoy! NagmaMarunong na MangMang at BobO! ano ang sinasabi mo? Ang Original na Text ng Bibliya ay Greek? Bueno bago po natin sagotin ang kaMangMangan na ito ng isang nagpakilala na SimplyCatholic daw marapat siguro na patunayan nya muna kong si Kristo at ang kanyang mga disciples ay Greek nga! kasi kong hindi po Greek si Kristo o kahit isa man lamang sa kanyang mga disciples eh papaano po nagkakaroon ng Greek Original Text ang Bibliya? kong itinuturing nilang Original ang mga Greek text ng Bibliya sa kanya na isang MangMang ibig bang sabihin nito na ang salita ni Kristo o di kaya si Kristo mismo ay Greek?

    NapakaMangmang po talaga ng mga ito! dear readers of this blog
    bueno po suriin po natin ang talagang salita ni Kristo kong ito po ay Greek ba o aramaic,
    basa po tayo ng talata mula mismo sa Bibliya nila.

    Matt 27:46
    "And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

    Mark 15:34
    "And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

    Ibig bang sabihin ng Tinamaan ng KaTangahan na ito na si SimplyCatholic daw Greek ang mga pangungusap ni Kristong iyan? Kailan pa naging Greek ang mga pangungusp na iyan ni Kristo dear readers of this blog? Nasa tamang katinoan pa kaya itong mga tinamaan ng Lintik na ito? Kong ano-ano na lamang ang pinagsasabi! Hindi pa kayo Tinamaan ng kidlat mga BobO kayo! Well ang masasabi ko sayo tangang SimplyCatholic ilitaw mo ang totoo original at tunay na Bibliya na salita mismo nila ni Kristo noon hindi yang inaakala mong original kono na Greek pero PIRATED naman pala! Ok? mag-aral kang mabuti at pag-aralan mo yang Bible mo ha? kaya kayo parating napapahiya eh mga Tanga at mangMang kasi kayo! Hindi sapat ang ibuka nyo lamAng ang inyong bbig ay sapat na! tingnan mo nangyari sayo ngayon oh di buking ka na naman sA Katangahan at KaMangMangan mo! bueno po hanggang s susunod at nmagandang araw p[o sa inyong lahat! nakaka-init lang po talaga ng ulo ang mga katangahan ng mga ito na nagpapanggap pa na magagaling!

    ReplyDelete
  94. Salam shabab.


    Kapatid na anonymous muslim relax ka lang brod. ganyan talaga pag usaping relihiyon nakakainit ng ulo dahil buhay at kabilang-buhay ang pinaguusapan dito eh. pero wag mo msyadong dibdibin sana ipakita mo rin sa mga kausap natin dito na marunong tayong rumespeto.

    ReplyDelete
  95. BULOK-ISLAM:
    Hoy Estupidong MANNY CRUZ sagotin mo nalang at huwag ka ng magpalusot!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Duling ka ba? Sinagot na kita ah. Basahin mo ulit ang sagot ko!

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    Ang nilalaman ng inyong Bibliya at ang nilalaman ng aming Qur'an ay alam ko. itatanong ko ba naman yon kong di ko alam? Estupido ka talaga!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Joker ka talaga eh! Kung alam e di sinagot mo na sana ang tanong ko: ILANG WORDS AND LETTERS BA ANG BIBLE AT ANG KORAN? Sagot na!

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    Pero hindi ko alam na Bukod sa pagiging MangMang mo ay naPakaTanga mo pa pala talaga!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    OWS! Really? Aber tingnan natin kung sino ang tunay na tanga at mangmang. Basa ka lang.

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    May mga katanungan ka na hindi na dapat sagotin gayan ng mga ito;

    "ilang basong tinta ang ginamit sa pag print ng bible, ilang atoms ang napapaloob sa lahat ng pages ng bible"

    MANNY CRUZ:
    HA HA HA HAH! GOTCHA! Ang dali mo palang ma TRAP! HA HA HA HA! Tama ka, hindi na dapat sagotin yang tanong ko kasi walang kwenta! Obvious naman e. Ang hindi mo napansin, e kapareho lang yan sa tanong mo na wala rin kwenta ha ha ha ha! O ano, sasagotin ko pa rin ba ang tanong mo kahit walang kwenta, ha? E Sino ngayon ang tanga at estupido, ha?

    Pahabol ko pa pala: ano ba ang batayan mo sa koran at bibliya para ipagdiinan mo na dapat alam mo kung ilang words and letters ang mga ito? Ingat ka sa pag sagot ha baka ma trap ka na naman he he he!

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    kasi ultimo ang Sto Papa ninyo o kahit si Kristo kapag tinatanong mo ng ganitong klaseng katanungan eh masasampal kang talaga!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Sampalin mo na lang ang sarili mo. Ikaw ang nagsimula ng mga walang kwentang katanungan dito ah! Baka nakalimutan mo na iyan!

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    Patunay na ultimo si Kristo hindi alam sagotin ang katanungan mo ay sya mismo hindi nya alam ang kanyang pagbabalik namang muli; basa:
    Matt 24:36
    "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only."
    May 19, 2010 5:53 PM

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Bakit, ikaw alam mo ba kung kailan babalik si Kristo? Ang galing mo naman! Pero teka muna, ano bang problema mo kung ang Ama lamang ang nakakaalam sa pagbabalik ni Kristo? Ano bang paki-alam mo tungkol sa bagay na iyan? Ha?

    ReplyDelete
  96. Cenon Bibe:
    HINDI MO NGA MAIPAGMALAKI na PINANSIN at KINAUSAP ng DIYOS ang PROPETA MO, di ba?

    Muslim;
    Ang totoong Dios ay hindi naririnig at walng nakakakita, malinaw na mababasa yan sa inyong Bibliya! bakit? hindi mo pa rin ba alam yon?
    basa;

    Exodus 33:20
    "And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live."

    John 1:18
    "No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."

    John 5:37
    "And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape."

    1Tim 6:16
    "Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen."

    Kawawa naman itong Demon este Cenon Bibe palang ito wala talagang alam ng kanyang Bibliya! ayan po ang mga talatang tuwiran nya ngayong binabali dahil sa sinasabi nyang katAngahan na kinakausap daw sila ng dios! Hoy Demon este Cenon Bibe pala kong may kumakausap man sa inyo FAKE na dios yon dahil malinaw ang sinsabi ng Bibliya!

    Cenon Bibe:
    Ngayon, kung RELIHIYON ni KRISTO ang ITINATANONG MO, SIYA ay isang HUDYO.

    Muslim;
    Oh di Tapus na ang kwento inaAmin mo na ngayon mismo na Nanlilinglang ka lamang at hindi talaga Kristyanismo ang Relihiyon ni Kristo! Oh sige Sumagot kang Sinungaling ka!?

    Cenon Bibe:
    At HINDI LANG SIYA HUDYO, SIYA ang HARI ng mga HUDYO.

    Sabi sa Matthew 27:11
    Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "YES, it is as you say," Jesus replied.

    Muslim;
    Ang senaryo po bang yan na nasa Matthew 27:11 dear readers of this blog ay nagpapatunay ba na hari talaga ng mga Hudyo si Kristo? Alam ba nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang tunay na kahulogan ng salitang Hari? ay nako Demon este Cenon Bibe pala aanga-anga ka na naman Demon este Cenon Bibe. salitang Hari lang hindi mo pa alam ang tunay na Kahulogan!

    Cenon Bibe:
    Ang MGA HUDYO ang KAAWAY NINYO, di ba?

    Muslim;
    Bakit inaamin mo na ba ngayon na ang Romano talaga ang napapatay kay Kristo? at hindi ang mga hudyo? ha? eh yang samahan nyo pala eh samahan pala yan ng mga kriminal na ultimo kinikilala ninyong dios ay pinapatay ninyo! at kaanim ka sa samahang yan! ang ROMANO KAtoliko na sya noong nagpapatay kay Kristo!

    ReplyDelete
  97. MANNY CRUZ:
    HA HA HA HAH! GOTCHA! Ang dali mo palang ma TRAP! HA HA HA HA! Tama ka, hindi na dapat sagotin yang tanong ko kasi walang kwenta! Obvious naman e. Ang hindi mo napansin, e kapareho lang yan sa tanong mo na wala rin kwenta ha ha ha ha! O ano, sasagotin ko pa rin ba ang tanong mo kahit walang kwenta, ha? E Sino ngayon ang tanga at estupido, ha?

    Muslim;
    Natural ang kailangang alam mo ang nilalaman ng iyong Bibliya... bakit? bueno basa;

    Revelation 22:
    18
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

    19
    And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    Oh di ba kailangan nyo pala talagang malalaman ang nilalaman ng Bibliya ng hindi naman kayo maging biktima! di ako ang may sab9i nyan Bibliya nyo mismo! ayan bashin at unawain mo nalang ang mga talatang iyan na nasa itaas! Now ngayon alinG Bibliya ang tunay na sa dios? ang 66 Books of the Bible po ba o ang 73 Books of the Bible? hindi mo na ito alam ano? ngayon kong ano man ang maging kasagutan mo, kaya mo bang patutunayan ito Biblically na dios mismo ang nagsasabi? ha? sige sagotin mo yan MANNY CRUZ ewan ko sayo kong saan mo na inilagay yang utak mo!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Pahabol ko pa pala: ano ba ang batayan mo sa koran at bibliya para ipagdiinan mo na dapat alam mo kung ilang words and letters ang mga ito? Ingat ka sa pag sagot ha baka ma trap ka na naman he he he!

    Muslim;
    Nang mapanghahawakan mo ang tunay at ang Authentic na galing sa Dios at hindi ang Fake gaya ng nangyari sa inyo ngayon! na may 66 Books of the Bible at mayroon din namang 73 Books of the Bible! kaya dapat alam mo ang talagang nilalaman ng iyong Bibliya o ng Koran for that matter! ng hindi ka naman maloko kagaya ng nangyari sa inyo ngayon! at sa karamihang mga Kristyano! Gets mo na ba?! in our case Muslim all over the world mapa Japanese, Chinese, American, Canadian, Australian, European, Malaysian, Indonesian, Singaporean Muslim man yan we memorized the Koran. not to mention the recitation of which 5 times or more everyday during prayers!

    Yon lamang po at marami pong salamat!

    ReplyDelete
  98. Muslim;
    Patunay na ultimo si Kristo hindi alam sagotin ang katanungan mo ay sya mismo hindi nya alam ang kanyang pagbabalik namang muli; basa:
    Matt 24:36
    "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only."
    May 19, 2010 5:53 PM

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Bakit, ikaw alam mo ba kung kailan babalik si Kristo? Ang galing mo naman! Pero teka muna, ano bang problema mo kung ang Ama lamang ang nakakaalam sa pagbabalik ni Kristo? Ano bang paki-alam mo tungkol sa bagay na iyan? Ha?

    Muslim;
    Hahahahahahaha! kong ang kinikilala mo ngang dios ay hindi nya alam ang kanyang sariling pagbabalik! hehehehehe! Tanga ka ba MANNY CRUZ? well siguro hindi na mahalaga kong Tanga ka man o hindi eh kitang kita naman eh! Ako o ang mga Muslim ay walang problema pagdating sa usaping yan! Pero kayo ang laki ng Problema ninyo dyan, kasi itong kinikilalang ninyong dios ay walang sapat na kaalaman o kakayahan para alamin ang hinaharap! Shame on you! mali ang kinikilala ninyong dios!

    ReplyDelete
  99. Muslim;
    Hoy! NagmaMarunong na MangMang at BobO! ano ang sinasabi mo? Ang Original na Text ng Bibliya ay Greek? Bueno bago po natin sagotin ang kaMangMangan na ito ng isang nagpakilala na SimplyCatholic daw marapat siguro na patunayan nya muna kong si Kristo at ang kanyang mga disciples ay Greek nga! kasi kong hindi po Greek si Kristo o kahit isa man lamang sa kanyang mga disciples eh papaano po nagkakaroon ng Greek Original Text ang Bibliya? kong itinuturing nilang Original ang mga Greek text ng Bibliya sa kanya na isang MangMang ibig bang sabihin nito na ang salita ni Kristo o di kaya si Kristo mismo ay Greek?

    NapakaMangmang po talaga ng mga ito! dear readers of this blog
    bueno po suriin po natin ang talagang salita ni Kristo kong ito po ay Greek ba o aramaic,
    basa po tayo ng talata mula mismo sa Bibliya nila.

    Matt 27:46
    "And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

    Mark 15:34
    "And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

    Ibig bang sabihin ng Tinamaan ng KaTangahan na ito na si SimplyCatholic daw Greek ang mga pangungusap ni Kristong iyan? Kailan pa naging Greek ang mga pangungusp na iyan ni Kristo dear readers of this blog? Nasa tamang katinoan pa kaya itong mga tinamaan ng Lintik na ito? Kong ano-ano na lamang ang pinagsasabi! Hindi pa kayo Tinamaan ng kidlat mga BobO kayo! Well ang masasabi ko sayo tangang SimplyCatholic ilitaw mo ang totoo original at tunay na Bibliya na salita mismo nila ni Kristo noon hindi yang inaakala mong original kono na Greek pero PIRATED naman pala! Ok? mag-aral kang mabuti at pag-aralan mo yang Bible mo ha? kaya kayo parating napapahiya eh mga Tanga at mangMang kasi kayo! Hindi sapat ang ibuka nyo lamAng ang inyong bbig ay sapat na! tingnan mo nangyari sayo ngayon oh di buking ka na naman sA Katangahan at KaMangMangan mo! bueno po hanggang s susunod at nmagandang araw p[o sa inyong lahat! nakaka-init lang po talaga ng ulo ang mga katangahan ng mga ito na nagpapanggap pa na magagaling!


    Hahahahaha!KAYO NA PO MGA GILIW NA TAGA BASA SA BLOG NA ITO ANG MAGHUSGA KUNG SINO ANG NANG LILINLANG DITO HAHAHAHA..

    Binigyang diin po ng muslim na bobo ang sinabi kong tungkol sa original text na greek ng biblia..Akala nya ay nakapuntos na sya ang di nya po nabigyan pansin na Greek ay ginamit ng mga author sa pagsulat ng New Testament at Hebrew namn sa Old testament..AT dahil nag pyesta na po si muslim na pedopilya dahil Greek lang ang binanggit ko eh pinagdidiinan nya po na mali ako at katunayan ay gusto nya akong itama sa napaka maingat nyang paraan sa pamagitan ng ng pagsitas ng sinabi ni Kristo nang nasa krus sya..Hindi daw po greek ang salitang iyon..Kundi aramaic..Tama naman po si Muslim..Pero ano po ba ang sinasabi natin? katunayan po ang pinaguusapan ntin ang text po kung saan sinulat ang banal na aklat..Wala pong tumatanggi na ang salita ni Kristo ay Aramaic..hahahahaha

    Pakibasa muslim ng link na ito ng matoto ka hahaha.. In what language was the Bible first written?

    Ngayon po ay patuloy ang pag iwas nitong si muslim na sagutin ang binabalik nating walang kwentang tanong nya kung alam nya ba ang eksaktong letra at salita ng koran nila at hinihingi din natin kung alin sa napakarami nilang original daw na koran ang knyang tinutukoy hahahaa..Huwag ka nang umiwas muslim deretsahan na tayo hhhahha..

    Bobo ba?Sino?Yung binalikan ng sarili nyang tanong at walang sagot!!! hahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  100. Saturday, May 22, 2010

    Muslim;
    hehehehehehe! ngayon na inaamin mo na mismo na huyo ang relihiyon ni Kristo bakit mo naman nasabi na sya ang nagtatag ng kristyanismo ay si Kristo? 8:43 AM
    bakit ang hudyo ba na syang relihiyon na kinaaaniban ni Kristo ay mali? kaya sya nagtatag ng Kristyanismo? ha? 8:43 AM
    lagpak ka na naman ngayon sa katangahan mo! hehehehehehehe! 8:44 AM
    Cenon Bibe: Ngayon, kung RELIHIYON ni KRISTO ang ITINATANONG MO, SIYA ay isang HUDYO. / Oh di ba ikaw mismo ang may sabi nyan? hehehehe! 8:47 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Niloko mo na naman mukha mo. Cno naman umamin ng cnasabi mo? Kayong balik islam puro ilusyon 8:47 AM
    Basahin mo nang buo ang sagot ko. Puro ka panlololoko sa sarili mo 8:48 AM
    Ikaw ang tatanga-tanga. Aanib ka lang sa hindi pa Diyos ang nagtayo. Hehe. Ayan puro ka tuloy kamangmangan 8:49 AM
    Ano ang Kristyanismo? Yan ang katuparan ng mga pangako ng Diyos sa mga hudyo. D mo nakita? Yung mga unang Kristyano ay mga hudyo? 8:51 AM
    Kahit maghapon ka magtutuwad sa pinasok mo e wala kang mapapala dyan. Alam mong hindi Diyos ang nagtatag nyan e 8:52 AM


    Muslim;
    Bakit cno ba ang nanloloko sa atin? ikaw na pinapaniwala mong Kristyano ang Relihiyon ni Kristo samantalang saayo mismo nanggagaling hudyo naman pla 8:53 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    Isang epekto ng pagdarasal mo ng d mo naiintindihan e ang pagiging palamura mo. Kala mo yan ang dinanadasal mo. O d b? Hehe 8:54 AM


    Muslim;
    Kong Hudyo ang paniniwala ni Kristo tapus nagtatatag sya ng panibagong Relihiyon isa lang ang ibig sabihin noon hindi kayo worth sa kinaanibang 8:54 AM
    relihiyon ni Kristo kaya kayo iba... 8:55 AM
    iba sa kinaaniban nya mismo! 8:55 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    O ano? Natameme ka d b? Sabi syo wala kang mapapala dyan sa hindi itinayo ng Diyos e 8:55 AM

    Muslim;
    ito ang katangahang sinasabi mo na syang Relihiyon na kinaaniban ni Kristo! 8:56 AM
    Cenon Bibe: Ngayon, kung RELIHIYON ni KRISTO ang ITINATANONG MO, SIYA ay isang HUDYO. / Oh di ba ikaw mismo ang may sabi nyan? hehehehe! 8:56 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Relihiyon talaga ni Kristo ang Kristyanismo. Nagkatawang tao pa sya para itayo ito bilang katuparam sa pangako ng Diyos sa mga hudyo 8:56 AM


    Muslim;
    hahahahahaha! lokoloko! huwag mo ng GagOhiN yang pagmumukha mo! mukhang GagO ka na! 8:57 AM
    ang totoong Relihiyon ng Dios ay nag-iisa yan at hindi yan kagaya ng Kristyanismo na napakarami! MangMang ka talaga! 8:58 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Paano naging iba e katuparan nga ng kinaaniban nya. Kumbaga e continuation lang. Yang inyo ang ibang-iba dahil hindi Diyos ang nagtayo 8:58 AM

    ReplyDelete
  101. Muslim;
    now kong Hudyo as according to you ang kinaanibang Relihiyon ni Kristo eh di Hudyo ang totoong Relihiyon ayon kay Kristo! 8:59 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ikaw ang luko-luko dahil umanib ka sa alam mong hindi Diyos ang nagtayo 8:59 AM

    Muslim;
    bakit kailangang magtayo pa sya ng panibagong Relihiyon? 8:59 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ang totoong relihiyon ng Diyos ay yung sya mismo ang nagtayo. Kaya nga alam mong wala ka sa tunay na relihiyon d b' 9:00 AM

    Muslim;
    eh ikaw sinong nagtayo ng Relihiyon mo? ha? ang nagtayo ba ng Relihiyon mo ay isang tao ba na ang kinaaanibanmg Rilihiyon ay Hudyo? ha? 9:01 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kaya nagtayo ng bago e para matupad ang pangakong ibinigay sa unang itinayo nya. Malas mo hindi ka kaanib sa nauna at sa katuparan 9:02 AM


    Muslim;
    well it goes without saying na hindi Dios ang nagtatayo ng Relihiyon mo dahil ang nagtayo ng Relihiyon kaanib ng Relihiyong Hudyo! oh hindi ba? 9:02 AM
    huwag kang Tatanga-tanga! 9:02 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Cno nagtayo ng KRISTIYANISMO? E d c KRISTO. Kasimple d mo nagets? 9:03 AM

    Muslim;
    Hoy! ang Dios hindi tanga na katulad mo para magtayo ng maraming Relihiyon! GagO ka! akala ko Mukhang GagO ka lang eh GagO ka palang Talaga eh! 9:04 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ikaw ang wag tatanga-tanga. Alam mong d ka maliligtas sa inaniban mo. Pag hindi Diyos ang nagtayo e walang kaligtasan 9:04 AM

    Muslim;
    Cno nagtayo ng KRISTIYANISMO? E d c KRISTO. Kasimple d mo nagets? 9:04 AM
    Cenon Bibe: Ngayon, kung RELIHIYON ni KRISTO ang ITINATANONG MO, SIYA ay isang HUDYO. / Oh di ba ikaw mismo ang may sabi nyan? hehehehe! 9:04 AM
    Sino ngayon ang GinaGo mo? 9:04 AM
    well it goes without saying na hindi Dios ang nagtatayo ng Relihiyon mo dahil ang nagtayo ng Relihiyon kaanib ng Relihiyong Hudyo! oh hindi ba? 9:05 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ang Diyos hindi tanga. Kaya nga hindi nya itimayo ang inaniban mo d b? Ikaw ang tatanga-tanga dahil umanib ka sa d nya itinayo 9:05 AM

    Muslim;
    so inaamin mo nagyon na ikaw lang ang Tanga? 9:06 AM

    ReplyDelete
  102. Cenon Bibe
    Ikaw lang gumagago sa mukha mo. Alam mong hindi itinayo ng Diyos nagpapakapagod ka pa. 9:06 AM

    Muslim;
    Cenon Bibe: Ngayon, kung RELIHIYON ni KRISTO ang ITINATANONG MO, SIYA ay isang HUDYO. / Oh di ba ikaw mismo ang may sabi nyan? hehehehe! 9:06 AM
    Cno nagtayo ng KRISTIYANISMO? E d c KRISTO. Kasimple d mo nagets? 9:06 AM
    well it goes without saying na hindi Dios ang nagtatayo ng Relihiyon mo dahil ang nagtayo ng Relihiyon kaanib ng Relihiyong Hudyo! oh hindi ba? 9:07 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ako? Umamin na tanga? Kelan ko inamin na hindi Diyos ang nagtayo ng Kristyanismo? 9:07 AM

    Muslim;
    bakit ano ba ang tingin mo kay Kristo Rebelde s dios na Katulad mo para magtayo pa sya ng panibagong Relihiyon? eh nasa Relihiyon ng Dios na nga sya 9:08 AM
    ng DFios kamo eh! 9:08 AM
    at yong ang kinaaaniban nyang relihiyon ang Hudyo! 9:08 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    It goes without saying na mahina talaga utak mo. Katuparan nga nga pangako ng Diyos sa hudyo ang Kristyanismo e. D mo nagets 9:09 AM

    Muslim;
    nagsalita ang MangMang at Tanga na si Demon! este Cenon pala sorry magkatunog kasi eh! 9:09 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kelan naging rebelde ang nagtupad sa pangako ng Diyos? Napakahina talaga ng utak mo 9:10 AM

    Muslim;
    katuparan ng pangako ng dios ang magtayo ng panibagong Relihiyon? nais ng dios yan? hindi dios ang may nais nyan kundi Demonyo! 9:10 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Katunog lang ng demon at cenon. Ikaw kaugali mo ang demon. Sori napuna ko lang. Hehe 9:11 AM

    Muslim;
    napuna mo? bakit may utak ka na ba ngayon? sino nagbigay Demon este Cenon pala? demonyo ba ang may bgay ng utak mong yan? 9:12 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kaya cno nagtayo ng relihiyon mo na iba sa itinayo ng Diyos? Tiyak kilala mo na. Kaugali mo na rin e 9:12 AM


    Muslim;
    hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe! 9:12 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    Kung demonyo nagbigay ng utak ko e d dapat nanalo ka na. Kaso ikaw talunan d b? D mo lang kaugali, kautak mo pa. Loser 9:13 AM

    Muslim;
    nagtatayo ng Islam? mahirap na magyabang tingnan mo nalang ang pamamaraan ng mga propeta ng Dios sa paniniwala ng nagiisang Dios at sa pagdarasal. 9:13 AM
    eh dyan palang malalaman mo na eh... 9:13 AM
    at yon hindi maaaring magbago! 9:14 AM
    kasi galing sa Dios! 9:14 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ano? Kilala mo na nagtayo ng relihiyon mo? Kaya gayang-gaya mo ugali d b? 9:14 AM

    Muslim;
    eh kayo pabagobago mula sa 73 books of the Bible ngayon naging 66 na naman mula sa nagiisang Dios ngayon tatlo na naman! oh di ba malaking kaTangahn 9:15 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ows? Diyos nagtayo nyan? Kailan kinausap ng Diyos ang propeta mo? Cge nga 9:15 AM
    Ikaw lang naman ang eengot-engot na nagsasabing nabago ang dami ng libro e. Hehe. Wala ka kasing alam 9:16 AM

    Muslim;
    Exodus 33:20 "And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live." 9:17 AM
    John 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him." 9:17 AM
    John 5:37 "And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape." 9:17 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Noon umanib ka sa gaya-gaya. Ngayon, umanib ka sa iba talaga sa itinayo ng Diyos. Tama? 9:18 AM

    ReplyDelete
  103. Muslim;
    1Tim 6:16 "Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour 9:18 AM
    and power everlasting. Amen." 9:18 AM
    Kawawa naman itong Demon este Cenon Bibe palang ito wala talagang alam ng kanyang Bibliya! 9:19 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ang linaw pala e. Ang Diyos Ama ang di nakita at d narinig. C Kristo ay Diyos Anak. At sya ang nakita at narinig. Ang galing d b? 9:19 AM


    Muslim;
    ayan po ang mga talatang tuwiran nya ngayong binabali dahil sa sinasabi nyang katAngahan na kinakausap daw sila ng dios! 9:20 AM
    Hoy Demon este Cenon Bibe pala kong may kumakausap man sa inyo FAKE na dios yon dahil malinaw ang sinsabi ng Bibliya! 9:20 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ows? Ako ang walang alam? E bat d mo alam na Diyos Ama ang d nakita at d narinig? Niloko mo na naman ang mukha mo 9:20 AM

    Muslim;
    bakit may iba ka pa bang kilalang Dios? 9:20 AM
    eh FAKE na dios yang kilala mong yan! 9:21 AM
    kasi malinaw ang sinasabi ni Kristo... na nagiisa lamang ang tunay na Dios! 9:21 AM
    John 17:3-4 9:21 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    Kung yung kinausap mismo ng Diyos Anak e inaakala mong peke e ano yang HINDI TALAGA KINAUSAP ng DIYOS? Totoong peke? Hehe 9:22 AM

    Muslim;
    3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. 9:23 AM
    4 I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. 9:23 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Jn17.1-3. Tunay na Diyos ang Ama. Kung ganun TUNAY na DIYOS ang ANAK. Magaling! 9:23 AM

    Muslim;
    the ONLY TRUE GOD hindi mo ba nauunawaan ang sinasabi ni Kristong yon? 9:23 AM
    papaano maging tunay eh kalahati Tao. Mutant ang tawag noon! bakit di mo mba alam yon? 9:24 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Sa inyo lang naman ang anak ng tao ay tsonggo. Tama? Hindi katulad ng magulang ang kalikasan ng anak. Kaya asal tsonggo ka. Tama? 9:24 AM
    Only true God ang Ama. E d ONLY TRUE GOD din ang ANAK. Iisa Sila e. Jn10.30. Basa! 9:25 AM
    Sa inyo lang naman may mutant e. Anak nyo d tulad ng magulang ang kalikasan. Mga mutant. Hehe 9:26 AM

    Muslim;
    bakit ano ba ang sabi ni Kristo sa inyong Bibliya? may sinasabi ba si Kristo na dios sya at ng kailanagang Samabahin sya ng magkaroon ang mga Tao 9:26 AM
    ng Buhay na walang Hanngan? 9:27 AM
    san mababasa sa inyong bibliya ang mga ganoon talata? 9:27 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ang sabi ni Kristo Ama nya ang Diyos. E d Diyos din sya. Kadali d mo gets 9:28 AM
    D mo nabasa sa jn17.1-3? Ang Tunay na Diyos ay Ama ni Hesus. Kung Diyos ang Ama e d Diyos ang Anak 9:29 AM

    Muslim;
    bakit ako din ang sabi ng Bibliya ama ko din ang Dios ah! di naman ako dios ah! 9:29 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ikaw nga nagpaampon ka lang sa demonyo magkatulad na magkatulad na ugali nyo d b? 9:30 AM
    Patunayan mo na ama mo nga ang Diyos. Gawa ka rin ng milagro. Dali! 9:30 AM

    Muslim;
    John 14:28 basa; 9:31 AM
    Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for 9:31 AM
    my Father is greater than I. 9:31 AM
    ito pa basa;John 20:17 9:33 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Mas dakila talaga ang persona ng Ama. Pero pareho pa rin ang KALIKASAN nila. DIYOS na ANAK ng DIYOS 9:33 AM

    Muslim;
    Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and 9:34 AM
    your Father; and to my God, and your God. 9:34 AM
    siguro ikaw anak ka ng Demonyo... hehehehehehe! 9:34 AM

    ReplyDelete
  104. Cenon Bibe
    Sa inyo lang naman mas mababa ang kalikasan ng anak sa ama d b? Tao ang ama. Tsonggo ang anak 9:34 AM

    Muslim;
    kaya nga sya lamang ang nag-iisa at tunay na Dios ayon sa sinasabi ni Kristo! 9:34 AM
    bakit muslim ba ang nagpapatay kasy Kristo hindi ba mga ROMANO? ikaw ang mat sabi noon ah! 9:35 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Tama. Bilang ulo ng Bayan ng Diyos ay nagpasakop ang Diyos Anak sa kanyang Ama. Walang malabo dyan. D mo lang unawa 9:36 AM

    Muslim;
    nagpasakop sya ng Dios para ano? para mangulo din? bakit ilang ulo ba ang dapat at ilang dios ba ang dapat? di ba iisa lang naman? bakit mo gawing 3 9:37 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    Tatay ko rin naging BOSS ko nung namasukan ako sa negosyo namin. Hindi nawala pagiging anak ko. Sa inyo alila na pag nagtrabaho para sa magulang 9:37 AM
    Kelan lang lumitaw ang islam. Kaya nga wala yang kaugnayam sa itinayo ng Diyos e 9:38 AM


    Muslim;
    Isaiah 55:8-9 9:38 AM
    8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. 9:39 AM
    9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. 9:39 AM
    bakit mo ihalintulad ang Dios sa iyo? napakababaw mo naman! 9:39 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    S inyo lang naman gumugulo pag nagpapasakop kayo sa founder ng inaniban nyo e. Tingnan mo naging palamura kayo 9:39 AM


    Muslim;
    ang minumura naman namin ay ang mga Demonyo lang na katulad mo! 9:40 AM
    ganon din naman ang dios s Demonyo di ba? 9:40 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kaming mga tunay na alagad ng Diyos ay nabigyan ng Holy Spirit para maunawa namin ang gusto ng Diyos. Kayo walang Holy Spirit kaya d kayo makaunawa 9:41 AM


    Muslim;
    Tunay? bakit kaanib mo na ba ngayon si Kristo? Hudyo ka na rin ba? 9:42 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ewan ko dyan sa inyo pero ang Diyos namin ay hindi sa demonyo. Baka sa inyo ganun. Hindi ang Diyos ang nagtayo nyan d b? 9:42 AM
    Kaanib talaga ako sa katuparan ng pangako ng Diyos sa mga hudyo. Kayo hindi kaya kawawa naman kayo 9:43 AM


    Muslim;
    tingnan mo nalang sa mga pamamaraan ng paniniwala ng kaisahan ng Tunay na Dios sa pagdasalan, sa pahaayuno at sa kong ano2 pa! malinaw yan sa Bible 9:43 AM

    ReplyDelete
  105. Cenon Bibe
    Bat mo naman mumurahin ang kapwa mo? Masaya kang murahin ang kapatid mo? 9:44 AM


    Muslim;
    kapwa? eh Demonyo ka nga! 9:45 AM


    Cenon Bibe
    Kahit ang demonyo gusto nya na sya lang ang sambahin ng tulad mo. Kaya nga umanib ka sa hindi Diyos ang nagtayo. Tama? 9:45 AM
    Ops! D tayo magkapatid. Hindi ko kapatid ang kaugali ng demonyo 9:46 AM


    Muslim;
    kaya nga! at ang mga palatandaan ng mga ito ay ang pagtatatag ng panibagong Relihiyon at ang pagtitiwalag sa tunay na Relihiyon ng Dios na ang sabi 9:47 AM
    ang Relihiyon ni Kristo 9:47 AM
    H U D Y O 9:47 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kayo lang naman ang umanib sa bagong relihiyon e. Kami nasa katuparan ng relihiyon na itinayo ng Diyos mula pa kay adan 9:49 AM


    Muslim;
    bakit ang Kristyanismo ba na hindi naman Relihiyon ni Kristo kasi ayon sayo Hudyo naman ito sino ang may tatag nyan? 9:50 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ang hudyo tatag ng Diyos. Kami katuloy at katuparan ng pangako sa hudyo. E kayo? Ano ang papel nyo? Kaaway ng itinayo ng Diyos 9:50 AM
    Niloko mo na naman mukha mo. Kelan ko cnabi na hindi sa Diyos ang Kristyanismo? Ikaw talaga 9:51 AM


    Muslim;
    oh di yong ang totoO kaya nga yon ang talagang relihiyon ng mga totoong sumusunod s Dios kagaya ni Kristo na isang masunorin sa Dios! 9:51 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kami masunurin sa Diyos. Kaya nga kaanib kami ng itinayo nya e. Kayo? Bat umanib kayo sa hindi itinayo ng Diyos? Suwail kasi kayo. Tama? 9:53 AM

    Muslim;
    masunurin kayo? kanino? saa demonyo? eh kaya pala bago yang kinaaaniban nyo? 9:54 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kung mag-iisip ka lang e dun ka aanib sa itinayo ng Diyos. Tama? 9:54 AM
    Cno naman kasing matino ang aanib sa hindi itinayo ng Diyos. Kahit maghapon ka pa magtutuwad e wala ka pa ring kaligtasan. Tama? 9:55 AM


    Muslim;
    (sabi ni Demon este Cenon pala ; Ang hudyo tatag ng Diyos.) bakit ikaw hindi umanib sa itinayo ng Dios? 9:55 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Kung masunurin kami sa demonyo e d dapat magkasama na tayo dyan sa hindi itinayo ng Diyos. Palamura na rin dapat kami. Tama? 9:56 AM

    Muslim;
    bakit kailan ba itinatayo ng Dios ang samahan nyong yan? hindi dios ang may tayo nyan pinatunayan mo na yan sa akin... 9:57 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Mas tama ang naaniban ko. Dito sa katuparan ng pangako sa hudyo. Kayo umanib sa walang kaugnayan sa Diyos e. Tama? 9:57 AM


    Muslim;
    ayon sa Katangahan mo! 9:58 AM
    pangako ng Dios ang panibagong Relihiyon? bakit ano ang nagyari sa kanyang Relihiyon? may mali ba sa Relihiyon na tatag ng Dios? 9:59 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Itinayo ng Diyos ang Kristyanismo nung magkatawang tao sya para tuparin ang pangako nyang kaligtasan sa mga hudyo 10:00 AM

    Muslim;
    sinong Dios ito? yong Dios ba na nakakaAlam ng Lahat at naguutus? o ang dios na kinikilala mo na sya ding masunurin sa Utus ng Tunay na Dios!? 10:02 AM

    Cenon Bibe
    Ang tunay na Diyos yung nagligtas sa tao at nagtayo ng relihiyon nya. Yang inyo cno nagligtas sa inyo? Cno nagtayo nyan? 10:04 AM
    Cno nagsabing magtatayo ng bagong relihiyon? Bulaan lang gagawa nyan. Ang tunay na relihiyon nagmula kay adan at itinuloy nya sa amin 10:06 AM


    Muslim;
    Oh talaga? tingnan nga natin kong ano talaga ang tunay na sinasabi ng kinikilala mong dios... basa Matt 12:7 10:06 AM
    "But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless." 10:06 AM
    Oh hindi naman pala sacrifice eh bakit nyo naman kailangan pa isacrifice itong kinikilala ninyong dios para sa mga kasalanan ninyo? 10:07 AM
    hindi mo rin ba nauunawaan ang mismong sinasabi ni Kristo sa talatang yan? 10:08 AM
    nagyon sina ba sa inyo talaga ni Kristo ang nagsasabi ng TotoO? 10:09 AM
    ang sabi mo namatay si Kristo bilang sacrifice sa mga kasalanan nyo! tapus ang sabi naman ni Kristo taliwas naman sa mga kasinunaglingang 10:11 AM
    pinasasabi mo! 10:11 AM
    papaano ngayon yan? sino sa inyo ngayon ang pwedeng paniniwalaan? 10:11 AM
    oh ano na? nabibilaukan ka ba? 10:18 AM

    ReplyDelete
  106. Oi muslim ano na yung usapan natin?SAbi ko di ba pangaralan mo ako kung ilang ang eksaktong bilang ng letra at salita ng biblia ganun din sa koran pakibanggit na lang kung alin sa tinutukoy mo ang original na koran nyo..Yan ba yung sinunog o hindi?hehehe

    ReplyDelete
  107. PURIHIN ang DIYOS!

    INILAGAY po RITO ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang USAPAN NAMIN kung saan MALINAW NATIN SIYANG TINALO sa DISKUSYON.

    HINDI po NIYA MATUTULAN na HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTAYO ng INANIBAN NIYA.

    HINDI MATUTULAN ng BALIK ISLAM na WALANG KALIGTASAN ang PINASOK NIYA.

    HINDI rin MATUTULAN ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na KRISTIYANISMO ang KATUPARAN ng PANGAKO ng DIYOS sa mga HUDYO.

    NAPATUNAYAN na namang TUNAY ang SALITA ni KRISTO sa BIBLIYA.

    Luke 21:14-15
    But make up your mind not to worry beforehand how you will defend yourselves.

    For I WILL GIVE YOU WORDS and WISDOM that NONE of YOUR ADVERSARIES WILL BE ABLE TO RESIST OR CONTRADICT.

    Hindi nga po ba WALANG MAITUTOL at WALANG MAIKONTRA ITONG BALIK ISLAM sa mga SINASABI NATIN?

    Ang SINASABI po kasi NATIN ay GALING SA DIYOS.

    Samantala, ang SINASABI ng BALIK ISLAM ay HINDI GALING sa DIYOS.

    Kaya nga LAGI SIYANG TALO sa USAPAN, di po ba?

    PURIHIN si KRISTO! PURIHIN ang DIYOS!

    ReplyDelete
  108. SABI po NATIN:
    PABALIK-BALIK sa WALANG KWENTANG TANONG ang MANGMANG na BALIK ISLAM.

    PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Walang kwenta? at pabalik-balik? eh siempre para paulit-ulit ka ding mapahiya sa KamangMangan at KaBobOhaN mo sayong sariling Bibliya!

    CENON BIBE:
    E di ULIT-ULITIN MO PA ang mga NASAGOT na NAMIN para MAKITA ng LAHAT na WALA TALAGA KAYONG MAISAGOT sa mga SINASABI NAMIN.

    ReplyDelete
  109. NAPAKAGALING po talaga MAGMURA nitong BALIK ISLAM. TALONG-TALO kasi sa USAPAN e.

    IYAN po ang NATUTUNAN NIYA sa pagba-BALIK ISLAM NIYA.

    Ang PAGMUMURA ang BUNGA ng MAGHAPON NIYANG PAGTUWAD-TUWAD at PAG-USAL ng mga SALITANG HINDI NIYA NAIINTINDIHAN.

    HINDI na po ako NAGTATAKA. Sabi po sa BIBLIYA ay KUNG ANO ang PUNO ay IYON ang BUNGA.

    ALAM nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na HINDI DIYOS ang NAGTAYO ng KANYANG INANIBAN kaya ang BUNGA ay HINDI RIN GALING sa DIYOS ang KANYANG IDINADALDAL.

    KANINO GALING ang PAGMUMURA NIYA?

    KAYO na po ang MAGSABI at MALAMANG na TAMA ang SASABIHIN NINYO.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Cenon Bibe;
    NAPATUNAYAN na namang TUNAY ang SALITA ni KRISTO sa BIBLIYA.

    Luke 21:14-15
    But make up your mind not to worry beforehand how you will defend yourselves.

    For I WILL GIVE YOU WORDS and WISDOM that NONE of YOUR ADVERSARIES WILL BE ABLE TO RESIST OR CONTRADICT.

    Muslim;
    Tunay po talaga ang sinasabi ni Kristo na mababasa natin sa Matt 12:7 & I quote;
    "But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless." Now its Demon este Cenon words against Jesus words dear readers of this blog! Aling Words at Wisdom kaya ang ibinigay ng Dios kay Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? hindi nyo po ba napansin na tuwirang kinukontra nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala ang malinaw na sinasabi ni Kristo sa Matt 12:7 ito po Dear Readers of this blog ang naging Pasok at Pagyayabang nitong Mangmang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe kanina ng kanya po'ng kapalitan ng Text pagmasdan nyo po;

    "Cenon Bibe;
    Ang tunay na Diyos yung nagligtas sa tao at nagtayo ng relihiyon nya. Yang inyo cno nagligtas sa inyo? Cno nagtayo nyan? 10:04 AM
    Cno nagsabing magtatayo ng bagong relihiyon? Bulaan lang gagawa nyan. Ang tunay na relihiyon nagmula kay adan at itinuloy nya sa amin 10:06 AM"

    at ito naman po ang naging tugon o sagot s katangahan nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala, at tila nabibilaukan po ang mangMang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala sa kanilang palitan kanina at tuloyan na po daw na nawala itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala.

    "Muslim;
    Oh talaga? tingnan nga natin kong ano talaga ang tunay na sinasabi ng kinikilala mong dios... basa Matt 12:7 10:06 AM
    "But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless." 10:06 AM
    Oh hindi naman pala sacrifice eh bakit nyo naman kailangan pa isacrifice itong kinikilala ninyong dios para sa mga kasalanan ninyo? 10:07 AM
    hindi mo rin ba nauunawaan ang mismong sinasabi ni Kristo sa talatang yan? 10:08 AM
    nagyon sina ba sa inyo talaga ni Kristo ang nagsasabi ng TotoO? 10:09 AM
    ang sabi mo namatay si Kristo bilang sacrifice sa mga kasalanan nyo! tapus ang sabi naman ni Kristo taliwas naman sa mga kasinunaglingang 10:11 AM
    pinasasabi mo! 10:11 AM
    papaano ngayon yan? sino sa inyo ngayon ang pwedeng paniniwalaan? 10:11 AM
    oh ano na? nabibilaukan ka ba? 10:18 AM"

    ReplyDelete
  111. 1. Buong yabang pong nagtanong ang Bulok-Islam kung ilang WORDS and LETTERS daw po ang BIBLIYA. Sabi natin e WALANG KWENTA ang tanong niya. Pero sabi niya MAHALAGA daw po na malaman ang kasagotan dito. Ngayon po, nung IBINALIK natin sa kanya ang kanya mismong tanong, WALA DIN PALA SIYANG MAISASAGOT!!! HA HA HA HA!!!Nahuli siya sa sarili niyang bitag. How pathetic ano po?

    2. Sa halip, ang reply lang niya ay isang PANLILINLANG at PANLOLOKO. Sinipi niya ang Revelation 22:18-19. At BINALUKTOT.

    Revelation 22:18-19
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    3. Tapos ang sabi niya:
    "Oh di ba kailangan nyo pala talagang malalaman ang nilalaman ng Bibliya ng hindi naman kayo maging biktima!"

    4. Sobrang MANGMANG po talaga itong kausap natin. Papano naging BIBLIYA tinutukoy sa Rev 22:18-19 e wala pang BIBLIYA nung panahon ni John? Ang aklat na tinutukoy po sa talata ay nandiyan na mismo NAKATUTOK sa mga MATA ng MANGMANG na Bulok-Islam pero hindi pa rin niya ito nakita!!!Pansinin nyo po, ang sabi ay "THIS BOOK." (SINGULAR noun po iyan. Ang BIBLIYA ay PLURAL. Kung tama si Mr Bulok-Islam, di sana sinabi na lang na "THESE BOOKS." Pero hindi e. Kaya palpak talaga ang unawa niya). Samakatuwid, yung aklat ng Revelation lang po ang tinutokoy ni John dito! NAPAKALIWANAG niyan.

    5. Ngayon po, PINALALABAS ni Mr Bulok-Islam na ang Rev 22:18-19 ang sagot sa WALANG KWENTA NIYANG TANONG. Naks naman! Parang awa nyo na po Mr Bulok-Islam, nahulog ka na nga sa sarili mong bitag, at hindi mo nga masagot ang sarili mong tanong, tapos ngayon lolokohin mo na naman ang sarili mo? Susme!

    ReplyDelete
  112. hehehe. bulok-islam. nice name. tumpak. hehehe

    ReplyDelete
  113. BULOK-ISLAM:
    Now ngayon alinG Bibliya ang tunay na sa dios? ang 66 Books of the Bible po ba o ang 73 Books of the Bible? hindi mo na ito alam ano?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Tandaan mo Mr Bulok-Islam, may utang ka pa sa amin sa isyung ito! Hindi mo pa sinagot ang hamon ko sa iyo na magbigay ka ng historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang Bible! Ikaw itong nagmamarunong kaya ipakita mo sa amin na marunong ka nga! Sagotin mo na ang hamon ko sa iyo para hindi ka lalong mapahiya dito!

    ReplyDelete
  114. BULOK-ISLAM:
    in our case Muslim all over the world mapa Japanese, Chinese, American, Canadian, Australian, European, Malaysian, Indonesian, Singaporean Muslim man yan we memorized the Koran. not to mention the recitation of which 5 times or more everyday during prayers!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ayon. MEMORYADO nyo pala ang Koran eh. Bakit di ka pa rin makasagot sa tanong namin kung ILANG WORDS at LETTERS meron ang Koran? Sagot na! Naghihintay na ang buong mundo sa kasagutan mo! Dali!

    ReplyDelete
  115. hahay nakakainip itong muslim hindi pa makasagot. nagbibilang pa siguro kung ilang words and letters ang koran

    ReplyDelete
  116. Muslim;
    in our case Muslim all over the world mapa Japanese, Chinese, American, Canadian, Australian, European, Malaysian, Indonesian, Singaporean Muslim man yan we memorized the Koran. not to mention the recitation of which 5 times or more everyday during prayers!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ayon. MEMORYADO nyo pala ang Koran eh. Bakit di ka pa rin makasagot sa tanong namin kung ILANG WORDS at LETTERS meron ang Koran? Sagot na! Naghihintay na ang buong mundo sa kasagutan mo! Dali!

    Muslim;
    Ang Sabi ng MangMang na si MANNY CRUZ (Ayon. MEMORYADO nyo pala ang Koran eh.) Oo naman MEMORYADO ito ng mga Muslim sA bawat sulok ng mundo! Eh ikaw na MangMang ka! Anong chapter ng Bibliya ang MEMORYADO mo at kaya mong iRecite? ha? may naMEMORYA ka ba na kahit isang chapter lamang ng iyong Bibliya? Malamang wala kasi Karamihan naman sa inyo kong hindi Banu, eh MangMang di ba? hahahahahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  117. Anonymous said...

    hahay nakakainip itong muslim hindi pa makasagot. nagbibilang pa siguro kung ilang words and letters ang koran

    Anonymous said;
    bakit ikaw din ba wala ka ding alam patungkol sa Bibliya mo? kaya naghihintay ka rin ng Kasagutan mula sa isang Muslim? Hindi ba kayo ang dapat nakakaalam kong ilan ang nilalaman ng inyong Bibliya? Bakit kayo sa isang Muslim umaasa ng Tamang kasagutan hinggil sa ta,ang bilang ng words at lrtters ng inyong Bibliya? nagpapatunay lamang ba ito na mga inutil o wala talaga kayo silbi pagdating sa usapin ng inyong Bibliya?

    bueno ito ang patungkol sa Qur'an;
    I mean The ORIGINAL Qur'an siguro naman alam nyo na ang ibig kong sabihin when I said the Qur'an! I mean the ORIGINAL at inaasahan ko na naintindihan nyo ako kapag sinasabi kong Qur'an!

    The Qur'an has 77,807 LETTERS 33,671 WORDS 6,336 VERSES and 114 CHAPTER. The Qur'an has 1,000,530 Full Stops (when reading it) Allah's name figures 2,607 times in the Qur'an while the word Qur'an appears 70 in the Qur'an.

    Pahabol na katanungan patungkol sa inyog Bibliya;

    1.) Ilang beses na ang WORD na Jehovah occurs in your Bible anybody? or any Bible expert for that matter can answer my query?

    2.) What about the WORD LORD ilang beses ito na nag occurs sa Bibliya?

    3.) At saan makikita ang WORD na REVEREND sa inyong Bibliya?

    Marami pa akong mga katanungan hinggil sa inyong Bibliya pero pansamantala ay iyan na muna.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Check this LINK;

    http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/general/wonder-boy-from-iran-has-holy-quran-etched-in-memory-1.403374

    ReplyDelete
  119. Salamat sa inpormasyon na binigay mo Muslim..Ngunit nakalimutan mo atang banggitin kung anong version ang iyong tinutukoy?Pakatapos mong banggitin ang version nang sinipi mo sa wonder boy nyo eh maari bang pangaralan mo ako kung ilang letra at salita ang ibang version..Alin ba ang gamit mo dito?Alam mo ba kung ilang letra at salita itong gamit mo?

    Salamat..

    ReplyDelete
  120. Paunang sagot sa mga tanong mo muslim hehehe..

    http://www.neverthirsty.org/pp/corner/read2/r00722.html

    Dyan mo matatagpuan ang mga tanong mo..Ngayon po pakisagot ng mga huling tanong ko..Salamat..

    Siyanga pala bashin mo nang maayos yan at mamangha ka sa likas na kagandahan ng biblia.. :)

    ReplyDelete
  121. Just in case ayaw mo mag copy paste ng link..ito na po..

    Bible Question: How many chapters, verses, and words are in the Bible?
    Bible Answer: The following answers your question and includes information about both the Old and New Testaments.

    Chapters Verses Words
    Old Testament 929 23,214 622,771
    New Testament 260 7,959 184,590
    Bible 1,189 31,173 807,361

    The longest chapter in the Bible is Psalm 119, and the middle and shortest chapter is Psalm 117. The middle chapter of the Old Testament is Job 29 and the middle chapter of the New Testament is Romans 13. The middle verse of the Bible is Psalm 118:8.The middle verse of the Old Testament is 2 Chronicles 20:17, and the middle verse of the New Testament is Acts 17:17. The above information was provided by the The Open Bible.[1]

    Conclusion: Is it not amazing that God used about 40 authors to write the Bible, and yet the flow of the Bible is consistent and unchanged? It all points to Jesus Christ The prophecies point to Him. The miracles He performed remind us that He is God. His teachings were amazing, and His control of nature was real. The entire Bible is about Him. It is about our God.

    Source:http://www.neverthirsty.org/pp/corner/read2/r00722.html

    ReplyDelete
  122. Pero syempre baka isipin mo walang record tungkol sa Greek (New Testament) and Hebrew (Old Testament)..Ito po pag aralan mo ha..Ayan po ipe-present ko na sayo ang bilang ng original namin hehehe..

    New Testament Statistics


    Old Testament Statistics - New American Bible


    Ngayon muslim na iprovide na kita..Meron din yan mga comparative studies against sa ibang translation..

    Ngayon po ay away sana namin patulan itong klase ng argumento mo..Di ko makita ang kahalagahan sa halip na pagusapan ang totoong mensahe ng salita ay napo fucos tayo sa bilang ng mga salita..Ganun pa man ay sinagot ko na ang mga tanong mo..

    Ngayon sana naman tanong ko naman ang sagutin mo bago ka kumontra..

    Anong version ba sa mga original daw na sinasabi nyo kinuha mo ang mga bilang na binanggit mo?Ito ba ay salin na ng sinunog ng mga taga sunod ng pedopilyang si muhammad?..Kung hindi alin sa npakarami nyong version?..Sumunod, meron ka rin bang listahan ng bilang ng lahat ng salita sa ibat ibang version nyo?

    ReplyDelete
  123. Muslim;
    Ang Sabi ng MangMang na si MANNY CRUZ (Ayon. MEMORYADO nyo pala ang Koran eh.) Oo naman MEMORYADO ito ng mga Muslim sA bawat sulok ng mundo!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Congrats sa yo. Ang galing mo palang magmemorize. Ang kulang na lang ay WASTONG PAG-IISIP. HEHEHE.

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    Eh ikaw na MangMang ka! Anong chapter ng Bibliya ang MEMORYADO mo at kaya mong iRecite? ha? may naMEMORYA ka ba na kahit isang chapter lamang ng iyong Bibliya?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ang labanan dito ay HINDI PAYABANGAN ng GALING ng MEMORY. Kung PAYABANGAN lang ang habol mo dito, e PANALO ka na! Congrats ulit sa iyo!

    BULOK-ISLAM:
    Malamang wala kasi Karamihan naman sa inyo kong hindi Banu, eh MangMang di ba? hahahahahaha!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    O ayan pa! Kung pagalingan ng PAGMUMURA ang labanan, e PANALO KA na naman! Congrats ulit sa iyo!

    Bilang consolation price para sa amin ay may dalawang assignment ako sa iyo, na base na rin sa mga pinanghahawakan mong prinsipyo:

    Una, ibigay mo dito ang sura mula sa ORIGINAL na Koran (Yung arabic version na galing mismo kay Anghel Gabriel, at hindi yung translation lang ng mga scholars nyo).

    Pangalawa, pag nagawa nyo na ang una ay ibigay nyo naman ang mga chapter and verse mula sa original HEBREW at GREEK bible na nagsasabi na KAILANGAN I MEMORIZE ang BIBLE!

    Pag nagawa nyo na itong dalawang assignment na ito e mag BALIK-ISLAM na ako! On the other hand, pag di mo naman nagawa ang kahit isa sa mga ito, TALO KA NA! O ano, DEAL? (Alalahanin mo na LARO mo itong gagawin natin! Galingan mo baka sa sarili mong laro ay papalpak ka na naman!)O, start na!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  124. SimplyCatholic:
    Ngayon po ay [AYAW] sana namin patulan itong klase ng argumento mo..Di ko makita ang kahalagahan sa halip na pagusapan ang totoong mensahe ng salita ay napo fucos tayo sa bilang ng mga salita..Ganun pa man ay sinagot ko na ang mga tanong mo..

    Anonymous:
    Tama ka SimplyCatholic. Napaka-trivial na isyu lang naman ang bilang ng mga salita pero nagpupumilit pa rin itong muslim na pag-usapan. Sabagay, mahilig naman talaga sila sa basurang aral di ba?

    ReplyDelete
  125. erratum:
    Bilang consolation [prize] para sa amin ay may dalawang assignment ako sa iyo, na base na rin sa mga pinanghahawakan mong prinsipyo:

    Una, ibigay mo dito ang sura mula sa ORIGINAL na Koran [na nagsasabing kailangan i memorize ang koran at ang bible.]

    ReplyDelete
  126. MANNY CRUZ:
    Sobrang MANGMANG po talaga itong kausap natin. Papano naging BIBLIYA tinutukoy sa Rev 22:18-19 e wala pang BIBLIYA nung panahon ni John?

    Muslim;
    Unawa mo ba ang nakasulat at SinasAbi ng inyong Bibliya? Ang hirap kasi sa inyo Pinapairal ninyo palagi ang mga KataNgahan at kamaNgmaNgAn ninyo eh!

    ito intindihin at unawain mo ang sinasabi ng inyong Bibliya;

    Revelation 22:18
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

    Of this Book! Of this book daw po MANNY CRUZ! ngayon estupidong MANNY CRUZ kong hindi yan ang Bibliya na Ginawa ninyo ngayon na 73 Books ano naman kaya yan? ang ibig mo bang sabihin ngayon ang Bibliya ninyo Ay gumamit ng mga mali-maling terminolohiya? Of this Book! Hindi daw po Bibliya ang tinutukoy dyan! hehehehehe! ayon sa MangManmg na si MANNY CRUZ! GagO talaga itong taong ito magpalusot nalang Bibliya nya pa ang sisiraan nya! Oh hindi po ba mga MangMang talaga ang mga ito?

    ReplyDelete
  127. SimplyCatholic said...
    Bible Question: How many chapters, verses, and words are in the Bible?
    Bible Answer: The following answers your question and includes information about both the Old and New Testaments.

    Chapters Verses Words
    Old Testament 929 23,214 622,771
    New Testament 260 7,959 184,590
    Bible 1,189 31,173 807,361

    Muslim;
    The Bible has 930 Chapter in the Old Testament & 259 in the New Testament. it has 31,102 Verses! and 773,746 WORDS! Oh ano ito? ito ba ang sagot mo kong ilang WORDS at LETTERS meron ang Bibliya mo? Hindi nyo ba masagot ng Malinaw ang katanungan kong ilang WORDS at LETTERS meron ang Bibliya ninyo? Lagpak ka pa rin bro! Pero may kaunti kang nalalaman kumpara kay Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na talagang blanko!

    ReplyDelete
  128. Muslim pinatulan ko na ang mga tanong mo kahit walang kwenta..Nagprovide na ako sayo ng mga sources pero sadyang hindi sapat sayo..Ngayon po kung hindi mo maibibigay sakin ang version ng sinasabi mong original sa napakarami nyong original ay nagpapakita lamang na wala kang maisagot..

    Hindi mo ba alam kung aling version ang sinasabi mo?Wala ka bang comparative analysis ng mga "original versions" nyo ng pagkakaiba o gusto mo ako na mismo ang magbigay sayo?Kung aaminin mo na wala ka nang maisagot ay ako na magbibigay sayo..

    ReplyDelete
  129. Parang ang galing mo lang humingi ng sagot pero wala ka namang matinong sagot pag binalik sayo ang mga tanong mo..Wala ka pa ring naibibigay na maayos na sagot kung anong version ang sinasabi ng wonder boy mo..Kumopya ka rin lang naman sa wonder boy mo di mo pa tinanong ang version kung alin sa mga original nyo daw na koran halaw yang bilang na yan..Muslim magpakalalake ka namn ikaw naman ang sumagot sa tanong mo..

    ReplyDelete
  130. Yung original texts na sinambit ko parang wala kang comment..Meron mga statistics dyan ng old testament at new testament at mga comparative analysis ng mga transalations..

    Meron ka bang ganyan?Pakibigay naman sa amin o..Yung huling binigay ko tungkol sa Hebrew at Greek text ay galing mismo sa isang Catholic Sources..Meron ka bang ganyan?

    Ulit na tanong anong version ng sinasabi mong original text nyo daw halaw ang bilang na sinasabi ng wonder boy mo?Huwag kang paiwas iwas nababasa ng mga taga subaybay dito bagkus walang kwenta ang mga tanong mo ay sinsagot namin ngunit pag binalik na sayo ay tulala ka at tameme..KAHIYA KA OY!!!

    ReplyDelete
  131. If what you have is the Old Testament with the 929 Chapter and The New Testament with the 260 chapter eh malinaw na hindi Katolik (Catholic) bible yang iyong binabanggit ngayon! So dito palang Tuwiran mo ng kinakahiya ang iyong Bibliya na mayroong karagdagang 7 libro! hehehehehehe! may tama ka na naman sa Sinasabi ng iyong BibliyA! basa;

    Rev. 22:18-19
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    ReplyDelete
  132. Muslim;
    Sa mga matitino kasama na ang ibang mga pari at iba pang mga Christians na talagang nag-aaral ng Qur'an ay iisa lamang ang kanilang knikilalang Qur'an at sa buong mundo iisa lamang ang HARD COPY nitong Qur'an (origunal) na Kinikilala ng mga Muslim. Iisa lamang ang Qur'an na niriRecite at kinikilala ng mga Muslim saang sulok man ng Mundo. Pero sa mga MangMang at madaling maloko at mga walang Utak na katulad mo! ay iniisip nila na mayroon pang ibang Version ng Qur'an! eh mga Tanga kasi at mga mangMang lamang ang nag-iisip ng ganito! Now kong ipagpipilitan mo na mayroon pang ibang version ang Qur'an at kong alam mo ito eh di magproduce ka ng HARD COPY mula sa pinagsasabi mong ibang version ng Qur'an, meron ka bang HARD COPY dyan ng sinasabi mong ibang version ng Qur'an? sige ilitaw mo kong nagsasabi ka ng Totoo! ng hindi ka naman magmukhang Tanga at mangMang!

    ReplyDelete
  133. SimplyCatholic said...

    Yung original texts na sinambit ko parang wala kang comment..Meron mga statistics dyan ng old testament at new testament at mga comparative analysis ng mga transalations..


    Muslim;
    Bakit tanggap mo na ba ang King James Version ng Bibliya? oh ang 66 books of the Bible ng mga Protestante? Hindi ba Katoliko ka? kaya nga SimplyCatholic ka di ba? At ang inyong 73 Books ng Bibliya ay katuparan lamang sa Hula o prophecya na ng bibliya, kaya mo ba ito ikinakahiya ngayon? basa;

    Rev. 22:18-19
    "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

    And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

    Hindi kaya GinaGo mo nalang yang Pagmumukha mo ngayon na ibinabalandra mo na dito ang 66 books of the Bible instead na ang 73 books of the Bible ang syang ipagdidiinan mo ay tila ikinakahoiya mo pa ang inyong 73 books of the Bible ngayon ito ang mga patunay na ang 73 books ng Catholic bible ay kinakahiya mo!

    Chapters

    Old Testament 929

    New Testament 260

    Total Chapter of the Bible ay 1,189 - ito po ang tamang bilang ng mga Chapter ng 66 Books of the Bible! at hindi po yan ang bilang ng mga Chapter ng kanilang 73 books of the Bible!

    eh papaano yong 14 chapters ng Tobit, Judith 16 chapters, 1Maccabees 16 chapters, 2Maccabees 15 chapters, Wisdom of Solomon 19 chapters, Sirach 51 Chapters at ang Baruch na mayroong 6 Chapters iilan ilan pa lamang yan sa mga idinagdag ninyo sA bibliya pero tila ngayon parang ikinakahiya mo na ito kaya kapus ang mga bilang ng Chapters ng iyong ipinipresenta ngayon! Shame on You sarili mong Bibliya na mayroong 73 books ay ikinakahiya mong GagO kA!

    ReplyDelete
  134. MANNY CRUZ said...
    Bilang consolation [prize] para sa amin ay may dalawang assignment ako sa iyo, na base na rin sa mga pinanghahawakan mong prinsipyo:

    Una, ibigay mo dito ang sura mula sa ORIGINAL na Koran [na nagsasabing kailangan i memorize ang koran at ang bible.]

    Anonymous said;
    Ang pagMemorize ay upang maiwasan ang mga pagbagObaGo o maiwasan ang mga Corruption na possibling mangyari sa nasabing kasulatan! Plain! Clear! and SimpLe!

    eh kong magkaroon ka ba naman ng ganitong klaseng mga kasulatan eh papaano mo pa matukoy ang totoo nito. paki check lamang po ang link na ito:

    http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/Heb-Xn-Bibles.htm

    Hindi kaya na ang bibliya ay katuparan lamang sA naging Hula din nito? basa;

    Rev. 22:18-19
    "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

    And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

    kalimitan po talaga ganito ang possibling mangyari kong ang mga namamahala ng nasabing kasulatan ay mga Mangmang at Tanga! kaya tingnan mo ngayon ang Bibliya mayrong 73 books at 66 books! alin po kaya sa dalawang magkaibang Version ang Tama! galing sa Dios at pinapahintulutan ng Dios? nagtatanong lamang po!

    ReplyDelete
  135. Anonymous said;
    Ang pagMemorize ay upang maiwasan ang mga pagbagObaGo o maiwasan ang mga Corruption na possibling mangyari sa nasabing kasulatan! Plain! Clear! and SimpLe!

    I said;
    Bakit kailangan i-memorize?Upang maiwasan ma-corrupt?

    Eh Ano ngayon basehan nyo kung yung tao na nag memorize nyan at nagsimula na isulat ito ay
    wala nga naging pagbabago nito mula sa original?

    Syempre wala kayo basehan. So paano nyo malalaman na wala ngang mali? Wala din kayong
    paraan para malaman na mali.

    Sino may kakayahan na magsabi sa inyo kung may mali yung naisulat galing sa memorization?

    Ang daming loop hole sa argumento nyo na kailangan i-memorize para di ma-corrupt.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Tama ka yang version na yan ay sa 66 books lamang kung saan ginagamit ng mga protestante..

    Yung tinatanong ko sayo ay kung napansin mo ang tungkol sa greek at hebrew na statistics na binanggit ko na galing mismo sa Catholic sources..Parang tila iwas na iwas ka sa sources kong ito..

    Ang kabobohan mo ay di mo pa din sinasagot hanggang ngayon?Anong version ang sinasabi ni wonder boy na pinagyayabang mo?Ikaw anong alam mong version ng napakaraming koran nyo?Ito ba ay halaw sa sinunog ng alalay ni mohammad?Bakit nga ba sinunog, ang alam ko dahil hindi daw tugma ang mga sinsabi ng mga alalay ni mohammad totoo ba ito hahahaha..

    O sagot na anong version ba ang tinutukoy mo at ang tinutukoy ni wonder boy mo?Huwag ka puro iwas halatang takot ka sa sarili mong katanungan..

    ReplyDelete
  137. 73 books at kumpleto ang binabanggit dun sa catholic sources na sinasabi ko bakit tila di mo ata ito pinapansin?hehehe

    Alam mo muslim sana hindi puro pagmumura ang ginagawa mo sana naman marunong ka din tumayo sa mga sukatan mo..Ngayon binigyan kita ng dalawang sources sa walang kwenta mong tanong para naman ay sumagot ka..Pero parang pili lang ang gusto mo sagutin..Yung catholic sources tila nagbulag bulagan ka na hehehe..Matagal nang stayl yan pero di na uubra yan marami ang nag aantabay dito at alam nila na wala kang masagot..Asan na ang comparative analysis mo din...

    Sabi mo minimorya ng mga muslim ang koran para walang korapsyon?Eh bakit meron sunugan na na nangyari nang hindi magtugma tugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad?

    O ayan dalawa na tuloy ang tanong ko pakisagot naman..Ang hirap naman humingi ng sagot sayo puro ka iwas hehehe..

    ReplyDelete
  138. Muslim said:
    kalimitan po talaga ganito ang possibling mangyari kong ang mga namamahala ng nasabing kasulatan ay mga Mangmang at Tanga! kaya tingnan mo ngayon ang Bibliya mayrong 73 books at 66 books! alin po kaya sa dalawang magkaibang Version ang Tama! galing sa Dios at pinapahintulutan ng Dios? nagtatanong lamang po!

    And i said..

    Dahil mangmang ka sa history hindi mo talga malalaman yan..Pero ako kwekwentuhan kita bakit meron 66 at 73 na libro..Pero sasabihin ko sayo bilang catholic 73 ang libro ng biblia na gamit ko..

    Oooppss bago ako magkwento dapat sumagot ka muna sa katanungan ko dahil parang ako na lang lagi sumasagot..Pagnasagot mo eh saka kita kwentuhan..

    Una: anong version ang ginagamit ng idol mong si wonder boy?Ikaw anong version ang gamit mo?Alin sa napakaraming version ito?Anong bilang ng letra at salita ng alam mong version?

    Pangalawa:Sigurado ka bang walang alteration sa koran mo?Bakit meron sunugan nung di magtugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad?Akala ko ba kailangan imemorize para walang korapsyon eh bakit magkakaiba ang sinsabi ng mga alalay ng pedopilyang si mohammad kaya humantong sa sunugan?

    Kayang kaya mo yan alam ko meron ka sagot..Bilisan mo lang para makasagot ulit ako salamat..

    ReplyDelete
  139. MANNY CRUZ:
    Tandaan mo Mr Bulok-Islam, may utang ka pa sa amin sa isyung ito! Hindi mo pa sinagot ang hamon ko sa iyo na magbigay ka ng historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang Bible! Ikaw itong nagmamarunong kaya ipakita mo sa amin na marunong ka nga! Sagotin mo na ang hamon ko sa iyo para hindi ka lalong mapahiya dito!


    Muslim;
    MangMang ka ba talaga? ha? MANNY CRUZ? anong historical background ang sinasabi mo? ha? At ano nga yon? Ako daw mapApahiya? MANNY CRUZ wala ka na sa srili mong katinuan! Kayo nga itong pahiyang-pahiya na eh dahil iyan hindi mo na alam kong aling bibliya talaga ang galing sa Dios yan bang 66 books of the Bible or ang 73 books of the Bible? At anong historical background ang pinagsasabi nitong BugoK na ito? bakit nasa Bibliya ba at malinaw bang nakasulat ang hinggil dito? kong Papaano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books of the Bible? Eh ang malinaw MANNY CRUZ ang Bibliya nyo ang naging dahilan kong bakit dumarami ang sekta ng Kristtyanismo! Kong ito0 ay talagang galing sa Dios bakit nagkabulod-buglod ang mga kaKristyanohan? Ano ba ang Bibliya para sa inyo MANNY CRUZ? Ang Bibliya ba ay Gabay para sa Tao o ito ay Pagsubok para sa Tao? ha? Panis na yang style mo MANNY CRUZ ang pinapatunayan mo lamang dito ay ng kaBobOhan mo!

    ReplyDelete
  140. Muslim parang di mo nakikita ang mga tanong ko ah..Uulitin ko lang ha..

    Una: anong version ang ginagamit ng idol mong si wonder boy?Ikaw anong version ang gamit mo?Alin sa napakaraming version ito?Anong bilang ng letra at salita ng alam mong version?

    Pangalawa:Sigurado ka bang walang alteration sa koran mo?Bakit meron sunugan nung di magtugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad?Akala ko ba kailangan imemorize para walang korapsyon eh bakit magkakaiba ang sinsabi ng mga alalay ng pedopilyang si mohammad kaya humantong sa sunugan?

    Kayang kaya mo yan alam ko meron ka sagot..Bilisan mo lang para makasagot ulit ako salamat..

    ReplyDelete
  141. SimplyCatholic said...
    Dahil mangmang ka sa history hindi mo talga malalaman yan..Pero ako kwekwentuhan kita bakit meron 66 at 73 na libro..Pero sasabihin ko sayo bilang catholic 73 ang libro ng biblia na gamit ko..


    Muslim;
    Kwento mo? ha? Bakit kailan ba nanggagaling sayo ang bibliya? may kaugnayan ka ba sa Bibliya? hehehehehe! Wala bang kwento na galing sa kong saan talaga nangGagaling ang Bibliya? Hindi ba Dios lamang ang pwedeng magsabi o magKwento kong aling Bibliya talaga ang nararapat na maging Gabay ng Tao? Hoy! hindi pa naman ako naging Tanga at mangMang katulad nyo para makinig sa kwentong Barbero na walaa naman kaugnayan sa Bibliya! Karapatdapat ka bang magKwento hinggil dito? Hinggil sa inyong Bibliya? Kaya nga Puro na lamang SalUngatan at Kontra-kontra ang inyong Bibliya dahil kwento lang ito ng kahit kanikanino eh! Tingnan mo ang Four (4) books of the Gospel di po ba The Gospel According to Matthew, According to Mark, According to Luke, According to John... Now what is this According to! According to... Ang simply at ibig lamang sabihin nyan ay Hindi si Matthew ang may sulat ng Matt... plain! clear! and simple! Gusto mo ng proof? basA;

    Kong may Utak ka at nasa tamang katinoan ka pa, mauunawaan mo yan! that Matt is not writing or the author of the book of Matt. Simple English ito...

    Matthew 9:9
    "And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, Follow me. And he arose, and followed him."


    If Matthew is the Author an writing the Book of Matthew dapat ganito ang mababasa natin sa talatang ito.

    "And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw 'ME', sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto 'ME', Follow me. And 'I' arose, and followed him."

    A little of a Common Sense lang po at huwAg ng magpalusot eh napaghahalata tuloy ang KaBobOhan ninyo eh! May paHistory-History pa kayong mga nalalaman palusot eh simpling English nga lang Naloko na kyo eh... at naBobObO! kaya tingin ko tuloy sayo naboBo ka lalo dyan sa Bible mo eh, pagdating din sa Matt 12:40 ni hindi nyo na rin alam kong ilan ang TamaNg Oras na nakapaloob sa 3 Days & 3 Nights na sinasabi ni Kristo! hehehehehe! Oh ngayon magyayabang ka na may alam ka sa History? Hoy! usapAn ng mga may Utak ang Tungkol sa History... eh yang Matt 9:9 nga lang simpling English di nyo pa nauunawaan kong ito ay sulat o hindi ni Matthew eh! itong Matt 12:40 3 Days & 3 Nights hindi nyo pa Alam kong ilan ang totoong OraS na nakapaloob mula sA sinasbi ni Kristong yon! Tingin nyo anong credibilidad nyo sa mga PinagsasBi ninyo?

    ReplyDelete
  142. Humihingi sayo ng paliwanag si Bro Manny Cruz kung bakit 66 o 73 ang libro..Wala ka namang masagot kaya minura mo na lang si Bro..Wala kang makukuha sa biblia kung ilang libro meron ang biblia dhil mga Katoliko ang nag determina nyan..Ngayon ibalik natin ang kamangmangan mo sayo..Sinabi ba sa koran nyo na kung hindi magkakatugma ang recitation ng koran nyo ay sunugin ang magkakaibang sipi ng koran?Itanong mo kaya kay Uthman..hehehe..

    Ooopsss wala ka pa ding sagot sa huli kong tanong muslim ha..Naghihintay pa din ako..

    ReplyDelete
  143. SimplyCatholic said:
    Una: anong version ang ginagamit ng idol mong si wonder boy?Ikaw anong version ang gamit mo?Alin sa napakaraming version ito?Anong bilang ng letra at salita ng alam mong version?


    Muslim;
    Una: anong version ang ginagamit ng idol mong si wonder boy? (IISA LAMANG ANG QUR'AN NA KILALA NG MGA MUSLIM SA BUONG MUNDO!) Ikaw anong version ang gamit mo? (SAME QUR'AN THAT THE BOY IS USING.) Alin sa napakaraming version ito? (BAKIT MAY HARD COPY KA BANG HAWAK NG IBANG VERSION NA SINASABI MO? BAKA BIKTIMA KA NA NAMAN NG PANLOLOKO!?) Anong bilang ng letra at salita ng alam mong version? (IISA LAMANG ANG QUR'AN PERIOD! HINDI KA BA NAKAKAUNAWA? KONG MAY ALAM KA NA HARD COPY NG IBANG VERSION ILABAS MO NG MAPATUNAYAN NA NAGSASABI KA TALAGA NG TOTOO! KAYA MO?)


    SimplyCatholic said:
    Pangalawa:Sigurado ka bang walang alteration sa koran mo?Bakit meron sunugan nung di magtugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad?Akala ko ba kailangan imemorize para walang korapsyon eh bakit magkakaiba ang sinsabi ng mga alalay ng pedopilyang si mohammad kaya humantong sa sunugan?


    Muslim;
    Pangalawa:Sigurado ka bang walang alteration sa koran mo? (PAPAANO MAGKAKAROON NG ALTERATION EH ANG DAMING MUSLIM NA NAKAMEMORIZE O NAKAKABISADO NG QUR'AN.) Bakit meron sunugan nung di magtugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad? (ALAMIN MO ANG HISTORY UKOL DYAN.) Akala ko ba kailangan imemorize para walang korapsyon eh bakit magkakaiba ang sinsabi ng mga alalay ng pedopilyang si mohammad kaya humantong sa sunugan? (ANONG ALAM MO TUNGKOL SA QUR'AN? EH BIBLIYA MO NGA AANGA-ANGA KA PA EH. Matt 9:9 di mo pa nga nauunawaan at maintindihan kong sinong may sulat ng nasabing book nA inuukol nitong unknown writer kay Matthew. At yong sinasabi ni Kristo sa Matt 12:40 na 3 Days & 3 Nights ni hindi nyo nga alam ang tamang ORAS na nakapaloob mula sa sinasabi ni Kristong iyon.)

    ReplyDelete
  144. Ayan po maliwanag sa taas na wala na namang sinagot si Muslim hehehe..Puro palusot at pagiwas sa mga tanong natin..Uulitin ko lang ang tanong ko kay muslim..Makailang ulit na kaya itong tinanong at tila bahag na buntot meron itong muslim na ito at ayaw basahin ng deretso ang mga tanong ko..

    Una: anong version ang ginagamit ng idol mong si wonder boy?Ikaw anong version ang gamit mo?Alin sa napakaraming version ito?Anong bilang ng letra at salita ng alam mong version?

    Pangalawa:Sigurado ka bang walang alteration sa koran mo?Bakit meron sunugan nung di magtugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad?Akala ko ba kailangan imemorize para walang korapsyon eh bakit magkakaiba ang sinsabi ng mga alalay ng pedopilyang si mohammad kaya humantong sa sunugan?

    Pangatlo:Sinabi ba sa koran nyo na kung hindi magkakatugma ang recitation ng koran nyo ay sunugin ang magkakaibang sipi ng koran?Itanong mo kaya kay Uthman..

    Pang apat:Paki-bigay naman ng surah kung propeta talga si muhammad, nakausap nya ba ng deretsa si Alla?Ang alam ko kasi demenyo ang nakausap nya ng aktwal kaya nga merong satanic verses di ba hehehe..

    Mga taga subaybay po ng blog na ito pakipansin lang ng mga iwas at palusot ni muslim..Hanggang ngayon wala pa din syang naipapakitang sagot sa mga tanong ko..Makikita nyo rin sa mga sagot nya ang kawalan ng pagiisip at kababaan ng kalidad ng argumento..kayo na po ang maghusga..

    Wala ka pa ding sagot sa mga tanong ko..Natatambakan ka na!hehehe

    ReplyDelete
  145. Ayan po wala pa ding sagot at binabalik nya ang 3 days and 3 nights kahit naipaliwanag na..Naalala ko lang wala ka pa ding paliwanag sa time factor na ginamit dyan ah muslim..Pakidagdag nga sa mga isasagot mo hehehe

    ReplyDelete
  146. SAbi ni Muslim sagot sa mga tanong ko:

    Bakit meron sunugan nung di magtugma ang mga ni recite ng mga alalay ni mohammad? (ALAMIN MO ANG HISTORY UKOL DYAN.) Akala ko ba kailangan imemorize para walang korapsyon eh bakit magkakaiba ang sinsabi ng mga alalay ng pedopilyang si mohammad kaya humantong sa sunugan? (ANONG ALAM MO TUNGKOL SA QUR'AN? EH BIBLIYA MO NGA AANGA-ANGA KA PA EH.

    Pakipansin po wala na naman syang nasagot, hehehehe..Alamin daw natin ang history ng Quran bakit may sunugan..Take note: SAbi ni Muslim pare-parehas ang minimorya ng mga muslim sa buong mundo [PAPAANO MAGKAKAROON NG ALTERATION EH ANG DAMING MUSLIM NA NAKAMEMORIZE O NAKAKABISADO NG QUR'AN.]..hehehe..Hmmm alamin nga natin..Ito po ay halaw mismo sa isang islamic source:

    Bukhari: vol. 6, hadith 514, p. 482; book 61

    Narrated Umar bin Al-Khattab:

    I heard Hisham bin Hakim reciting Surat Al-Furqan during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle and I listen to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I controlled my temper and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, "Who taught you this Surat which I heard you reciting ?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it to me". I said, "You have told a lie, for Allah's Apostle taught it to me in a different way from yours". So I dragged him to Allah's Apostle and said, "I heard this person reciting Surat Al-Furqan in a way which you haven't taught me!". On that Allah's Apostle said, "Release him (Umar) recite, O Hisham!" Then he recited in the same way I heard him reciting. Then Allah's Apostle said, "It was revealed in this way", and added, "Recite, O Umar", I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle then said, "It was revealed in this way. This Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in seven different ways, so recite of it whichever is easier for you."

    Kung di mo naintindihan ang pgka english welcome ka po na talakayin natin isa isa hehehe..

    Kung gusto mo pa ng ibang source magsabi ka lang..Pero bago ang lahat sagot ka muna hehehehe..

    ReplyDelete
  147. Ang tagal sumagot..Balikan kita bukas ha..Kung gusto mo para di ka mahirapan bigyan kita ng islamic source na pang depensa sa mga tanong ko, gusto mo?hehehehe

    ReplyDelete
  148. Muslim wala ka pa ding paliwanag sa mga tanong ko?Anu bayan?Deretsahan na..

    ReplyDelete
  149. Muslim;
    Una: anong version ang ginagamit ng idol mong si wonder boy? (IISA LAMANG ANG QUR'AN NA KILALA NG MGA MUSLIM SA BUONG MUNDO!) Ikaw anong version ang gamit mo? (SAME QUR'AN THAT THE BOY IS USING.) Anong version nga po ang gamit nyo ni wonder boy?Alin sa napakaraming version ito? (BAKIT MAY HARD COPY KA BANG HAWAK NG IBANG VERSION NA SINASABI MO? BAKA BIKTIMA KA NA NAMAN NG PANLOLOKO!?) kailangan ba ng hard copy kala ko ba memorized nyo?Anong bilang ng letra at salita ng alam mong version? (IISA LAMANG ANG QUR'AN PERIOD! HINDI KA BA NAKAKAUNAWA? KONG MAY ALAM KA NA HARD COPY NG IBANG VERSION ILABAS MO NG MAPATUNAYAN NA NAGSASABI KA TALAGA NG TOTOO! KAYA MO?)hahaha wala akong hard copy dahil di ako muslim..bibigyan kita ng mga versions kung magpapaka lalake ka sa pagsagot ng mga tanong ko hahahaha..huwag puro iwas..

    ReplyDelete
  150. Inaantok na ako sa pagsagot mo ng deretsa sa mga tanong ko muslim..Wait ko bukas mga sagot mo ha..

    ReplyDelete
  151. MANNY CRUZ:
    Sobrang MANGMANG po talaga itong kausap natin. Papano naging BIBLIYA tinutukoy sa Rev 22:18-19 e wala pang BIBLIYA nung panahon ni John?

    SAGOT NG MUSLIM:
    Unawa mo ba ang nakasulat at SinasAbi ng inyong Bibliya? Ang hirap kasi sa inyo Pinapairal ninyo palagi ang mga KataNgahan at kamaNgmaNgAn ninyo eh!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Hanggang PAGMUMURA ka na lang ba Mr Bulok-Islam? Sumagot ka naman ng maayos. Patunayan mo muna na meron nang BIBLIYA noong sinulat ni John ang Book of Revelation! Yan ang wastong pagsagot sa tanong ko. Yung daldal mo, sa iyo na lang yun. Nagmumukhang bobo ka lalo!

    ReplyDelete
  152. MUSLIM QUOTES THE BIBLE:
    Revelation 22:18
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

    ANG COMMENT NIYA:
    Of this Book! Of this book daw po MANNY CRUZ! ngayon estupidong MANNY CRUZ kong hindi yan ang Bibliya na Ginawa ninyo ngayon na 73 Books ano naman kaya yan?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Kitams nyo mga kaibigan kung gaano ka IGNORANTE ITONG NAGMAMARUNONG NA BULOK-ISLAM? Sabi niya BIBLIYA daw po ang tinutukoy ni John! Hahahahha. Marunong ka bang magbasa Mr Bulok-Islam? THIS BOOK. Yan yung sinulat ni John. Yan ang Book of Revelation. Gets mo? Ang Book of Revelation ba ay katumbas na ng buong BiBLE? Ha ha ha ha! Sorry pero ayun sa kausap nating may DOCTORATE sa PAGMUMURA, buong BIBLE na daw ang Revelation? At para sa kanya, walang kaibahan ang THIS BOOK (Revelation) at ang THESE BOOKS (73 Books=Bible). Kahit yung grade 4 na pamangkin ko e natawa sa sinabi mo mr bulok-islam! hehehe.

    DAGDAG PA NG MUSLIM:
    ang ibig mo bang sabihin ngayon ang Bibliya ninyo Ay gumamit ng mga mali-maling terminolohiya?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Saan naman kaya niya napulot ang salitang "MALI-MALING TERMINOLOHIYA." Ang layo naman po yata niyan sa sinabi ko. Ang mali-mali po dito ay hindi ang "terminolohiya" kundi ang PANG-UUNAWA nitong Bulok-Islam na ito.

    HETO PA SABI NG MUSLIM:
    Of this Book! Hindi daw po Bibliya ang tinutukoy dyan! hehehehehe!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ayun. Natawa siya sa kamangmangang niya! Hahahahaha!

    MUSLIM:
    ayon sa MangManmg na si MANNY CRUZ! GagO talaga itong taong ito magpalusot nalang Bibliya nya pa ang sisiraan nya! Oh hindi po ba mga MangMang talaga ang mga ito?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Hindi lang pala Bulok-Islam ang angkop na discription sa kausap natin. Dahil sa mga PAGMUMURA NIYA, Pwede rin pala natin siyang tawaging Mr CHEAP SHOT.

    ReplyDelete
  153. SINABI KO PO:
    ibigay mo dito ang sura mula sa ORIGINAL na Koran [na nagsasabing kailangan i memorize ang koran at ang bible.]

    ANG SAGOT NG MUSLIM:
    Ang pagMemorize ay upang maiwasan ang mga pagbagObaGo o maiwasan ang mga Corruption na possibling mangyari sa nasabing kasulatan! Plain! Clear! and SimpLe!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Sa madaling sabi po, WALA SIYANG SAGOT SA TANONG KO. WALA SIYANG IBINIGAY NA SURA. TAPOS.

    ReplyDelete
  154. ANG SABI KO PO:
    Tandaan mo Mr Bulok-Islam, may utang ka pa sa amin sa isyung ito! Hindi mo pa sinagot ang hamon ko sa iyo na magbigay ka ng historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang Bible! Ikaw itong nagmamarunong kaya ipakita mo sa amin na marunong ka nga! Sagotin mo na ang hamon ko sa iyo para hindi ka lalong mapahiya dito!

    1. ANG SAGOT NG MUSLIM:
    MangMang ka ba talaga? ha? MANNY CRUZ? anong historical background ang sinasabi mo? ha? At ano nga yon? Ako daw mapApahiya?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Sinagot po ba niya ang hamon ko sa kanya? HIndi po! Wala siyang naibigay na katiting na historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang Bible. Daldal ng daldal pero wala naman palang alam sa history ng topic na siya rin ang nag bukas. So, gusto mo pa bang mapahiya ha Mr Cheap Shot Bulok-Islam?

    2. Mr CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    MANNY CRUZ wala ka na sa srili mong katinuan!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Kung hindi mo masagot ang isang isyu na ikaw rin ang nagbato, e di ikaw ang wala sa katinuan. Maliwanag ba yan?

    3. Mr CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    Kayo nga itong pahiyang-pahiya na eh dahil iyan hindi mo na alam kong aling bibliya talaga ang galing sa Dios yan bang 66 books of the Bible or ang 73 books of the Bible?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Nagbukas ka ng isang TOPIC, tapos nung tinanong kita hinggil sa historical background ng topic mo, wala ka naman palang alam kaya bigla kang natameme, umiwas at nagmura na lang!!!Tsk tsk ysk. Istilo po yan ng talunan! Tama? Alam na ng readers natin kung sino ang tunay na napahiya dito.

    4. MR. CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    At anong historical background ang pinagsasabi nitong BugoK na ito? bakit nasa Bibliya ba at malinaw bang nakasulat ang hinggil dito? kong Papaano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books of the Bible?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    HAHAHAHAHA! Lalo lang po niyang nasupalpal ang sarili niya! Hinahanap niya ang HISTORICAL BACKGROUND doon mismo sa BIBLIYA????? HAHAHAHA! Kaya nga tawag diyan BACKGROUND Eh. Ang presumption diyan ay ang mga pangyayari na NAKAPALIBOT sa ISYU, at labas na iyan sa Bibliya. Hay naku! Kaya naman pala tuliro itong kausap natin eh hindi naman pala niya naintindihan ang ibig sabihin ng HISTORICAL BACKGROUND!!!! Wawa talaga itong taong to!

    5. MR CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    Eh ang malinaw MANNY CRUZ ang Bibliya nyo ang naging dahilan kong bakit dumarami ang sekta ng Kristtyanismo! Kong ito0 ay talagang galing sa Dios bakit nagkabulod-buglod ang mga kaKristyanohan?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Natunaw na yata ang mga brain cells nitong PALAMURANG kausap natin mga kaibigan! Sinisisi niya ang Bible sa pagkawatak-watak ng mga kristianos.

    Pero hindi niya sinisisi ang mga kristianong katulad niya kung mag-isip, na pinapairal muna ang pansariling interpretasyon bago ang wastong pang-unawa. Para na rin po niyang sinisi ang CONSTITUTION ng PILIPINAS dahil sa pagtatalo ang mga abugado? Nakupo!

    So, sino kaya sa tingin ninyo ang tunay na BOBO dito?

    ReplyDelete
  155. bro manny, hehehehe. yun lang ang comment ko hahahaha. wawa muslim no?

    ReplyDelete
  156. ANG SABI KO PO:
    Tandaan mo Mr Bulok-Islam, may utang ka pa sa amin sa isyung ito! Hindi mo pa sinagot ang hamon ko sa iyo na magbigay ka ng historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang Bible! Ikaw itong nagmamarunong kaya ipakita mo sa amin na marunong ka nga! Sagotin mo na ang hamon ko sa iyo para hindi ka lalong mapahiya dito!

    1. ANG SAGOT NG MUSLIM:
    MangMang ka ba talaga? ha? MANNY CRUZ? anong historical background ang sinasabi mo? ha? At ano nga yon? Ako daw mapApahiya?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Sinagot po ba niya ang hamon ko sa kanya? HIndi po! Wala siyang naibigay na katiting na historical background kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang Bible. Daldal ng daldal pero wala naman palang alam sa history ng topic na siya rin ang nag bukas. So, gusto mo pa bang mapahiya ha Mr Cheap Shot Bulok-Islam?

    2. Mr CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    MANNY CRUZ wala ka na sa srili mong katinuan!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Kung hindi mo masagot ang isang tanong na ikaw rin ang nagbato, e di ikaw ang wala sa katinuan. Maliwanag ba yan?

    3. Mr CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    Kayo nga itong pahiyang-pahiya na eh dahil iyan hindi mo na alam kong aling bibliya talaga ang galing sa Dios yan bang 66 books of the Bible or ang 73 books of the Bible?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Nagbukas ka ng isang TOPIC, tapos nung tinanong kita hinggil sa historical background ng topic mo, wala ka naman palang alam kaya bigla kang natameme, umiwas at nagmura na lang!!!Tsk tsk ysk. Istilo po yan ng talunan! Tama? Alam na ng readers natin kung sino ang tunay na napahiya dito.

    4. MR. CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    At anong historical background ang pinagsasabi nitong BugoK na ito? bakit nasa Bibliya ba at malinaw bang nakasulat ang hinggil dito? kong Papaano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books of the Bible?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    HAHAHAHAHA! Lalo lang po niyang nasupalpal ang sarili niya! Hinahanap niya ang HISTORICAL BACKGROUND doon mismo sa BIBLIYA????? HAHAHAHA! Kaya nga tawag diyan BACKGROUND Eh. Ang presumption diyan ay ang mga pangyayari na NAKAPALIBOT sa ISYU, at labas na iyan sa Bibliya. Hay naku! Kaya naman pala tuliro itong kausap natin eh hindi naman pala niya naintindihan ang ibig sabihin ng HISTORICAL BACKGROUND!!!! Wawa talaga itong taong to!

    5. MR CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    Eh ang malinaw MANNY CRUZ ang Bibliya nyo ang naging dahilan kong bakit dumarami ang sekta ng Kristtyanismo! Kong ito0 ay talagang galing sa Dios bakit nagkabulod-buglod ang mga kaKristyanohan?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Natunaw na yata ang mga brain cells nitong PALAMURANG kausap natin mga kaibigan! Sinisisi niya ang Bible sa pagkawatak-watak ng mga kristianos.

    Pero hindi niya sinisisi ang mga kristianong katulad niya kung mag-isip, na pinapairal muna ang pansariling interpretasyon bago ang wastong pang-unawa. Para na rin po niyang sinisi ang CONSTITUTION ng PILIPINAS dahil sa pagtatalo ang mga abugado? Nakupo!

    So, sino kaya sa tingin ninyo ang tunay na BOBO dito?

    ReplyDelete
  157. Muslim;
    IISA LAMANG ANG QUR'AN PERIOD! HINDI KA BA NAKAKAUNAWA? KONG MAY ALAM KA NA HARD COPY NG IBANG VERSION PINAGSASABI MO ILABAS MO NG MAPATUNAYAN NA NAGSASABI KA TALAGA NG TOTOO! KAYA MO?

    SimplyCatholic said
    hahaha wala akong hard copy dahil di ako muslim..bibigyan kita ng mga versions kung magpapaka lalake ka sa pagsagot ng mga tanong ko hahahaha..huwag puro iwas..

    Muslim;
    eh di inaamin mong Tangan ka nga! Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an! Nakakaunawa ka ba? BobO mo naman talaga! Now ngayon kong may hawak kang HARD COPY sa mga Katangahang pinagsasabi mo bilang patunay, eh di iliTaw mo! Pero ayon na rin sayo Eh isa ka din lang palang Tanga na naniniwala sa mga Sabi-sabi! Ganyan talaga kapag ang isng Tao TaNgA ay mdalas nabibiktima. Those versions that you are Talking about does Not exist! There's no such thing as Qur'an Version Period! Hindi katulad ng Bibliya nyo ang Qur'an! ang Bibliya nyo ay may ibat-ibang Version and I can proved it to you! Coz I hve a HARD COPY of the Different Versions of your Bible. Eh Ikaw puro ka lang Bunganga! at Hearsay! Style mo brod pamBakla eh! bakla ka siguro anO?

    ReplyDelete
  158. MANNY CRUZ:
    Sobrang MANGMANG po talaga itong kausap natin. Papano naging BIBLIYA tinutukoy sa Rev 22:18-19 e wala pang BIBLIYA nung panahon ni John?

    Hanggang PAGMUMURA ka na lang ba Mr Bulok-Islam? Sumagot ka naman ng maayos. Patunayan mo muna na meron nang BIBLIYA noong sinulat ni John ang Book of Revelation! Yan ang wastong pagsagot sa tanong ko. Yung daldal mo, sa iyo na lang yun. Nagmumukhang bobo ka lalo!


    Muslim;
    Unawa mo ba ang nakasulat at SinasAbi ng inyong Bibliya? Ang hirap kasi sa inyo Pinapairal ninyo palagi ang mga KataNgahan at kamaNgmaNgAn ninyo eh!

    MAngManG Cruz este MaNNY Cruz pala Hula o isang prophecy yan na maari at siguradong mangYayari o magaganap sa inyong Bibliya! Samakatwid baga'y hindi nangyayari sa Bibliya ang Tinutukoy sa Hula o prophecy na DaGdaG BawAs? Ikaw ba MangMang CruZ este MANNY cRuZ pala nasa Ulo pa ba yang Utak mo? Tingin ko po kasi yang Utak mo ay nasa talampakan mo na eh! Ito ang Hula o prophecy mula sa inyong Bibliya! Unawain mo ha? MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala. basa;

    Rev. 22:18-19
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    TAma na ang KatAngahan at kabObohan unawain mo na lamang ang mga nakasulat mula sa mga talatang iyan! Ok?

    ReplyDelete
  159. ANG SAGOT NG MUSLIM:
    Ang pagMemorize ay upang maiwasan ang mga pagbagObaGo o maiwasan ang mga Corruption na possibling mangyari sa nasabing kasulatan! Plain! Clear! and SimpLe!

    Bro Manny bakit di natin tanungin ang history sa sinasabi nitong muslim na ito..Kumuha tayo sa isang pinagpipitagang Bukhari..

    Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. ..."

    Muslim kala ko ba pare-parehas kayo nang recitation?Sinungaling ka talga!Kung akala mo recitation lang yan ha kaya kita iprovide ng iba't ibang versions ng Quran kung sakali lang tinatamad ka maghanap..

    Ooooppsss natatambakan ka na brad ng mga hindi sinsagot hehehehe..Alisto ka at deretsahan na sagot huwag paligoy ligoy at pag mumura hehehe..Napaghahalatang ampaw ang laman ng isip mo..

    ReplyDelete
  160. Hahahaha Ayan po walang pangontra na naman si muslim hahahahaha..Nagmumura na lang hehehe..

    At nakuha mo pang baluktutin ang sinabi ko hahaha..Ang inamin ko lang wala akong hard copy pero di ko sinabi na walang ibang version..Ang tanga mo na sinungaling ka pa..At heto pa Muslim partida sayo mahigit sampu ang alam kong version ng Quran hehehehe..

    Kaso di ka pa sumasagot sa mga hamon ko eh..Puro pagmumura ang sagot mo hehehe..

    sabi ni muslim mga kapatid tunghayan natin ha..

    Muslim;
    eh di inaamin mong Tangan ka nga! Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!

    Ulitin po natin ang sabi ng hadith nila hehehe..

    Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. ..."

    Ibang version ba gusto mo?Tumutol ka muna panay kme ang tumututol sa mga sinsabi mo eh..

    ReplyDelete
  161. Muslim;
    Patungkol po ito sa usapin ng 66 at 73 books of the Bible. at sa historical background kono ng pagkakaroon ng 66 at 73 books of the Bible ayon sa panganagtwirn nitong si MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala!

    MangMang Cruz este Mnny Cruz;
    Kaya nga tawag diyan BACKGROUND Eh. Ang presumption diyan ay ang mga pangyayari na NAKAPALIBOT sa ISYU, at labas na iyan sa Bibliya. Hay naku!

    Muslim;
    So dito po dear readers of this blog tuwirang inaamin ngayon nitong si MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala na naniniwala sila sa mga Pangyayari na walang batayan o mga patunay hinggil sa nasabing claimed na wala man lamang pinaghahawakang matibay na mga patunay! So marahil po ito ay sabi-sabi lamang ng isang Tao, but difinitely not from God. So dito pa lamang po sa mga pangangatwiran nitong mangmang na ito ay kitang-kita na po natin ang kanyang kababawan. mahilig at Madali po syang naniniwala sa mga sabi-sabi lamang. May pa Historical-historical background pa syang nalalaman. Eh Bibliya nya na nga lang hindi na nya kayang unawaiin eh! History pa kaya na ayon sa kanya wala namang batayan? eh sinong niloko nitong mangMang na ito? hahahahahaha! kawawa naman po itong Taong ito! ang kanyang natutonan sa kanyang Bibliy ay puro kamalianm.

    ReplyDelete
  162. Psssttt muslim sagutin mo naman ako ng deretso..Iiwas ka na naman ba?Mga sagot mo kay Bro Manny walang saysay pang ampaw hehehe..Walang kabuluhan..Kung baga sa usapang kanto eh kwentong kutsero..

    sumagot ka na..

    ReplyDelete
  163. Trabaho muna ako Muslim para may oras ka sumagot ha..Kung wala kang pang sagot dyan eh iprovide na rin kita ng mga sinasabi ng scholars nyo hehehe..At iprovide na rin kita ng pangontra hehehe..

    Ingats muslim..Baka mapunta ka agad sa paradise ng merong 72 virgins..

    ReplyDelete
  164. Simply Catholic said...
    Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies.

    Muslim;
    Now ibalik ko sayo ang katanungan, ayon na rin sa mga salaysay mo! Did the Devil succeeded or did the Devil Achieve his intention as per your allegations para gawin ang Ginagawa nya na sa mga nauna pang mga kasulatan? katulad na lamang ng Ginagawa ng Demonyo sa inyong Bibliya na nagkaroon ito ng 66 at 73 books of the Bible? Not to mention the huge number of versions in the Bible. Hindi po! hindi nagtagumpay ang Demonyo para gawin yon sa Qur'an sayo na mismo nanggagaling and For Your Information what Muslims have now r perfect copies manuscripts known as the Qur'an.

    But then if you still insist na mayroon pang ibang version ang Qur'an I challenge you to come forward with that HARD COPY of the Qur'an in different Version and Present your Case! malinaw ba? Dapat sa isang May Utak at matinong Tao bago ka magngangawa dapat hawak mo na talaga ang ebidensya! Now Produce you proof a HARD COPY of the Qur'an for that matter then come forward and Present your Case! Tama na ang history-history naku naman Oo! Bibliya nyo nga di nyo pa kayang unawain eh ang history pa kaya! Lets get to the point! Produce your proof and present your Case!

    ReplyDelete
  165. I'll show my proof later..But first you have to refute my position as well as the position by your own hadith..

    Muslim;
    eh di inaamin mong Tangan ka nga! Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!

    Akala ko ba isang recitation lang sinasabi nyo?Gusto mo pa ba ng dagdag na patotoo sa hadith nyo?hehehe kumontra ka muna wala kang pangontra eh..Wala kang sinagot sa huling post mo kundi bagong tanong..Bago tayo mapunta sa ibang usapin eh tutulan mo muna ang sinabi ng hadith mo hehehe..O gusto mo ebidensya na pinayagan ni Muhammad nyo na meron ibat ibang version..hahahaha

    Teka bakit hard copy na gusto mo ngayon hindi ba pinagyayabang mo ang galing nyo sa memorya?hmmmm pero sige pagbibigyan kita pero bago ang lahat tutol ka muna hehehehe..Ikaw naman kung mag demand ka ng proof kala mo sumasagot ka sa demand namin na sumagot ng maayos eh ehehehe..

    Sagot muna bago demand..Muslim..Wala akong nakitang direktang sagot mula sayo kahit nga pahapyaw ay nada..hahahaha..Ang ganda nga tingnan ng mga post mo ang haba eh pero walang laman hehehe paulit ulit..Bopols istayl..

    ReplyDelete
  166. let us narrow it down..sabi mo..

    Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!

    sabi ng hadith mo ganito..
    Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies.

    O sino nagsasabi sayo inyo ngayon ng totoo..

    ReplyDelete
  167. SimplyCatholic said...
    Humihingi sayo ng paliwanag si Bro Manny Cruz kung bakit 66 o 73 ang libro..Wala ka namang masagot kaya minura mo na lang si Bro..

    CENON BIBE:
    MAGMUMURA NA LANG talaga yan, Brod.

    IYAN ang EPEKTO ng MAGHAPON at MAGDAMAG NIYANG PAGTUWAD-TUWAD sa DIYOS na AYON MISMO sa KANYA ay HINDI SILA KINAUSAP.

    Kahit naman sino siguro ay MAPAPAMURA NA LANG kapag ang DIYOS na TINUTUWARAN MO MAGHAPON ay HINDI KA PALA PINANSIN.

    ReplyDelete
  168. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    (IISA LAMANG ANG QUR'AN NA KILALA NG MGA MUSLIM SA BUONG MUNDO!)

    CENON BIBE:
    NILOKO MO NA NAMAN ang SARILI MO.

    Kaya yata ALAM MONG HINDI KAYO PINASIN at KINAUSAP ng DIYOS e dahil WALA KAYONG RESPETO sa SARILI NINYO e.

    MISMONG HADITH NINYO ang NAGSABI na MARAMING VERSION ng QURAN kaya PINASUNOG PA ni USMAN ang KARAMIHAN sa mga IYON.

    Kaya ka PALAMURA e PUMASOK KA sa ALAM MONG HINDI KINAUSAP ng DIYOS, HINDI ITINAYO ng DIYOS, SARI-SARI at IBA-IBA ang KASULATAN at HIGIT sa LAHAT ay HINDI MO MAIDEPENSA kung HINDI MO LOLOKOHIN ang SARILI MO.

    ANONG URI yang PINASOK MO kung IKAW MISMO ay ALAM MONG HINDI IYAN GALING sa DIYOS?

    IISA BA ang QURAN? ALING QURAN ang SINASABI MO? Yung HAWAK ng mga SAHABA o YUNG PINAGAWA ni USMAN?

    Diyan pa lang e NANGANGAMOTE KA NA E. PILIT MO NA LANG NILOLOKO ang SARILI MO.

    ANONG KLASE KANG TAO kung yang PINANINIWALAAN MO ay ALAM MONG PANLOLOKO LANG sa SARILI MO?

    ReplyDelete
  169. MANNY CRUZ:
    Hanggang PAGMUMURA ka na lang ba Mr Bulok-Islam? Sumagot ka naman ng maayos. Patunayan mo muna na meron nang BIBLIYA noong sinulat ni John ang Book of Revelation!

    CENON BIBE:
    NAKAKALUNGKOT MAN pero MAGANDA NA RIN na INILALABAS ng BALIK ISLAM ang NATUTUNAN NIYA sa INANIBAN NIYA.

    Sa NAKIKITA NATING LAHAT ay WALANG MABUTING NATUTUNAN sa BALIK ISLAM itong ating KAUSAP.

    PURO KASAMAAN ang NAKIKITA NATIN sa KANYA: PAGMUMURA, GALIT, PANLOLOKO SA SARILI, PANLOLOKO SA IBA, PAGSISINUNGALING, PAGPAPALUSOT, PANLALAIT, KAMUNDUHAN, PAGKAHAYOK SA BABAE, PAGKAHAYOK SA BATA at MARAMI PANG KASAMAAN.

    IYAN po ang IMAHEN ng BALIK ISLAM na INILALABAS NIYA RITO.

    SALAMAT sa DIYOS at NAKIKILALA NATIN nang HUSTO ang mga URI ng TAO na MAGHAPONG TUMUTUWAD at NAGDARASAL nang HINDI NILA NAIINTINDIHAN.

    ReplyDelete
  170. 1. TINANONG po natin si Mr Cheap Shot Bulok-Islam kung meron na bang BIBLE nung panahon na sinulat ni John ang Book of Revelation, particular ang sinipi niyang Chapter 22:18-19.
    Ito po ang sagot niya:

    "Unawa mo ba ang nakasulat at SinasAbi ng inyong Bibliya? Ang hirap kasi sa inyo Pinapairal ninyo palagi ang mga KataNgahan at kamaNgmaNgAn ninyo eh!"

    MANNY CRUZ:
    NASAGOT po ba ni Mr CSBI ang tanong natin? Hehehe! Nagreact lang siya. WALA namang SAYSAY. Tapos akala niya nakasagot na siya! hehehe! Sakit na talaga niya yan eh. Pag di makasagot, mura na lang ng mura. No surprise really!

    2. Mr CHEAP SHOT BULOK-ISLAM:
    MAngManG Cruz este MaNNY Cruz pala Hula o isang prophecy yan na maari at siguradong mangYayari o magaganap sa inyong Bibliya! Samakatwid baga'y hindi nangyayari sa Bibliya ang Tinutukoy sa Hula o prophecy na DaGdaG BawAs?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    a.) Tuliro na talaga itong Bulok-Islam na ito! Ang Rev 22:18-19 ay isa daw propesiya na tumutukoy sa dagdag bawas ng Bible? Hahahaha!!!

    b.) Yun pong Bible as compiled and translated by the Catholic Church is still intact. Wala pong nabawas o nadagdag diyan. Yan po ang tunay na Bible. Hindi yung salin lang ng kung sino-sino.

    c.) Di porke't may mga palpak na translators ang Bible e palpak na ang tunay na Bible. Tandaan mo Bulok-Islam, the Bible is a CATHOLIC BOOK. Naunawaan mo ba yan? Ha?

    d.) Sinipi na naman po ng Bulok-Islam ang Rev 22:18-19, at buong tapang siyang naghamon na:

    "TAma na ang KatAngahan at kabObohan unawain mo na lamang ang mga nakasulat mula sa mga talatang iyan! Ok?"

    e.) Opo. Naunawaan ko po yan. Pero ang MALING pagkaunawa mo sa talata ay ganito: ang phrase na "THIS BOOK" ay ang BUONG BIBLIYA. Tama? Kung ganoon e di PALPAK nga ang PAGKAUNAWA mo. Ang THIS BOOK kasi diyan ay ang BOOK of REVELATION lang. Hindi po buong bibliya. Ang Bibliya kasi ay PLURAL na kung i translate mo ayon sa contexto ng Rev 22:18-19 magiging "THESE BOOKS." Di mo pa rin ba NAINTINDIHAN YAN? Kung hindi pa e di sabihin mo na lang ito sa sarili mo:

    "TAma na ang KatAngahan at kabObohan unawain mo na lamang ang mga nakasulat mula sa mga talatang iyan! Ok?"

    ReplyDelete
  171. Simply Catholic said...
    sabi ng hadith mo ganito..
    Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies.


    Muslim;
    Nauunawaan mo ba pinagbabasa mo? ha? eh ikaw din mismo sumasagot sa katanungan mo eh! at ito ang sagot mo oh;

    "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies! 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies."

    Oh so Ano ang natira na Qur'an na syang pinaghahawakan ng mga Muslim ngayon? di ba ang perfect copies na!? at wala na itong ibat-ibang version tulad ng katangahang pinagpipilitan mo! ang Qur'an ay hindi katulad ng inyong Bibliya na mayroong 66 at 73 books of the Bible not to mention the huge number of versions it has! different from our Qur'an, ikaw mismo ang may sabi eh! oh di ako ang may sabi nyan ha? baka naman sabihin ng ating mga taga subaybay sa blog na ito na masyado ng nagyayabang ang mga Muslim! ayon sa iyo mismo na ang Qur'an ng mga muslim ngayon ay ang perfect copies na! Period at ikaw mismo ang may sAbi nyan! kasi Sa kwento mong yan ipinaliwanag mo lamang na hindi nagtagumpay kahit ang Demonyo sa Qur'an ng mga Muslim, dahil ang Qur'an ng mga Muslim ay nananatiling Perfect! ayon sayo na rin mismo. Plain! Clear! & Simple! hindi mo pa rin ba gets?! ang hina nyo talaga!

    ReplyDelete
  172. Ako ba talga ang nakakaunawa o hindi?Hmmm hahaha..Pero tingnan natin mga kasama hindi na po binigyan pansin ni Muslim ang pangungusap na "differences in the recitation of the Qur'an,"..Bakit kaya?Dahil kaya magiging salungat ito sa claims nya na "Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!"?

    Hmmm..Sabi po ni muslin eh ang natira daw ay perfect copies na hehehehe..Matanong ko lang muslim sino ang magsasabi na ang ibang recitation ng mga kasama mo ay hindi ang perfect recitation?Remember muslim pinagyayabang mo ang mga muslim ay magaling sa memorya..sino ang magsasabi na mali ang nirerecite nya hehehe...

    At ito pa sabi ni muhammad..

    Bukhari: vol. 6, hadith 514, p. 482; book 61

    Narrated Umar bin Al-Khattab:

    I heard Hisham bin Hakim reciting Surat Al-Furqan during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle and I listen to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which Allah's Apostle had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I controlled my temper and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, "Who taught you this Surat which I heard you reciting ?" He replied, "Allah's Apostle taught it to me". I said, "You have told a lie, for Allah's Apostle taught it to me in a different way from yours". So I dragged him to Allah's Apostle and said, "I heard this person reciting Surat Al-Furqan in a way which you haven't taught me!". On that Allah's Apostle said, "Release him (Umar) recite, O Hisham!" Then he recited in the same way I heard him reciting. Then Allah's Apostle said, "It was revealed in this way", and added, "Recite, O Umar", I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Apostle then said, "It was revealed in this way. This Qur'an has been revealed to be recited in seven different ways, so recite of it whichever is easier for you."

    O pwede naman pala eh iba iba eh..Di lang dalawang pagkakaiba kundi pito..O salungat na namn sa sinasabi mo tsktsk..Nag aaral ka ba talga ng quran nyo..Ngayon Muslim tingin mo ba isang version lang ang tinitingnan nyo hahahaha..

    Sinunog daw yung iba kaya sabi ni muslim ang natira eh yung perfect copies na hahaaha..Muslim pano mo ngayon malalaman na hindi yung sinunog ang perfect kung wala ka nang pag kukumparahan hahahaha..Lagi mo pinamamalaki clear and simple wala ka naman nasasalungat puro ka dada haha..

    ReplyDelete
  173. MANNY CRUZ:
    a.) Tuliro na talaga itong Bulok-Islam na ito! Ang Rev 22:18-19 ay isa daw propesiya na tumutukoy sa dagdag bawas ng Bible? Hahahaha!!!


    Muslim;
    Rev 22:18-19
    18
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

    19
    And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    Tuliro? sino? di ba ikaw yon? hahahahaha! kayo na po ang bahalang umunawa at umiintindi hinggil sa tinutukoy ng nasabing talata dear readers of this blog. bakit ng sabihin ba ni John ang tungkol sa hula na yon ng pagDadagDag at pagBabawas ng mga kasulatan nag i-exist na ba ng Rev.? hindi pa rin naman ah! Pro maliwanag po ang hula ay ukol o patungkol sa kanilang mga kasulatan na mayroong 66 at 73 Books not to mention the huge number of versions therein! in their book called the Bible!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    b.) Yun pong Bible as compiled and translated by the Catholic Church is still intact. Wala pong nabawas o nadagdag diyan. Yan po ang tunay na Bible. Hindi yung salin lang ng kung sino-sino.


    Muslim;
    Ayon lamang sayo! eh Tanga ka eh! bakit? sabi ba ng Dios mismo na yon lamang 73 books ang authentic? sige ipakita mo kong anong talata ng Bibliya sinasabi ng Dios yang katangahan mong yan! Kaya mo ba? Mga katangahang claimed nyo lamang ang yan na hindi nyo kayang supportahan ng mga katibayan mula sa inyong Bibliya! infact ang malinaw na sinasabi ng Bibliya nyo ay ganito na po;

    basa;

    1 Corinthians 13:
    9
    For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

    10
    But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

    Sa unawa kaya nitong Bugok na si MANNY CRUZ ano kaya ang tinutukoy dyan mula sa Talatang nabanggit? Ano kaya ayon sa kanyang Unawa ang sinasabi dyan na PART lamang daw?! at ano naman din kaya ang unawa nya sa DONE AWAY na tinutukoy dyan? Ano kaya ang maDoNE AwAy na tinutukoy mismo ng kanyang Bibliya? ang komiks nya kaya ang maDoNe Away na binanggit ng kanyang Bibliya? hehehehehe! Nauunawaan kaya nya ang mga TalAtang ito? Nagtatanong lamang po!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    c.) Di porke't may mga palpak na translators ang Bible e palpak na ang tunay na Bible. Tandaan mo Bulok-Islam, the Bible is a CATHOLIC BOOK. Naunawaan mo ba yan? Ha?

    Muslim;
    Bible daw ay Catholic Book? sino kayang Tangang nagsabi nyan? ano talata ng Bibliya mo MangMang Cruz este MANNY CRUZ pala na sinasabi na ang Bibliya ay Catholic Book? ipakita mo naman ng mawala na ang mga agam-agam ng mga taga subaybay sa blog na ito MangMang CruZ este Manny Cruz pala! At sa kanya na rin po nanggagaling na may alam pala syang mga palpak na translators ang Bibliya, eh papaano nya nasiguro na hindi palpak yang hawak nyang Bibliya? alin po kaya sa dalawang magkaibang Bibliya ang tunay na Bible? ang 66 books of the Bible kaya? o ang 73 books of the Bible? not to mention the huge number of different version in their Bible! matutukoy kaya nitong si MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala kong alin talaga ang tunay na Bibliya ayon sa isang Talata na susuporta sa katangahan nya kong meron man? bueno sige po hintayin po natin ang kasAgotan nitong si MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala!

    ReplyDelete
  174. The Canon of Scripture

    There is a significant difference between Catholic and Protestant Bibles. Catholic Bibles contain seven more books than Protestant Bibles do. The seven books, all in the Old Testament, are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch and 1 and 2 Maccabees. Catholics call the disputed books Deuterocanonical and consider them to be inspired. Bible Christians call them Apocryphal and consider them to be spurious. (WHO'S TELLING THE TRUTH HERE?)

    The list of books that comprise the Bible is referred to as the canon. During Jesus' time there were two Old Testament canons in use. There was the Palestinian canon, which is identical to the Protestant Old Testament, and there was the Alexandrian canon – also known as the Septuagint – which is identical to the Catholic Old Testament. The reason why the Catholic Bible has the longer canon is simple. The Apostles and the early Church used the Septuagint.

    Bible Christians use the shorter canon because it matches the present day Jewish canon. They will often quote Romans 3:2, which says, "The Jews are entrusted with the oracles of God." (YOU SEE ITS THE JEWS AN NOT THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AS CLAIMED BY THEM!) They reason that since God entrusted the Old Testament to the Jews, (TO THE JEWS AGAIN AN NOT TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC AS STUPIDLY CLAIMED!) they should be the ones who determine which books belong in it. (BUT THEN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH INVENTED THEIR OWN BOOK AND IT CONTAIN 73 BOOKS, AND THEY CLAIMED THAT GOD TOLD THEM SO?)

    This reasoning presents a couple of problems. Firstly, both Old Testament canons were received from the Jews. Thus neither canon is eliminated by this verse. Secondly, the Jews didn't settle on the Palestinian canon until at least 90 AD at the Council of Jamnia. This was well after authority had passed from the Jews to the Church (Acts 4:19). Ironically it was at the Council of Jamnia that the Jews also rejected the New Testament. Logically speaking, anyone who would consider Jamnia as being authoritative would also have to reject the New Testament.

    Most Church Fathers regarded the Septuagint as the standard form of the Old Testament. When the Councils of Hippo (393 AD) and Carthage (397 AD) set the canon of the New Testament they also confirmed the Septuagint as the Old Testament. Further evidence of the Septuagint's acceptance by the early Church can be found in the New Testament itself. It quotes the Old Testament approximately 350 times. Three hundred of those quotes are from the Septuagint. Surely this amounts to an overwhelming endorsement by the early Church.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Some raise objections over supposed errors. One example is in Judith 1:1-7. Here Nebuchadnezzar is called the king of Assyria when in fact it is well known that he was the king of Babylon. But Judith is not a historical book; it's a religious novel. The combining of the Babylonians and the Assyrians is a representation of the enemies of Israel. Both had conquered Israel at one time or another. Judith means Jewess and she represents the whole of Judaism. The lesson of the book is to rely on God's way of deliverance no matter what the method. Similar objections are raised over verses in Tobit, which are likewise symbolic and not historical.

    Critics will often dismiss the role of the Church in determining the New Testament. They contend that the Holy Spirit caused the books of the New Testament to fall into place on their own. They would have us believe that the Church councils that dealt with the canon were nothing more than bishops getting together to say "Wow, look at that." Once again, history tells us another story.

    The book of 1 Clement was considered inspired by most in the early Church (Eusebius, The History of the Church 3:16, 325 AD). We also know that the book of Revelation was disputed by many at the time. And yet Revelation made it into the canon and 1 Clement didn't. That's because the Church set the canon of Scripture, and she did so under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Just as God worked infallibly through men in writing the Bible, He worked infallibly through men in communicating exactly which books comprised it.

    And so the canon stood. Unchanged until the Protestant Reformation when Martin Luther threw out the seven Deuterocanonicals because they contradicted his new doctrines. He also wanted to throw out Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, Jude, and Revelation. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed.

    "In Revelation 22:19" the apostle John proclaims, "If any one takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book." It's true that this verse refers to the book of Revelation. However, common sense tells us that the same principal should apply to all of Scripture. Certainly God would never be pleased with us tampering with any part of His word.

    ReplyDelete
  176. Some raise objections over supposed errors. (OH MAY MGA ERRORS PA DAW PO?) One example is in "Judith 1:1-7. Here Nebuchadnezzar is called the king of Assyria when in fact it is well known that he was the king of Babylon." (SO SA PUNTO PONG YAN SINO PO KAYA ANG NAGKAKAMALI ANG TAO O ANG DIOS? NAGTATANONG LAMANG PO!) But Judith is not a historical book; it's a religious novel. (OH? SO HALO-HALO NA PALA YANG NAKATALA SA BIBLIYA? KAYA PALA TULIRO ANG MGA NAGBABASA NITONG BIBLIYA EH! AT HINDI NILA TALAGA ALAM KONG ALIN SA DALAWANG SALIN ANG SA DIOS! AT KONG ALIN SA NAPAKARAMING VERSIONS ANG SA DIOS! ANG GULO TALAGA ANO PO?!) The combining of the Babylonians and the Assyrians is a representation of the enemies of Israel. Both had conquered Israel at one time or another. Judith means Jewess and she represents the whole of Judaism. The lesson of the book is to rely on God's way of deliverance no matter what the method. Similar objections are raised over verses in Tobit, which are likewise symbolic and not historical.

    Critics will often dismiss the role of the Church in determining the New Testament. They contend that the Holy Spirit caused the books of the New Testament to fall into place on their own. (YOU SEE?) They would have us believe that the Church councils that dealt with the canon were nothing more than bishops getting together to say "Wow, look at that." Once again, history tells us another story. (SO MALINAW PO NA MAY NAG-IMBENTO LAMNG NG MGA KASINUNGALINGAN PARA PANINIWALAIN ANG TAO HINGGIL SA KASINUNGALING NG KANILANG BIBLIYA!)

    The book of 1 Clement was considered inspired by most in the early Church (Eusebius, The History of the Church 3:16, 325 AD). We also know that the book of Revelation was disputed by many at the time. And yet Revelation made it into the canon and 1 Clement didn't. (SO DITO PO AYON SA HISTORY MAY MGA KASULATANG PUMASOK O INAPROBAHANG ISMA SA KANILANG BIBLIYA AT MERON NAMAN PONG HINDI! SO DITO PO MALINAW NA HINDI PALA DIOS ANG MAY GUSTO O HINDI PALA KAGUSTOHAN NG DIOS NA ANG KANILANG BIBLIYA AY MAGKAROON NG 73 BOOKS! TAO DIN LANG PALA ANG NAGPASYA HINGGIL DITO! AT HINDI DIOS ANG NAGPASYA HIGGIL SA KANILANG 73 BOOKS OF THE BIBLE!) That's because the Church set the canon of Scripture, (SO SIMBAHAN LAMANG PALA ANG NAGPASYA NG KANILANG 73 BOOKS OF THE BIBLE AT HINDI DIOS! EH PAPAANO NAMAN PO KONG ANG KATUTOHANANG HANAP NG TAO AY NANDOROON SA HINDI ISINAMA NG KANILANG SIMBAHAN NA MAGING PART NG BIBLIYA? PAPAANO NAMAN PO KONG MAGKAGAOON? TAO PO BA ANG HAHATOL SA TAO? HINDI PO BA DIOS NAMAN? KAYA MEDYO HINDI PO TALAGA TAYO NAKAKASIGURO PAGDATING SA BIBLIYA!) and she did so under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Just as God worked infallibly through men in writing the Bible, He worked infallibly through men in communicating exactly which books comprised it. (TALAGA? SO ANONG BOOK NGA? ANG 66 BOOKS PO BA NG BIBLIYA O ANG 73 BOOKS? HINDI KO NA PO BANGGITIN PA ANG NAPAKARAMING VERSION NG BIBLIYA!)

    ReplyDelete
  177. Are Catholics biblical illiterates? (YES MOST OF THEM IF NOT ALL!) So goes the frequent question, proving that myths die hard. But Catholics ought to be able to answer (SOMETIMES) the charge made by many non-Catholics in this regard. This book is a response to Fundamentalist critics and an explanation of the Catholic biblical tradition.

    The Catholic Church and the Bible is a significant scriptural study guide, published from a Catholic perspective and particularly keyed to the new Catechism of the Catholic Church. The well-planned, straight-forward text is clearly outlined to make information easy to find and understand. Main topics include: (BUT MOST OF THEM IF NOT ALL ANSWER ANSWERS ON THE CONTRARY!)

    • The Catholic understanding of the Bible

    • God's Word and its purpose in the Church

    • A biblical theology of the Mass, the place of the Bible in the Sacred Liturgy

    • A question-and-answer section that deals with pertinent and popular inquiries made by Catholics and non-Catholics alike

    This work should be heartily welcomed by both clergy and laity, for Father Stravinskas sheds new light on Catholic Bible study by writing with candor, clarity and scriptural backing. This is ideal for high schools and RCIA programs.

    ReplyDelete
  178. SimplySimply Catholic said...

    Ako ba talga ang nakakaunawa o hindi?Hmmm hahaha..Pero tingnan natin mga kasama hindi na po binigyan pansin ni Muslim ang pangungusap na "differences in the recitation of the Qur'an,"..Bakit kaya?Dahil kaya magiging salungat ito sa claims nya na "Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!" said...

    Ako ba talga ang nakakaunawa o hindi?Hmmm hahaha..Pero tingnan natin mga kasama hindi na po binigyan pansin ni Muslim ang pangungusap na "differences in the recitation of the Qur'an,"..Bakit kaya?Dahil kaya magiging salungat ito sa claims nya na "Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!"

    Muslim;
    Medyo mahina lang talaga ang pang-unawa nitong nagpakilala sa atin na si Simplang Catholic este Simply Catholic daw po. samantalang ito na mismo ang sinasabi nya sa kanyang post pagmasdan po ninyo ang POST mismo nitong si Simplang Catholic este Simpling Catholic daw po sya na po mismo ang sumagot sa katanongan nyang yon! At sya mismo ang nagpapatunay na ang kanyang pinagdidiinan ay HISTORY na o LUMIPAS NA at wala na pong saysay! kasi po sya mismo ang nagsabi na ang qur'an ay naging perfect na!;

    ito po ang POst nya mismo;
    na ayon sa hadith:

    "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before (BEFORE THEY DIFFER!) they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in "perfect copies!" (PERFECT COPIES!) 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies." (SO? PERFECT COPIES NA! ANO NGAYON ANG PINUPUNTO NITONG mANGmANG NA ITO?)

    Oh so Ano ang natira na Qur'an na syang pinaghahawakan ng mga Muslim ngayon? MAY PAGKAKAIBA O DIFFER PA PO BA? O WALA NA PO! KA SIMPLY EH! BAKIT KA PA SUMEMPLANG pa hinggil sa usaping yan? HEHEHEHE! Hindi ba ang perfect copies na lamang!? At wala na itong ibat-ibang version tulad ng katangahang pinagpipilitan mo! ang Qur'an ay hindi katulad ng inyong Bibliya na mayroong 66 at 73 books of the Bible not to mention the huge number of versions it has! different from our Qur'an, ikaw mismo ang may sabi eh! oh di ako ang may sabi nyan ha?

    Ano ka ba naman sinasabi mo na nga eh hindi mo pa rin alam pinagsasabi mo! ang BobO mo naman talaga! bueno hangang sa susunod po! tsek! tsek! tsek! kong kayo kaya dear readers of this blog ang magkaroon ng ganito ka Tanga at kaBobOng kausap bababa pa po kaya ang dugo ninyo? hehehehehe! nagtatanong lang po!

    ReplyDelete
  179. ANG SABI KO PO:
    a.) Tuliro na talaga itong Bulok-Islam na ito! Ang Rev 22:18-19 ay isa daw propesiya na tumutukoy sa dagdag bawas ng Bible? Hahahaha!!!

    1. ANG SAGOT PO NG BULOK-ISLAM:
    Tuliro? sino? di ba ikaw yon? hahahahaha! kayo na po ang bahalang umunawa at umiintindi hinggil sa tinutukoy ng nasabing talata dear readers of this blog.

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Mga kaibigan, ayon po sa Bulok-Islam na kausap natin e kayo na lang daw po ang bahalang umintindi sa Rev 22:18-19. Bakit kaya? Simple lang! Hindi naman kasi niya ito NAINTINDIHAN eh!!!HAHAHAHAHA! Buong bible daw ang tinutukoy ni John????Tuliro nga talaga!

    2. BULOK-ISLAM:
    bakit ng sabihin ba ni John ang tungkol sa hula na yon ng pagDadagDag at pagBabawas ng mga kasulatan nag i-exist na ba ng Rev.? hindi pa rin naman ah!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Ayan pa po mga kaibigan. KINUMPIRMA LANG NIYA na TULIRO nga SIYA. HIndi pa raw po nag exist ang Revelation ni John nung snulat niya ang panghuling apat na talata dito (verses 18-21)? HAHAHA!

    Joker talaga itong taong to! Ayon sa PALPAK na unawa niya, nung sinabi ni John na "THIS BOOK," ang ibig daw palang sabihin nito ay "THIS BOOK THAT DOES NOT EXIST YET!!!" HEHEHEHE! NAGLAHO ba ang Chapters 1 to 22:17 tapos LUMITAW ulit nung natapos na ang verse 21 ng Chapter 22????? Sabi ba ni John na HINDI pa raw nag-EXIST ang THIS BOOK na kasalukuyan niyang SINUSULAT???? ehehehehe! TULIRO to the MAX TALAGA itong kausap nating Bulok-Islam!!

    3. BULOK-ISLAM:
    Pro maliwanag po ang hula ay ukol o patungkol sa kanilang mga kasulatan na mayroong 66 at 73 Books not to mention the huge number of versions therein! in their book called the Bible!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Anong maliwanag ang pinagsasabi mo? Nakakakita ka ng 73 books doon sa THIS BOOK ni John? Simpleng grammar pa lang lagpak ka na eh! Ang maliwanag dito ay HINDI MO TALAGA NAINTINDIHAN ANG TALATA. NAGPALUSOT KA LANG. PERO SABLAY PA RIN!

    ReplyDelete
  180. ANG SABI KO PO:
    b.) Yun pong Bible as compiled and translated by the Catholic Church is still intact. Wala pong nabawas o nadagdag diyan. Yan po ang tunay na Bible. Hindi yung salin lang ng kung sino-sino.

    1. SAGOT PO NG BULOK-ISLAM:
    Ayon lamang sayo! eh Tanga ka eh! bakit? sabi ba ng Dios mismo na yon lamang 73 books ang authentic? sige ipakita mo kong anong talata ng Bibliya sinasabi ng Dios yang katangahan mong yan! Kaya mo ba? Mga katangahang claimed nyo lamang ang yan na hindi nyo kayang supportahan ng mga katibayan mula sa inyong Bibliya!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Sabi ng Bulok-Islam, claim lang daw natin at walang basehan ang pag likom at pag buo ng CATHOLIC CHURCH sa MGA AKLAT na ngayo'y tinatawag nating Bibliya. Dito, NALANTAD na naman niya ang KAWALAN NIYA NG ALAM SA HISTORY. Mag research ka naman Brod. Available lahat ng detalye niyan sa internet. Gusto mo kami pa ang mag research para sa iyo? Kalokohan na yata iyan.

    2. BULOK-ISLAM QUOTES THE BIBLE:
    "infact ang malinaw na sinasabi ng Bibliya nyo ay ganito na po;

    "1 Corinthians 13:
    For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
    But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away."

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Sa halip po na ipaliwanag niya ang talatang sinipi niya, e nagtanong na lang siya ng mga walang kwentang tanong! Sabi niya:

    "Sa unawa kaya nitong Bugok na si MANNY CRUZ ano kaya ang tinutukoy dyan mula sa Talatang nabanggit? Ano kaya ayon sa kanyang Unawa ang sinasabi dyan na PART lamang daw?! at ano naman din kaya ang unawa nya sa DONE AWAY na tinutukoy dyan? Ano kaya ang maDoNE AwAy na tinutukoy mismo ng kanyang Bibliya? ang komiks nya kaya ang maDoNe Away na binanggit ng kanyang Bibliya? hehehehehe! Nauunawaan kaya nya ang mga TalAtang ito? Nagtatanong lamang po!"

    Pasensya na po kayo mga kaibigan at biglang naging MAHIYAIN itong kausap natin na Bulok-Islam. PILIT na PILIT po kasi niyang TINUTUMBOK sa talatang sinipi niya na merong magaganap na DAGDAG-BAWAS sa BIBLIYA! Kaya lang, paano natin siya MASASAGOT sa puntong ito kung NAHIHIYA siyang magpaliwanag. Marahil alam na niya na MASUSUPALPAL na naman niya ang sarili niya kapag ipupursige niya ang OPINYON niyang SABLAY..

    ReplyDelete
  181. SABI KO PO:
    c.) Di porke't may mga palpak na translators ang Bible e palpak na ang tunay na Bible. Tandaan mo Bulok-Islam, the Bible is a CATHOLIC BOOK. Naunawaan mo ba yan? Ha?

    1. SAGOT NG BULOK-ISLAM:
    Bible daw ay Catholic Book? sino kayang Tangang nagsabi nyan? ano talata ng Bibliya mo MangMang Cruz este MANNY CRUZ pala na sinasabi na ang Bibliya ay Catholic Book?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    Kitams nyo mga kaibigan? HIndi na naman niya NAINTINDIHAN na ang BIBLE ay PAG-AARI NG CATHOLIC CHURCH? Palibhasa MANGMANG siya sa HISTORY kaya ganoon na lang siya KAKITID.

    2. BULOK-ISLAM:
    ipakita mo naman ng mawala na ang mga agam-agam ng mga taga subaybay sa blog na ito MangMang CruZ este Manny Cruz pala!

    MANNY CRUZ:
    a.) Para po sa mga tagasubay na ALAM ang KASAYSAYAN, wala pong agam-agam diyan. Alam nila at naintindihan nila papano ang Bibliya ay isang librong katoliko. Subalit para sa katulad nitong mangmang sa history na Bulok-Islam, KALITUHAN lamang ang umiiral sa kokote niya.

    b.) Madali lang magpakita ng mga katibayan sa usapin ng HISTORY ng BIBLIYA. Nakalabas na lahat ng ebidensya diyan.

    c.) Kaya lang, ito kasing kausap natin ang naREREKLAMO tungkol sa bibliya eh. NAGMAMARUNONG kasi siya at buong YABANG pa niyang SINIRAAN ang BIBLIYA.

    d.) Kaya IBINALIK lang natin sa kanya ang HAMON na siya dapat ang MAGPATUNAY at MAGPAKITA ng HISTORICAL BACKGROUND kung paano nagkaroon ng 66 at 73 books ang BIBLiYA. Ang dahilan ay para MALAMAN natin kung NAIINTINDIHAN BA NIYA ang INIREREKLAMO NIYA tungkol sa Bibliya.

    e.) Pero, tulad nang IPINAKITA NA NIYA sa atin, e MANGMANG PALA SIYA sa history. hehehehe. Hindi nga niya alam ang ibig sabihin ng HISTORICAL BACKGROUND EH. HEHE. In short, nagrereklamo siya sa isang bagay na hindi naman pala niya NAINTINDIHAN!!!! May tawag po sa taong ganyan! Alam nyo po ba kung ano mga Kaibigan?

    ReplyDelete
  182. Anonymous Christian;
    Ganyan talaga yan bro.manny kahit natutumbok
    na ay di yan matinong kausap.
    Yung time factor nga sa matt12:40 ay hanggang
    ngayon di nya maipaliwanag pero claim pa din
    ng claim yan na tayo ay di nakakaunawa
    samantalang di nya maipaliwanag pinaniniwalaan nya sa mga nababasa nya o pinagkukunan ng paninira sa bibliya at kristiyanismo.

    Uulit ulitin lang mga sinasabi nya tapos paikot ikot na lang ang magiging usapan.
    At wala ka na makikita na matinong sagot nyan kundi magmura, manlait, mangutya at magmarunong sa unawa sa bibliya.

    ReplyDelete
  183. Ito po ang sabi ni muslim..

    Muslim;
    Medyo mahina lang talaga ang pang-unawa nitong nagpakilala sa atin na si Simplang Catholic este Simply Catholic daw po. samantalang ito na mismo ang sinasabi nya sa kanyang post pagmasdan po ninyo ang POST mismo nitong si Simplang Catholic este Simpling Catholic daw po sya na po mismo ang sumagot sa katanongan nyang yon! At sya mismo ang nagpapatunay na ang kanyang pinagdidiinan ay HISTORY na o LUMIPAS NA at wala na pong saysay! kasi po sya mismo ang nagsabi na ang qur'an ay naging perfect na!;


    Pero kung inyong susuriin ay meron iniiwasan si muslim na pangungusap ano po ba ito?Hayan nyo po ipost ko ang nauna kong post at ating isa isahin..

    Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) ..." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. ..."

    Bakit po iniiwasan ni MUslim yun kasi ganito po ang kanilang posisyon..

    "Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!"

    In short ang sabi ni muslim..

    "Walang ibat-ibang Version ang Qur'an! Period! All Muslims around the World Recite & Memorize one and the same Qur'an!"

    sabi ng hadith nila ganito..

    Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an,

    O di ba..hhahahaa..yan po ang dahilan kaya di nya ganap na pinopost ng buo yan mga kapatid hahaha..

    Ngayon tyak na sasabihin ni muslim at least ngayon iisa na lang hehehe..Ang tanong dyan kaya nya ba panindigan yan hehehe..Pangalawa..Kelan ba nagumpisa ang perfect na koran nung panahon ni muhammad o sa panahon na ni usman?Pakisagot nga muslim?O huwag nang iiwas ha..hehehehe

    ReplyDelete
  184. Pahabol pala..Perfect nga ba ang koran?Hehehe..Kung meron 20 na may pagkakaibang version at claim mo na orig laht at perfect?Masasabi nyo pa bang perfect laht yun?O di kaya alin dun ang perfect?

    Kung perfect ang isang version dapat meron kang ipanghahalintulad sa hindi..Pero pano mo pa ito maihahalintulad kung nasunog na hehehe..Nagtatanong lang po..

    ReplyDelete
  185. Simply Catholic said...
    Pahabol pala..Perfect nga ba ang koran?Hehehe..Kung meron 20 na may pagkakaibang version at claim mo na orig laht at perfect?Masasabi nyo pa bang perfect laht yun?O di kaya alin dun ang perfect?

    MANNY CRUZ:
    1. Brod SimplyCatholic, humingi na ako ng Sura mula sa Koran na direktang nag-utos na kailangan itong i-memorize, pero wala silang naibigay. (Kung hindi pala inutos ng Koran yan, e sino kaya ang magaling na Muslim ang may pakana niyan?)

    2. At saka, papano kaya nila ma insure na pare-pareho ang MEMORY nila sa Koran? Paki pansin po ang paliwanag nila:

    "Ang pagMemorize ay upang maiwasan ang mga pagbagObaGo o maiwasan ang mga Corruption na possibling mangyari sa nasabing kasulatan! Plain! Clear! and SimpLe!

    3. Ayun!! Para na rin nilang sinabi na PERFECT MEMORY ang paraan para maging PERFECT ang KORAN! Pero NAKALIMUTAN yata nila na sa pag-rerecite ng Koran e meron ding NAKAKALIMOT sa kanila! Tama? Kumbaga'y hindi nila pwedeng sabihin na LAHAT NG MUSLIM ay may PERFECT MEMORY! Susundan lang natin ang Logic nila at makikita natin na dahil HINDI PERFECT ang MEMORY nila at HINDI PERFECT ang PAG-RECITE nila sa Koran, lalabas na HINDI RIN PERFECT ang KORAN! Sila na rin ang kumontra sa sarili nilang conclusion. Yan ang Plain! Clear! and Simple! hehehehe!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  186. MANNY CRUZ:
    a.) Para po sa mga tagasubay na ALAM ang KASAYSAYAN, wala pong agam-agam diyan. Alam nila at naintindihan nila papano ang Bibliya ay isang librong katoliko.

    Bro. naniniwala ako sa mga comments mo dito. Gusto ko lang sna malaman kung pwedeng maipaliwanag ng kaunti kung papaanong ang Bible ay isang Catholic Book. Christian po kasi ako, ibinubuhay ko ang mga aral ng panginoong Jesus at ng Dios Ama, pero hindi po ako Catholic. Wala po ba kaming karapatan na gamitin ang Biblia dahil ito pala ay Catholic book at hindi Christian book sa pangkalahatang aspeto?

    Sana po maipaliwanag n'yo. Hindi po ako kalaban at irerespeto ko ang opinyon n'yo. Salamat din at ibinubunyag n'yo ang mga maling aral ng islam. Nagulat lang po ako ngayon ko lang nabasa na ang Bible pala para sa inyo ay isang Catholic book. Salamat God bless po.

    ReplyDelete
  187. MANNY CRUZ:
    Ayan pa po mga kaibigan. KINUMPIRMA LANG NIYA na TULIRO nga SIYA. HIndi pa raw po nag exist ang Revelation ni John nung snulat niya ang panghuling apat na talata dito (verses 18-21)? HAHAHA!

    Joker talaga itong taong to! Ayon sa PALPAK na unawa niya, nung sinabi ni John na "THIS BOOK," ang ibig daw palang sabihin nito ay "THIS BOOK THAT DOES NOT EXIST YET!!!" HEHEHEHE! NAGLAHO ba ang Chapters 1 to 22:17 tapos LUMITAW ulit nung natapos na ang verse 21 ng Chapter 22????? Sabi ba ni John na HINDI pa raw nag-EXIST ang THIS BOOK na kasalukuyan niyang SINUSULAT???? ehehehehe! TULIRO to the MAX TALAGA itong kausap nating Bulok-Islam!!


    Muslim;
    MangMang Cruz este MaNNY CRUZ pala ito ang pagbulaybulayan ninyo, yan po ay HULA! HULA po! nauunawaan mo ba kong ano ang ibig sabihin ng HULA MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala? Magpalusot ka nalang eh sablay pa! kahit anong palusot gawin mo sapul na spul ka talaga dyan sa nasabing HULA na yan ng iyong Bibliya! hehehehehe! MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala, ang nasabi po bang HULA mula sa nabanggit na TalaTa naganap o hindi sa inyong Bibliya? Sagot! Sumagot ka!

    Revelation 22:
    18
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

    19
    And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    Siguro po ang tingin nitong MangMang Cruz na ito este MANNY CRUZ pala ang HULA na yan ni John ay patungkol sa KOMIKS nitong si MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala at hindi ito patungkol sa kanilang Bibliya na Katutohanan namang nagkakaroon talaga ng DAGDAG BAWAS na mayroon pong 66 at 73 books of the Bible! At hindi lamang po ang tungkol sa DAGDAG BAWAS ang naging HULA sa kanilang Bibliya! MAy HULA din po na ang kanilang Bibliya ay magiging Ampaw na rin daw po obsolete o wala na pong silbe ayon po yon sa HULA na malinaw po nating mababasa sa kanilang Bibliya!

    basa:

    1Corinthians 13:
    9
    For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

    10
    But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

    Nauunawaan po kaya ang mga talatang ito ni MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala? Sige MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala magpalusot ka na naman ngayon! Ang sabi po ng inyong Bibliya,

    "For we know in part, and we prophesy in part"

    Ano ang nalalaman nila ang patungkol kaya sa KOMIKS nitong si MangMang CRUZ este Manny Cruz pala? hehehehehehehe! at ito pa po karagdagan;

    "But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away

    So this proved that the Bible they have is NOT PERFECT Yet! eh ito po ang sabi ng Kanilang Bibliya mismo eh! Oh so ngayon nasa iyo na yon MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala kong paniniwalaan mo ang nakasulat sa iyong Bibliya o hindi! Alam kong Sapul ka na naman dyan kaya hindi mo talaga matatanggap at makuhang unawain ang talatang iyan! Pero Ano po kaya yong PERFECT na darating liban sa Bibliya? Bibliya din po kaya? o another new edition ng HARRY POTTER books, para sa apo nitong si MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala? Ikaw MangMang Cruz este Manny Cruz pala, favorite KOMIKS mo kaya itong DARATING na PERFECT daw po? Ano kaya sa tingin mo MangMang Cruz itong darating na Bibliya nyo pa mismo ang may HULA? alam mo ba? o magPalusot ka na naman?! hehehehehehe!

    ReplyDelete
  188. MANNY CRUZ:
    Sabi ng Bulok-Islam, claim lang daw natin at walang basehan ang pag likom at pag buo ng CATHOLIC CHURCH sa MGA AKLAT na ngayo'y tinatawag nating Bibliya. Dito, NALANTAD na naman niya ang KAWALAN NIYA NG ALAM SA HISTORY. Mag research ka naman Brod. Available lahat ng detalye niyan sa internet. Gusto mo kami pa ang mag research para sa iyo? Kalokohan na yata iyan.


    Anonymous said:
    Where did the Bible come from?
    Introduction

    PERHAPS THE DAYS ARE GONE when very many people have the impression that the Bible was somehow mysteriously written in the English of the King James Version (KJV), all ready-made and bound in a book, at some unknown point since the days of the apostles. Certainly, such a notion would be hard to find amongst Orthodox Christians. But in the society in which we live, perhaps many Orthodox folk included, there is often a "that's the way it is" attitude, attached to whatever concept of "the Bible" one happens to have.

    A truly Christian understanding of the Scriptures, however, must be founded in Truth... not in a thoughtless acceptance of the "received" notion in one's own circle... be that circle Orthodox, Roman Catholic, or Protestant. But Truth is a harsh master. If relentlessly pursued, it often forces dramatic changes in one's preconceived notions, religious or otherwise... and therefore, in one's whole life. Perhaps this is the reason for which it is so seldom pursued!

    When we speak of "the Bible," we speak of a collection of books. The earliest of these existed in oral form long before they were written down, but attained a written form many centuries before the birth of Our Lord. The latest of these books were written many years after His Resurrection... the very latest, probably, as late as the end of the first century, some 60 or more years after the Resurrection. The former, of course, comprise the Old Testament, and the latter the New Testament. When St. Paul speaks of "scripture," it is to the