Friday, February 3, 2012

Bible 'malaswa': Lot ginawang prostitute ang mga anak?

BASAHIN po NATIN ang isang POST ni BEN LANGCUYAN na isa raw MUSLIM FAITH DEFENDER.

SABI po NIYA,


Isa sa paratang laban sa kay Propeta Muhammad (sumakanya nawa ang kapayapaan at pagpapala) ay, si Propeta Muhammad (sumakanya nawa ang kapayapaan at pagpapala)ay isang Pedophile.

Sagot:

Is Muhammad a true Prophet? - On the topic of Sexual Immorality.

1. Prophet Muhammad lived among pagans who literally worshiped in nakedness! (http://www.quransearch.com/naked_pagan_society.htm)

2. Women as war booties in the Bible. (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#spoils_of_war)

3. Coveting the neighbor's wife and another man's wife. (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#covet)

4. Judah and the prostitute. No punishment! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#judah)

5. Lot's offering of his daughters as prostitutes! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#lot)

6. Favoritism to Lot over the innocent children! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#favoritism_to_lot)

7. David committed Covet, Adultery and Murder! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#david)

8. David's selective murder was never condemned! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#davids_selective_murder)

9. Jesus too broke the Mosaic Law! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#jesus_broke_law)

10. Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene on the mouth! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#jesus_lusted)

11. Prophet Muhammad and Aisha. (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#muhammad_and_aisha)

12. Young girls married off to much older men in the Bible. (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#young_girls_in_bible)

13. Moses and his men raped 3-year old slave girls! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#moses_raped_babies)

14. Digital Defloration to virgins in the Bible. Fingers inserted into virgins' vaginas before marriage in the Bible! (http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#digital_defloration_in_bible)



MERON po TAYONG ARTIKULO KAUGNAY ng SINABI NINYO.

MAGANDA pong MABASA NINYO para MAKAPAGKOMENTO rin KAYO.

Paki CLICK po NINYO itong PROPETA MODELO ng PAG-ASAWA sa BATA

SALAMAT po.


+++

Ang IBA po NINYONG TINURAN ay MGA PANINIRA LANG sa BIBLIYA.

Kung MABABASA NINYO at MASUSURI ang mga TALATANG BATAYAN sa mga SINABI NINYO ay MAKIKITA NINYO na OUT OF CONTEXT po ang mga YAN.

Halimbawa po, itong sinabi ninyo na "LOT OFFERING HIS DAUGHTERS AS PROSTITUTES." OUT OF CONTEXT po ang UNAWA NINYO RIYAN.

HINDI po INIALOK ni LOT ang mga ANAK NIYA bilang PROSTITUTE. Ang PROSTITUTE po kasi ay BAYARANG BABAE.

Sa GENESIS 19:1-8 ay HINDI NAMAN PINABABAYARAN ang mga ANAK na BABAE ni LOT e.

KATUNAYAN, NAPAKA-MARANGAL at KAHANGA-HANGA ang GINAWA NI LOT sa EKSENSANG IYAN.

Pero BAGO po KAYO MAGKAMALI na naman ng UNAWA sa SINABI KO ay BASAHIN po NATIN ang MGA PANGYAYARI riyan.

Kunin po natin ang MISMONG TALATA na SINIPI sa WEBSITE na IBINIGAY NINYO.



Genesis 19
1 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground.

2 "My lords," he said, "please turn aside to your servant's house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning."

"No," they answered, "we will spend the night in the square."

3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate.

4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house.

5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."

6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing.

8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof."




NAKITA po ba NINYO?

BAKIT po INIALOK ni LOT ang KANYANG MGA ANAK na BABAE? PARA po ba IBENTA at PAGKAKITAAN?

HINDI po.


GUMAGAWA ng MALAKING SAKRIPISYO si LOT. INIAALAY NIYA ang KANYANG MGA ANAK para HUWAG MALAPASTANGAN ang KANYANG MGA BISITANG ANGHEL.

IPINAKIKITA riyan ni LOT na MAS MAHAL NIYA ang DIYOS at ang mga SUGO ng DIYOS kaysa sa KANYANG mga ANAK.

Kaya KAHIT MASAKIT KAY LOT na MALALAPASTANGAN ang KANYANG MGA ANAK ay INIALOK NIYA ang mga ITO sa mga GUSTONG LUMAPASTANGAN sa mga SUGO ng DIYOS.

At IYAN po ang KAHANGA-HANGA sa GINAWA NI LOT.



PANSININ po NINYO na NUNG BINASA at SINURI NATIN AYON sa TAMANG KONTEKSTO ay BIGLANG NAIBA ang KAHULUGAN ng GEN 19:1-8.

DOON sa PANINIRA nung WEBSITE na TINUKOY NINYO ay lumalabas na MASAMANG AMA si LOT at GINAGAWA NIYANG PROSTITUTE ang mga ANAK NIYA.

Pero sa TAMANG PAGBABASA ay MALINAW NATING NAKITA na MABUTING TAO si LOT at HANDA SIYANG ISAKRIPISYO ang KANYANG MGA ANAK para lang HUWAG MALAPASTANGAN ang MGA SUGO ng DIYOS.



Ang PAKI-USAP KO lang po sa INYO ay SURIIN po NINYO nang HUSTO ang MGA BINABASA NINYO.

MARAMI po KASING MALI at PANINIRA LANG sa BIBLIYA na IKINAKALAT ng mga KAPATID NINYO.

NANINIWALA po AKO na MATINO at DISENTE KAYONG TAO at HINDI KAYO KAKAMPI sa ALAM NINYONG MALI.

21 comments:

  1. NOTE: "The two Angels simply had the power to defend themselves! They didn't need his sacrifice."

    - from http://www.quransearch.com/is_muhammad_true_prophet_3.htm#lot

    Therefore, they are fake angels. And it it's impossible to an angel to have sex with a human. Can a Most Merciful God let that to happen? His angels are weak enough and lust for a sex with a human? What is the justice of God of all of that? What kind of God will allow such a thing?

    - personal comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU GOT THIS IDEA.

      There is NOTHING in the STORY of LOT and the ANGELS that SHOWS that the ANGELS were "WEAK" or "LUST FOR A SEX WITH A HUMAN."

      I'm SORRY but YOU AGAIN MISREAD and MISUNDERSTOOD the TEXT.


      I am CONFIDENT that IF YOU ONLY READ the TEXTS PROPERLY AND CORRECTLY, YOU WILL SEE the TRUTH.

      And as the LORD JESUS TELLS US, THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE.

      Delete
  2. if we accept your claim, you would foolishly deny these two:

    * that human are bale to harm angels, and
    * being a liar is permissible in the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again, WHAT'S THE CONTEXT?

      I'M SURE that IF YOU MENTION EXAMPLES from the BIBLE, WE WILL BE ABLE to SEE the TRUTH.

      I have already SHOWN in the case of LOT and HIS DAUGHTERS that IT IS NOT LOT WHO is at FAULT, but the PEOPLE who MISREAD and LIE ABOUT the BIBLE.

      Delete
  3. What is your opinion about this? Why would god allow incest in the bible?
    Bible's verses about Lot's sex with his daughters in the book of genesis.
    "Thus both The daughters of lot were with child by their father"
    (Genesis 19:23-25,30-36, NKJV)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. THE BIBLE is the STORY of the PEOPLE of GOD.

      IT TELLS the TRUTH, EVEN if the TRUTH is NOT SO GOOD in the EYES of SOME.

      But TELLING THE TRUTH DOES NOT MEAN something BAD is being condoned. SOMETIMES WE HAVE TO SAY what is NOT NICE so that WE WILL UNDERSTAND REALITY.

      The BIBLE is NOT LIKE some other "HOLY BOOK" that is SANITIZED while CLAIMING to be FROM GOD but the "PROPHET" who supposedly REVEALED IT CANNOT be PROVEN to have been SENT BY GOD HIMSELF.

      Anyway, as I already said, WE SHOULD READ the BIBLE and LOOK at the CONTEXT.

      Let us see the context of this "incest" between LOT and HIS DAUGHTERS?

      The IMPORTANT QUESTIONS are:

      1. WHY DID IT HAPPEN?

      2. WAS IT OUT OF LUST or OUT OF "NECESSITY"?

      3. WAS THERE ABUSE?

      LET US READ Gen 19:23-25, 30-36.

      The sun was just rising over the earth as Lot arrived in Zoar; at the same time the LORD rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah (from the LORD out of heaven).

      He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.

      Since Lot was afraid to stay in Zoar, he and his two daughters went up from Zoar and settled in the hill country, where he lived with his two daughters in a cave.

      The older one said to the younger: "Our father is getting old, and there is not a man on earth to unite with us as was the custom everywhere.

      Come, let us ply our father with wine and then lie with him, that we may have offspring by our father."

      So that night they plied their father with wine, and the older one went in and lay with her father; but he was not aware of her lying down or her getting up.

      Next day the older one said to the younger: "Last night it was I who lay with my father. Let us ply him with wine again tonight, and then you go in and lie with him, that we may both have offspring by our father."

      So that night, too, they plied their father with wine, and then the younger one went in and lay with him; but again he was not aware of her lying down or her getting up.

      Thus both of Lot's daughters became pregnant by their father.



      WE SEE from the TEXT that the SCENE is JUST AFTER GOD DESTROYED SODOM and GOMORRAH.

      SODOM and GOMORRAH were the ONLY WORLD that the DAUGHTERS of LOT KNEW.

      When GOD DESTROYED these CITIES, GOD DESTROYED the ONLY WORLD that THEY KNEW.

      THIS is the CONTEXT of the INCEST THEY COMMITTED as TOLD in Gen 19:31.

      The VERSE READS"
      The older one said to the younger: "Our father is getting old, and THERE IS NOT A MAN ON EARTH to unite with us as was the custom everywhere.


      Because of the DESTRUCTION of the ONLY WORLD they KNEW, the DAUGHTERS of LOT THOUGHT that THERE IS NO LONGER ANY OTHER MAN on EARTH to GIVE THEM CHILDREN.

      For them, the SITUATION was already HOPELESS.

      So, THEY DID WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS BEST. THAT is WHY THEY SAID in Gen 19:32:

      Come, let us ply our father with wine and then lie with him, THAT WE MAY HAVE OFFSPRING BY OUR FATHER."


      Was it OUT OF LUST?

      NO. For the DAUGHTERS OF LOT, it was a matter of SURVIVAL and a NECESSARY THING TO DO so that HUMANITY WOULD CONTINUE.

      IT was NOT LIKE what SOME PEOPLE DID. SOME PEOPLE MARRIED and HAD SEX with CHILDREN, as if there were no other WOMEN EXISTED. THIS is INFINITELY WORST than WHAT LOT'S DAUGHTERS DID.

      In this case, THERE IS ABUSE. And a CHILD is ABUSED.

      In the case of INCEST between LOT and his DAUGHTERS, there was NO ABUSE ... ESPECIALLY since IT WAS NOT LOT (the OLDER PERSON) who INITIATED IT. HE DID NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE of HIS DAUGHTERS.

      So, THAT'S THE CONTEXT of this INCEST.


      IF THIS KIND OF INCEST HAPPENED TODAY, IT WOULD BE TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.

      COMPARE that to the PRACTICE of SOME who still MARRY and HAVE SEX with CHILDREN.

      Delete
  4. bro cenon , your explanation is totally comprehimsive, with true context and clear examples,

    viva , viva bro . cenon.


    anonymousSAB

    ReplyDelete
  5. CORRECTION. CORRECTION:
    * that human are 'ABLE' (not bale) to harm angels, and

    x--------------------x

    just wondering what kind of nature do your God have when he mentioned it in his 'holy books' about such incests.

    "True God is far removed from any mistakes."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NO MAN was ABLE to HURT or HARM any ANGEL in the STORY of LOT.

      In fact, the ANGELS even BLINDED all those OUTSIDE THE house of LOT and MANAGED to LEAVE LEAD LOT'S FAMILY OUT OF SODOM. (Genesis 19:11, 16)

      So, I'M SORRY but I SEE ANOTHER MISUNDERSTANDING from YOUR PART.


      Perhaps you are CONFUSED by LOT'S APPEAL to HIS TOWNMATES in Gen 19:6-8, when HE ASKED THEM NOT TO LAY HANDS on HIS GUESTS.

      LOT'S WORDS DID NOT SHOW or INDICATE ANY WEAKNESS in the ANGELS. THEY (WORDS) JUST SHOWED THAT LOT WAS A VERY GOOD HOST: HOSPITABLE and PROTECTIVE OF HIS GUESTS.

      IT'S THAT SIMPLE.


      +++

      YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT the NATURE of OUR GOD?

      Well, HE IS THE ONE TRUE GOD. HE PERSONALLY APPOINTED the TRUE PROPHETS and even PERFORMED MIRACLES to CLEARLY SHOW HIS FAVOR TOWARDS HIS TRUE SERVANTS.

      COMPARE that to the "GOD" and "PROPHET" of OTHER PEOPLE who NEVER SPOKE to EACH OTHER.

      WHAT KIND of GOD would NOT EVEN TALK to HIS OWN PROPHET?

      And WHAT KIND of PROPHET is one WHO WAS NEVER SENT BY GOD HIMSELF?



      THE INCEST in LOT DOES NOT in ANY WAY SHOW that GOD MADE A MISTAKE.

      IT JUST SHOWS that OUR GOD is TRUE, the HISTORY in the BIBLE is AUTHENTIC. IT is NOT CENSORED and NOT SANITIZED.



      SOME other "HOLY BOOKS" are JUST MANMADE. That is why its CONTENTS were MADE TO PRETEND to be "CLEAN."

      You KNOW FAKES when THESE PRETEND to be "CLEAN." GOD KNOWS HISTORY IS NOT THE LEAST CLEAN.

      Delete
  6. Kataka-taka na sa isang proof ka lang nag-react mula sa itaas.

    x--------------x

    TRUTH:
    * God do not commit a mistake or mistakes.

    * A scripture or scriptures claimed to be from God has no errors, mistakes or contradictions.

    * A scripture/s claimed to be from God has no that has errors, mistakes or contradictions is s false scripture/s.

    * Anyone who follow false scripture/s is misleading himself/herself away from the Straight Path.

    * Any religion that follow a false scripture/s is false religion.

    FROM THE BIBLE:

    How old was Jehoiachin when he began to reign?

    * 2KI 24:8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother's name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.

    * 2CH 36:9 Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD.

    CONCLUSION:

    * Anyone who follow the two passages is NOT on the Straight Path.

    * Any religion that has that two passages is a false religion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. benmfwnt SAID:
      * God do not commit a mistake or mistakes.


      CENON BIBE:
      I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU GOT the IDEA that GOD MADE A MISTAKE by READING the STORY of LOT.

      IN THE BIBLE, WHEN A MISTAKE is MADE, IT IS NOT MADE BY GOD. PEOPLE MAKE the MISTAKE. THE BIBLE ONLY REPORTS IT.

      Why does the BIBLE REPORT MISTAKES?

      Because MISTAKES are PART OF THE TRUTH. And GOD is TRUTH.

      GOD is NOT A DECEIVER in that HE WOULD HIDE the TRUTH, EVEN IF IT IS UGLY.

      ONLY a FALSE GOD would TRY TO DECEIVE PEOPLE by ONLY PRESENTING THE "GOOD" or the "CLEAN."


      GOD ALLOWS the PRESENTATION OF THE UGLY, THE MISTAKES, THE BAD so that PEOPLE would be ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE IT with what is BEAUTIFUL, CORRECT and GOOD.

      A FALSE GOD--CREATED ONLY BY MAN--WOULD TRY TO PRESENT ONLY the "GOOD" and "CLEAN" to DECEIVE PEOPLE that "HE" is a TRUE GOD.



      +++

      benmfwnt SAID:
      * A scripture or scriptures claimed to be from God has no errors, mistakes or contradictions.


      CENON BIBE:
      Well, the Bible is INDEED FROM GOD because IT DOES NOT HAVE ERRORS or MISTAKES or CONTRADICTIONS, but REPORTS PEOPLES' ERRORS and MISTAKES.

      The CONTRADICTIONS are NOT IN THE BIBLE but in the WRONG UNDERSTANDING of PEOPLE about WHAT IT SAYS or in the HISTORY of WHAT IT SAYS.


      IF YOU WANT TO SEE ERRORS, MISTAKES and CONTRADICTIONS, READ the MEANINGS MADE OF THE QURAN.

      THESE "MEANINGS OF THE QURAN" have SO MANY ERRORS IN FACT and MISTAKES and CONTRADICTIONS.

      For EXAMPLE, IN SURA 20:85-88 and 95, IT BLAMES the "SAMARITAN" for DECEIVING THE ISRAELITES into MAKING THE GOLDEN CALF, in reference to Exodus 32:1.

      This is a VERY BIG and BAD MISTAKE in the "MEANINGS OF THE QURAN."

      THERE were NO SAMARITANS during the TIME OF EXODUS 32. The SAMARITANS CAME MANY CENTURIES LATER when the CITY of SAMARIA was FORMED.


      ANOTHER BIG MISTAKE and ERROR in the MEANINGS OF THE QURAN is that IT MISTOOK MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS as the SISTER of MOSES and AARON.

      MUSLIMS TRY to COVER UP this ERROR by CLAIMING that "SISTER" meant "A DESCENDANT of MOSES and AARON."

      But this COVER UP of a BIG ERROR is FALLS APART because MARY the MOTHER OF JESUS is ALSO CALLED "DAUGHTER OF IMRAN," the FATHER OF MOSES and AARON.

      IF "SISTER" MEANT "DESCENDANT" then MARY SHOULD have also been CALLED "SISTER" of IMRAN.

      OR IF "DAUGHTER" MEANT "DESCENDANT" then MARY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CALLED the "SISTER" of MOSES and AARON but THEIR "DAUGHER."



      THESE are just TWO EXAMPLES of ERRORS in the MEANINGS of the QURAN.

      MORE can be READ HERE: ERRORS IN THE QURAN


      So, IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE IN that MISTAKES MAKE A "HOLY BOOK" FALSE, then PERHAPS YOU SHOULD RECHECK YOUR BELIEF IN THE QURAN or ITS MEANINGS.

      Delete
    2. * Maybe there are already people called Samaritans before the city of Samaria was formed. Who know? Haha.

      * Cite the passages that "MISTOOK MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS as the SISTER of MOSES and AARON."

      ** btw, i will check on it.

      Delete
    3. SORRY, THERE WERE NO SAMARITANS during the time of MOSES.

      IT'A A CLEAR MISTAKE, something that A TRUE HOLY BOOK WOULD NOT MAKE.

      +++

      The MISTAKE that MARY was the SISTER of MOSES and AARON can be FOUND in SURAH 19:27-28

      "Then she brought him (the baby) to her people, carrying him. They said: "O Mary! Indeed you have brought a thing Fariyy (a mighty thing). [Tafsir Al-Tabari]

      "O SISTER (i.e. the like) OF HARUN (AARON) ! Your father was not a man who used to commit adultery, nor your mother was an unchaste woman."
      (MOHSIN KHAN)


      PROOF of the MISTAKE is MARY WAS ALSO CALLED the DAUGHTER OF IMRAN, the FATHER of MOSES and AARON, in SURAH 66:12.

      "And MARYAM (MARY), the DAUGHTER OF 'IMRAN who guarded her chastity."


      The MISTAKE is VERY CLEAR. IT CANNOT BE EXPLAINED IN ANY OTHER WAY.

      Delete
  7. Cenon said:

    ANOTHER BIG MISTAKE and ERROR in the MEANINGS OF THE QURAN is that IT MISTOOK MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS as the SISTER of MOSES and AARON.

    MUSLIMS TRY to COVER UP this ERROR by CLAIMING that "SISTER" meant "A DESCENDANT of MOSES and AARON."

    But this COVER UP of a BIG ERROR is FALLS APART because MARY the MOTHER OF JESUS is ALSO CALLED "DAUGHTER OF IMRAN," the FATHER OF MOSES and AARON.

    IF "SISTER" MEANT "DESCENDANT" then MARY SHOULD have also been CALLED "SISTER" of IMRAN.

    OR IF "DAUGHTER" MEANT "DESCENDANT" then MARY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CALLED the "SISTER" of MOSES and AARON but THEIR "DAUGHER."

    My Comment:

    Then she brought him to her people, carrying him. They said, "O Mary, you have certainly done a thing unprecedented. O sister of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste."
    -(Quran 19:27)

    Note that, (Virgin) Mary and Aaron (peace be upon them both) are descendants of Prophet Abraham (peace be upon him). So it is okey if she was addressed as 'sister of Aaron' . . . as all of us are sons and daughters of the first man ~ Adam (peace be upon him), we are brothers and sisters regardless as to what degree of generation we are in. Clear, isn't it, my brother Cenon?
    _

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I ALREADY EXPLAINED that in my PREVIOUS POST.

      The MISTAKE is PROVEN when MARY is ALSO CALLED the "DAUGHTER" of IMRAN, the FATHER of MOSES and AARON.

      If we are to take the excuse that MARY was called "SISTER OF AARON" because they both came from ABRAHAM, then SHE SHOULD ALSO have been called "SISTER OF IMRAN" and NOT DAUGHTER of IMRAN.


      So, the EXCUSE is NOT VALID and even DISCREDITED by another SURAH, specifically 66:12.

      Delete
  8. "Deaf, dumb, and blind, they will not return (to the path). (The Noble Quran, 2:18)"

    "The parable of those who reject Faith is as if one were to shout Like a goat- herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: Deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom. (The Noble Quran, 2:171)"

    "It is he whom God guides, that is on true Guidance; but he whom He leaves astray - for such wilt thou find no protector besides Him. On the Day of Judgment We shall gather, them together, prone on their faces, blind, dumb, and deaf: their abode will be Hell: every time it shows abatement, We shall increase from them the fierceness of the Fire. (The Noble Quran, 17:97)"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To WHAT PATH should PEOPLE RETURN TO?

      Of the THREE MAJOR MONOTHEISTIC RELIGIONS (JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM), ISLAM was the LAST ONE to RISE.

      In fact, MANY, if not MOST, of the FIRST MUSLIMS TURNED THEIR BACKS from either JUDAISM or CHRISTIANITY.


      So, IF ANYONE is to RETURN or REVERT to "THE PATH," SHOULDN'T THEY BE the MUSLIMS WHO TURNED THEIR BACKS on JUDAISM or CHRISTIANITY?

      In fact, CHRISTIANS who BECAME MUSLIM LITERALLY TURNED THEIR BACKS on THE WAY, the LORD JESUS CHRIST.

      John 14:6
      Jesus answered, “I am THE WAY and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

      +++


      WHO is GUIDED BY GOD?

      WAS MUHAMMAD GUIDED by GOD?

      How come MUSLIMS CANNOT PROVE that GOD HIMSELF APPOINTED MUHAMMAD TO BE HIS PROPHET?

      How come MUSLIMS ADMIT that THERE IS NO PROOF that an "ANGEL" (JIBREEL) TALKED or MADE REVELATIONS to MUHAMMAD?

      So, HOW CAN MUSLIMS CLAIM to be GUIDED by GOD when THEY THEMSELVES CANNOT PROVE that GOD GUIDED THEIR PROPHET?



      The next question is: HOW DO YOU ACCEPT a FAITH where the BELIEVERS CANNOT EVEN PROVE that THEIR PROPHET was PERSONALLY APPOINTED BY GOD?

      Delete
  9. Replies
    1. Why should be read the Quran?

      Muslims themselves CANNOT PROVE that the QURAN CONTAINS ONE WORD that God Himself spoke.

      Worse, I have talked to Muslims who ADMITTED that the QURAN DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY WORD that GOD HIMSELF TOLD to MUHAMMAD.

      So, why should we read the Quran?

      Delete
  10. sino naman yan tinutukoy mong muslims na nakausap mo na hindi nila mapatunayan ang mga salita ng Allah sa qur'an?baka naman ang mga nakausap mo ay yung mga kulang sa kaalaman,bakit di mo subukang makipag debate sa mga talagang nag aral sa qur'an baka sakali malinawan ka sa mga sinasabi mo na walang makakapag patunay ba ika mo sa salita ng allah sa qur'an? bakit di mo subukan makipag debate kay uztad Ahmad barcelon?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LAHAT ng NAKAUSAP kong MUSLIM ay NEVER NAPATUNAYAN na SALITA ng DIYOS ang QURAN.

      KAYO po ba ay KAYANG MAGPATUNAY na SALITA nga ng DIYOS ang QURAN? PUWEDE po bang PATUNAYAN NINYO YAN?

      KAHIT si BARCELON ay HINDI MAPATUTUNAYAN na SALITA ng DIYOS ang QURAN. Kahit po IPAGTANONG NINYO kay BARCELON ay WALA SIYANG MAISASAGOT.

      Delete