Monday, June 28, 2010

Ahmed Deedat gumamit ng panloloko sa Balik Islam

HINDI na po NAKASAGOT si ABDULLAH BALIK ISLAM sa HAMON NATIN sa KANYA na PATUNAYAN na si ISMAEL ay ITINURING ng DIYOS na KAPATID ng mga ISRAELITA.

Marahil po ay NAMULAT sa KATOTOHANAN si ABDULLAH na HINDI TALAGA KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang KAPATID ng mga ISRAELITA.

At DAHIL HINDI ITINURING ng DIYOS na KAPATID ng ISRAELITA si ISMAEL ay MALINAW na WALA RING BATAYAN para sabihin na ang PROPETA ng BALIK ISLAM ang TINUTUKOY sa Deuteronomy 18:18 bilang PROPETA na IBABANGON ng DIYOS MULA sa KAPATIRAN ng mga ISRAELITA.

Ngayon, BAHALA NA ang mga BALIK ISLAM para HANAPAN ng KATWIRAN ang PANINIWALA NILA sa KANILANG PROPETA.

DESISYON NA NILA kung MANINIWALA pa SILA sa KANILANG PROPETA kahit pa ALAM NILA na HINDI ITO ang PROPETANG TINUKOY ng DIYOS sa Deut 18:18.

KAYA lang naman po NAPANIWALA ang mga BALIK ISLAM na ang PROPETA NILA ang tinutukoy sa Deut 18:18 ay dahil NALINLANG SILA ng SKOLAR NILANG si AHMED DEEDAT.

Si DEEDAT po kasi ang isa sa mga MASIPAG at MASIGASIG na NAGPAKALAT ng MALING ARAL na ang PROPETA ng BALIK ISLAM ang "PROPETA" sa Deut 18:18. Si DEEDAT din po ang NAG-IMBENTO ng SARI-SARING PALIWANAG para MASUPORTAHAN ang MALING ARAL na IYAN.

Kahit po PAGSISINUNGALING ay GINAMIT ni DEEDAT para MALINLANG at MALOKO ang mga WALANG ALAM at WALANG MALAY na mga BALIK ISLAM.

Tingnan po natin ang ISA sa mga KASINUNGALINGAN na GINAMIT ni DEEDAT para MALOKO ang mga WALANG MALAY.

Sa IBABA po ay MABABASA NATIN ang ISANG KWENTO MISMO ni SHIEKH AHMED DEEDAT tungkol sa PAKIKIPAG-USAP NIYA sa isang "REV. ROBERTS."

Diyan ay GUSTONG PALABASIN ni DEEDAT na DINAGDAGAN LANG ang BIBLIYA, partikular sa LUKE 3:23. At dahil daw may "DAGDAG" ay "CORRUPTED" at "HINDI DAPAT PANIWALAAN" ang BIBLIYA.

Pero IPAKIKITA po NATIN sa IBABA na SI DEEDAT ang NAG-IMBENTO at NAGDAGDAG ng HINDI TOTOONG IMPORMASYON para MALINLANG at MALOKO ang KANYANG MGA KAUSAP.

HETO po ang MISMONG ISINULAT ni DEEDAT at SINIPI ng isang BALIK ISLAM na NALOKO NIYA:
I drew the Reverend's (ROBERTS) attention to the words - "(As was supposed)." I said: "Do you see that the words 'As was supposed' are written within brackets?" He said that he saw that. I asked him: "Why are the brackets there?" He acknowledged, "I don't know, but I could find out for you from some Bible scholars." I admired his humility. Though I knew that all Supervisors of Bible Houses in South Africa are retired reverends, it was possible that this aspect of Bible knowledge was beyond their sphere. I said: "If you do not know, then let me tell you what the brackets are doing there in this verse. You do not have to take the trouble of looking for a Bible scholar."

I explained that in the "most ancient" manuscripts of Luke, the words "As was supposed" are not there.

CENON BIBE:
HERE we again EXPOSE DEEDAT as a LIAR.

IT IS NOT TRUE that the WORDS "AS WAS SUPPOSED" ARE NOT IN THE "MOST ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS" of LUKE.

ONE of the OLDEST MANUSCRIPTS of LUKE is called P75.

The TEXT of P75 is SIMILAR to that of CODEX VATICANUS and is USED as BASIS by the "Novum Testamentum Graece, Nestle-Aland 26th edition."

In the GREEK NEW TESTAMENT of NESTLE-ALAND 26th edition, WE CAN READ in Lk 3:23:
"Καὶ αὐτὸς ἦν Ἰησοῦς ἀρχόμενος ὡσεὶ ἐτῶν τριάκοντα, ὢν υἱός, ὡς ἐνομίζετο, Ἰωσὴφ τοῦ Ἠλὶ"

TRANSLITERATED, the GREEK TEXT READS:
"Kai autoz hn Ihsouz aoxomenoz wsei etwn toiakonta, wn vioz, wz enomizeto, Iwshf tou Hli."

PLEASE TAKE NOTE of the WORDS "wz enomizeto."

THAT is the GREEK EQUIVALENT of the WORDS "AS WAS SUPPOSED" WHICH DEEDAT CLAIMS ARE NOT in the ANCIENT TEXT of LUKE 3:23.

As WE CAN SEE CLEARLY, the ANCIENT TEXT of P75 (as CITED by NESTLE-ALAND) CONTAINS the WORDS "AS WAS SUPPOSED," which PROVES that DEEDAT LIED when he SAID that IT WAS NOT in the ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS.

WHAT DOES THAT PROVE about AHMED DEEDAT, the SCHOLAR of ISLAMIC REVERTS or BALIK ISLAM?

IT PROVES that DEEDAT USES LIES that would FOOL ANYONE WHO KNOWS LITTLE of BIBLE TEXTS.

In this case, DEEDAT'S LIES WERE FOOLING one REV. ROBERTS, as DEEDAT OPENLY ADMITS.

So, WHAT DOES THIS TELL US of the PRIMARY SOURCE of BALIK ISLAM MEMBERS?

IT PROVES to US that THEIR PRIMARY SOURCE BASES HIS TEACHINGS on LIES and that ALL THAT THEY ARE TELLING US (through DEEDAT'S WRITINGS) are ALL LIES.

THAT SHOWS that ALL the TEXTS that THEY ARE COPY PASTING on this BLOG are FROM what others may call, A LIAR.

Kaya po KUNG BINABASA NINYO ang mga KINA-COPY-PASTE DITO ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay BINABASA NINYO ang MGA SINULAT ng GUMAGAMIT ng KASINUNGALINGAN at PANLOLOKO.

At KUNG NAPANIWALA KAYO ng mga KINA-COPY-PASTE DITO ng mga BALIK ISLAM ay NALOLOKO NA PO KAYO.

SORRY po pero IYAN ang SIMPLENG KATOTOHANAN.

46 comments:

  1. salamat mr.cenon sa mga paliwanag!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cenon Bibe;
    Marahil po ay NAMULAT sa KATOTOHANAN si ABDULLAH na HINDI TALAGA KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang KAPATID ng mga ISRAELITA.

    At DAHIL HINDI ITINURING ng DIYOS na KAPATID ng ISRAELITA si ISMAEL ay MALINAW na WALA RING BATAYAN para sabihin na ang PROPETA ng BALIK ISLAM ang TINUTUKOY sa Deuteronomy 18:18 bilang PROPETA na IBABANGON ng DIYOS MULA sa KAPATIRAN ng mga ISRAELITA.


    Muslim;
    Katangahang Ipinagmamalaki at Pagbibentang sa Dios ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;

    "HINDI TALAGA KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL"

    Batid po natin na nasa tamang Katinuan at Pag-iisip na Dios lamang ang may likha ng lahat ng mga bagay at kasama na tayo doon sa mga nililikha ng Dios! Ngayon makatwiran po bang sabihin ito ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na may nililikha pala ang Dios na hindi nya gusto at hindi nya ito kinikilala? Sino itong dios na ito na kilala nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na mayroon daw nilikha as according to Demon este Cenon Bibe's STUPIDITY pero hindi naman daw pala nya gusto at hindi pa kinikilala? Katangian po ba ng TOTOONG Dios ang mga nabanggit nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala hinggil sa kanyang kinikilalang dios daw po pero ayon sa kanyang mga katangahang sinasabi ay mayroon daw itong nilikha na hindi naman gusto at hindi pa kinikilala? Medyo malayo po taya yong sa katangian ng TOTOO TUNAY at NAG-IISA DIOS!

    Dyan madali po nating mahalata na ibang dios ang kinikilala nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala. Kasi ang katanagian ng TOTOONG DIOS na ating kinikilala ay isang MAHABAGIN, MAUNAWAIN MAPAGMAHAL at MAPAGPALANG DIOS at taliwas sa dios na kinikilala nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala!

    Biruin nyo po parang ipinapalabas pa nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na inuUDYOKAN pa ng dios mismo na hindi kilalanin si Ismael nitong si ISAAC bilang kapatid nya, na galing kay Abraham;

    "DAHIL HINDI ITINURING ng DIYOS na KAPATID ng ISRAELITA si ISMAEL"

    ayon sa salaysay at pagbibentang nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na si ISAAC o ang mga ISRAELITA ay huwag kumilala kay Ismael bilang kapatid o Anak na galing sa BINHI mismo ni Abraham! What a SHAME on this god your talking about or known to you Demon este Cenon Bibe pala. Mukhang sya pa yata ang nag-uUDYOK kay ISAAC o sa mga ISRAELITA na huwag kilalanin si Ismael bilang Anak o galing sa BINHI mismo ni Abraham! What a SHAME to your known god! Kong sino man yang dios na kinikilala mo ay malayong malayo yang sa KATANGIAN ng TUNAY at NAG-IISANG Dios na MpagMAhal at MaHAbagin sa kanyang mga nilikha!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kahit pa halimbawang kinilala si Ismael wala namang patunay na si muhamad ay lahi ni Ismael dahil nung panahon pa ni Abraham may Egyptian na tulad ni H
      aggar na ina ni Ismael ibig sabihin may mga Arabo na rin nuon kaya hindi lahat ng arabo galing kay Ismael.

      Delete
  3. @ muslim

    sa haba ng opinyon mo sana naghanap ka na lang ng patunay na mali yun paliwanag ni Bro. Cenon hindi kailangan dito ang opinyon mo FACTS ang kailangan namin

    ReplyDelete
  4. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Katangahang Ipinagmamalaki at Pagbibentang sa Dios ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;

    "HINDI TALAGA KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL"

    Batid po natin na nasa tamang Katinuan at Pag-iisip na Dios lamang ang may likha ng lahat ng mga bagay at kasama na tayo doon sa mga nililikha ng Dios! Ngayon makatwiran po bang sabihin ito ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na may nililikha pala ang Dios na hindi nya gusto at hindi nya ito kinikilala?

    CENON BIBE:
    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na KINILALA ng DIYOS ang LOLO ISMAEL MO?

    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na KALOOBAN ng DIYOS na IPANGANAK ang NINUNO MO?

    WALA KANG MAIPAKITA, di ba?

    TAMA si REY, PATUNAY ang IBIGAY MO at HINDI KWENTO.

    MARAMING KRISTIYANO na PILIT NINYONG NILOLOKO para mag-BALIK ISLAM ang NAGBABASA ng BLOG na ITO. MAHIYA KAYO sa KANILA.

    PATUNAY ang IPAKITA NINYO sa KANILA at HINDI KWENTONG KUTSERO na BUNGA LANG ng INYONG MALIKOT at BALUKTOT na PAG-IISIP.

    NAHAWA KA NA kay AHMED DEEDAT na PALAGAWA at PALA-IMBENTO ng KWENTO.

    Ang MAGANDA LANG sa GINAGAWA NINYO ay PINATUTUNAYAN NINYO na ANG PANINIWALA NINYO ay NAKABATAY sa OPINYON at HAKA-HAKANG GAWA-GAWA LANG NINYO.

    TAMA ang SABI ng PANGINOON KAUGNAY sa INYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM.

    Isaiah 29:13
    The Lord says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men.

    MALINAW po na BALIK ISLAM ang TINUTUKOY riyan.

    NAGKUKUNWARI ang mga BALIK ISLAM na NAGPUPURI at NAGPUPUGAY SILA sa DIYOS pero SA DALDAL o SALITA LANG PO.

    At TUNAY NGA na ang PAGSAMBA NILA ay GAWA-GAWA LANG ng TAO dahil ang PANINIWALA NILA ay BUNGA LANG ng KANILANG MGA MALILIKOT na PAG-IISIP--GAWA LANG ng TAO at HINDI GALING sa DIYOS.

    Tingnan po NINYO, HINDI NILA MAIPAKITA at HINDI NILA MAPATUNAYAN na DIYOS MISMO ang NAG-UTOS sa KANILA ng mga GINAGAWA NILA.

    Ni HINDI nga po NILA MAIPAKITA at HINDI NILA MAPATUNAYAN na DIYOS ang NAGTAYO ng KANILANG INANIBAN.

    NILOLOKO NA LANG TALAGA NILA ang KANILANG MGA SARILI.

    NAKAKAAWA PO ang mga BALIK ISLAM na ITO.

    ReplyDelete
  5. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Biruin nyo po parang ipinapalabas pa nitong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na inuUDYOKAN pa ng dios mismo na hindi kilalanin si Ismael nitong si ISAAC bilang kapatid nya, na galing kay Abraham;

    CENON BIBE:
    AKO LANG BA ang NAGSASABI na HINDI KINILALA ng DIYOS ang LOLO ISMAEL MO?

    E di IPAKITA at PATUNAYAN MO na KINILALA at ITINURING ng DIYOS na ANAK ni ABRAHAM ang NINUNO ng PROPETA MO.

    WALA KANG MAIPAKITA at HINDI MO MAPATUNAYAN, di ba?

    HINDI IYAN MAKUKUHA sa DALDAL at KAPAL ng MUKHA (although ARAL yata sa INYO ang MAGPAKAPAL ng KALYO sa MUKHA NINYO).

    PRUWEBA ang IBIGAY MO at HINDI WENTO.

    PROOF at HINDI ISTORYA-ISTORYA LANG.

    KATOTOHANAN at HINDI BUNGA ng ALIMUOM ng INYONG PAG-IISIP.

    ALAM NAMIN na HINDI NINYO MAPATUTUNAYAN ang MGA PINANINIWALAAN NINYO.

    Sa TOTOO LANG ay NAKAKAAWA KAYO. PILIT NA LANG NINYONG NILOLOKO ang mga PAGMUMUKHA NINYO.

    Ang HIRAP kasi ay PUMASOK KAYO RIYAN na HINDI NINYO ALAM na PAPATAYIN KAYO sakaling MAMULAT KAYO sa KATOTOHANAN at PUMILI KAYO ng IBANG PANANAMPALATAYA. (Surah 4:89)

    Ngayon ay HINDI NA KAYO MAKAALIS DIYAN kaya KAILANGAN NA LANG NINYONG BASTUSIN ang INYONG MGA SARILI at DURAAN ang INYONG DANGAL. NAPIPILITAN NA LANG KAYONG TANGGAPIN ang ALAM NINYONG HINDI NINYO KAYANG PATUNAYAN na GALING MISMO sa DIYOS.

    Ang TANONG ko lang ay ito: MAS GUGUSTUHIN MO BANG MABUHAY sa KASINUNGALINGAN at WALA KANG RESPETO sa SARILI MO o MAPATAY KA na MAY DANGAL at NANINIWALA sa KATOTOHANAN?

    ReplyDelete
  6. BRO. CENON:
    TAMA ang SABI ng PANGINOON KAUGNAY sa INYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM.

    Isaiah 29:13
    The Lord says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men.

    MANNY CRUZ:
    BRO. CENON, GUSTO KO LANG IDIIN DOON SA SINABI MO NA LAPAT NA LAPAT NGA SA BALIK-ISLAM ANG ISAIAH 29:13 KUNG SAAN SINABI NA "THEIR WORSHIP OF ME IS MADE UP ONLY OF RULES TAUGHT BY MEN.."

    ANG KORAN NAMAN KASI AY HALOS PURO MGA RULES LANG. MAGIGING MUSLIM KA LANG KUNG SUSUNDIN MO ITO AT IYAN AT KUNG ANO-ANO PANG MGA PATAKARAN.

    KASAMA NA SA MGA RULES NA IYAN ANG PUMATAY AT MAGPAKAMATAY PARA SA ISLAM, KAYA HINDI NA TAYO MAGTATAKA KUNG BAKIT WALA TAYONG MABABASA SA KORAN NA NAG-UUTOS NA MAHALIN ANG DIYOS AT ANG KAPWA.

    SORRY NA LANG KAY ABDULLAH KUNG SAKALING MAMULAT SIYA SA KATOTOHANAN. SA ORAS NA IIWANAN NA NIYA ANG ISLAM AY TIYAK PAPATAYIN SIYA, MISMO NG MGA KAANAK PA NIYA. KAWAWA TALAGA. DITO NGA NATIN LALONG MAKIKITA ANG KAHALAGAHAN NG TANONG NI BRO CENON KAY ABDULLAH: PIPILIIN KAYA NIYANG MABUHAY SA KAMALIAN AT MATAPON SA IMPIERNO O MAMATAY SA KATOTOHANAN AT MAPUNTA SA DIOS?

    ReplyDelete
  7. rey (catholic) said...

    @ muslim

    sa haba ng opinyon mo sana naghanap ka na lang ng patunay na mali yun paliwanag ni Bro. Cenon hindi kailangan dito ang opinyon mo FACTS ang kailangan namin


    Muslim;
    Anong paliwanag at patunay pa ba ang gusto mo? Eh kitang - kitang sa pagkakalat nitong Tanga ninyong INIIDOLOng nagwawala ngayon na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na ang dios na kinikilala nya ay may TINATANGI at hindi kinikilala na nilikha! Anong klaseng dios ito? Na kong saan malayong-malayo sa Katangian ng Nag-IISA, TOTOO at walang KATULAD na DIos na maPAGMAHAL at maPAGPATAWAD sa kanyang mga nilikha!?

    The FACT is very VIVID there REY (Catholic) na ang dios na kinikilala ninyo ay malayong-malayo sa KATANGIAN ng TOTOO at NAG_IISANG TUNAY na DIOS. HIndi ba isa sa mga paniniwala ninyo na ang dios ay mapagpatawad? sa tingin ko TOTOO yon, isa sa mga Katangian ng totoong Dios ang pagpatawad, MAPAGPATAWAD talaga ang DIOS! MAAWAIN din ang TOTOONG Dios! at ayon na rin sa KATANGAHAN ninyong pinagkakalat na ang dios ninyo ay nagpapakamatay pa ito alang-alang sa mga kasalanan ng SangkaTAuhan o Sanglibutan! Hindi po ba? bakit tila ganito na lamang ang galit ng kinikilala ninyong dios kay Ismael kong totoo man?! Ano ba ang naging KASALANAN na nagawa nitong si Ismael na Tila hindi talaga mapatawad ng dios na kinikilala ninyo? At Inuudyokan pa ang mga ISRAELITA para huwag kilalanin si Ismael bilang kapatid na Galing din mismo sa BINHI ni Abraham!?

    What a SHAME para sa dios na ito na syang kinikilala ninyo! Ito ba ang makatwirang dios para sa (mga Tangang) Katulad ninyo? Tila taliwas talaga kayo sa katotohanan! Kahit sa simpling pagkikilala pa lamang sa tunay at nag-iisang Dios! Sablay na kayo! Pero dahil nga Tanga ka ito naghahanap ka pa ng PATUNAY mula sa mga paliwanag ng isang TANGA rin na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala! bakit hindi mo pa ba nahahalata na ibang dios itong tinutukoy ni Demon este Cenon Bibe pala sa inyo?! Mag-isip ka naman brod kong may natitira ka pang utak!

    ReplyDelete
  8. CENON BIBE:
    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na KINILALA ng DIYOS ang LOLO ISMAEL MO?

    Muslim;
    Bueno po talata lamang po ng Bibliya ang katapat mo sa akin Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;

    Isaiah 45:18-19
    18
    "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else

    Sapagka't ganito ang sabi ng Panginoon na lumikha ng langit, na siyang Dios na nag-anyo sa lupa at gumawa niyaon, na kaniyang itinatag, at hindi niya nilikha na sira, na kaniyang inanyuan upang tahanan: ako ang Panginoon; at wala nang iba."

    So may ibang Dios pa ba liban sa kanya? wala na po! So was Ismael created also in VAIN? Hindi po ba na si Ismael ay part of GOds creation? If God created THINGS not in vain, eh ano itong IPINAGPIPILITAN ngayon nitong mga Tangang sina Demon este Cenon Bibe pala? Sinong dios kaya ito na kinikilala nila? Tila sumasalungat na naman sila sa mga hayag at maliwanag na mga nakasulat sa kanilang Bibliya! Tuwirang pagbibentang po ito sa kanilang kinikilalang dios!

    19
    "I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth: I said not unto the seed of Jacob, Seek ye me in vain: I the LORD speak righteousness, I declare things that are right.

    Ako'y hindi nagsalita ng lihim, sa dako ng lupain ng kadiliman; hindi ako nagsabi sa lahi ni Jacob, Hanapin ninyo ako ng walang kabuluhan: akong Panginoon ay nagsasalita ng katuwiran, ako'y nagpapahayag ng mga bagay na matuwid."

    Ngayon MATUWID bang papaniwalain natin ang ating mga sarili na itong si Ismael ay tila ISINUSUMPA pa ng dios? at hindi pa kinikilala ng dios na kilala nitong mga Katoliko na ito? tila taliwas po yata yon ah!?

    CENON BIBE:
    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na KALOOBAN ng DIYOS na IPANGANAK ang NINUNO MO?

    Muslim;
    Isaiah 42:
    5
    "Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:

    Ganito ang sabi ng Dios na Panginoon, na lumikha ng langit, at nagladlad ng mga yaon; siyang naglatag ng lupa at ng nagsisilitaw rito; siyang nagbibigay ng hinga sa bayang nito, at ng diwa sa kanila na nagsisilakad dito:"

    Now ngayon po mag-isip po tayo! May iba pa bang kilala itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na maaaring syang lumikha kay Ismael na hindi naman kinikilala ng dios ayon sa katangahang alam nitong at kwento nitong Mangmang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala?!

    ReplyDelete
  9. CENON BIBE:
    WALA KANG MAIPAKITA, di ba?

    Muslim;
    Pagyayabang ng Mangmang at Tangang si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala, ang hindi nya alam ay talata ng Bibliy ang tinatapat ko sa kamngmangan nya!

    CENON BIBE:
    TAMA ang SABI ng PANGINOON KAUGNAY sa INYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM.

    Isaiah 29:13
    The Lord says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules "taught by men."

    Muslim;
    Oo tinamaan talaga kayo dyan kasi hindi katuruan ng totong Dios ang inyong mga aral bagkus katuroan lamang ito ng mga Tao!

    Ito pa po ang karagdagang sinasabi ni Kristo;

    Matt 15:
    9
    "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

    Datapuwa't walang kabuluhan ang pagsamba nila sa akin, Na nagtuturo ng kanilang pinakaaral ang mga utos ng mga tao."

    Oh hindi po ba ang linaw-linaw po ang sinasabi po mismo ni Kristo ay; walang kabuluhan ang pagsamba nila sa akin. Na nagtuturo ng kanilang pinakaaral ang mga utos ng mga tao. Katulad ng mga aral ni Pablo at mga aral din daw ng mga Discipolo po ni Kristo, na tuwiran namang pinagtitibay pa mismo ni Kristo na ang mga yaon ay talagang walang karapatang mangaral na mababasa natin sa Bibliya; sa talata po'ng ito nangungusap mismo si Kristo sa kanyang mga Disipolo!

    basa;

    John 16:
    12
    "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

    Mayroon pa akong maraming bagay na sa inyo ay sasabihin, nguni't ngayon ay hindi ninyo mangatitiis."

    Ngayon po magtanong kayo kay Demon este Cenon Bibe pala, anong karapatang mangaral ng mga Disipolo ni Kristo? Meron na po ba silang karapatang mangaral? Huwag po maging Biktima kay Demon este Cenon Bibe pala!

    ReplyDelete
  10. @ muslim

    Muslim;
    bakit tila ganito na lamang ang galit ng kinikilala ninyong dios kay Ismael kong totoo man?! Ano ba ang naging KASALANAN na nagawa nitong si Ismael na Tila hindi talaga mapatawad ng dios na kinikilala ninyo?

    galit kay ismael? sure ka ba sa mga sinasabi mo na galit yun Diyos kay ismael?

    Gen 16 KJV
    9And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands. 10And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.

    yan ba ang galit? pararamihin pa daw yun lahi ng lolo mo sabi ng Diyos yun nga lang pati magiging ugali sinabi na din ng Diyos

    12And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

    puro ka lang kasinungalingan muslim kung meron man dapat gumamit ng utak dito eh ikaw yun.
    puro opinyon mo lang ang "patunay" mo at hindi ako maniniwala sa mga sinabi mo lang..
    facts ang ilabas mo hindi puro opinyon mo lang!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Muslim, ano ba ang masasabi mo doon sa sinabi ni Manny Cruz tungkol sa mga myths ng islam? Kaya mo bang tutulan yon? Bakit tila kinaligtaan mong mag comment doon? Just curious lang talaga ako! sana masagot mo iyon.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Baka hindi lang nabasa ng Bulok Islam yon Mr Anonymous! Nasa ibang thread kasi yon eh. Anyway, pagbibigyan natin siya. I copy-paste ko na lang dito. Mag-expect ka na lang na murahin tayo nun. Heto Mr Bulok-Islam, basa!:

    "THE MYTHS OF ISLAM

    MYTH NO. 1: ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE.

    Sura 5:51;9:5,29,41 reads:
    "Take not the Jews and Christians as friends...SLAY the idolaters [non-muslims] wherever ye find them...FIGHT AGAINST such...as believe not in Allah..."

    The Koran is a warrior code containing more than 100 verses that advocated the use of violence to spread Islam.

    MYTH NO. 2: ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF LOVE.

    The Koran did not give even a single verse that commands muslims to love one another. Where is Koran's equivalent of Deut 6:5 or Lev 19:18? There is none.

    MYTH NO. 3: ALLAH IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE

    The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is a Father who keeps his promises. Allah is not a Father and is presented as capricious, as he would do just anything to get what he wants. The God of the Bible is Immanent, as He became Man who "lives among us." Allah is only transcendent, a master to his slaves, and is so far away and infinitely distant and coldly detached from human beings.

    MYTH NO. 4: KORAN IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE BIBLE.

    The Koran borrows many Biblical stories and repackaged them differently. The Bible names Isaac as the one offered by Abraham. The Koran did not mention Isaac, leading many muslims to believe - erroneously of course - that it was Ismael whom Abraham tried to sacrifice on Mt. Moriah.

    MYTH NO. 5: ISLAM VENERATES JESUS CHRIST.

    Only in words, but not in deeds. Worse, Isa and Jesus are two distinct individuals being anomalously forged as one in the Koran. Jesus died on the cross and rose again. Isa never died on the cross, never went down to the souls in prison, and never ascended to the right hand of the Father.

    There are many more myths of Islam. But these five will do for now. But first let's allow Abdullah and Bulok-Islam to give their violent reactions."

    ReplyDelete
  13. [MUSLIM, IN QUOTES, SA AKIN, ALL CAPS]

    "Muslim;
    Anong paliwanag at patunay pa ba ang gusto mo?"

    ANG PATUNAY AY ANG TALATA NA NAGSASABI NA KINILALA NG DIOS SI ISMAEL BILANG ANAK NI ABRAHAM, NA PINANGAKOAN NG DIOS NA SA LAHI NIYA MATUTUPAD ANG PAGDATING NG ISANG PROPETA O MESIYAS. HANGGANG NGAYON WALA KA PANG NAIPAKITA.

    "Eh kitang - kitang sa pagkakalat nitong Tanga ninyong INIIDOLOng nagwawala ngayon na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na ang dios na kinikilala nya ay may TINATANGI at hindi kinikilala na nilikha!"

    PAGDATING SA KALIGTASAN, WALANG TINATANGI ANG DIOS. "[GOD]who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth." (1 Tim 2:4, New International Version (©1984).

    PAGDATING NAMAN SA SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS NG DIOS, PUMIPILI SIYA. TULAD NG PAGPILI NIYA KAY MOSES, ABRAHAM, ISAAC (at hindi si Ismael), JACOB, AT SA BAYANG ISRAEL (at hindi Saudi Arabia), AT KAY MARY AT SA 12 APOSTLES. [Yung Allah nga ninyo "pinili" si Mohammad eh (at hindi ikaw at si Abdullah). NGAYON, BAKIT NAGREREKLAMO KA PA KUNG PUMIPILI ANG DIOS? HA? IKAW LANG NAMAN ANG NAGKAKALAT DITO EH!

    "Anong klaseng dios ito?"

    YAN ANG DIOS NAMIN NA MARUNONG PUMILI, AT HINDI NAGREREKLAMO KAHIT PINANGUNAHAN NI SARAH ANG PLANO NIYA. YAN ANG DIOS NAMIN NA NAGPAPAKITA PA RIN NG KABAITAN KAY ISMAEL AT GINAWA PA NIYA ITONG "GREAT NATION" SA KABILA NG KAPANGAHASAN NI SARAH, KAHINAAN NI ABRAHAM, AT KAYABANGAN NI HAGAR. TALIWAS YAN SA UGALI NITONG BULOK-ISLAM NA REKLAMADOR SA MGA PLANO NG DIOS AT WALANG BAIT SA SARILI.

    "Na kong saan malayong-malayo sa Katangian ng Nag-IISA, TOTOO at walang KATULAD na DIos na maPAGMAHAL at maPAGPATAWAD sa kanyang mga nilikha!?"

    ANG SABIHIN MO, HINDI YAN ANG KATANGIAN NG ALLAH NINYO. DAHIL ANG ALLAH NINYO AY MARAHAS, MALAYO SA TAO, AT HINDI NAG-UTOS NA MAGMAHALAN ANG MGA TAO.

    "The FACT is very VIVID there REY (Catholic) na ang dios na kinikilala ninyo ay malayong-malayo sa KATANGIAN ng TOTOO at NAG_IISANG TUNAY na DIOS. HIndi ba isa sa mga paniniwala ninyo na ang dios ay mapagpatawad? sa tingin ko TOTOO yon,"

    CONFUSED KA TALAGA BULOK-ISLAM. INAMIN MO NA TOTOO ANG PANINIWALA NAMIN SA DIOS NA MAPAGPATAWAD, PERO ITINANGGI MO NAMAN PALA ITO NANG SABIHIN MONG MALAYO ITO SA KATANGIAN NG TOTOONG DIOS NA KINILALA NAMIN. NAG-COUNTER FLOW YATA ANG TAKBO NG MGA NEURONS MO BULOK-ISLAM!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. "...at ayon na rin sa KATANGAHAN ninyong pinagkakalat na ang dios ninyo ay nagpapakamatay pa ito alang-alang sa mga kasalanan ng SangkaTAuhan o Sanglibutan!"

    KATANGAHAN PARA SA IYO ANG KRUS NG KALIGTASAN. TANDAAN MO LANG ITO BULOK-ISLAM,

    1 COR 1:18
    For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

    NGAYON, SINO SA TINGIN NINYO ANG TUNAY NA FOOLISH?

    "Ano ba ang naging KASALANAN na nagawa nitong si Ismael na Tila hindi talaga mapatawad ng dios na kinikilala ninyo?"

    SAAN MO NA NAMAN BA NAPULOT ANG BASURANG ITO HA BULOK-ISLAM? ANG HILIG MO TALAGANG MAG-IMBENTO. MAGBIGAY KA NGA NG TALATA NA NAGSASABING HINDI MAPAPATAWAD NG DIOS SI ISMAEL! PURO KA LANG KWENTO EH.

    "At Inuudyokan pa ang mga ISRAELITA para huwag kilalanin si Ismael bilang kapatid na Galing din mismo sa BINHI ni Abraham!?"

    KUNG ANG DIOS HINDI KINIKILALA SI ISMAEL BILANG ANAK NI ABRAHAM (NA PINANGAKOAN NIYA NG TAGAPAGLIGTAS NA PROPETA), BAKIT MO NGAYON PIPILITIN NA KASAMA NGA SI ISMAEL SA PARTICULAR NA PLANONG ITO NG DIOS PARA KAY ISAAC?

    "What a SHAME para sa dios na ito na syang kinikilala ninyo!"

    SHAME ON YOU BULOK-ISLAM, HINDI KASAMA ANG LOLO NINYO SA PANGAKO NG DIOS. IBA ANG PANGAKO SA INYO NG DIOS, KAYA DOON NA LANG KAYO. "GREAT NATION" NA KAYO, AYAW MO BA NUN?

    O SIGE BULOK-ISLAM, SIMULAN MO NA ANG PAGMUMURA MO!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. MANNY CRUZ said...

    Baka hindi lang nabasa ng Bulok Islam yon Mr Anonymous! Nasa ibang thread kasi yon eh. Anyway, pagbibigyan natin siya. I copy-paste ko na lang dito. Mag-expect ka na lang na murahin tayo nun. Heto Mr Bulok-Islam, basa!:

    "THE MYTHS OF ISLAM

    MYTH NO. 1: ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE.

    Sura 5:51;9:5,29,41 reads:
    "Take not the Jews and Christians as friends...SLAY the idolaters [non-muslims] wherever ye find them...FIGHT AGAINST such...as believe not in Allah..."


    Muslim;
    Bakit ikaw ba MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala nagbabasa ka ba ng Bibliya mo? eh nauunawaan mo ba ang mga binabasa mo? bueno bibigyan kita ng Sample ng mga katangahan ninyo! BASA;

    Matt 10:
    34
    Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

    35
    For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

    36
    And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

    Luke 12:
    51
    Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:

    52
    For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.

    53
    The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

    It is a known FAC that Jesus was only sent to the lost sheep of the Hopuse of Israel the Bible confirmed it in the Book of Matthew 15:

    22
    And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

    23
    But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.

    24
    But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

    Infact tinatawag kayo mismo ni Kristo na mga BABOY at ASO! gusto mo ng PATUNAY;

    Matt 15
    26
    But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.

    Matt 7
    6
    Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

    Mark 7:
    27
    But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.

    Oh papaano yan Bibliya nyo na mismo at si Kristo mismo ang tumatawag sa inyo ng mga BABOY at ASO!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of Israel; not to gentiles as held by Paul

    Promised Messiah says:

    Let it be noted that though Christians believe that Jesus (peace be on him) after his arrest through the betrayal by Judas Iscariot, and crucifixion — and resurrection — went to heaven, yet, from the Holy Bible, it appears that this belief of theirs is altogether wrong. Matthew (chapter 12, verse 40) says that just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the fish, so the Son of Man shall be three days and three nights in the bowels of the earth. Now it is clear that Jonah did not die in the belly of the fish; the utmost that happened was that he was in a swoon or a fit of fainting.

    The holy books of God bear witness that Jonah, by the grace of God, remained alive in the belly of the fish, and came out alive; and his people ultimately accepted him. If then Jesus (on whom be peace) had died in the belly of the ‘fish’, what resemblance could there be between a dead man and the one who was alive, and how could a living one be compared with one dead? The truth rather is, that as Jesus was a true prophet and as he knew that God, whose beloved he was, would save him from an accursed death, he made a prophecy in the form of a parable, revealed to him by God, in which he hinted that he would not die on the Cross, nor would he give up the ghost on the accursed wood; on the contrary, like the prophet Jonah, he would only pass through a state of swoon.

    In the parable he had also hinted that he would come out of the bowels of the earth and would then join the people and, like Jonah, would be honoured by them. So this prophecy too was fulfilled; for Jesus, coming out of the bowels of the earth, went to his tribes who lived in the eastern countries, Kashmir and Tibet, etc. viz. the ten tribes of the Israelites who 721 years before Jesus, had been taken prisoner from Samaria by Shalmaneser, King of Assur, and had been taken away by him.

    Ultimately, these tribes came to India and settled in various parts of that country. Jesus at all events must have made this journey; for the divine object underlying his advent was that he should meet the lost Jews who had settled in different parts of India; the reason being that these in fact were the lost sheep of Israel who had given up even their ancestral faith in these countries, and most of whom had adopted Buddhism, relapsing, gradually into idolatry. Dr. Bernier, on the authority of a number of learned people, states in his Travels that the Kashmiris in reality are Jews who in the time of the dispersal in the days of the King of Assur had migrated to this country.

    In any case it was necessary for Jesus (peace be on him) to find out the whereabouts of these lost sheep, who had, on coming to this country, India, become merged into the other people. I shall presently adduce evidence that Jesus (peace be on him) did in fact come to India and then, by stages, travelled to Kashmir, and discovered the lost sheep of Israel among the people who professed the Buddhist faith and that these people ultimately accepted him, just as the people of the prophet Jonah accepted Jonah. And this was inevitable, for Jesus had said in so many words that he had been sent to the lost sheep of Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Promised Messiah says:

    Let it be noted that though Christians believe that Jesus (peace be on him) after his arrest through the betrayal by Judas Iscariot, and crucifixion — and resurrection — went to heaven, yet, from the Holy Bible, it appears that this belief of theirs is altogether wrong. Matthew (chapter 12, verse 40) says that just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the fish, so the Son of Man shall be three days and three nights in the bowels of the earth. Now it is clear that Jonah did not die in the belly of the fish; the utmost that happened was that he was in a swoon or a fit of fainting.

    The holy books of God bear witness that Jonah, by the grace of God, remained alive in the belly of the fish, and came out alive; and his people ultimately accepted him. If then Jesus (on whom be peace) had died in the belly of the ‘fish’, what resemblance could there be between a dead man and the one who was alive, and how could a living one be compared with one dead? The truth rather is, that as Jesus was a true prophet and as he knew that God, whose beloved he was, would save him from an accursed death, he made a prophecy in the form of a parable, revealed to him by God, in which he hinted that he would not die on the Cross, nor would he give up the ghost on the accursed wood; on the contrary, like the prophet Jonah, he would only pass through a state of swoon.

    In the parable he had also hinted that he would come out of the bowels of the earth and would then join the people and, like Jonah, would be honoured by them. So this prophecy too was fulfilled; for Jesus, coming out of the bowels of the earth, went to his tribes who lived in the eastern countries, Kashmir and Tibet, etc. viz. the ten tribes of the Israelites who 721 years before Jesus, had been taken prisoner from Samaria by Shalmaneser, King of Assur, and had been taken away by him.

    Ultimately, these tribes came to India and settled in various parts of that country. Jesus at all events must have made this journey; for the divine object underlying his advent was that he should meet the lost Jews who had settled in different parts of India; the reason being that these in fact were the lost sheep of Israel who had given up even their ancestral faith in these countries, and most of whom had adopted Buddhism, relapsing, gradually into idolatry. Dr. Bernier, on the authority of a number of learned people, states in his Travels that the Kashmiris in reality are Jews who in the time of the dispersal in the days of the King of Assur had migrated to this country.

    In any case it was necessary for Jesus (peace be on him) to find out the whereabouts of these lost sheep, who had, on coming to this country, India, become merged into the other people. I shall presently adduce evidence that Jesus (peace be on him) did in fact come to India and then, by stages, travelled to Kashmir, and discovered the lost sheep of Israel among the people who professed the Buddhist faith and that these people ultimately accepted him, just as the people of the prophet Jonah accepted Jonah. And this was inevitable, for Jesus had said in so many words that he had been sent to the lost sheep of Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Was Jesus sent to the Children of Israel or to the world?

    Jesus(P) was sent by God exclusively to the Bani Israil (Children of Israel) and had many times clearly and explicitly stated that he is a Prophet sent only to the Jews. There are many verses in the New Testament that supports this mission of Jesus(P). The following are only a few indications of his statements.

    In Matthew 1:21, we read that

    “And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS, for he shall save his people from their sins.”

    It is clear from the very onset of Jesus’(P) birth that his mission was for the Jews, his own people.

    Further, we read in Matthew 5:17-18, where Jesus(P) said:

    “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

    The verse above complements the previous one. Jesus’(P) purpose is to fulfil the Laws of Moses(P), and who else has this Law but the Jews themselves? It is true that the Christian missionaries has spread Christianity all over the world, but Jesus(P) did not originally intended for the religion to be spread in this manner. The point is not what the missionaries do, but what Jesus(P) himself means. What is the purpose of God sending Jesus(P)? No one could give a better detail more than Jesus(P) himself.

    The mission of Jesus(P) is further substantiated and made clear if we read the incident in Matthew 15:22-27 as follows:

    “And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, ‘I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel’.

    Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. But he answered and said, ‘It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs’. And she said, ‘Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.’”

    Although Jesus(P) did help the Canaanite woman in the end, it was because of his compassion for the woman’s plight. But note that it is only this single woman (a Gentile) who was helped. There is no other Gentile that Jesus(P) had preached to. Other related statements can also be found in John 11:52 and John 10:16.

    Similarly in Matthew 10:5-6, Jesus gave explicit instructions to his disciples to whom they should preach his message, by commanding

    ReplyDelete
  19. “Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

    In Matthew 21:11, the people of his time are recorded as referring to Jesus as a prophet in the country of Galilee

    “And the crowds said, ‘This is the prophet Jesus of Nazareth of Galilee.’”

    In Mark 6:4, it is stated that Jesus(P) referred to himself as a prophet to the Jews:

    “And Jesus said to them, ‘A prophet is not without honour, except in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.’” (also read Matthew 13:57, Luke 4:24 and John 4:43).

    It is therefore clear that Jesus(P) himself rejects any notion of preaching to others besides the Jews he(P) was sent to.

    Jesus’(P) closest disciples do not agree that it is correct to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles. This is evident when we read in Acts 11:19 that

    “Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only.”

    When the other disciples heard that Peter was preaching the Gospel to the Gentiles, they were upset with him.

    “And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him. Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.” (Acts 11:1 – 3)

    Thus, it is clear that Jesus(P) had plainly stated that he is not a Messenger for the Gentiles and that his message is not a final one for all of mankind. His disciples too heeded this original command of Jesus(P) and was upset when Peter did not. Anyone who says otherwise, i.e. that Jesus(P) was sent to the whole world, clearly neither understands Jesus’(P) mission nor the Scriptures.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jesus was sent to the house of Israel ony not to the whole world
    Reader comment on item: Is Prince Charles a Convert to Islam?
    in response to reader comment: And to you a warning from Jesus.

    Submitted by esan (United Kingdom), Dec 7, 2008 at 14:33

    My dear lynn Jesus did not come for the whole world but He came only for the Children of Israel.

    JESUS FOR JEWS ONLY These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them saying, Go ye not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go ye rather unto The Lost Sheep Of The House Of Israel. (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 10:5-6

    And behold a woman of Canaan came ... and cried unto him saying, have mercy on me .. my daughter is seriously possessed with a devil.

    But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying. Send her away: for she crieth after us.

    But he answered and said, I am Not Sent But Unto The Lost Sheep Of The House Of Israel.

    But she came and knelt before him, saying. Lord, help me.

    But he answered her and said, It is Not Fair To Take The Children's Bread And Cast It To The Dogs. (HOLY BIBLE) Matthew 15:22-26

    It goes to the credit of this Jewish prophet, that he practised what he preached. In his lifetime he never converted a single Gentile (non-Jew). And of his hand-picked elect (his twelve disciples), he made sure that they belonged to his tribe so that his other prophecy might Find fulfilment: "when the son of man (Jesus pbuh referring to himself) shall sit on the throne of his glory, ye (the disciples) also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matthew 19: 28)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Introduction:
    We must first of all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and unreliable and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption!

    GOD Almighty Said:
    "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

    The Revised Standard Version makes even clearer: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"

    In either translation, we clearly see that the Jews had so much corrupted the Bible with their man-made cultural laws, that they had turned the Bible into a lie!

    See Also Deuteronomy 31:25-29 where Moses peace be upon him predicted the corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death.

    The Book of Moses predicted that the Law (Bible) will get corrupted. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed confirm this corruption.


    The Bible claims that Jesus was a racist! It also claims that Jesus was sent only to the Jews and not to Mankind!

    Please be advised that non of the following in the Bible I take as the truth, because the Bible is highly doubtful and corrupted according to the Theologians and Historians of the NIV Bible. I can't trust the Bible, because the Truth can not be filtered out from it.

    It is important for Christians to know, however, that Muslims claim that every Messenger of GOD Almighty before Muhammad was sent to a limited amount of people. He was sent to a tribe or nation to save them from their wrong doing and to lead them to GOD Almighty's Straight Path. Muhammad on the other hand was sent to all of Mankind. Below, we will see how the Bible agrees with the Muslims' claim:

    The following was taken from Bad things said about Jesus in the Bible:

    Jesus calling the Jews, the masters, and the Philistines their dogs. Also, Jesus refusing to heal a sick child until he [Jesus] was pressured by the mother's begging. Does Jesus like to be begged? "A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, 'Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession. Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, 'Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.' He [Jesus] answered, 'I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.' The woman came and knelt before him. 'Lord, help me!' she said. He [Jesus] replied 'It is not right to take the children's [Jews] bread [blessings and miracles reserved for them] and toss it to their dogs [the Canaanite, or the Philistines].' 'Yes, Lord' she said, 'but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table.' Then Jesus answered, 'Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.' And her daughter was healed from that very hour. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 15:22-28)"

    This seems to be quite clear a contradiction from the Bible, because Jesus did call the Jews hypocrites and he never liked them, and they were the ones who crucified him:

    "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 23:37)"

    ReplyDelete
  22. "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel":

    There are other verses that Christians display to prove their point that Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) was sent for all mankind.

    Mark 16:15-16
    He said to them, "Go into all the world, and preach the Gospel to the whole creation.
    He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who disbelieves will be condemned.

    This raises two points;

    1) There was some Gospel already in existance but from history we know that the present day Gospels were written by men much after the departure of Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) from earth.

    2) There is a contradiction as at other places, he says to go only to Israel. A careful look at this verse reveals that there is no contradiction;

    GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
    Then Jesus said to them, "So wherever you go in the world, tell everyone the Good News.


    Other verses that Christians rely on for their claim;

    Matthew 28:18-20 is the most solid proof a christian can present!

    "A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, 'Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession. Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, 'Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.' He [Jesus] answered, 'I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.' The woman came and knelt before him. 'Lord, help me!' she said. He [Jesus] replied 'It is not right to take the children's [Jews] bread [blessings and miracles reserved for them] and toss it to their dogs [the Canaanite, or the Philistines].' 'Yes, Lord' she said, 'but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table.' Then Jesus answered, 'Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.' And her daughter was healed from that very hour.
    (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 15:22-28)"

    Here Jesus calls all Gentiles as dogs. This is racism!

    An interpretation of this verse given by Christians is that that the woman had faith and for that she was saved by Jesus. This is a false interpretation and makes guaranteed salvation in danger for the Christians as strong faith is required.

    Furthermore, if my mother sends me to the market to buy a dozen apples and on my way back, a beggar stops me and aks for two apples. I tell him that I have not been sent to give apples to beggars but the beggar starts pleading and crying and due to pity, I give him two apples. This does not change my mission. My mission is still to bring apples for my mother!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Although Jesus (peace be upon him) did help the woman, it was because of his compassion for the woman's plight. But note that it is only this single Gentile who was helped. There is no other Gentile that Jesus (peace be upon him) had preached to. Other related statements can also be found in John 11:52 and John 10:16, Matthew 10:5-6.

    "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."


    Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) is referred to as a Prophet of Galilee and not of the whole world by the ordinary folk in Matthew 21:11. It were the hypocrites like Paul who changed his mission to suit their needs.

    "And the crowds said, 'This is the prophet Jesus of Nazareth of Galilee.'"


    Jesus (peace be upon him) is definitely greater than the disciples and his words are what matter most. If there is a contradiction, the disciples should be rejected on that matter!

    "And Jesus said to them, 'A prophet is not without honour, except in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.'" (also in Matthew 13:57, Luke 4:24 and John 4:43).

    This is a wonderful prophecy as well. It not only says that he is for Israel alone but also says that others do not respect non fellow race Prophets. This has turned out to be true. We see that the so-called followers of Jesus (peace be upon him) do not respect him and they have done this by associating man-made concepts like Trinity to him.


    The disciples were confused

    Acts 11:19

    "Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only."


    Acts 11:1-3

    "And the apostles and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the Gentiles had also received the word of God. And when Peter was come up to Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him. Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them ."

    Jesus (peace be upon him) was sent for Israel only!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Continuing with the article...

    Jesus also said: "These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: 'Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.' (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 10:5-6)"

    These are the words of Jesus in the Bible. It is quite obvious that Jesus was NOT sent to Mankind and Christianity isn't a religion for Mankind. Even if Jesus did die on the cross for people's sins, he didn't do it for all nations' sins, but for the Jews alone who believed in him.

    And when Jesus told his disciples to go "to all nations" and teach them the words and baptize them in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit (Mathew 28:18-20), it is obvious that "all nations" is a mistranslation, because in the Middle East, the words for "People" and "Nation" are the same word.

    Very Important Note: It is important to know also that nations as we know them today in countries were very few back 2000 years ago. People for the most part were divided into either "tribes" or "empires"; like the Persian and Roman Empires for instance, which both spread in land as far as what we call today North Africa, Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan and India. Nations as we know them today existed in few places only. Arabs for instance weren't called "The Arab Nation", because they were divided into 365 pagan tribes, each tribe worshiping their idol god(s) which were different than the others.

    So if Jesus told his disciples to go to "all people", then this simply means to all of the people of Israel, because he "was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel", and NOT to anyone else, because THERE WERE ALMOST NO NATIONS AROUND HIM AND VERY FEW NATIONS WORLD-WIDE! We are clearly left with a crystal clear contradiction between the Christian Missionaries of today and what Jesus said.

    And as we clearly see from the introduction above, the Bible was very badly corrupted by the Jews. GOD said they corrupted the Bible so bad that they turned it into a "lie!".


    Please visit Contradictions and proofs of Historical Corruptions in the Bible.

    http://www.answering-christianity.com/contra.htm

    ReplyDelete
  25. Deuteronomy 4:2 clearly declares that the Bible is corrupt! Also, what does the Noble Quran say about the Bible's Law!

    1- Deuteronomy 4:2 and the categories of the Bible:

    Christians are often quick to tell you that their modern-day "Bible" (different quantity of books and gospels, and different quantity of verses exist between bibles) is the "true living word of God." This is despite the fact that whatever bible we're confronted with, we can easily find countless contradictions between verses and contradictions even with history! Not only that, but ironically, even the Bible's own theologians admit that the bible is corrupt and was written by "mysterious" people. Not only that, but they also declare that the bible(s) contain fictions, fairy tales and fables:
    # The Christian and Bible theologians call them "fictions that exist in the Bible"!

    # The Christian and Bible theologians say "The original manuscripts had been lost"!

    # The Christian and Bible theologians call them "fairy tales and fables in the Bible"!


    Anyway, it is important for the reader to not fall into the tricks and deception of Jews and Christians, because the Bible's (any version) text is categorized differently. It can not all be lumped up into one big book and treat all verses and texts equally as the deceivers and liars do today! The following verses clearly prove this:

    Deuteronomy 4:2
    Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you.

    Those who are familiar with the Bible (any modern-day bible) know that it is divided into the following categories:

    1- The Torah. Also known as the five books of Moses. They are: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.

    Note: I finished going through the entire collection of "Moses' five books" and produced a rough draft article documenting the entire Mosaic Law (Thikr or Dhikr in Islam) containing all of the direct Commands that came down from Allah Almighty to Prophet Moses in the 5 books of Moses was added.


    2- The Prophets. These are the remaining books of the Old Testament. Their quantity varies between bible to bible, and the quantity of verses in even the common books also vary between bible to bible.

    3- The New Testament. This also has sub-categories in it such as (1) the four gospels (Mark, John, Luke and Matthew); (2) the Acts of the Apostles; (3) Pauline Epistles; (4) Epistle of the Hebrews; (5) General Epistles; (6) Revelation. The quantity of verses in the four gospels varies between bible to bible, and the quantity of the books in points 2, 3, 4 and 5 also vary between bible to bible.

    ReplyDelete
  26. IT IS A MYTH TO CALL ISLAM A RELIGION OF PEACE, MAINLY BECAUSE OF ITS TEACHINGS ON THE DIRECT USE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST NON-MUSLIMS AS WELL AS FELLOW MUSLIMS.

    KAUGNAY DITO, NAG COMMENT PO SI BULOK-ISLAM. SABI NIYA:

    "Muslim;
    Bakit ikaw ba MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala nagbabasa ka ba ng Bibliya mo? eh nauunawaan mo ba ang mga binabasa mo? bueno bibigyan kita ng Sample ng mga katangahan ninyo! BASA"

    TAPOS NAG QUOTE NA NAMAN SIYA NG MGA TALATA SA BIBLIYA NA OBVIOUSLY HINDI NIYA NAUUNAWAAN.

    PERO, NAKATUTOL BA ITONG BULOK-ISLAM NA ITO NA ANG ISLAM AY ISANG VIOLENT RELIGION AT HINDI RELIGION OF PEACE? HINDI PO! NI SALITANG "ISLAM" NGA AY HINDI NIYA BINANGGIT SA COMMENTO NIYA EH. KAYA NGA MISTULANG AGREE NA AGREE SI BULOK-ISLAM SA SINABI NATIN, DI PO BA? PATAGO NA LANG NIYANG INAMIN ANG KATOTOHANAN.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Banned From Bible 1 of 12

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3D28Ys-dp4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUytXGke53s&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDPMcXfWCFc&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-e2b6A-pM&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-JLJ5Ujg4Q&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1dugrpQEE0&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn0P1NBXCk8&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HS6RKvKG9o0&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lXYiHdrwgQ&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MBNJ_UD9UQ&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5gNL5Aawb4&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H6XRUtJRtE&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  28. MANNY CRUZ:
    TAPOS NAG QUOTE NA NAMAN SIYA NG MGA TALATA SA BIBLIYA NA OBVIOUSLY HINDI NIYA NAUUNAWAAN.


    Muslim;
    Hindi po naipost ni MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala dito ang mga talatang isinagot ko sa mga Kamangmangan nya! hehehehehe! bakit ikaw ba MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala ano ba ang alam mo sa Qur'an? Tila bumabalik sa iyo lahat ng mga KAtangahan at Kamangmangan mo!


    MANNY CRUZ:
    PERO, NAKATUTOL BA ITONG BULOK-ISLAM NA ITO NA ANG ISLAM AY ISANG VIOLENT RELIGION AT HINDI RELIGION OF PEACE? HINDI PO! NI SALITANG "ISLAM" NGA AY HINDI NIYA BINANGGIT SA COMMENTO NIYA EH. KAYA NGA MISTULANG AGREE NA AGREE SI BULOK-ISLAM SA SINABI NATIN, DI PO BA? PATAGO NA LANG NIYANG INAMIN ANG KATOTOHANAN.


    Muslim;
    Ano ang kailangang sagotin doon eh wala ka namang alam MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala pagdating sa Qur'an, na nagkuQuote-quote pa ng Qur'an eh! Bibliya mo nga AangaAnga ka pa eh! at isa pa hindi naman Qur'an ang kanyang kinuQuote! period! Kaya hindi kailangang magReact doon sa KAtangahan mong yan Mangmang ka lang kasi MangMang Crux eh! este Manny Cruz pala! kahit anong paliwanag hinggil sa Qur'an ay hindi mo talaga ito mauunawaan! Qur'an kasi eh Bibliya mo nga mismo TatangaTanga ka pa at hindi mo rin talaga ito nauunawaan eh! Ang Qur'an pa kaya?!

    ReplyDelete
  29. "Muslim;
    Ano ang kailangang sagotin doon eh wala ka namang alam MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala pagdating sa Qur'an,"

    HAHAHAH! WALA TALAGA AKONG ALAM SA KORAN ... NA NAGSASABING INIUTOS NI ALLAH NA MAHALIN SIYA AT ANG KAPWA TAO. KAYA NGA HINDI KATAKATAKA NA NAPAKADALI PARA SA INYO ANG PUMATAY NG KAPWA, LALONG LALO NA ANG MGA "NFIDELS" AT ANG MGA TAONG NAGISING SA KATOTOHANAN AT TUMATALIKOD NA SA ISLAM. PAGPATAY AT HINDI PAGMAMAHAL ANG INIUTOS NG KORAN. TAMA? KUNG DI KA SANG-AYON DIYAN E DI TUTULAN MO! DALI!!!!!!!

    "na nagkuQuote-quote pa ng Qur'an eh! Bibliya mo nga AangaAnga ka pa eh! at isa pa hindi naman Qur'an ang kanyang kinuQuote! period!"

    SABI MO NAG-QUOTE AKO NG QUR'AN, TAPOS SABI RIN HINDI QUR'AN ANG "KINUQUOTE" KO. ANG LABO MO TALAGA BULOK-ISLAM. TULIRO KA TALAGA KUNG MAG-ISIP!PERIOD. I MEAN, EXCLAMATION MARK!!! HEHEHE!

    "Kaya hindi kailangang magReact doon sa KAtangahan mong yan Mangmang ka lang kasi MangMang Crux eh!"

    DAHIL BA HINDI MO KAYANG TUTULAN ANG SINABI KONG "IT IS A MYTH TO CALL ISLAM A RELIGION OF PEACE?" HINDI KA NAKA-REACT DAHIL TOTOO DI BA? KAYA NGA UMIIWAS KA NA LANG. TAMA?

    "kahit anong paliwanag hinggil sa Qur'an ay hindi mo talaga ito mauunawaan!"

    BAKIT, MERON KA NA BANG NAIPALIWANAG HINGGIL SA KORAN DITO SA BLOG NA ITO? PAANO BA NAMIN MAUUNAWAAN ANG KORAN MO E KAHIT KATITING NA PALIWANAG MULA SA IYO E ZERO. ANG GINAWA MO LANG NAMAN AY PANAY SABLAY NA PANG-AATAKE SA BIBLIYA. AT HIGIT SA LAHAT, PAGMUMURA. NANANAGINIP KA LANG NG GISING!

    "Qur'an kasi eh Bibliya mo nga mismo TatangaTanga ka pa at hindi mo rin talaga ito nauunawaan eh! Ang Qur'an pa kaya?!"

    IKAW NGA ITONG QUOTE NG QUOTE NG BIBLIYA EH. ANG HINDI MO LANG NAMALAYAN EH NILALANTAD MO LANG ANG KAWALANG UNAWA AT BALUKTOT NA INTERPRETASYON MO SA BIBLIYA. YAN ANG MALIWANAG!

    ReplyDelete
  30. NAGREKLAMO PO ITONG BULOK-ISLAM DAHIL HINDI KO RAW IPINOST YUNG MGA "SAGOT" DAW NIYA SA DOON SA SINABI KONG "IT IS A MYTH TO CALL ISLAM A RELIGION OF PEACE." SABI NIYA:

    "Muslim;
    Hindi po naipost ni MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala dito ang mga talatang isinagot ko sa mga Kamangmangan nya! hehehehehe

    PERO SA KABILANG DAKO NAMAN PO, SINABI RIN NIYA NA:

    "Muslim;
    Ano ang kailangang sagotin doon eh wala ka namang alam MangMang Crux este Manny Cruz pala pagdating sa Qur'an,"

    AYON SA BULOK-ISLAM, HINDI RAW PO KAILANGAN SAGOTIN YUNG POST KO, PERO "SINAGOT" NA PALA NIYA. SABI RIN NIYA NA HINDI NA RAW PO KAILANGANG MAG-REACT SA NASABING POST KO, PERO NAKAREACT NA PALA SIYA. HAHAHAHA! JOKER KA TALAGA BULOK-ISLAM!!!

    TILA HINDI PO YATA NAGKASUNDO YUNG KANYANG RIGHT BRAIN AT LEFT BRAIN. DAGDAG NA PATUNAY LANG PO YAN NG PAGKATULIRO NIYA. PASENSYA NA LANG PO KAYO MGA KAIBIGAN.

    ANYWAY, NAKASAGOT BA TALAGA ITONG BULOK-ISLAM NA ITO? SORRY PO PERO NADA! NAG-REACT LANG PERO NEVER PO SIYANG NAKATUTOL. ANG TANGING NAGAWA NIYA AY ANG SUMIPI SA BIBLIYA (MAT 10:34-36 AT LUKE 12:51-53), AT IBININTANG NA LANG NIYA SA KRISTIANISMO ANG PAGKA VIOLENT NG RELIGION NILA.

    ReplyDelete
  31. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    The FACT is very VIVID there REY (Catholic) na ang dios na kinikilala ninyo ay malayong-malayo sa KATANGIAN ng TOTOO at NAG_IISANG TUNAY na DIOS.

    CENON BIBE:
    At ANO NAMAN po ang ALAM nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM tungkol sa TOTOO at NAG-IISANG TUNAY na DIYOS?

    Ni HINDI MAIPAKITA na KINAUSAP MAN LANG ng TUNAY na DIYOS ang KANILANG PROPETA, di po ba?

    PANAY LANG ang CLAIM NILA na SINASAMBA NILA ang TUNAY na DIYOS e HINDI NGA NILA MAPATUNAYAN na PINANSIN MAN LANG ng DIYOS ang PINUNO NILA. Tama po ba?

    Ang AKLAT nga NILA ay WALA SILANG MAIPAKITA na KAHIT ISANG SALITA na DIYOS MISMO ang NAGSABI sa PROPETA NILA.

    Kaya nga po PALAMURA at MASAMA ang UGALI ng mga BALIK ISLAM e. ALAM kasi NILA na HINDI DIYOS ang SINUSUNOD NILA kundi TAO LANG.

    MASAKIT po ang KATOTOHANAN pero KATOTOHANAN pa rin po IYAN.

    ReplyDelete
  32. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na HINDI MAPATUNAYAN na KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL BILANG ANAK ni ABRAHAM:
    HIndi ba isa sa mga paniniwala ninyo na ang dios ay mapagpatawad? sa tingin ko TOTOO yon, isa sa mga Katangian ng totoong Dios ang pagpatawad, MAPAGPATAWAD talaga ang DIOS! MAAWAIN din ang TOTOONG Dios! at ayon na rin sa KATANGAHAN ninyong pinagkakalat na ang dios ninyo ay nagpapakamatay pa ito alang-alang sa mga kasalanan ng SangkaTAuhan o Sanglibutan!

    CENON BIBE:
    TUNAY na MAPAGPATAWAD ang DIYOS pero HINDI SIYA KUNSINTIDOR sa MALI.

    KATUNAYAN na MAPAGPATAWAD SIYA ay BINIGYAN pa NIYA ng CONSUELO DE BOBO ang LOLO ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM. GINAWA pa ngang MALAKING BANSA, di po ba?

    Pero HINDI po porke MAPAGPATAWAD ang DIYOS ay KILALANIN na NIYA ang PAGMAMARUNONG ni SARAH at ang PAGKAKAMALI ni ABRAHAM.

    MAPAGPATAWAD po ang DIYOS pero HINDI SIYA KUNSINTIDOR.

    Iyan ang DAHILAN SIMPLE at MALINAW na DAHILAN kung bakit HINDI pa rin KINILALA ng DIYOS ang PAGIGING ANAK ni ISMAEL.

    NAPAKASIMPLE pero HINDI MAUNAWAAN ng MAIKLI ang ISIP at PANG-UNAWA na BALIK ISLAM. WALA na po KASING TITINDIGAN ang mga MALING PANINIWALA NILA e.

    Kaya KAWAWA talaga itong mga BALIK ISLAM na ITO: TINALIKURAN NILA ang PAGLILIGTAS ng NAG-IISANG TUNAY na DIYOS at UMANIB sa SAMAHAN na HINDI MAN LANG KINILALA ng DIYOS ang NINUNO.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anti-muhammad the phedopileJuly 2, 2010 at 11:21 AM

    Pwede po ba magtanong mga balik-slum? 5 lang pwede?

    1. Ayon sa aral n'yo, nasan ba ngayon si muhammad the phedopile, buhay ba s'ya o patay?

    2. Sa tingin n'yo, kasama na ni Deedat at ni muhammad the "prophet" ang kanilang mga reward na 72 virgins each?

    3. Dun ba sa 72 na reward, wala bang lalake? Kasi karamihan sa Saudi at Pakistani mga lalake ang nire-rape eh.

    4. Meron pa kayang mga suicide bomber sa paraiso n'yo?

    5. Ang mga Shia at Sufi Muslims ba welcome din sa paraiso ni Allah?

    6. Dun ba sa paraiso ni allah meron kayong kanya-kanyang lupa, o gaya rin dito sa mundo na kailangan n'yong mang-agaw ng lupa ng may lupa?

    7. Ano naman ang reward sa mga babae, 72 din ba na mga lalake???

    TENK U hehehehehh...

    ReplyDelete
  34. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na HINDI MATANGGAP na HINDI KINILALA ng DIYOS ang LOLO ISMAEL NIYA BILANG ANAK ni ABRAHAM:
    at ayon na rin sa KATANGAHAN ninyong pinagkakalat na ang dios ninyo ay nagpapakamatay pa ito alang-alang sa mga kasalanan ng SangkaTAuhan o Sanglibutan!

    CENON BIBE:
    Ang KATANGAHAN ay ang TALIKURAN ang DIYOS na NAGKATAWANG TAO para ILIGTAS SIYA para lang UMANIB sa RELIHIYON na HINDI NIYA MAIPAKITA na ITINAYO nga ng DIYOS.

    KATANGAHAN din na TALIKURAN si KRISTO na NAG-ALAY ng BUHAY upang MANIWALA sa PROPETA na HINDI NIYA MAIPAKITA na PINANSIN MAN LANG ng DIYOS.

    Ang TUNAY na DIYOS ay TUNAY ngang NAGKATAWANG TAO, NAMATAY at NABUHAY na MULI upang ILIGTAS ang TAO.

    Iyan ay PINATUNAYAN ng mga SAKSI na NAKAKITA, NAKARINIG at NAKAKILALA sa DIYOS.

    Ang kaso ay PINAIRAL po NITONG PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang KATANGAHAN kaya MAS PINILI NIYANG MANIWALA sa HINDI SAKSI at HINDI MAN LANG NAKARINIG sa TINIG o UTOS MISMO ng DIYOS.

    ReplyDelete
  35. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na NAG-IIMBENTO na lang ng KUNG ANU-ANONG HAKA-HAKA:
    bakit tila ganito na lamang ang galit ng kinikilala ninyong dios kay Ismael kong totoo man?! Ano ba ang naging KASALANAN na nagawa nitong si Ismael na Tila hindi talaga mapatawad ng dios na kinikilala ninyo? At Inuudyokan pa ang mga ISRAELITA para huwag kilalanin si Ismael bilang kapatid na Galing din mismo sa BINHI ni Abraham!?

    CENON BIBE:
    SINO po ba ang NAGSABI na GALIT ang DIYOS kay ISMAEL? Hindi po ba ITO LANG PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM?

    SIYA LANG naman po ang NAG-IIMBENTO ng PANINIWALA na GALIT ang DIYOS kay ISMAEL, di po ba?

    HINDI po kasi MAPATUNAYAN nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang ANAK ni ABRAHAM.

    Ganoon po KASIMPLE yon.

    At DAHIL HINDI KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang ANAK ni ABRAHAM ay TIYAK na TIYAK na HINDI ang PROPETA NILA ang PROPETA na IBABANGON ng DIYOS ayon sa Deut 18:18.

    ReplyDelete
  36. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    What a SHAME para sa dios na ito na syang kinikilala ninyo! Ito ba ang makatwirang dios para sa (mga Tangang) Katulad ninyo? Tila taliwas talaga kayo sa katotohanan! Kahit sa simpling pagkikilala pa lamang sa tunay at nag-iisang Dios!

    CENON BIBE:
    Bakit? Ang KINIKILALA bang DIYOS nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ay KUNSINTIDOR sa MALI?

    Kaya ba PALAMURA itong BALIK ISLAM dahil ang "DIYOS" NIYA ay PUMAPAYAG na SILA ay MAGDILANG DEMONYO?

    KUNSINTIDOR po ba ang "DIYOS" nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM kaya PINAYAGAN NIYA na ASAWAHIN ng PROPETA NILA ang 6-ANYOS na BATA at I-SEX ng PROPETA NILA ang 9-ANYOS na PASLIT na WALANG MALAY?

    Kaya po ba PAYAG ang "DIYOS" ng mga BALIK ISLAM sa PATAYAN at PAGPATAY sa mga GUMAGAMIT LANG sa FREE WILL na REGALO ng TUNAY na DIYOS sa TAO?

    Aba, hindi po kaya DAPAT LANG na MAGSURI po KAYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM kung GANYAN ang DIYOS NINYO?

    Ang TUNAY na DIYOS po ay MAPAGPATAWAD pero HINDI NIYA KUKUNSINTIHIN ang MALI at HINDI NIYA PAPAYAGANG MANAIG ang KAMALIAN.

    Sa pinalalabas po nitong BALIK ISLAM ay KUNSINTIDOR at PUMAPAYAG sa MALI at KASINUNGALINGAN ang "DIYOS" NILA e.

    ReplyDelete
  37. SABI po NATIN:
    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na KINILALA ng DIYOS ang LOLO ISMAEL MO?

    PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Bueno po talata lamang po ng Bibliya ang katapat mo sa akin Demon este Cenon Bibe pala;

    Isaiah 45:18-19
    18
    "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else

    Sapagka't ganito ang sabi ng Panginoon na lumikha ng langit, na siyang Dios na nag-anyo sa lupa at gumawa niyaon, na kaniyang itinatag, at hindi niya nilikha na sira, na kaniyang inanyuan upang tahanan: ako ang Panginoon; at wala nang iba."

    CENON BIBE:
    NASAAN po RIYAN SINABI na "KINIKILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang ANAK ni ABRAHAM?"

    WALA po.

    NAG-IILUSYON NA NAMAN PO itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.

    NAKAKAKITA SIYA ng mga BAGAY kahit WALA NAMAN sa TALATANG KANYANG IBINIGAY.

    KAWAWA NAMAN, di po ba?

    ANONG URI ng PANANAMPALATAYA at PANINIWALA IYAN na NAKABATAY sa ILUSYON?

    ReplyDelete
  38. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na NAG-IILUSYON na LANG:
    So may ibang Dios pa ba liban sa kanya? wala na po! So was Ismael created also in VAIN? Hindi po ba na si Ismael ay part of GOds creation?

    CENON BIBE:
    TINGNAN po NINYO kung PAANO MAG-ILUSYON at KUNG PAANO LOKOHIN nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang KANYANG SARILI.

    GANITO po ang SABI ng SINIPI NIYANG TALATA sa Isaiah 45:18-19
    "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else

    ANO po ang TINUTUKOY RIYAN na GOD CREATED NOT IN VAIN? Si ISMAEL po ba?

    NABANGGIT man lang po ba ang BIGOTE ni ISMAEL sa TALATA?

    HINDI po.

    MALINAW po na ang TINUTUKOY ng DIYOS diyan ay ang "EARTH" o ang DAIGDIG.

    HINDI po si ISMAEL ang TINUTUKOY riyan.

    MALING-MALI at OUT of CONTEXT NA NAMAN po ang PAGGAMIT nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM sa TALATA.

    Kaya SIYA NALOKO ni AHMED DEEDAT e. MADALI SIYANG MALOKO at MAPANIWALA sa mga OUT OF CONTEXT na PAGBASA sa BIBLIYA.

    Anyway, PAGBIGYAN po NATIN itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM. SAGUTIN po NATIN ang TANONG NIYA kung "IN VAIN" po ang PAGKAKALIKHA kay ISMAEL.

    HINDI po "IN VAIN" ang PAGKAKALIKHA kay ISMAEL dahil SIYA ang EHEMPLO ng ISANG PAGKAKAMALI na HINDI KINILALA ng DIYOS.

    Sa madaling salita po: si ISMAEL ay GINAGAMIT ng DIYOS bilang PATUNAY na BASTA PAGKAKAMALI ay HINDING-HINDI KUKUNSINTIHIN ng NAG-IISANG TUNAY na DIYOS.

    MAY SILBI pa rin po si ISMAEL, di po ba?

    Ang SILBI NIYA ay PATUNAY SIYA na KAHIT MAPAGMAHAL at MAPAGPATAWAD ang DIYOS ay HINDI KIKILALANIN ng DIYOS ang KAPALPAKAN ng TAO.

    IYAN po ang SILBI ni ISMAEL.

    ISA pa pong SILBI ni ISMAEL ay NAGSISILBI SIYANG "JOKER."

    NAGAGAMIT SIYA ng DIYOS upang BIGYAN ang TAO ng CHOICE: PIPILIIN BA ng TAO ang ISANG PAGKAKAMALI (si ISMAEL) o ang TAMA (si ISAAC)?

    KAYO po? PIPILIIN ba NINYO ang PAGKAKAMALI?

    Nasa PASYA na po NINYO IYON.

    ReplyDelete
  39. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na OUT OF CONTEXT MAGBASA ng TALATA sa BIBLIYA:
    Isaiah 45:19
    "I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth: I said not unto the seed of Jacob, Seek ye me in vain: I the LORD speak righteousness, I declare things that are right.

    Ako'y hindi nagsalita ng lihim, sa dako ng lupain ng kadiliman; hindi ako nagsabi sa lahi ni Jacob, Hanapin ninyo ako ng walang kabuluhan: akong Panginoon ay nagsasalita ng katuwiran, ako'y nagpapahayag ng mga bagay na matuwid."

    Ngayon MATUWID bang papaniwalain natin ang ating mga sarili na itong si Ismael ay tila ISINUSUMPA pa ng dios? at hindi pa kinikilala ng dios na kilala nitong mga Katoliko na ito? tila taliwas po yata yon ah!?

    CENON BIBE:
    ANO po ba ang SINABI ng DIYOS kung KINILALA NIYA si ISMAEL bilang ANAK ng DIYOS?

    DIYOS na po ang PAKINGGAN NATIN at HINDI NA itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.

    Sabi ng DIYOS sa Genesis 22:2
    Then God said, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about."

    MATUWID po ba ang MISMONG SALITA ng DIYOS?

    OPO.

    At ang SABI ng MATUWID na SALITA ng DIYOS ay si ISAAC ang "NAG-IISANG ANAK" ni ABRAHAM.

    KANINO po TAYO MANINIWALA? Sa PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na NAGPUPUMILIT (pero WALANG MAIPAKITANG PATUNAY) na KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL o sa DIYOS MISMO na NAGSABING si ISAAC LANG ang NAG-IISANG ANAK ni ABRAHAM?

    KAMI pong MGA KATOLIKO ay SA DIYOS MANINIWALA.

    KAYO po?

    At saka, TAKE NOTE po. Ang SINABIHAN DIYAN ay ang LAHI ni JACOB.

    Si ISMAEL po ay HINDI LAHI ni JACOB dahil HINDI SIYA ANAK ni JACOB.

    SUMADSAD na naman po ang PANGANGATWIRAN nitong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM.

    Ang MASAKIT ay MISMONG TALATANG GINAMIT NIYA ang NAGPAHIYA sa KANYA.

    ReplyDelete
  40. SABI po NATIN:
    NASAAN ang PATUNAY na KALOOBAN ng DIYOS na IPANGANAK ang NINUNO MO?

    PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Isaiah 42:5
    "Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:

    Now ngayon po mag-isip po tayo! May iba pa bang kilala itong si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala na maaaring syang lumikha kay Ismael na hindi naman kinikilala ng dios ayon sa katangahang alam nitong at kwento nitong Mangmang na si Demon este Cenon Bibe pala?!

    CENON BIBE:
    SAAN po SINABI RIYAN na KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang ANAK ni ABRAHAM?

    WALA po. ALIMUOM na naman lang ng PALAMURANG TAGASUNOD ng PROPETANG NAG-SEX sa 9-ANYOS na PASLIT.

    Ang SINASABI po sa TALATA ay NILIKHA ng DIYOS ang LAHAT ng TAO.

    TAMA po IYAN.

    WALA naman kasing NALILIKHA na HINDI PINAYAGAN ng DIYOS e.

    Pero HINDI po IYAN ang ISYU.

    Ang ISYU ay KUNG KINILALA ng DIYOS si ISMAEL bilang ANAK ni ABRAHAM.

    HINDI po IYAN TINUKOY sa Is42:5 kaya po PALPAK NA NAMAN ang PAGGAMIT NITONG PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM sa TALATA.

    HINDI KASI MARUNONG MAGBASA at HINDI MARUNONG MAG-ISIP e.

    Sabagay, kaya nga SIYA BALIK ISLAM e, di po ba?

    ReplyDelete
  41. SABI po NATIN:
    CENON BIBE:
    TAMA ang SABI ng PANGINOON KAUGNAY sa INYONG MGA BALIK ISLAM.

    Isaiah 29:13
    The Lord says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules "taught by men."

    PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Oo tinamaan talaga kayo dyan kasi hindi katuruan ng totong Dios ang inyong mga aral bagkus katuroan lamang ito ng mga Tao!

    CENON BIBE:
    NILOKO na naman po ng BALIK ISLAM ang PAGMUMUKHA NIYA.

    SINO po ang SUMUSUNOD LANG sa ARAL ng TAO?

    Sabi ng DIYOS, si ISAAC LANG ang ANAK ni ABRAHAM (Gen22:2)

    IYAN po ang PINANINIWALAAN NATING mga KATOLIKO.

    Sabi ni AHMED DEEDAT at ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM, si ISMAEL ay KINILALA ng DIYOS.

    Hindi po ba MALINAW na ITONG MGA BALIK ISLAM ang SUMUSUNOD LANG sa ARAL ng TAO?

    SAPUL na SAPUL SILA, di po ba?

    Ang MASAKLAP ay SINUSUNOD NILA si AHMED DEEDAT na GUMAGAMIT ng KASINUNGALINGAN sa mga ARAL NIYA. Paki BALIKAN NINYO ang ARTIKULO sa ITAAS.

    ReplyDelete
  42. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    Matt 15:9
    "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

    Datapuwa't walang kabuluhan ang pagsamba nila sa akin, Na nagtuturo ng kanilang pinakaaral ang mga utos ng mga tao."

    Oh hindi po ba ang linaw-linaw po ang sinasabi po mismo ni Kristo ay; walang kabuluhan ang pagsamba nila sa akin. Na nagtuturo ng kanilang pinakaaral ang mga utos ng mga tao. Katulad ng mga aral ni Pablo at mga aral din daw ng mga Discipolo po ni Kristo, na tuwiran namang pinagtitibay pa mismo ni Kristo na ang mga yaon ay talagang walang karapatang mangaral na mababasa natin sa Bibliya; sa talata po'ng ito nangungusap mismo si Kristo sa kanyang mga Disipolo!

    CENON BIBE:
    NILOKO NA NAMAN ng PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang MUKHA NIYA.

    Si PABLO ay PINAGPAKITAAN ng DIYOS at INUTUSAN MISMONG MANGARAL (Acts 9:3-5). GANOON DIN ang mga ALAGAD ni HESUS (Matthew 28:19-20).

    Ito pong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM, SINO po ang SINUSUNOD?

    Hindi po ba ang PROPETA NIYA na HINDI NIYA MAPATUNAYAN na SINUGO MISMO ng DIYOS.

    Hindi po ba ITO mismong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM ang NAGPATUNAY na NEVER KINAUSAP ng DIYOS at NEVER NABIGYAN ng DIYOS ng ARAL ang KANYANG PROPETA?

    SINO po ang SUMUSUNOD sa ARAL na BIGAY LANG ng TAO? Hindi po ba itong PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM na ITO?

    KAWAWA nga po e. PROPETA NIYA ni HINDI PINANSIN ng DIYOS.

    ReplyDelete
  43. PALAMURANG BALIK ISLAM:
    John 16:12
    "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

    Mayroon pa akong maraming bagay na sa inyo ay sasabihin, nguni't ngayon ay hindi ninyo mangatitiis."

    Ngayon po magtanong kayo kay Demon este Cenon Bibe pala, anong karapatang mangaral ng mga Disipolo ni Kristo? Meron na po ba silang karapatang mangaral? Huwag po maging Biktima kay Demon este Cenon Bibe pala!

    CENON BIBE:
    GUMAMIT na naman ng TALATA itong PALAMURA kahit HINDI NIYA NAUUNAWAAN.

    HINDI pa MAKAKAYANG TANGGAPIN ng mga ALAGAD ni HESUS ang MGA ARAL ni HESUS dahil KAILANGAN NILA ng TULONG ng ESPIRITU SANTO.

    Kaya nga po IPINADALA ang ESPIRITU SANTO at iyan ay NAIULAT sa Acts 2:1-4.

    Tingnan po ninyo, NUNG MATANGGAP ng mga ALAGAD ang ESPIRITU SANTO ay NAKAPANGARAL na SILA.

    E ITO pong PROPETA ng BALIK ISLAM? KAILAN po TUMANGGAP ng ESPIRITU SANTO?

    Ni HINDI nga po KINAUSAP ng DIYOS at HINDI MISMO SINUGO ng DIYOS, di po ba?

    ITO lang namang BALIK ISLAM na ITO ang NANINIWALA sa HINDI MISMO SINUGO ng DIYOS e. Kaya nga po PALAMURA SIYA e, di po ba?

    ReplyDelete
  44. MAGANDANG ARAW
    SASAGUTIN KO PO SANA ANG SINABI NINYO TUNGKOL KAY AHMED DEEDAT..
    ANG TOTOO PO NYAN MAY NABSA AKONG LIBRO NI AHMED DEEDAT AT TALAGANG NAPAKA GALING NITONG MAG SULAT AT HINDI PO KASI NO NGALINGAN ANG KANYANG MGA SINA SABI BAKIT CYA MAG AAKSAYA NG MGA LIBRO KUNG PURO DIN I2 KASINUNGALINGAN HINDI BA..??
    SO SANA GUMALANG KAYO SINA SABI NYONG ISA KAYUNG NAGTUTURO SA RILIHEYUNG CRISTIAN HINDI POBA AT DAPAT MAY PAG GALANG ANG INYONG PAG TUTURO KUNG GUSTO NYO RING GALANGIN...

    SHAM

    ReplyDelete
  45. IGINAGALANG KO po ang PAGTATANGGOL NINYO kay AHMED DEEDAT.

    MAGALING po TALAGA MAGSULAT si AHMED DEEDAT at MAGALING DIN MAGSALITA. Iyan po ang MISMONG GINAGAMIT NIYA para MAKAPANLOKO SIYA ng mga TAO, partikular ang mga WALANG ALAM.

    MARAMI na po AKONG IPINAKITA RITO na PANLOLOKO ni DEEDAT sa mga WALANG ALAM at WALANG MALAY na TAYO.

    Kung NAIS po talaga ninyong IPAGTANGGOL si DEEDAT ay SUBUKAN po SANA NINYONG TUTULAN ang mga PATUNAY na IBINIGAY KO kaugnay sa PANLOLOKO ni DEEDAT sa mga TAO.

    SALAMAT po.

    ReplyDelete