MATTHEW 1:16 vs LUKE 3:23? WHO IS THE FATHER OF JOSEPH?

A MUSLIM, MHUMAR ISMAEL MUALLAM is BOASTING that NO CHRISTIAN has won a DEBATE with a MUSLIM.

HE BRAGGED that CHRISTIANS CANNOT MATCH "MUSLIM INTELLECT."

So, MHUMAR posed this QUESTION:
answer it from the bible cenon...who is the father of joseph according to the bible?
.
.
.
+++

CENON BIBE:
While MHUMAR ISMAEL MUALLAM BRAGS, HIS QUESTION BETRAYS the FACT that the so-called "MUSLIM INTELLECT" FAILS to COMPREHEND the ANSWER to HIS SIMPLE QUESTION.

That is why WE are EXPLAINING this TO HIM to CURE the DEFICIENCY of this "MUSLIM INTELLECT" of HIS.

The FATHER of JOSEPH is JACOB. (MATTHEW 1:16)

That is the SIMPLE TRUTH.

But "MUSLIM INTELLECT" WILL NOT UNDERSTAND THAT.

The "INTELLIGENT" MUSLIM will ASK why LUKE 3:23 says that JOSEPH is the "SON of HELI."

So, "MUSLIM INTELLECT" will WRONGLY SAY that "HELI is the FATHER of JOSEPH."

Why is that WRONG?

Because, HELI is NOT the FATHER of JOSEPH. HELI is the FATHER of MARY, to whom JOSEPH was MARRIED to. HELI is another form of JEHOHIACHIM or JOAQUIN for short.

So, JOSEPH is CALLED the "SON OF HELI," because of HIS MARRIAGE to MARY, whose FATHER is HELI.

HELI, the FATHER of MARY is MENTIONED in the GENEALOGY in LUKE 3 because it is ACTUALLY the GENEALOGY of the LORD JESUS THROUGH MARY HIS MOTHER.
.
.
.
But IF the GENEALOGY is that of MARY, WHY was JOSEPH the one MENTIONED in the GENEALOGY and NOT MARY.

The reason is SIMPLE: HEBREW GENEALOGIES are PATERNAL, which INVOLVES MALES, or INVOLVE ONLY the FATHERS.

That is why IT WAS JOSEPH who was MENTIONED in the GENEALOGY and NOT MARY, who was a WOMAN. JOSEPH was SUBSTITUTED in the PLACE of MARY.

THAT is something that "MUSLIM INTELLECT" DOES NOT KNOW.